Introduction to Selection Indexes Bob Weaber, Ph.D. State Extension Specialist-Beef Genetics University of Missouri-Columbia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enterprise:Animal Science Unit:Basic Genetics Factor Information needed I. Intro.A. The use of genetics to improve animals can not be overlooked by producers.
Advertisements

Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
Selection Decisions Using Economically Relevant Traits: The Pathway to Indexes B. L. Golden 1 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
Making the Web equal Profit Surfing for Genetics Dorian Garrick & Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
Cow-Calf Operations Makenna Ramos April 10, 2012 Animal Science.
Economic Feasibility of Adopting Genomic Selection in Beef Cattle Kenneth Poon & Getu Hailu University of Guelph CAES 2010, Niagara Falls June 18 th, 2010.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at
Beef Production. Terms to Know Polled –born naturally without horns Horned –Born naturally with the ability to grow horns….may never grow though Marbling.
Daryl Strohbehn, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor Iowa State University Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Ext. Cow-Calf Specialist Kansas State University.
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Jared E. Decker 1.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Economically Relevant Traits Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Tools of the Trade Tom Field, PhD Andy Herring, PhD.
Beef & Dairy Production. How to decide?? Type of production varies greatly. Depends on: type of animals Location Facilities overall producer goals In.
Designing Genetics and Selection for Seedstock Breeders, Commercial Cattlemen and Show Ring Enthusiasts ASA Fall Focus 2015: Confidence Builds Success.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
1 Application of Molecular Technologies in Beef Production Dan W. Moser, Ph.D Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How Do I Decide What Traits are Important? Carcass/Ultrasound EPDs Bob Weaber GRA-Cornell.
Chapters 13 & 14. Objectives Understanding of the concept of genetic variation Knowledge of quantitative vs. qualitative traits Appreciation for genetic.
Wade Shafer American Simmental Association. In the pursuit of genetic improvement all traits are antagonistically related to each other.
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Heterosis-Ignored or Forgotten? (or did we ever believe in it to start with?) D. A. Daley California State University, Chico.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Identifying Genetic Antagonisms Megan Rolf Oklahoma State University.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Kansas State University
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Nuts and Bolts of Genetic Improvement Genetic Model Predicting Genetic Levels Increase Commercial Profitability Lauren Hyde Jackie Atkins Wade Shafer Fall.
Genetic Evaluations & Decision Support to Improve Feed Efficiency Dorian Garrick Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
NBCEC Brown Bagger: Economic Selection Index Wade Shafer American Simmental Association.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Multiple Trait Selection for Maternal Productivity D. H. Crews, Jr., P. B. Mwansa.
PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires Michael MacNeil USDA ARS Miles City, MT.
What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference
Selection Decision Tools Revisited Economically Relevant Traits vs. Indicator Traits B. L. Golden California Polytechnic State University, SLO.
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Brown Bagger Seminar Carcass EPDs Integrating Carcass and Ultrasound October 22, 2008 Sally L. Northcutt Genetic.
Advanced Animal Breeding
Sally L. Northcutt American Angus Association Selection Tools Beef Improvement Federation April 20, 2006.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
Using EPDs in Selection
A Stroll Down Genetic Improvement Lane…
DNA Technology.
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Using EPDs in Selection
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Unit 4: Genetic Selection & Mating
Wading through the confusion of EPDs and genomics
The Future of the U.S. Beef Cattle Industry HPJ 2019 Cattle U by Lee Leachman.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Selection Indexes Bob Weaber, Ph.D. State Extension Specialist-Beef Genetics University of Missouri-Columbia

July 7, th BIF Annual Research Symposium and Meeting2 Seedstock Cow-calf Packer Consumer Feeder Cattle Information Communicate Value??

July 7, th BIF Annual Research Symposium and Meeting3 Overview What are selection indexes? –Defined –The Breeding Objective –Traits vs. Characteristics –Relative Economic Values Why do we need selection indexes? –Multiple trait selection What are their limitations?

July 7, th BIF Annual Research Symposium and Meeting4 What Is a Selection Index? Selection on ‘aggregate merit’ (Hazel, 1943) List of traits that influence “satisfaction” Relative Economic Value (REV) of each trait –Increase in satisfaction with one unit change in a trait, all others held constant List of characteristics to be measured on animal Relationships between characteristics (phenotypes) and traits (genotypes)

July 7, th BIF Annual Research Symposium and Meeting5 Selection Index Defined Two Step approach by Henderson (1950s) –Calculate predictions of genetic merit (EPD) for each trait in selection objective –Weight each genetic prediction by it’s Relative Economic Value (REV) Equivalent to Hazel approach

July 7, th BIF Annual Research Symposium and Meeting6 Breeding Objective Traits in Selection Index CE EPD WW EPD YW EPD Milk EPD Heifer Pregnancy EPD Stayability EPD Characteristics In Breeding Objective Calf Survival Weaning weight Male/female Fertility Longevity Milk production Feed efficiency

July 7, th BIF Annual Research Symposium and Meeting7 Why Do We Need Selection Indexes? “There is no easily accessible, objective way for breeders, particularly breeders in the beef and sheep industries where ownership is diverse and production environments vary a great deal, to use these predictions intelligently.” -- R. M. Bourdon, 1998

July 7, th BIF Annual Research Symposium and Meeting8 Why is multiple trait selection.. Difficult? –Lots of EPDs –Some for Economically Relevant Trait (ERT) some for Indicator Traits –Relative economic importance of traits given breeding/marketing/endpoint –Ability to construct a meaningful profit function Important? –More than one trait is important for enterprise, operation or industry profitability

July 7, th BIF Annual Research Symposium and Meeting9 Tools for Multiple Trait Selection Independent Culling Levels –Too cumbersome –Inefficient in generating response to selection –Economics sketchy—’seat of pants’ approach Selection Indexes –Objective –Easy to use and interpret ($) –Economically driven REVs from bio-economic simulation –Links ERTs and Indicator Traits –Customizable (Site/user specific)

July 7, th BIF Annual Research Symposium and Meeting10 Selection Index Limitations EPD not available on all ERTs or Indicators Most indexes revenue focused; cost information difficult to obtain General Indexes representative of industry vs. Custom Index representative of individual firm Relative Economic Values used in generalized index may not be reflective of your operation Linear vs. Non-linear Profit Functions –Diminishing returns (i.e. Carcass Wt., Mature Size) Managerial differences can cause contraction or expansion of phenotypic variation Still better than ‘seat of pants’ approach that most of us apply

Thank You!

July 7, th BIF Annual Research Symposium and Meeting12 Literature Cited Bourden, R. M Shortcomings of current genetic evaluation systems. J. Anim. Sci. 76: Golden, B. L., D. J. Garrick, S. Newman, and R. M. Enns Economically Relevant Traits A Framework for the Next Generation of EPDs. Proc. 32nd Annual Research Symposium and Annual Meeting, Beef Improvement Federation, Witchita, Kansas. Harris, D. L Livestock improvement: Art, Science, or Industry? J. Anim. Sci. 76: Harris, D. L. and S. Newman Breeding for profit: Synergism between genetic improvement and livestock production (a review). J. Anim. Sci. 72: Hazel, L. N The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28: Hazel L. N. and J. L. Lush The efficiency of three methods of selection. Journ. Hered. 33: Hazel, L. N., G. E. Dickerson, and A. E. Freeman The selection index: Then, Now, and for the future. J. Dairy Sci. 77: Henderson, C. R Mimeo published by Cornell University. Ithaca, NY. Henderson, C. R Selection index and expected genetic advance. In: Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Natnl. Acad. Sci. Natnl. Res. Counc. Publ pp National Academy of Science, Washington, DC. MacNeil, M. D Genetic evaluation of an index of birth weight and yearling weight to improve efficiency of beef production. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2425–2433 Schneeberger, M., S. A. Barwick, G. H. Crow, and K. Hammond Economic indices using breeding values predicted by BLUP. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 109:180.