Postoperative Visual Acuity in Patients With Fuchs Dystrophy Undergoing Descemet Membrane–Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: Correlation With.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Post-Mortem Ultra-Structural Analysis of a Cornea Transplanted With DMEK Jack Parker Jr, MD; Eitan Livny, MD; Vasilis S. Liarakos, MD, PhD; Gerrit R. Melles,
Advertisements

Endothelial Cell Changes as an Indicator for Upcoming Allograft Rejection Following Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Jack Parker Jr, MD; Lamis.
Hemi-DMEK Transplantation: Novel Method to Increase the Pool of Endothelial Graft Tissue Lam FC 1-4, Baydoun L 2-4, Dirisamer M 2-4, Lie J 2-4, Dapena.
Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group
Comparison of Endothelial Cell Count by Manual and Automated Methods in Normal Corneas and in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy Somasheila I Murthy, Debarun.
Venting Incisions in DSAEK Patients: Is It an Absolute Necessity?
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Serum Lipids and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Klein BEK, Myers CE, Howard.
The authors have no financial interests to disclose
Corneal morphology in Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy: A large cross-sectional study with in vivo confocal microscopy Johan Germundsson M.D, Per.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Corticosteroids to Treat Bacterial Keratitis Ray KJ, Srinivasan M, Mascarenhas.
Relationship Between Donor Graft Cell Count and Visual Outcome in DSAEK Patients Authors Silvin Bakalian MD PhD, Johanna Choremis MD FRCSC, Michele Mabon.
V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.
DSAEK in Eyes With Severe Pre-operative Visual Acuity Loss. 1. Sightline Ophthalmic Associates, Pittsburgh, PA 2. Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR 3.
Corneal Densitometry and Visual Outcome Comparisons of DSAEK and DMEK Eyes Xiaolin Zhang MD Robert L. Schultze MD Robert A. Eden MD Rahul Raghu.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Macular Edema After Cataract Surgery Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.
Anterior Chamber Depth, Iridocorneal Angle Width, and Intraocular Pressure Changes After Phacoemulsification: Narrow vs Open Iridocorneal Angles Huang.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Elevated Intraocular Pressure After Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Aref.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss and Quality of Life in Glaucoma Gracitelli CPB,
Bryan Y Kim 1, Shintaro Kanayama MD PhD 1, Tueng T Shen MD PhD 1, Thomas E Gillette MD 2 1 University of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, 2 Eye.
Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital Coimbatore
Somasheila I. Murthy, Prashant Garg, Pravin K. Vaddavalli
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Association of Pattern Dystrophy With an HTRA1 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Jaouni T, Averbukh E, Burstyn-Cohen T, et al. Association of pattern dystrophy.
Evaluation of Interface Reflectivity and Corneal Aberrations following DSAEK Hamid Khakshoor, MD Professor of Ophthalmology Mashhad University of Medical.
Urrets-Zavalia Syndrome Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Claire Y. Chu, MD Pawan Prasher, MD Eric Dai, MD R. Wayne Bowman, MD V. Vinod.
Quality of Vision in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy and After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty van der Meulen IJE, Patel SV, Lapid-Gortzak.
Cataract Surgery After Trabeculectomy: The Effect on Trabeculectomy Function Husain R, Liang S, Foster PJ. Cataract surgery after trabeculectomy: the effect.
Effect of Age on Response to Amblyopia Treatment in Children Holmes JM, Lazar EL, Melia BM, et al; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Effect of.
Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Findings in Femtosecond Laser- Assisted Keratoplasty Kurt H. Kelley, MD;
Case Report of Severe Haze After DSAEK
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: TT Clamp vs Standard BLTR for Trichiasis Surgery Gower EW, West SK, Harding JC,
Epithelial Ingrowth Following Endothelial Keratoplasty Ritika Dalal, DNB Robert S. Feder, MD, Irving Raber, MD, Steven P. Dunn, MD, Robert Weisenthal,
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Thickness and Asymmetry After DSAEK Dickman MM, Cheng YYY, Berendschot TTJM, van.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: AMD in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Chew EY, Clemons TE, Agrón E, et al;
Successful Use of Corneal Tissue from LASIK Donors in Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Case Series Mark D. Mifflin, MD Majid Moshirfar,
Copyright restrictions may apply Pneumatic Retinopexy for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis Fabian.
Daniel D. Hayes, MD1; Carolyn Y. Shih, MD1; David C
Angiofibrotic Response to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibition in Diabetic Retinal Detachment: Report No. 1 Sohn EH, He S, Kim LA, et al. Angiofibrotic.
Rate of Visual Field Progression in Eyes With Optic Disc Hemorrhages in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study De Moraes CG, Demirel S, Gardiner SK, et.
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) Vs Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) in patients with Keratoconus (KC). Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital.
Jodhbir S Mehta, Donald Tan The Authors have a financial Interest in the Endoglide patent/royalty.
DSEK for the treatment of endothelial disease in India -Initial Experience in 80 eyes- Authors have no financial interest Dr Ashish Nagpal MD, FRCS Dr.
Comparison of Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) Visual Outcomes with OCT Derived Corneal Thickness Measurements Authors Abraham K. Sleem, MD Robert L. Schultze,
Three-Year Outcomes of the Surgery for Trichiasis, Antibiotics to Prevent Recurrence Trial Woreta F, Munoz B, Gower E, Alemayehu W, West SK. Three-year.
The authors have no conflicting interest in the subject matter of this poster. In Vivo Evaluation of DSAEK Interface with Scanning- Laser Confocal Microscopy.
First 25 Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Outcomes for an Experienced DSAEK Surgeon Authors: Victoria Epstein, MS.,DO, Josh Wallsh, MS-III,
Predicting Visual Acuity after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty using Corneal Topography, Pachymetry and Posterior Curvature Asymmetry Indices.
Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with prior Trabeculectomy or Tube shunt surgery. Thadani S.M. Fynn-Thompson N. Authors.
0 Case Study Conflict of Interest Learning on the Job What your Patients Should Know.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effects of Graft Thickness and Asymmetry on Visual.
Effect of Donor Processing and Storage Time and Preoperative Endothelial Cell Counts on DSAEK Detachment Rates Daniel Demsey BScE Stephanie Baxter MD,
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Quality of Vision in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial.
Outcome of LASIK in Pre-Descemet’s Membrane Corneal Dystrophy
Outcomes and Complications of DSEK in Eyes with Tube shunts or ACIOLs
Histopathological findings of failed grafts following Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)  Hind Alkatan, MD, Ali Al-Rajhi,
DSAEK using corneas with previous LASIK
Endothelial keratoplasty in failed grafts
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Validity of the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Grading Scale Vitale S, Clemons TE, Agrón E, et al; Age-Related Eye.
Hong A, Boehlke CS, Afshari NA, Kim T Duke University Medical Center
A presentation to: Meeting name Date
Long term Results of Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with failed penetrating Keratoplasty Maoz D. Amiran, MD, Raneen Shehadeh-Mashor, MD, Marie Eve.
Glaucoma Progression after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Neelofar Ghaznawi MD, Melissa B Daluvoy MD, Ajoy Virdi MD, Edwin S Chen, Kristin.
Role of HSV Infection in the Histopathology of Failed DSAEK
Anand K Shah MD1 Neda Shamie MD1 Paul Phillips MD1 Mark A Terry MD1,2*
I.J.E van der Meulen1, C.P. Nieuwendaal1,
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Texas
Francis Char DeCroos, MD
Presentation transcript:

Postoperative Visual Acuity in Patients With Fuchs Dystrophy Undergoing Descemet Membrane–Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: Correlation With the Severity of Histologic Changes Happ DM, Lewis DA, Eng KH, et al. Postoperative visual acuity in patients with Fuchs dystrophy undergoing Descemet membrane–stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: correlation with the severity of histologic changes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(1): Copyright restrictions may apply

Introduction Fuchs endothelial dystrophy is a common cause of decreased visual acuity due to cornea-related pathologic changes. Progressive and possibly irreversible changes in the corneal stroma associated with increasing severity of Fuchs dystrophy may limit postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) following Descemet membrane–stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in more severe cases of Fuchs dystrophy. Objective: To investigate a correlation between the severity of histologic changes of the Descemet membrane, which we believe would correlate to the severity of corneal stromal changes, in patients with Fuchs dystrophy and the postoperative BCVA following DSAEK. Copyright restrictions may apply

Methods Retrospective study design. A total of 92 DSAEK specimens of patients with a clinical diagnosis of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy were obtained from 3 corneal surgeons. Thirteen specimens were excluded owing to visually significant comorbid disease, graft failure, or surgical complications. Copyright restrictions may apply

Methods Data Analysis –The DSAEK specimens were evaluated under light microscopy, and a histologic grading system was created based on 4 characteristics: (1) guttae dispersion; (2) presence of a laminated Descemet membrane; (3) presence of embedded guttae; and (4) density of guttae. Based on the total score, the cases were categorized into mild, moderate, or severe disease. –Preoperative BCVA and postoperative BCVA at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were obtained. –Regression models were used to compare the histologic score (mild, moderate, severe), presence of the 4 individual histologic features used for grading, preoperative BCVA, and postoperative BCVA at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Copyright restrictions may apply

Methods Grading System for Histologic Changes Observed in Descemet Membrane Copyright restrictions may apply

Methods Limitations –No clinical correlation. –No confocal microscopy for comparison. –Unknown accuracy of the weight of the factors used for histologic grading. –Unable to determine the stromal changes or the association with the severity of Fuchs dystrophy in relation to changes in the Descemet membrane based solely on DSAEK specimens. Copyright restrictions may apply

Results No significant relationship between preoperative BCVA, the individual histologic features, or the histologic score was found. There was a mild correlation between the preoperative and final BCVAs. There was no correlation between the 4 individual histologic features or the histologic score and the postoperative BCVA at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years following DSAEK. Copyright restrictions may apply

Results Simple linear regression of preoperative and postoperative visual acuity (VA) (left column) and a piecewise linear regression (right column) show that patients’ VA improves regardless of preoperative VA. This trend is observed at 6 months (top row), 12 months (middle row), and 24 month (bottom row). Copyright restrictions may apply

Results Patients with laminated Descemet membrane but without embedded guttae are less responsive to DSAEK and do not obtain the same postoperative BCVA benefit. Copyright restrictions may apply

The subgroup of patients with lamination and no embedded guttae appear to be less responsive to DSAEK. Results Copyright restrictions may apply

Comment Implications for future clinical work: histologic findings of lamination of Descemet membrane without concordant embedded guttae may be used by the surgeon to explain why postoperative BCVA following DSAEK did not show the anticipated improvement. An explanation for why patients with a laminated Descemet membrane without embedded guttae may have poorer outcomes could be the separation of the layers of Descemet membrane during DSAEK and thus incomplete removal of the recipient’s Descemet membrane. Remnants of the recipient’s Descemet membrane would then be present at the host-donor interface. 1 Preoperative BCVA is mildly correlated with postoperative BCVA, and earlier surgical intervention (DSAEK) may have better visual outcomes for patients. Copyright restrictions may apply 1 Dapena I, Ham L, Moutsouris K, Melles GR. Incidence of recipient Descemet membrane remnants at the donor-to- stromal interface after descemetorhexis in endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(12):

Comment Implications for future research in this area: there are no methods currently available to implicate the development of a laminated Descemet membrane or embedded guttae, and there are no known risk factors that suggest a higher risk for their development. Investigations may be warranted into what factors may cause the development of lamination of Descemet membrane without embedded guttae as this was a rare finding, because lamination of Descemet membrane with guttae was highly correlated. Copyright restrictions may apply

Contact Information If you have questions, please contact the corresponding author: –Daniel M. Albert, MD, MS, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Room K6/412 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI Funding/Support This study was supported by core grant for vision research P30 EY from the National Institutes of Health and by an unrestricted department award from Research to Prevent Blindness. Copyright restrictions may apply