SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patrick Krejcik May 3-6, 2004 Patrick Krejcik R. Akre, P. Emma, M. Hogan, (SLAC), H. Schlarb, R. Ischebeck (DESY), P. Muggli.
Advertisements

1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
P. Emma LCLS FAC 12 Oct Comments from LCLS FAC Meeting (April 2004): J. Roßbach:“How do you detect weak FEL power when the.
R. Akre, P. Emma, P. Krejcik LCLS April 29, 2004 LCLS RF Stability Requirements LCLS Requirements The SLAC Linac.
Patrick Krejcik LCLS April 29, 2004 Breakout Session: Controls Physics Requirements Overview P. Krejcik.
Juhao Wu Feedback & Oct. 12 – 13, 2004 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Longitudinal Feedback with CSR as Diagnostic.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
Bunch Length Measurements at the Swiss Light Source (SLS) Linac at the PSI using Electro-Optical Sampling A.Winter, Aachen University and DESY Miniworkshop.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
R. Akre XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and July 26, 2004 LCLS Drive Laser Timing Stability Measurements XFEL Short Bunch Measurement.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
LCLS Transition to Science DOE Status Review of the LUSI MIE Project Near term opportunities for LCLS 'upgrades' J. Hastings for the LCLS Experimental.
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Hamid Shoaee LCLS FAC Review – October Control System Overview Hamid Shoaee Controls System Manager Injector control system commissioning & Support.
Henrik Loos High Level 17 June 2008 High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning Henrik Loos.
P. Emma, SLACICFA XFEL July 29, 2004 Electron Bunch Measurements with a Transverse RF Deflector P. Emma ICFA XFEL 2004 Workshop July 29, 2004 ICFA.
Patrick Krejcik LCLS April 7-8, 2005 Breakout Session: Controls Physics Requirements and Technology Choices for LCLS Instrumentation.
Towards ultrastable linac-driven free electron lasers Towards ultrastable linac-driven free electron lasers John Byrd Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
Stefan Simrock 3 rd LC School, Oak Brook, IL, USA, 2008, Radio Frequency Systems 1 Timing and Synchronization S. Simrock and Axel Winter DESY, Hamburg,
F Specifications for the dark current kicker for the NML test facility at Fermilab S. Nagaitsev, M. Church, P. Piot, C.Y. Tan, J. Steimel Fermilab May.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
TTF2 Start-to-End Simulations Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Zeuthen, 22 Jan 2004.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
S. Molloy, P. Emma, J. Frisch, R. Iverson, M. Ross, D. McCormick, M. Woods, SLAC, CA, USA S. Walston, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA V.
1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.
Diagnostics Overview for the LCLS Presented by Josef Frisch For the LCLS ANL / LBNL / LLNL / SLAC.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
LCLS LLRF System October 10-13, 2005 LLRF05 B. Hong, R. Akre, A. Hill, D. Kotturi, H. Schwarz SLAC, Stanford, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Work supported.
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
Sept 16-17, 2003 Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Controls.
PAC-2001, Chicago, IL Paul Emma SLAC SLAC Issues and R&D Critical to the LCLS UCLA LLNL.
Lessons Learned From the First Operation of the LCLS for Users Presented by Josef Frisch For the LCLS March 14, 2010.
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
Franz-Josef Decker 14-Dec-2011 CSR is a big deal limiting performance Tolerance studies beforehand helped a lot Tor’s List Software adaptability helped.
Emittance Growth in the SPPS Chicane P. Emma, P. Krejcik, C. O’Connell, M. Woodley; SLAC, H. Schlarb, F. Stulle; DESY.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
A single-shot method for measuring fs bunches in linac-based FELs Z. Huang, K. Bane, Y. Ding, P. Emma.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
Bunch Length Monitor Development
Wakefield issues due to a slotted foil for a THz source
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
LCLS Linac Update Brief Overview L1 & BC1 Progress LTU & E-Dump Status Continuing Resolution Impact.
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
LCLS RF Stability Requirements
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
LCLS Linac Overview E. Bong Lehman Review August 10, 2004
Linac (WBS 1.2.2) Vinod Bharadwaj April 23, 2002
Design of Compression and Acceleration Systems Technical Challenges
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
Breakout Sessions SC1/SC2 – Accelerator Physics
Transverse coherence and polarization measurement of 131 nm coherent femtosecond pulses from a seeded FEL J. Schwenke, E. Mansten, F. Lindau, N. Cutic,
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
Breakout Session SC5 – Control Systems
Diagnostics RF and Feedback
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback System and Bunch Length Monitor Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS DOE Review, February 08, 2006 LCLS longitudinal.
Physics Update P. Emma FAC Meeting October 27, 2005 LCLS.
Presentation transcript:

SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August 18-22, 2003

Long term stability dominated by RF phase drifts Measurement of phase variations seen along the linac main drive line over a period of several days. Measurement of the phase variations between two adjacent linac sectors over a period of several days

0.5 deg. S-band klystron phase variation over several minutes Phase variations measured at the PAD of a single klystron over a period of minutes. Each point is an average over 32 beam pulses.

Machine Feedback Systems Low level RF compensation of drifts Only as good as phase reference system –Low noise master oscillator –Reference phase distribution system must also be free of drifts. Interferometric stabilization of a long phase reference line against low frequency drifts introduces noise at higher frequencies

Pulse-to-pulse jitter Cannot be corrected by feedback Machine needs to meet XFEL stability requirements for long enough to allow beam tuning and feedbacks to work

Klystron phase stable to <0.1 deg. S-band over ~10 sec. Pulse-to-pulse phase variations, and histogram, measured at PAD of a single klystron shows degree S-band rms variation over 17 seconds. Pulse-to-pulse relative amplitude variations measured at the PAD of a single klystron shows 0.06% rms variation over 2 sec (horizontal axis is in 1/30-sec ticks).

Beam based jitter measurements

Linac orbit jitter dependance on BNS phase 0 deg. (on crest) -10 deg. (opposite phase to optimum BNS damping) SPPS 3 nC charge per bunch

SPPS Charge jitter 0.023% rms

Beam Based Measurement of Relative Phase Jitter Between Bunch and the Transverse Deflecting Cavity Phase deviations calculated from transverse kick measured by fitting BPM orbit downstream of cavity   y y 

L B =1.80 m B=1.60 T Chicane BPM for energy measurement s L T =14.3 m 9 GeV BPM Prof. Monitor Max dispersion 45 cm SPPS

SPPS chicane energy jitter

Incoming orbit jitter in the chicane 25 microns rms

Beam-Based Feedback Systems Orbit steering in linac, undulator launch etc –Respond with fast steering correctors Beam energy measured at BPM in high dispersion region in chicanes, undulator dog leg. –Correct with two klystrons with opposing phases so there is no net phase change 

Energy feedback at chicane responding to a step energy change Klystron off Klystron on Energy measured at a dispersive BPM, Actuator is a pair of klystron phase shifters

Energy jitter from chicane feedback system 5.6 MeV rms 0.06%

linac  phase  0.1 deg-S rmslinac  phase  0.1 deg-S rms linac  voltage  0.1% rmslinac  voltage  0.1% rms DR phase 0.5 deg-S rmsDR phase 0.5 deg-S rms Charge jitter of 2% rmsCharge jitter of 2% rms linac  phase  0.1 deg-S rmslinac  phase  0.1 deg-S rms linac  voltage  0.1% rmslinac  voltage  0.1% rms DR phase 0.5 deg-S rmsDR phase 0.5 deg-S rms Charge jitter of 2% rmsCharge jitter of 2% rms …and bunch arrival time variations… 0  0.26 psec rms Simulate bunch length variations… 82  20 fsec rms Pulse-to-pulse jitter estimates based on machine stability P. Emma

Far-Infrared Detection of Wakefields from Ultra-Short Bunches Wakefield diffraction radiation wavelength comparable to bunch length pyrometer foil LINAC FFTB Shortest bunch in FFTB with slight over-compression in linac GADC

Jitter in bunch length signal over 10 seconds ~10% rms

Bunch Length Feedback Systems Needs fast, pulse-by-pulse relative bunch length measurement –THz radiation from bunch wakefields detected as diffraction radiation, transition radiation –THz radiation from CSR in BC and DL bends –Signal is monotonically increasing with decreasing bunch length BL feedback responds by changing RF phase upstream of BC Requires that energy is independently being held constant by orbit-based feedback

Bunch Length Feedback Systems SPPS has demonstrated bunch length optimization with feedback At 10 Hz response time ~1 min. Present system uses dither control More sophisticated system would use THz detectors with different BW’s to normalise signal without dithering Multiple bunch compressors require independent monitoring and control

Dither feedback control of bunch length minimization – L. Hendrickson Dither time steps of 10 seconds Bunch length monitor response Feedback correction signal Linac phase “ping” optimum

Bunch arrival timing jitter Synchronisation of electron bunch (linac RF) with laser for user experiments Coarse timing wrt RF bucket Sub picosecond (femtosecond!?) synchronisation Time-stamping each bunch

OTR Layout OTR Screen mirror Pyrometer OTR light also provides timing signal for RF synchronisation with experimental laser Photodiode

Laser timing compared to OTR

Electro optic sampling with chirped laser pulse BW limited pulse Short chirp Long chirp Temporal profile Spectral profiles Timing jitter moves centroid of spectrum

Stability of the x-ray beam

Undulator launch feedback rms angle jitter 5 microradians

SPPS X-ray jitter, seen at the end of the monochromator