G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 1 GAUTRANS APT ELZBIETA SADZIK MAY 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ROAD PAVEMENT FORUM MAY 2007 Technical Guideline: The use of Modified Bituminous Binders in Road Construction TG1: 2 nd Edition – May 2007.
Advertisements

Research | consulting | technology safety and efficiency in transport through knowledge TT1825 Mix design and field evaluation.
Aspects of Current MLS APT Activities in southern Africa Fred Hugo Road Pavement Forum 7 November 2006.
HMA permanent deformation study: Progress report to the RPF 7 May 2008 Erik Denneman.
Behavior of Asphalt Binder and Asphalt Concrete
HRVATSKO ASFALTERSKO DRUŠTVO COLD IN SITU RECYCLING AND VERY THIN ASPHALT CONCRETE - FRENCH TECHNOLOGY JP MICHAUT SEMINAR ASFALTNI KOLNICI 2015 OPATIJA,
Project TX Strategies to Improve and Preserve Flexible Pavement at Intersections UTEP - Soheil Nazarian - Imad Abdallah Project Duration September.
‘Characterisation of Granular Materials Rut Resistance’ Austroads project TT1819 Pavement Technology Program Andrew Papacostas (VicRoads) Austroads Project.
Asset Management Performance (Structures) Awtar Jandu Safe Roads, Reliable Journeys, Informed Travellers Bridge Owners Forum – Leeds -14 June 2005.
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LTD Pavement Research
In Tai Kim & Erol Tutumluer University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
California Asphalt Rubber Case Studies – Reduced Thickness Jack Van Kirk Basic Resources.
SESSION 3 Subgrade This module presents the concepts and methods of characterizing the subgrade for the purpose of concrete pavement design. It also highlights.
Activities as Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center Jack Youtcheff Materials & Construction Team Federal Highway Administration
Session 3-6 HMA Overlays.
Bituminous Stabilized Materials Guideline: Inception Study Project Funded By: Gautrans Sabita.
Bituminous Stabilized Materials Guideline RPF Feedback : K Jenkins May 2006.
Bituminous Stabilized Materials Guideline Project Initiated By: Gautrans Sabita.
Interim Guidelines: The Design and Use of Foamed Bitumen Treated Bases Fenella Long Road Pavements Forum November 2001.
Ultra Thin Continuously Reinforced Concrete - Modelling &Testing under APT Louw Kannemeyer (SANRAL) Bryan Perrie (C&CI) Pieter Strauss (Consultant) Louw.
Revision of the South African Pavement Design Method Louw Kannemeyer.
Status Report on Standard Specifications and Codes of Practice Department of Transport RPF November 2004.
World of Asphalt Pavements Feedback Sydney Stephen Emery.
ROAD PAVEMENT RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE BMJA Verhaeghe 12 MAY 2005 NINTH MEETING OF THE ROAD PAVEMENTS FORUM (RPF)
Road Pavements Forum Structural Design Working Group Revision of the South African Flexible Pavement Design Method 7 November 2006 Pretoria H L Theyse.
 Materials – Highest & Best Use  Public Health  Safety  The Environment  Safety  Reliability  Performance  Flexibility  Productivity Improve Mobility.
Technical Recommendations for Highways No 12 TRH 12
Kim Jenkins SANRAL Chair in Pavement Eng
Terence Milne South African Road Pavement Forum 13 & 14 November 2002 Conference Report Back: ICAP – 22 AUGUST 2002 COPENHAGEN AFRICON.
AAPA 2010 Study Tour – Accelerated Pavement Testing & Equipment Observations and Recommendations Accelerated Pavement Testing & Equipment.
RSA Design Guidelines for hot-mix asphalt TRH3/HMA Workshop June 2001.
A Protocol for the establishment and operations of LTPP sections Prepared for Gautrans by CSIR, Transportek.
Influence of Pavement Condition on Project Selection
Chapter 3 Framework for Treatment Selection From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
Technical Services By Nathan Haaland.  Increase in Construction Costs  Asphalt  $350 to $735 per ton  Labor  3.6% increase  Inflation  13% increase.
DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA CVE 409 HIGHWAY ENGINEERING.
In Situ Stabilization of Pavement Base Courses Roads Pavement Forum Thursday, May 17, 2001.
CSIR-UCB research programme Road Pavements Forum 14 November 2001.
Overview of French Research Project on Cold Mix Asphalt Recycling for Road Construction / Maintenance Vincent GAUDEFROY June 4, 2012.
X:\Presentations\FBworking groupRPFnov02.ppt DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT & PUBLIC WORKS FOAMED BITUMEN WORKING GROUP Road Pavement Forum- Nov 2002 E. SADZIK.
Interim Guidelines: The Design and Use of Foamed Bitumen Treated Materials Kim Jenkins, Dave Collings Hechter Theyse, Fenella Long Road Pavements Forum.
GAUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS Job Creation, Skills Development and Empowerment in Road Construction Rehabilitation and Maintenance.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Superpave Mixture and Aggregate Expert Task Group Las Vegas, Nevada 16 – 18 September 2003.
INNOVATIVE INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY FOR THE USE OF DECONTAMINATED RIVER SEDIMENTS IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION Progress Meeting September 10 th 2015 Prof. Ing. Massimo.
GAUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS APT STEERING COMMITTEE ROAD PAVEMENT FORUM 26 November 2003 Elzbieta Sadzik.
EIGHTH ROAD PAVEMENTS FORUM Programme and Status of Resolutions.
DESIGN FLEXIBLE AND RIGID PAVEMENTS Ms Ikmalzatul Abdullah.
Pavement Research Advisory Committee (PRAC) 13 th Meeting of the RPF 8 May 2007.
R52 Rustenburg-Koster Road
I took 3510 this Spring …What Can I do with it? A collection of work related to what you learned (or should have) in 3510.
Foamed Asphalt Working Group Road Pavements Forum 13 November 2001.
CSIR RPRAC WORKING GROUP: THIN-LAYER CONCRETE RPF, 23 November 2005.
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
Road Pavement Forum 11 May 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik APT Steering Committee.
CSIR Pavement Design Task Group Feedback RPF meeting 23 November 2005.
RE-USE and RECYCLING of CONSTRUCTION WASTES in FRANCE By Jean Paul Michaut.
INNOVATIVE INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY FOR THE USE OF DECONTAMINATED RIVER SEDIMENTS IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION Progress Meeting Pisa, February 25 th 2016 “CLEANSED.
IPWEA SA 2016 – Conference Low Traffic Volume Asphalt Trial Rod Ellis 27 May 2016 Support From:
Presented to: REDAC By: Navneet Garg, Ph.D. Date: March 15, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration RPA P2: National Airport Pavement & Materials Research.
Introduction Old asphalt pavements Increase demand in landfill areas and landfill costs Landfill areas.
Brief Overview of Global MLS Users Group Applications 2015
Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays PennDOT Research Findings
Phase I Experiment 4 Different pavement structures, 8 sections Compare
TT1825 Mix design and field evaluation of foamed bitumen stabilised pavements December Advancing safety and efficiency in transport.
Authors: Trent McDONALD, Ernesto URBAEZ and Scott MCINTYRE
PAVEMENTS CEE 320 Steve Muench.
AASHTOWare Pavement-ME Design Software: Materials Library
High Value Research Sweet 16 – RAC Region 3
Materials and Tests Engineer
Pavement Structural Analysis
Presentation transcript:

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 1 GAUTRANS APT ELZBIETA SADZIK MAY 2002

SPECIFICATIONS FOR HVS MARK III AND MARK IV HVS Mark IV+HVS Mark III Moving Constant (30 – 205 kN) and Dynamic Loads (mean dynamic load 36 – 88 kN) Only Moving Constant Loads (30 – 200 kN) Maximum passes / 24h Maximum passes / 24h Random (user- definable) wandering pattern Fixed wandering pattern

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 3 COST BENEFIT: HVS III vs HVS IV 57% Decrease in total production cost  50 % Increase in production  19% Decrease in Fuel consumption  56% Decrease in down time

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 4 Comparative Cost: HVS III vs HVS IV HVS Mk III: 80 cents/load repetition HVS Mk IV+: 50 cents/load repetition

HVS testing sites

Testing subjects Road No. Test topicOutputInfo dissemination S702Low-volume roads  Performance rating of various surface treatments 1 st & 2 nd level analysis reports D2388Labour- intensive construction  Cost-benefit rating  WM guideline  ETB struct. design for Sabita Manual 21 Seminar & site visit for local road authorities WM seminar – October 2000 N1 P243/1Deep in situ recycling FB guideline  Behaviour model  Material class.  ME design method Workshop – Jan ‘01 Workshop – April ‘02 Seminars – June ‘02

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 7 HVS accompanied tests Laboratory  Standard laboratory  Grading, Atterberg, OMC/MDD (untreated)  CBR, UCS, ITS  Advanced laboratory  Flexural beam test (FBT)  Static and dynamic triaxial (STT and DTT)  Durability  Permeability  Wheel-tracking erosion (WTE) and mechanical brush (MBT)

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 8 HVS accompanied tests Field  HVS  Material characterisation  Field moisture and density, environmental data  Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)  Deflection, permanent deformation and rut  LTPP  Visual evaluation  Deflections  Traffic survey

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 9 Test matrix for foam-treated material Recycled material Active filler content Binder content NoneLow (0,5 – 2 %) Intermediate (2 – 4 %) High (4 – 6 %) Recycled CTB with foamed bitumen treatment (P243/1) NoneStd lab Adv Lab UCS, ITS FBT Low (0,5 – 1,5 %) UCS, ITS FBT UCS, ITS FBT Std lab Adv Lab Durability UCS, ITS FBT Intermediate (1,5 – 3,0 %) UCS, ITS FBT Std lab Adv Lab Durability HVS

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 10 Test matrix for emulsion-treated material Recycled material Active filler content Binder content NoneLow (0,5 – 2 %) Intermediate (2 – 4 %) High (4 – 6 %) Recycled CTB with emulsion treatment (P243/1) NoneStd lab Adv Lab UCS, ITS FBT UCS, ITS FBT Low (0,5 – 1,5 %) UCS, ITS FBT UCS, ITS FBT UCS, ITS FBT Durability Intermediate (1,5 – 3,0 %) UCS, ITS FBT Std lab Adv Lab Durability HVS UCS, ITS FBT

HVS management Steering Committee Technical management Needs Scope Prioritisation Technical panel Proposals Reports Guidelines Review Pool

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 12 Issues discussed Unanimous agreement on historical benefit of HVS research for pavement engineering in South Africa and a need to continue Needs identified:  Long-term research objective  Ad hoc needs (proof testing)

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 13 “Steering Committee” identified needs Cold-mix recycling Rut-resistant solutions Ultra-thin & thin concrete layers Appropriate asphalt overlays & seals New cement / high UCS layers

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 14 “Steering Committee” identified needs Composite pavements Cost-effective solutions for low- volume roads Risk assessment & management Vehicle-pavement interaction

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS 15 Proposal It is proposed that an APT Steering Committee be established as a sub-committee of the RPF