News Ted & Kirsten June 10, 2005 TDWG. Meet Trigger Reps today? Exotic Trigger Reps: Vadim and Oscar doing great work QCD Trigger Rep: Mary herself EWK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the CTP O.Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham April 23rd 2009.
Advertisements

 Project Overview & System Integration Ted Liu June 11th, 2004 Fermilab, High Rise, Hornet Nest Pulsar Meeting.
Final Commissioning Plan and Schedule Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Installation Readiness Review 09/27/2004 Outline: - Work to be done during shutdown - Work.
Introduction Ted Liu, FNAL Feb. 9 th, 2005 L2 Pulsar 2rd IRR Review, ICB-2E, video: 82Pulsar
Initial Step to go beyond 200E30 Ted TDWG, Sept 1st 2006.
Trigger Table Improvements -- past, present and future prospects Kirsten & Ted, Feb.02, 2006, CDF meeting Happy Chinese/Korea New Year! Year of dog… When.
GLAST LAT ProjectOnline Roadmap Progress Report – April 22, 2004 R. Claus1 Online Roadmap to the July 2004 Freeze Progress report for April 22, 2004 (to.
Table cleanup details Prepared by Ted for the 1st trigger rep meeting (July 13th, 2005)
Summary Ted Liu, FNAL Feb. 9 th, 2005 L2 Pulsar 2rd IRR Review, ICB-2E, video: 82Pulsar
Table Improvements & Near Term Plan Ted & Kirsten July 08, 2005 TDWG Introduction Table performance due to improved L2 JETs Initial Trigger Table Cleanup:
MOM Report. Shield Wall – Gone Before During After 2.
Alain Blondel MICE VC 9 september 2010 Spokesmouse report o VC 22nd April o 12th-13th May posters for IPAC (Vittorio Palladino) o VC 20th May o IPAC May.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 6th Edition
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Hot Checkout System for Accelerator Operations at JLab Ken Baggett (Team Leader) Theo Larrieu Ron Lauzé Randy Michaud Ryan Slominski Paul Vasilauskis.
13 January All Experimenters’ MeetingAlan L. Stone - Louisiana Tech University1 Data Taking Statistics Week of 2003 January 6-12 We had to sacrifice.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
Delta State University College of Education Annual Student Update Part II Dissertation January16, 2010.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
Cluster Finder Report Laura Sartori (INFN Pisa) For the L2Cal Team Chicago, Fermilab, Madrid, Padova, Penn, Pisa, Purdue.
Draft HPS Run Plan March 30, Next Steps Beamline Setup Trigger Commissioning Beam Stability Studies SVT Commissioning Data Taking Checking the.
27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review1 Status & Plans of the TDWG Mission Statement What Do We have to Guide Us ? Caveats & Concerns Current & Anticipated.
Societies Assembly Please Sign in at the Desk to receive your voting card Wednesday 3 rd June.
Release Management Configuration management. Release Management Goal Coordinate the processes through the project development life cycle Ensure the.
Cover for special hardcover edition of Phys. Lett. B featuring CMS+ATLAS Higgs results 31 July 2012G. Rakness (UCLA)1 The articles were submitted today.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
Status of Muon Trigger Efficiency Measurement for ICHEP Benedikt Hegner, Benjamin Klein, Yvonne Küssel, Patricia Lobelle, Markus Marienfeld, Rahmat Rahmat,
Deliverable 10. Deliverable #10 Class Design and Implementation #1 due 9 April Executive Summary and Statement of Work Iteration Plan (Updated) for remaining.
17 February All Experimenters’ MeetingAlan L. Stone - Louisiana Tech University1 Data Taking Statistics Week of 2003 February Dedicated some.
NEW LEAVE SYSTEM HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF. LEAVE SYSTEM Current system History Look and limitations New system Overview Benefits Project phases Description.
LHC BLM Software revue June BLM Software components Handled by BI Software section –Expert GUIs  Not discussed today –Real-Time software  Topic.
L3 Filtering: - short- and medium term plans - how you can help out All-D  Meeting: 14 th March 2003 Terry Wyatt (FNAL-CD/Manchester) on behalf of the.
Simple ideas on how to integrate L2CAL and L2XFT ---> food for thoughts Ted May 25th, 2007.
Low p T Muon trigger studies for J/       Supreet Pal Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof. J.B.Singh (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Prof.
4 Dec 2008G. Rakness (UCLA)1 Online Software Updates and RPC data in the RAT …including Pad Bit Mapping and Efficiency… Greg Rakness University of California,
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
Latest News & Other Issues Ricardo Goncalo (LIP), David Miller (Chicago) Jet Trigger Signature Group Meeting 9/2/2015.
Firmware - 1 CMS Upgrade Workshop October SLHC CMS Firmware SLHC CMS Firmware Organization, Validation, and Commissioning M. Schulte, University.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
Transversity Readiness and Timeline Xiaodong Jiang, March 17th, This document specifies the overall readiness for Hall A experiments E06-010/E
TDRp Implementation Challenges David Vance, Executive Director Peggy Parskey, Assistant Director October 23, 2014.
L2 Status and Plan Matt Worcester, Heather Ray, Monica Tecchio, Myron Campbell, Jane Nachtman, David Saltzberg, Tom Wright, Steve Kuhlmann, Karen Byrum,
Pulsar Status For Peter. L2 decision crate L1L1 TRACKTRACK SVTSVT CLUSTERCLUSTER PHOTONPHOTON MUONMUON Magic Bus α CPU Technical requirement: need a FAST.
Introduction Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) HSG5 H->bb weekly meeting, 7 June 2011.
AliRoot survey: Analysis P.Hristov 11/06/2013. Are you involved in analysis activities?(85.1% Yes, 14.9% No) 2 Involved since 4.5±2.4 years Dedicated.
Performance Requirements J. Lewis Level 2 Loya Jurga 7 December 2001.
Level 1-2 Trigger Data Base development Current status and overview Myron Campbell, Alexei Varganov, Stephen Miller University of Michigan August 17, 2000.
D. Saltzberg, May 19, 2000 CDFWEEK ``Physics Tables’’ for Commissioning Run -- TDWG l TDWG collected information from detector groups during CDFWEEK äHow.
News and Related Issues Ted & Kirsten May 27, 2005 TDWG News since last meeting (April 29th) Organization Issues: how to improve communication Future Plans:
T Project Review Wellit I1 Iteration
Status of LAV electronics commissioning Mauro Raggi, Francesco Gonnella Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati 1 Mauro Raggi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati4.
Project Planning A2 ICT Edexcel. Learning Objective To look at ways of breaking down a project into manageable stages To produce a project plan with suitable.
Status of Digitization, Testbeam Simulation, and Production ATLAS Muon Week -CERN, February 18th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN.
Sridhara Dasu115 April 2002 L1CaloTrigger Algorithms Sridhara Dasu University of Wisconsin Algorithms: Details, Updates and Simulation - 2 x cm -2.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Overview B A B AR L1 DCT Upgrade FDR Masahiro Morii Harvard University Scope of the Project Current Status Schedule  Commissioning.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
Working groups status report on Feedbacks
The ZEUS Event Store An object-oriented tag database for physics analysis Adrian Fox-Murphy, DESY CHEP2000, Padova.
Overview of CLAS12 Calibration
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Relational Security Corporation
Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger
RUN-4 has finished About 70 (!!!) billions of candidate tracks collected up to now About 20 (!!!) billions of candidate tracks collected in RUN-4.
Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago
Overview Activities from additional UP disciplines are needed to bring a system into being Implementation Testing Deployment Configuration and change management.
XFT2B: Plans and Tasks XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.1.
Presentation transcript:

News Ted & Kirsten June 10, 2005 TDWG

Meet Trigger Reps today? Exotic Trigger Reps: Vadim and Oscar doing great work QCD Trigger Rep: Mary herself EWK Trigger Reps: have one “good candidate” Top Trigger Reps: have one “good candidate” B Trigger Reps: have “several good candidates” Deadline: find your trigger reps by next TDWG meeting!

Plans to train trigger experts Will have meetings dedicated to training: Level 1 and 2 and 3 Invite trigger experts to explain trigger system from trigger table point of view: tracks, electrons, muons, JETs, ScalerMon, XMON … etc. Have trigger reps involved in documentation Have trigger reps deeply involved in trigger table design, implementation, table testing and performance analysis, to speed up the process Each trigger rep is expected to become an expert on at least one trigger subsystem: understand and monitor the lower level triggers and their behaviors … How to improve the communication, speed up trigger table testing?

Improving the procedures for trigger table testing… (1) Trigger heads come up with a list of changes, with help from Trigger Reps. Each new trigger have a name behind it (who will check it offline). (2) Once the new table is made, Trigger Reps should carefully check the changes for their own triggers. Then we request for beam test. (3) Trigger heads and trigger Reps (take turns) perform the actual beam test in the control room. Check the rates. (4) Once the data is taken and processed, each trigger reps should make sure that the data is looked upon for their triggers within one week. (5) Report the results back to trigger heads… The details of each step should be posted in the trigger table e-log! This is just initial thoughts, let’s finalize the procedures at next meeting (Kirsten will be back next Monday)

New High Lumi Table performance New High Lumi table performance offset by CAL LER update Date: April 29 May 21 June 2 Run: Table: old old new CAL LER Update: No YES YES L1A 12KHz 12KHz L2A 290Hz 340Hz 290Hz L3A 70Hz 80Hz 70Hz DT: 0.6% 1.5% 1.7%

Other News L1 transverse mass firmware ready! Need a plan for commissioning. See Christopher’s talk. XMON is doing well. Charles will give an update soon Good progress on “Straw Trigger Table” study  See Vadim’s talk on June 7th at RunIIb Physics Trigger meeting  tools developed can be soon apply to other triggers … New version of L2 build script without building Alpha executable (Daniel). Now it runs in ~ 30 seconds (was ~10 mins).

Plan for next two weeks Move the changes for high lumi into default  Need B group’s plan for reducing J/Psi to mumu rate  Need EWK group’s plan for high Pt J/Psi to mumu … etc (See Chris Hays talk) Get remaining test triggers into default table Show your results on the test run (198597) for PHYSICS_TEST_3_02[9,656,571]  Chris Neu’s talk (?) on Z to bbbar  How about others? * Start expanding # of L2 bits from 128 to 192 (Daniel coordinates this effort) * Commission the L1 transverse mass cut and adjacent linker veto

Goals for this summer Include the remaining test triggers into default table Finish L2 bits expansion (128 to 192 bits) Offline code available for handling prescaled trigger Have the L1 Mt cut and adjacent linker veto working in physics table Testing/implementing CLC multiplicity trigger Goal: have a default table good to 150E30 while fully efficient at low lumi. Prototyping an unified trigger table, and first use it to measure the system performance with the new EVB…. to see where is the next new wall. It should be flexible enough to test the system performance with new SVT as well. This summer will be exciting. Great time for young people to get involved...