- DOES IT AFFECT STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING AND OUTCOMES? DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION Janice Congreaves EDU. 702.22 SPRING 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiation in the Art Classroom
Advertisements

Mountain View High School GATE Program
The Teacher Work Sample
Universal Design for Learning (UDL). UD in Architecture a movement of designing structures with all potential users in mind incorporated access features.
- DOES IT AFFECT STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING AND OUTCOMES? DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION Janice Congreaves EDU SPRING 2010.
I’ve Got Style…What’s Your Style? Matching Students With Their Learning Style An Action Research Peta-Gaye Grey Edu Spring 2010.
Meeting the Needs of Gifted Students Through the Use of Differentiated Instruction Angela Nicole Flenniken University of Saint Thomas Research Professor:
Multiple Intelligences and Adult Literacy: 8 Things You Should Know M Cecil Smith, Ph.D. Northern Illinois University.
Overview of Gifted Implementation and Advanced Learning Program (ALP)
Differentiated Instruction for English Language Learners (ELLs) Christopher Bell, Hong Duong, Sheryl Hoilette EDUC 4800 Action Research Project Georgia.
Ann Matschiner OATAG October 11, 2013 Pacific University Early and Equitable Identification of Talented and Gifted First Grade Students.
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION -Does it Affect student’s Understanding And Outcomes? Janice Congreaves ED. 7202T Fall 2010.
INCLUSION: How do we organise the curriculum to include all learners?
Gifted Education in the Elementary Schools Swarthmore-Rutledge School E.
Why take the leap … …to Differentiated Instruction? Why take the leap … …to Differentiated Instruction?
“WHATEVER IT TAKES” DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION Feb 2010 Dawn Holden Instructional Services, Langley School District.
Rationale Meet Needs of Diverse Students & Legal Mandates.
D IFFERENTIATED I NSTRUCTION A Professional Development for Teachers Grades K-5 By: Lorie Knaeble National University MAT 640 Presented to Dr. Kathleen.
BY Keith A. Anderson.  District-wide Initiative  Link between Differentiated Instruction and Danielson  What is Differentiated Instruction?  Why Differentiate?
Parent Involvement and Literacy Achievement Vanessa DeVito Education Spring 2008.
DLM2008 Cultural Proficiency and Student Achievement: Education that is Multicultural Session 1 Face-to-Face Course Overview.
Which is a better solution for our non- English speaking students? 1 Susana Pinto Fall 2009.
Seminar in Applied Theory and Research II By: Peta-Gaye Grey
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Welcome to Unit 6 Academic Curriculum: Cognitive & Language Domains.
Using Learning Styles Strategies to Enhance Classroom Learning
- DOES IT AFFECT STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING AND OUTCOMES? DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION Janice Congreaves EDU FALL 2009.
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION
Assuring Gifted Program Quality Through Self-Study. Gail Hanninen, Ed. D.
1 An Introduction to the SIOP Model Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol.
Welcome to Unit 6 Academic Curriculum: Cognitive & Language Domains We will start class at the top of the hour!
A Quick Quiz What is your DI IQ? Discuss with peers… What do you know about differentiation? What concerns or fears do you have regarding differentiation?
The Four P’s of Change 1. P recedent- What’s happening? 2. P hilosophy- paradigm shifts in beliefs and values 3. Practices/Programs - curriculum, teaching.
UNIT 6.1 DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION: PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION ( ). Simon Ellis and Janet Tod.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
How to Write…… GIEP’s Best Practices Cheryl Everett PAGE Conference 2011.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Meeting the Diverse Needs of All Learners: One Size Does Not Fit All.
Barnette Elementary Talent Development in Grades 3-5 Welcome! Please sign in, write down your address and find your child’s DEP form.
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
Diverse Learners July 10, 2013.
The Best Time of Day for Literacy Instruction. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: 3 Statement of the Problem: 4 Review of the Literature: 5-9 Hypothesis:
A Short Overview Melcher-Dallas K-12 Gifted and Talented.
An Introduction to Differentiation Presented by Kathy Marks, M.Ed.
To Act, Or Not To Act? Drama In The Classroom Lauren E. Duerson ED-7201 Fall 2011.
Universal Design for Learning
Effective Strategies for English Language Learners in Science Melinda Moya Edu 7201T Fall 2011.
Preparing for your Cumulative Self Assessment of the Gifted Endorsement Course Please view this with a copy of your philosophy of teaching that you composed.
Responding to the Needs of All Learners Katina Alexander Foundation of Education ED 500 Dr. Gloria Crawford.
Effective Strategies for English Language Learners in Science Melinda Moya Edu 7201T Fall 2011.
Action Research Proposal: Virtual Manipulatives & Academic Success of Middle School Math Students Byekwaso Gilbert EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational.
21 st century Teaching and Learning District Educator Deborah Harris EDU620: Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology Instructor: Adriane Wheat.
Technology Help or Hinderance? DOMINIQUE JOHNSON EDU671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: FREDERICK ANSOFF 2 JUNE 2014.
Differentiated Instruction Presented by: Team A Rachel Brown, Kim Blackwell- Coleman, Patti Chlepas, Jennifer Cutting, and Jacqui Koyama MTE/532 Curriculum.
Shannon O’Reilly EDU 673 Universal Design for Learning, and Differentiation.
By Jessica Foland December 12, 2013 Creating a Connection between Formative Assessment and Differentiated Instruction.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION Cynthia Eason EDU 673 Instruction, Strategy for Differentiated Teaching & Learning.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION
Differentiated Instruction
Differentiation in Preschool: A New Approach to Instruction
Differentiated Instruction
The Metropolitan High School Project
Gifted Education Meeting
Differentiated Instruction
Yan Chen CBSE 7201, Fall 2016 Midterm Presentation
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Differentiated Instruction
Differentiated Instruction Reaching to all our students
Presentation transcript:

- DOES IT AFFECT STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING AND OUTCOMES? DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION Janice Congreaves EDU SPRING 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Statement of the Problem Review of Literature Statement of the Hypothesis METHOD Participants (N) Instruments (s) REFERENCES APPENDIX (CES)

INTRODUCTION With the inclusion of students from non- English speaking backgrounds, disabilities, diverse cultural backgrounds, educators are compelled to rethink their teaching and instructional practices. The homogeneity of yesteryear has been replaced by widespread diversity, however, in many instances teachers do not appear to have adjusted their methods to keep abreast of these trends.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Regular classroom teachers make very few modifications in their instruction to suit the needs of students of various ability in their classroom. There is a tendency to “teach to the middle,” which can cause boredom in gifted students and confound students at risk resulting in poor achievement in both groups.

Review of Literature Pros: ( Robert Gagne, Dunn and Dunn, Howard Gardner ). Each of these theorist address the idea they students are not made from the same cookie cutter mold, and teaching should be adjusted accordingly. Gagne in his Condition of Learning stipulates that there are several different types or levels of learning. The significance of these classification is that each different type of learning requires different type of instruction. (Gagne, 1965)

Review of Literature Gardner describes learning differences through his multiple intelligences theory. According to his theory, humans have at least eight ways of being intelligent or talented about the world. (Gardner, 1999). Dunn and Dunn Learning Styles Model is built on the theory that each individual has a unique set of biological and developmental characteristics. These unique characteristics impact substantially on how a person learns new information and skills. (Good & Brophy, 1986).

Review of Literature Vygotsky stresses the importance of looking at each child as an individual who learns distinctively. Consequently, the knowledge and skills that are worthwhile learning varies with the individual.( Vygotsky,1962) Tomlinson a nationally recognized leader on differentiated instruction states that “the differentiated classroom balances learning needs common to all students, with more specific needs tagged to individual learners”(Tomlinson, 2001).

Review of Literature Doyle and Rutherford (1984)states that learners differ in a wide variety of ways and these differences are likely to influence how they respond to and benefit from a given instructional method or program. If instruction is adapted to specific intellectual or emotional “aptitudes” then it would seem that in comparison to standard teaching situations, more students would reach higher levels of achievement.

Review of Literature Cons: Many teachers do not feel equipped to differentiate for a class of diverse needs and disabilities with in- service training. Planning for differentiating instruction is time consuming. Few teachers have the time, energy or support for making substantial changes in how they teach, let alone the opportunity to arrive at a determination to do so. (Neely & Alm 1992).

Statement of the Hypothesis H R 1. If grouped by learning styles, twenty-five second grade students at PS X in Brooklyn, N.Y. will improve their math scores over a six week period.

PARTICIPANTS Twenty-five second grade students at an elementary school in an urban community in Brooklyn, NY. Fifteen girls and ten boys. General education classroom

INSTRUMENTS Student survey Consent Form

Appendix A: Student Survey The Global or Analytical Test Complete the questionnaire below by checking the square. Check all squares that you think are true about yourself as a learner. 1._____ I enjoy doing more than one thing at a time. 2._____ I can work well if when it is noisy? 3._____ I prefer to sit at a desk when I study. 4._____ I don’t eat or drink while I study. 5._____ I find it difficult to sit in one place for a long time. 6._____ I like to work alone. 7._____ I usually finish my homework on time. 8._____ I enjoy learning from posters,photographs, looking at models. 9_____ I like my teacher to check my school work. 10_____ I prefer to have instructions written down I can check so I can check them later.

Appendix B: Consent Form May 25,2010 Dear Principal, I am currently enrolled in a graduate Childhood Education program at Brooklyn College that requires me to complete an action research project. The focus of my research, will be differentiated instruction. Part of my research will involve a student’s survey, collecting student’s work and data all information gathered will be strictly confidential. Potential benefits of this research include increasing my knowledge of how children learn, helping other teachers who are interested in differentiated instruction, and helping me reflect on and analyze my teaching practices. I am hereby requesting permission to conduct this research in my class Sincerely, Janice Congreaves

REFERENCES Anderson, K. M. (2007). Differentiating instruction to include all students. Journal.of School Failure, 57(2), Retrieved from ERIC database. Beecher, M., & Sweeny, S., M. (2008). Closing the gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: one school’s story. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19 (3), Retrieved from ERIC database. Cox, 5. (2008). Differentiated instruction in the elementary classroom. Education Digest, Retrieved October 21, 2009, from ERIC database Cuthbert, P. F. (2005). The student learning process: learning styles or learning approaches? Teaching In Higher Education, 10(2), Retrieved from JSTOR database. Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning Styles: An overview of theories, models and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), Retrieved from JSTOR database. Dembo, M. H., & Howard, K. (2007). Advice about the use of learning styles: A major myth in education. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), Retrieved from ERIC database. Doyle, W., Ruterford, B., (1984). Classroom research on matching learning and teaching styles. Theory and Practice, 23(1), Retrieved from JSTOR database. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: practical approaches for grades 3-6. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

REFERENCES Dunn, R., Griggs, S. A., Olson, J., Beasley, M. & Gorman, B. S. (1995).A meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn model of learning-style preferences. The Journal of Educational Research, 88(6), Retrieved from JSTOR database. Dunn, R., Honnigsfeld, A., Doolan, L. S., Bostrom, L., Russo, M. S., Schiering, B. S., & Tenedero, H. (2009). Impact of learning- style instructional strategies on students’ achievement and attitudes: Perceptions of educators in diverse institutions. The Clearing House, 88(3), Retrieved from ERIC database. Edwards, C. J., Carr, S., Siegel, W. (2006). Influences of experiences and training on effective teaching practices to meet the needs of diverse learners in schools. Education, 126(3), Retrieved from ERIC database. George, P.S.,(2005). A rational for differentiating instruction in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), Retrieved from ERIC database. Hawkins,V. J., (2009). Barriers to implementing differentiation: lack of confidence, efficacy and perseverance. The NERA Journal, 44(2), Retrieved from Wilson database. Keefe, J. W. (1985). Assessment of learning style variables: the NASSP task force model. Theory into Practice, 24(2), Retrieved from JSTOR database. Klein, P.D., (2003). Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: alternatives to “learning styles” and “multiple intelligences”. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), Retrieved from JSTOR database.

REFERENCES Levy, H., (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction: helping every child reach and exceed standards. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies; Issues and Ideas, 81(4), Neely, R. O., & Alm, D., (1992). Meeting individual needs: a learning styles success story. The Clearing House, 66(2), Retrieved from JSTOR database. Pierce, R. L., Adams C., M., (2004).Tiered lessons: one way to differentiate mathematics instruction. Gifted Child Today, 27 (2), Retrieved from Wilson database Pitts, J., (2009). Identifying and using a teacher-friendly learning-styles instrument. The Clearing House, 82(5), Retrieved from ERIC database. Rock, M. L., Gregg M., Ellis E., & Gable, R, A. (2008) REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Journal of School Failure 57(2), retrieved October 21, 2009 from ERIC database. Reynolds, J., Gerstein, M. (1992). Learning styles characteristics: an introductory workshop. The Clearing House, 66(2), Retrieved from JSTOR database. Sims, R. R., & Sims, S. J. (1995). The importance of learning styles: understanding the implications for learning, course design and education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

REFERENCES Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms, 2nd ed, chapter 2. Retrieved from / Tomlinson, C. A. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in middle school: one school’s journey. Gifted Children Quarterly 39 (2), Retrieved from Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27 (2/3), Retrieved from Wilson database.