GlencoIS – Interoperability through Reference Data ISO15926 Reference Data Some Template Ref Data Issues (Relevant to coordinating JORD take-up) PCA /

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ontology Assessment – Proposed Framework and Methodology.
Advertisements

DC Architecture WG meeting Monday Sept 12 Slot 1: Slot 2: Location: Seminar Room 4.1.E01.
Slide 1 Presentation of the example business concept – DNV Exchange architecture - DNV Summary / issues from last workshop - DNV Presentation of Swedish.
OVERVIEW OF Ian Glendinning Target Training Room Target Plaza South 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN September 20-21, 2007 ISO Training -
Program The five presentations are dealing with:  what are reference data (taxonomy) and what object information models (ontology)? data and documents.
TC3 Meeting in Montreal (Montreal/Secretariat)6 page 1 of 10 Structure and purpose of IEC ISO - IEC Specifications for Document Management.
Web Service Architecture Part I- Overview and Models (based on W3C Working Group Note Frank.
Foundations This chapter lays down the fundamental ideas and choices on which our approach is based. First, it identifies the needs of architects in the.
Chapter 10: Architectural Design
Metadata Standards and Applications 4. Metadata Syntaxes and Containers.
Quality Management in Business and Manufacturing Sectors.
FIATECH FIATECH ADI Programmers Circle 2006 Onno Paap, Fluor Corporation.
Requirements for DSML 2.0. Summary RFC 2251 fidelity Represent existing directory protocols with new transport syntax Backwards compatibility with DSML.
RDF: Concepts and Abstract Syntax W3C Recommendation 10 February Michael Felderer Digital Enterprise.
1 CIM User Group Conference Call december 8th 2005 Using UN/CEFACT Core Component methodology for EIC/TC 57 works and CIM Jean-Luc SANSON Electrical Network.
Metadata Standards and Applications 5. Applying Metadata Standards: Application Profiles.
Executable UML The Models are the Code - Executable UML CS387 Paul Krause.
INF 384 C, Spring 2009 Ontologies Knowledge representation to support computer reasoning.
PCA and ISO are true! Welcome! Thore Langeland, Ph. D. Chairman of PCA Americas PCA Forum and Member Meeting Hosted by Bechtel, Houston.
MPEG-21 : Overview MUMT 611 Doug Van Nort. Introduction Rather than audiovisual content, purpose is set of standards to deliver multimedia in secure environment.
Session 11 The Class Diagram: Aggregation and Generalization Written by Thomas A. Pender Published by Wiley Publishing, Inc. October 12, 2011 Presented.
Templates. The Problem Supplier X A range on the data sheet.
CountryData Technologies for Data Exchange SDMX Information Model: An Introduction.
ISO Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Data documentation format.
SDMX Standards Relationships to ISO/IEC 11179/CMR Arofan Gregory Chris Nelson Joint UNECE/Eurostat/OECD workshop on statistical metadata (METIS): Geneva.
1 Synchronize work on DEXs and reference data between PLCS pilots and OASIS/PLCS - Proposed PLCS TC Organization and Functional Responsibilities.
EuroRoadS for JRC Workshop Lars Wikström, Triona Editor of EuroRoadS deliverables D6.3, D6.6, D6.7.
© 2012 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. For internal MITRE use 13 June 2013 Meeting #3 hData Record Format Taskforce 1 © 2012 The MITRE Corporation.
ECIMF meeting, Paris Overview of some international projects related to ECIMF Andrzej Bialecki.
Information Interchange on the Semantic Web an interactive talk by Piotr Kaminski, University of Victoria
Creating an Application Profile Tutorial 3 DC2004, Shanghai Library 13 October 2004 Thomas Baker, Fraunhofer Society Robina Clayphan, British Library Pete.
1 Metadata –Information about information – Different objects, different forms – e.g. Library catalogue record Property:Value: Author Ian Beardwell Publisher.
WI 4 (CWA1): Guidelines for machine-processable representation of Dublin Core Application Profiles Pete Johnston, UKOLN, University of Bath Thomas Baker,
What and Why? Next steps for oneM2M Semantics Group Name: WG5 Source: Joerg Swetina, Martin Bauer (NEC) Meeting Date: Agenda Item: WI-0005 oneM2M-MAS
Rupa Tiwari, CSci5980 Fall  Course Material Classification  GIS Encyclopedia Articles  Classification Diagram  Course – Encyclopedia Mapping.
Symbols relationship class of relationship class of class of relationship Name RDS Identifier/URI Relationships Classes Name Level 2/Class of class Level.
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects November 1, 2004 Descriptive Metadata: “Modeling the World”
XML 2nd EDITION Tutorial 4 Working With Schemas. XP Schemas A schema is an XML document that defines the content and structure of one or more XML documents.
RELATORS, ROLES AND DATA… … similarities and differences.
Relationships Relationships between objects and between classes.
PLCS DEXs Trine Hansen DNV 20 April Content OASIS / PLCS Organization PLCS DEXs DEX architecture Process – define and verify capabilities Way forward.
Metadata : an overview XML and Educational Metadata, SBU, London, 10 July 2001 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN is supported.
WIGOS Data model – standards introduction.
Dictionary based interchanges for iSURF -An Interoperability Service Utility for Collaborative Supply Chain Planning across Multiple Domains David Webber.
Ontology Architectural Support Options Group Name: MAS WG Source: Catalina Mladin, Lijun Dong, InterDigital Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
All Presentation Material Copyright Eurostep Group AB ® A Meta-model of EXPRESS in UML for MOF and UML to EXPRESS David Price April 2002.
Winter 2011SEG Chapter 11 Chapter 1 (Part 1) Review from previous courses Subject 1: The Software Development Process.
Digital Object Identifier doi> Norman Paskin The International DOI Foundation W3C DRM workshop January 22/
Interoperability How to Build a Digital Library Ian H. Witten and David Bainbridge.
WG3 Presentation to TC184/SC 4 Closing Plenary Baltimore, USA 23 Oct 2015 WG3 Oil, Gas, Process and Power Paul van Exel, Convener Nils Sandsmark, Deputy.
Synchronise work on DEXs and reference data between PLCS pilots and OASIS/PLCS Workshop #3 10 – 11 November 2004.
1 ISO 15926/iRING Demonstration Digital Plant 2010 Houston March 1, 2010 Lee Colson, P.E.
1 RDF, XML & interoperability Metadata : a reprise Communities, communication & XML An introduction to RDF RDF, XML and interoperability.
ISO TC37/SC4 N435 Nov 12, 2007 Presented by Miran Choi/ETRI Written by Jae Sung Lee/Chungbuk National Univ.
1 Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
Onno Paap Integration manager Fluor Corporation Radisson Plaza Hotel Minneapolis, MN September 17-19, 2007 Progress of project: Acceleration Deployment.
Owner_idnameid nameid owners dogs SELECT o.name, d.name AS dog_name FROM owners o, dogs d WHERE o.id = d.owner_id Database Objects name | dog_name
David Leal / Ontology Summit Synthesis Panel - 26-Mar URI for quantities, units and scales Motivation  URIs are being assigned to quantities,
OSLC PLM Reference model February Summary of the OSLC PLM Reference Model V0.2 February 22 nd 2011 Gray Bachelor Mike Loeffler OSLC PLM Workgroup.
IRINGTools Exemplo de aplicação para Web Sêmantica.
Information Delivery Manuals: Functional Parts
TOSCA Namespaces for tosca-nfv-profile
UML to XSD.
SDMX Information Model
Software Measurement Process ISO/IEC
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
SDMX Information Model: An Introduction
Semantic Information Modeling for Federation
LOD reference architecture
MUMT611: Music Information Acquisition, Preservation, and Retrieval
Presentation transcript:

GlencoIS – Interoperability through Reference Data ISO15926 Reference Data Some Template Ref Data Issues (Relevant to coordinating JORD take-up) PCA / FIATECH Modelling SIG 16 th Dec 2010 Ian Glendinning GlencoIS (Information Services) Realizing Open Information Interoperability – ROI 2

GlencoIS – Interoperability through Reference Data Some JORD Technical Issues JORD aims to support, coordinate & validate that (as a minimum) ; All compliant use of ISO15926 actually uses valid Ref Data. All compliant use of ISO15926 actually uses valid Template Signatures. So enhanced RDS created by JORD needs to fix; A number of publishing and uploading technology issues with people actually using RDS (triple-stores, URI’s, namespaces, ID-Generation, Sandboxes, Part6 Meta-data implementation, XML, OWL … others ?) A number of implementation-technology-neutral content modelling issues inconsistent with usage procedures being coordinated and business uses that need to be supported (for current projects). Today – examples of the latter modelling issues. Later – the processes by which similar issues will be handled in JORD and – the technical resources to implement technology fixes

GlencoIS – Interoperability through Reference Data Example Template Signature Issues Compound Templates – templates whose roles are templates. (So that we can use templates as intended to assemble, classify, specialize, organize, arrange other templates.) Example – information sets comprising multiple property attribute templates. Eg “Process Data” subset in a datasheet / or even an OIM, comprising several properties / indirect properties, but with common identity for engineering business information management purposes. Example – core application or engineering geometric object comprising assemblies and specializations of base / abstract Part 3 geometric objects. Issue – Needed, but not supported directly by Part 7 FOL Identification / Naming – context for uniqueness and language. Clearly needed, but no agreed templates / signatures yet. Multiple Issues … unique library naming convention …. name strings organized according to language, BUT it is the naming relation that declares the use in a language context (strings are not unique to any one language). Others from previous Modelling SIG’s (eg Frederick) / iRING / IDS-ADI Projects / Proteus / Inst-SIG / Geom-SIG / IOHN / EqHub / Onno … ?

GlencoIS – Interoperability through Reference Data Aside – NB «Core» Reference Data Core Classes & Templates Standard Classes & Templates Data Model (Base Classes & Templates) Manufactured & Application- Specific Classes & Templates Data Model (Base Classes & Templates) Application-Specific Classes inc Templates > Simple technical compliance of any valid RDL Items. Bottom-Up Content Development >>> ( Any new industry / business areas / uses ) Compliance of valid RDL Items constrained by needs of industrial standardization. (Content management hierarchies, SIG’s, etc.) P4 (initial) / WIP Content Implemented in P9 (SPARQL Facade) Represented in P8 (RDF/OWL)

GlencoIS – Interoperability through Reference Data ID’s & Triples / Relationships & Mappings ID’s (URI’s) are fundamental to the Reference Data architecture and Fundamentally all mappings and all relationships are Triples. ID#1 (URI)Relationship ID (URI)ID#2 (URI) (URI) ”MyPump101” (Classification relationship URI) (RDL Class URI) Centrifugal Pump (URI) ” Центробежный насос” (?) (Identification relationship URI) (RDL Class URI) Centrifugal Pump (URI) ”MyCatalogueXYZPumpType” (Specialization relationship URI) (RDL Class URI) Centrifugal Pump These are indicative only. In practice these are ”proto-templates” in Part 7 terms (one for each Part 2 relationship entity). Everything else is built from these.

GlencoIS – Interoperability through Reference Data Language – Victor’s Proposal Thing Named Thing ES “Именованный объект” CoIdent representedpattern CoCoIdent Russian Thing Name Representation Class ISO CLASS class_of_represented Language Russian Name for Thing Class class_of_pattern Language Russian Language Language NATURAL LANGUAGE 7 CoCoIdent NAME REFERENCE data#R data#R

GlencoIS – Interoperability through Reference Data Ian’s Response Thing Named Thing ES “Именованный объект” CoIdent representedpattern CoCoIdent Russian Thing Name Representation Class ISO CLASS class_of_represented Language Russian Name for Thing Class class_of_pattern Language Russian Language Language NATURAL LANGUAGE 7 CoCoIdent NAME REFERENCE data#R data#R This relation IS the Russian Language Naming relation These are about organization of natural language strings in the library. NB identical strings can be homonyms in one or more language It is this relation that says “I am using the X language to name this thing” NOT the classification of the string itself.

GlencoIS – Interoperability through Reference Data The “Language Naming” Signature (Actually two templates & signatures, depending whether it is the class or the member you are naming) Thing Named Thing ES “Именованный объект” CoIdent representedpattern CoCoIdent Russian Thing Name Representation Class ISO CLASS class_of_represented Name String Russian Name for Thing Class class_of_pattern Language Russian Language Language NATURAL LANGUAGE 7 CoCoIdent NAME REFERENCE data#R data#R This relation IS the Russian Language Name-Assignment relation

GlencoIS – Interoperability through Reference Data