Office of Institutional Research CCSSE & Active and Collaborative Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2009 Findings.
Advertisements

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
October 17,  Review of CCSSE  Descriptions of HCC Students  Discussion of Benchmark Results  Item Results  Critical Thinking analysis.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
Data for FCDC Dec ACCJC New Standards Mission Fulfillment through institutionally defined standards Bakersfield College is committed to providing.
LFCC SENSE 09 Data Dave Urso John Milam March 23, 2010.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Entering Community College Students: Consciously Creating Critical Connections 2012 FYE Conference San Antonio, TX.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
1 This CCSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement State Center Community College District CCSSE Workshop November 7, 2014.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
May 26, 2010 IOL 2010 Student Engagement: Social Networking and Student Success.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Corning CC and CCSSE: What We Experienced and How We Handled It Maren N. Hess Director of Institutional Research AIRPO Winter Conference Syracuse – January.
Susan Burrow August 17, The Purpose of the QEP Improve student learning in developmental math through active learning and supplemental instruction.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement JIM Meeting Presentation January 20, 2009 Jerome Ward Director, Institutional Research Cochise College.
Strategic Conversation: A Commitment to Student Engagement.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
Committing to Student Engagement AVC 2008 Findings.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
ENGAGING STUDENTS, CHALLENGING THE ODDS 2006 SFCC Findings
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement Wyoming Community Colleges Statewide Workshop October 29, 2013.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Robert Franco, Ph.D. Director, Office for Institutional Effectiveness Professor of Anthropology
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Most & Least Frequent Activities.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
Director, Institutional Research
Faculty In-Service Week
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Office of Institutional Research CCSSE & Active and Collaborative Learning

First … What is CCSSE? Pronounced “Cessie”, the Community College Survey of Student Engagement is a national survey used as a research tool to assess the quality of education and to examine the results against national benchmarks. The CCSSE survey is administered during the spring semesters of 2008, 2009, and 2010 in 47 states and in Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec, Bermuda, Northern Marianas, and the Marshall Islands. Responding to the survey were approximately 403,428 students in 658 colleges participating colleges.

CCSSE National College Characteristics 292 Single-campus colleges 273 Multi-campus colleges 93 Colleges of multi-college systems 322 Small < 4, Medium 4,500 – 7, Large 8,000 – 14, Extra-large > 15,000 Size 162 Urban-serving 139 Suburban-serving 393 Rural-serving Location Organizations

CCSSE National College Characteristics 42% Male 58% Female Gender 63% White 11% Hispanic/Latin 11% Black 11% Native American 4% Asian/Pacific Islander Race 73% Full-time 27% Part-time Note: Part-time students are underrepresented in the sample Enrollment Status

What does CCSSE Measure? Data from CCSSE measures student engagement in five categories. 1. Academic Challenge 2. Active & Collaborative Learning 3. Student-Faculty Interaction 4. Student Effort 5. Support for Learners

What is Active and Collaborative Learning (ACTCOL)?  Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and to apply what they are learning in different settings.  Through collaborating with others to solve problems or to master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Over the last 7 years, Active & Collaborative Learning has consistently decreased, while the other benchmarks have increased at Delgado.

The CCSSE survey includes seven specific questions that provide Delgado with a benchmark against which to measure the College’s progress in supporting active and collaborative learning.

Based on documented research, each of the seven questions was developed and designed to provide data that reveals whether active, collaborative learning is actually occurring.

ACTCOL … How does DCC compare?

 (67.9%) of students often or very often ask questions or contribute to class discussions.  More than half (58.3%) have made a class presentation.  Most have worked with other students on projects during class with 43.4% reporting they have done so very often or often and 37.4% reporting they have done so at least sometimes.  Only (20.8%) of respondents have very often or often worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments.

 Over two-thirds (70.5%) have never tutored or taught other students.  Over three-quarters (78.1%) have never participated in a community-based project as part of a regular course.  Less than half (42.4%) have discussed ideas from their readings or classes with others outside of class often or very often and (38.0%) have done so at least sometimes.

Questions 4a, b, and f reveal student’s connection in the classroom. 4a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussionsAsked questions in classcontributed to class discussions 4b. Made a class presentationMade a class presentation 4f. Worked with other students on projects during classWorked with other students on projects during class **** Clicking each link will provide documented research for each of the ACTCOL questions ****

ACTCOL … How does DCC compare?

ACTCOL … How does DCC compare?

ACTCOL … How does DCC compare? 46.9% 37.4% 40.1%

Questions 4g and h reveal student’s connection on campus. 4g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignmentsWorked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments 4h. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary)Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) **** Clicking each link will provide documented research for each of the ACTCOL questions ****

ACTCOL … How does DCC compare?

ACTCOL … How does DCC compare?

Questions 4i and r reveal student’s connection in the classroom. 4i. Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular courseParticipated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course 4r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.) **** Clicking each link will provide documented research for each of the ACTCOL questions ****

ACTCOL … How does DCC compare?

ACTCOL … How does DCC compare? 49.4%49.9%

ACTCOL … How does DCC compare?

ACTCOL …

According to CCSSE, National Benchmarks were designed to assist community colleges in reaching for excellence. Based on effective educational practices, the focal point of the CCSSE benchmarks are on institutional practices and student behaviors that ultimately promote student engagement and are positively related to student learning and persistence. ACTCOL … What are CCSSE Benchmarks?

ACTCOL … How are CCSSE Benchmarks calculated? Every college has a score for each benchmark, computed by averaging the scores on survey items that comprise that benchmark. Benchmark scores are standardized so that the mean — the average of all participating students — always is 50 and the standard deviation is 25. The most valuable use of benchmarks is to see an individual college’s deviation from the mean, and the standardized score provides an easy way to assess whether an individual college is performing above or below the mean (50) on each benchmark.

Race/Ethnicity

Complete CCSSE Survey: National Key Findings: Active and Collaborative Learning For information and interpretation regarding overall national results for the 2010 survey, please see CCCSE's 2010 National Report, The Heart of Student Success: Teaching, Learning, and College CompletionThe Heart of Student Success: Teaching, Learning, and College Completion CCSSE Participating Colleges