Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

IDEA 2004 and Section 504: Key Differences Wayne County Public Schools Exceptional Children Program Teresa Smith, EC Transition Coordinator Rhonda Wiggins,
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Individual Education Program (IEP) Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
1 The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
Surrogate Parent Training
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-1 Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
An Overview of the Law 1 Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
7 Major Principles Under IDEA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS.
The Next Decade: Special Education and Oregon Charter Schools COSA Fall Conference October 2009.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 2: The Personnel and Procedures of Special Education Chapter 2 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008.
Writing Compliant ETRs State Approved Training Module
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Free and Appropriate Public Education and Least Restrictive Environment Chapters 9 & 12.
THE PERSONNEL AND PROCEDURES OF SPECIAL EDUCATION Chapter 2.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Placement ARC Chairperson Training 1 Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
Your Exceptional Child Kaily Osborne. We will cover… IDEA IEP Inclusion RTI.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
The New IDEA in Special Education
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
SPECIAL EDUCATION BASICS Adrienne Volenik Education Rights Clinic University of Richmond School of Law
Free Appropriate Public Education. The FAPE Mandate IDEA Substantive requirements- special education and related services through the IEP Procedural-
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
The Evaluation and Re-evaluation Process Guidelines for Parents Karen Finigan, Director of Special Education & Michelle Giovanola, Lead School Psychologist.
Transition Collaborators. Team Models Multidisciplinary Interdisciplinary Transdisciplinary.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
…program and placement decisions are based on students strengths, potential, and needs?
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
M eetings of the IEP Team Produced by NICHCY, 2007 | Updated by CPIR, 2016.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Bridging the gap between the Individual Healthcare Plan (IHP) and the Individualized Educational Program (IEP) How Special Education and School Nurses.
Understanding the IEP Process
The Special Education Process
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
Meetings of the IEP Team
New Enrollment and Transfer Students
Presentation transcript:

Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11

IEP Fun Dr. Suess on IEP’s 10 ten list IEP Quiz Dr. Suess on IEP’s 10 ten list IEP Quiz

1. Must a child’s IEP address his or her involvement in the general curriculum, regardless of the nature and severity of the child’s disability and the setting in which the child is educated?

2. Must the measurable annual goals in a child’s IEP address all areas of the general curriculum, or only those areas in which the child’s involvement and progress are affected by the child’s disability?

3. Must the public agency inform the parents of who will be at the IEP meeting?

4. Do parents have the right to a copy of their child’s IEP?

5. Must a public agency hold separate meetings to determine a child’s eligibility for special education and related services, develop the child’s IEP, and determine the child’s placement, or may the agency meet all of these requirements in a single meeting?

6. May IEP meetings be audio or video tape recorded?

7. If a child with a disability attends several regular classes, must all of the child’s regular education teachers be members of the child’s IEP team?

8. Do parents and public agencies have the option of inviting any individual of their choice to be participants on their child’s IEP team?

9. Are attorney’s fees available for parents’ attorneys (relating to their attendance at an IEP meeting) if the parents are prevailing parties in actions or proceedings brought under Part B?

10. Must related services personnel attend IEP meetings?

11. Must the public agency ensure that all services specified in a child’s IEP are provided?

12. Is it permissible for an agency to have the IEP completed before the IEP meeting begins?

13. Must a public agency include transportation in a child’s IEP as a related service?

14. Must a public agency provide related services that are required to assist a child with a disability to benefit from special education, whether or not those services are included in the list of related services in Sec ?

15. Must the IEP specify the amount of services or may it simply list the services to be provided?

16. If a child’s IEP includes behavioral strategies to address a particular behavior, can a child ever be suspended for engaging in that behavior?

17. If a child’s behavior in the regular classroom, even with appropriate interventions, would significantly impair the learning of others, can the group that makes the placement decision determine that placement in the regular classroom is inappropriate for that child?

18. May school personnel during a school year implement more than one short-term removal of a child with disabilities from his or her classroom or school for misconduct?

Individualized Education Plan (IEP) Keystone of IDEA Special education program directed by IEP Program monitored by IEP Assures FAPE Legal document Keystone of IDEA Special education program directed by IEP Program monitored by IEP Assures FAPE Legal document

Requirements Notice Timeline Parent involvement Assessment Team member involvement Appropriate content Implemented as planned Notice Timeline Parent involvement Assessment Team member involvement Appropriate content Implemented as planned

Ensure Benefit Assess of needs Base goals on needs Measurable goals Provide necessary services Monitor progress Assess of needs Base goals on needs Measurable goals Provide necessary services Monitor progress

Common Problems Team representation Parental input Components Goals Transition LRE Services Implementation Timeline Behavioral interventions Team representation Parental input Components Goals Transition LRE Services Implementation Timeline Behavioral interventions

IDEA Amendments of ‘97 and ‘04 Accountability Scientifically based practices Level of responsibility Accountability Scientifically based practices Level of responsibility

Purpose of IEP Communication Management Accountability Compliance and monitoring Evaluation Communication Management Accountability Compliance and monitoring Evaluation

IEP Mandate Meaningful educational benefit Individualized –Standardization –Available services –Categorical programming Complete before services Due process –FAPE –Parent participation –Educational benefit Meaningful educational benefit Individualized –Standardization –Available services –Categorical programming Complete before services Due process –FAPE –Parent participation –Educational benefit

IEP Development Planning process –Referral –Consent –Assessment –IEP team –IEP –Placement Planning process –Referral –Consent –Assessment –IEP team –IEP –Placement

Process Referral –Parent –School Notice to parent Follow school-designed referral process Assessment –Consent from parent for assessment –Complete within at least 60 days –Determine presence of disability –Adversely affects educational performance –Consider results, student strengths, parents concerns Referral –Parent –School Notice to parent Follow school-designed referral process Assessment –Consent from parent for assessment –Complete within at least 60 days –Determine presence of disability –Adversely affects educational performance –Consider results, student strengths, parents concerns

Process Eligibility –Develop team –Set meeting within 30 calendar days –Eligibility criteria IEP development –Review results of assessment –Review current records –Develop plan for services –Document in IEP May bring draft IEP to meeting Should not interfere in full discussion Eligibility –Develop team –Set meeting within 30 calendar days –Eligibility criteria IEP development –Review results of assessment –Review current records –Develop plan for services –Document in IEP May bring draft IEP to meeting Should not interfere in full discussion

Process Placement –Parental consent Fully informed Understand contents Agree to terms - voluntary and revokable –Implementation Timely Delay permissable only due to timing of meeting and need for time to make proper arrangements Placement –Parental consent Fully informed Understand contents Agree to terms - voluntary and revokable –Implementation Timely Delay permissable only due to timing of meeting and need for time to make proper arrangements

2004 Provisions Team member attendance –Pertinent information –Direct involvement Meeting format –Face-to-face –Alternative format Changes to IEP –Documentation of changes –Amendments to IEP Team member attendance –Pertinent information –Direct involvement Meeting format –Face-to-face –Alternative format Changes to IEP –Documentation of changes –Amendments to IEP

2004 Provisions 3-year IEP –Natural transitions –Long-range goals –Review at transitions Response to lack of consent –No provision of services –No liability Transfer students –Follow existing IEP –Parental contact –Assessment –New IEP if appropriate 3-year IEP –Natural transitions –Long-range goals –Review at transitions Response to lack of consent –No provision of services –No liability Transfer students –Follow existing IEP –Parental contact –Assessment –New IEP if appropriate

IEP Team Required –Parents/guardians –Special education teacher –General education teacher –Administrative representative –Interpreter when needed –Child when appropriate Required –Parents/guardians –Special education teacher –General education teacher –Administrative representative –Interpreter when needed –Child when appropriate

IEP Team Discretionary –Related service providers –AT specialist –Transition agency representative –Other invited specialists or guests Discretionary –Related service providers –AT specialist –Transition agency representative –Other invited specialists or guests

IEP Content Present levels –Academic achievement –Functional performance Annual goals Services General education participation Testing participation Dates Transition services if appropriate Progress reporting Special considerations Placement decisions Present levels –Academic achievement –Functional performance Annual goals Services General education participation Testing participation Dates Transition services if appropriate Progress reporting Special considerations Placement decisions

Substantive Requirements Parental participation IEP review Proper implementation of IEP Private schools Section 504 Parental participation IEP review Proper implementation of IEP Private schools Section 504

Litigation Goals and objectives Evaluation procedures Student progress Goals and objectives Evaluation procedures Student progress

Application Sample IEP’s Consider case –PLP –Needs –Goal –Objectives –Services –General education participation –Placement Sample IEP’s Consider case –PLP –Needs –Goal –Objectives –Services –General education participation –Placement