Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disaggregate to Appreciate Making SENSE of Texas’ Entering Community College Students 2012 TAIR Conference Corpus Christi, TX.
Advertisements

Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2009 Findings.
STRENGTHENING STUDENT SUCCESS — 2014 WHY IT MATTERS WHAT MATTERS MOST.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
Identifying Promising Practices Promising Practices for Community College Student Success A FIRST LOOK.
Creating an On-Ramp from High School to College LEARNING COLLEGE SUMMIT 2012.
Students Speak! Are We Listening? NISOD % …of traditional-age entering students responding to the Survey of Entering Student Engagement say they.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
Data for FCDC Dec ACCJC New Standards Mission Fulfillment through institutionally defined standards Bakersfield College is committed to providing.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Expectation & Experience Surveys 1998 & 2002 AIRPO, June West Point, New York.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Entering Community College Students: Consciously Creating Critical Connections 2012 FYE Conference San Antonio, TX.
Michigan Community College Student Services Association Your Role in Student Success: Doing More of What Works.
Engaging and Retaining New Developmental Education Students CASP Conference Thursday, Oct. 14, :00 – 10:00AM.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
1 This CCSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement State Center Community College District CCSSE Workshop November 7, 2014.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
TAIR 2007 Using CCSSE Results for Improvement. CCSSE Overview.
Susan Burrow August 17, The Purpose of the QEP Improve student learning in developmental math through active learning and supplemental instruction.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement JIM Meeting Presentation January 20, 2009 Jerome Ward Director, Institutional Research Cochise College.
Strategic Conversation: A Commitment to Student Engagement.
Data You Can Bank On What can OIR do for you?. Fall 2007 Student Demographics 13,217 students 69% Female 52% Minority Average age is 27 18% are First-time.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
Committing to Student Engagement AVC 2008 Findings.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
PROMOTING STUDENT SUCCESS: WHAT WE’RE LEARNING ABOUT WHAT MATTERS MOST Kay McClenney Director, Center for Community College Student Engagement The University.
Office of Institutional Research CCSSE & Active and Collaborative Learning.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
ENGAGING STUDENTS, CHALLENGING THE ODDS 2006 SFCC Findings
NISOD 2011 Student Success – From the Starting Gate to the Finish Line.
Ready or Not, Here I Am! League Innovations Conference 2010.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
Welcome Aboard! CCC-QEP Carteret Community College Quality Enhancement Plan.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
Chelan Community College Completion Project By: Ardith, Megan, & Michelle.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement Wyoming Community Colleges Statewide Workshop October 29, 2013.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
This SENSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s SENSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
Director, Institutional Research
The Heart of Student Success
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings

SOAR- Survey Outcome Assessment for Retention Why? Student Success – we want our students to succeed GRAD Act – our legislator’s want our students to succeed We spend a lot of money of surveys – let’s use what we have learned. Center for Community College Student Engagement

A word about the GRAD Act Over the next 6 years,  We must increase our First-time Full-time degree seeking Fall to Fall retention rate by 2.5%  We must increase our IPEDS GRS (percent of First-time, full-time degree seeking students who graduate within 150% of the normal time by 2%. While these may seem like small increases, it is very difficult to increase these rates. There are so many reasons students drop out that we have no control over. Center for Community College Student Engagement

CCSSE Community College Survey of Student Engagement The survey asks questions about institutional practices and student behaviors that are highly correlated with student learning and retention

The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) provides a much-needed tool for assessing quality in community college education. CCSSE results help colleges focus on good educational practice — defined as practice that promotes high levels of student learning and retention — and identify areas in which community colleges can improve their programs and services for students. All our work is grounded in research about what works in strengthening student learning and persistence. Center for Community College Student Engagement

CCSSE: Background Information CCSSE data analyses include a three-year cohort of participating colleges.  The CCSSE Cohort includes more than 400,000 community college students from 663 institutions in 48 states, British Columbia, the Marshall Islands, Nova Scotia, and Ontario. Center for Community College Student Engagement

“I’m a divorced, single mother. I can and need to do this. If I fall down, my kids are going to fall down. If I’m standing, they will be there, right beside me.” Giving Voice to Students Carolina Villamar (left) and classmate Luisa Castano. 26-year-old single mother of a 6-year-old son and a 4-year-old daughter

“Students need someone to show them empathy, kick them in the butt, and raise the bar.” — FACULTY MEMBER Center for Community College Student Engagement

What have we learned about our students from CCSSE? The next several slides, come from information gathered by CCSSE Some of the charts will surprise you, others will confirm what you already know. Center for Community College Student Engagement

Key Demographics, Enrollment, and Attendance Most Students Are Enrolled Part-Time Many Full-Time Students Work Close to Full-Time Source: DCC Enrollment, spring Source: 2010 Delgado CCSSE data. Center for Community College Student Engagement Part-time students Full-time students who work more than 30 hours per week

Key Demographics, Enrollment, and Attendance Many Students Take Evening Classes Many Students Take Classes Online Source: 2010 Delgado CCSSE data. Source: Data from DCC 2010 enrollment. Center for Community College Student Engagement Students who take evening classes Students who have taken an online class

Community College Students’ Plans When asked when they plan to take classes at this college again, 23% of students had no plan to return or were uncertain about their future plans. Source: 2010 Delgado CCSSE data. Center for Community College Student Engagement

Barriers to Returning to College How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college? In addition, 51% of respondents say that transfer to a four-year college or university is a likely or very likely reason they would not return to this college. Source: 2010 Delgado CCSSE data. Percentage of students responding likely or very likely Center for Community College Student Engagement

Least Engaged Students* *This analysis does not include students who hold degrees. Source: 2009 CCSSE Cohort data. The least engaged community college students are:  Part-time students  Traditional-age students (those 24 and younger)  Students not seeking credentials  Students who have not completed 30 or more credits  Male students  Financially independent students (those using their own income or savings as the major source of tuition)  Students who work more than 30 hours per week  Students who have not taken developmental courses  Students who have not taken study skill courses  Students who have not participated in orientation  Students who have not participated in learning communities

CCSSE Benchmarks Benchmarks are groups of conceptually related items that address key areas of student engagement. CCSSE’s five benchmarks denote areas that educational research has shown to be important in quality educational practice.

Center for Community College Student Engagement CCSSE Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practice CCSSE uses 5 benchmarks to measure student engagement:  Active and Collaborative Learning  Student Effort  Academic Challenge  Student-Faculty Interaction  Support for Learners

How benchmarks are calculated Every college has a score for each benchmark, computed by averaging the scores on survey items that comprise that benchmark. Benchmark scores are standardized so that the mean — the average of all participating students — always is 50 and the standard deviation is 25. The most valuable use of benchmarks is to see an individual college’s deviation from the mean, and the standardized score provides an easy way to assess whether an individual college is performing above or below the mean (50) on each benchmark. Center for Community College Student Engagement

Delgado’s Benchmark Scores CCSSE Delgado Community College 2010 Benchmark Scores 50 is the mean score

Center for Community College Student Engagement Benchmarking — and Reaching for Excellence The most important comparison: where you are now, compared with where you want to be.

How Good Is Good Enough? The purpose of “benchmarking” is to compare performance of like institutions — and through that process, to identify opportunities for improvement and potential models of “best practice.” Center for Community College Student Engagement

Where do we want Delgado to be? Part of the SOAR initiative was to bring together a group to review the CCSSE 2010 results. That group after reviewing the survey results chose Active and Collaborative Learning as our focus. The next slides outline the reason for that choice. Center for Community College Student Engagement

Fifty is the average of all colleges participating. The chart below shows DCC compared to other Large colleges  The most meaningful comparison is of DCC to large colleges

Center for Community College Student Engagement Since we are below the mean of other large colleges in Active & Collaborative Learning and Student Effort, it would make sense to focus on one of them.

Center for Community College Student Engagement If we look at the benchmark scores for DCC over the last 7 years, Active & Collaborative Learning has consistently decreased, while Student Effort has increased. Therefore it was decided to make Active & Collaborative Learning the focus

What is Active & Collaborative Learning ? Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with real- life situations and problems. Center for Community College Student Engagement

Active & Collaborative Learning (ACTCOL) The following seven survey items contribute to this benchmark. During the current school year, how often have you: Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions ¹ Made a class presentation ¹ Worked with other students on projects during class ¹ Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments ² Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) ² Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course ³ Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.) ³ Center for Community College Student Engagement 1 -- Connections in the classroom, 2 -- Connections on campus, 3 -- Connections beyond the campus

Center for Community College Student Engagement Connections in the Classroom at Delgado Community College DCC vs. Large College Active & Collaborative Learning

Center for Community College Student Engagement Connections on Campus at Delgado Community College DCC vs. Large College Active & Collaborative Learning

Center for Community College Student Engagement Connections Beyond the Campus at Delgado Community College DCC vs. Large College Active & Collaborative Learning

Center for Community College Student Engagement How do different student groups score?

Center for Community College Student Engagement The Inarguable Fundamentals 1.The center of community college work is student learning, persistence, and success. 2.Every program, every service, every academic policy is perfectly designed to achieve the exact outcome it currently produces.

Center for Community College Student Engagement Connections at DCC by developmental students (ACTCOL) 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often Developmental students vs. Non-dev students

The Connection Gap

Center for Community College Student Engagement The Connection Gap  60% of community college students attend college part-time.  67% of community college faculty teach part-time.  Part-time faculty typically teach 50% - 66% (half to two-thirds) of all community college course sections.

Center for Community College Student Engagement The Connection Gap How can we include Part-time faculty in our initiatives? If Part-time faculty are not engaged – how can we expect the students they teach to be?

Center for Community College Student Engagement The Connection Gap After controlling for income and other demographics, NCES found:  15% of part-time students earned a degree or certificate in six years — compared with 64% of full-time students  73% of part-time students left college without earning a degree — while 72% of full-time students persisted