LAT-TD-046181 GLAST LAT Project Tracker Inner Shipping Container Analysis and Test Results Tracker Inner Shipping Container Analysis and Test Results August.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of shell thicknesses Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,
Advertisements

GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, 2003 HPS Tracker Peer Review, WBS Section 2-D 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS Structural.
N. Dhanaraj, Y. Orlov, R. Wands Thermal-Stress Analysis of CC1 Space Frame.
R. Field 11/5/2013 University of Florida PHY 2053Page 1 Exam 2: Tomorrow 8:20-10:10pm Last NameRoom A-ENPB 1001 F-LNRN 137 M-RWEIM 1064 S-ZMCCC 100 You.
NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses
Structural Qualification Testing of the WindSat Payload Using Sine Bursts Near Structural Resonance Jim Pontius Donald Barnes.
Linear Buckling Workshop 7. Workshop Supplement Linear Buckling August 26, 2005 Inventory # WS7-2 Workshop 7 - Goals The goal in this workshop is.
The Turning Effect of Forces You should be able to: state what the centre of gravity of an object is. describe a simple experiment to determine the centre.
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
July GLAST Project Installation Review LATLAT 1 Tracker Tower Installation Review Peter Amnuaypayoat
ME 501 Corey Roberts Leo Montgomery Motor Plate Analysis.
APPLICATIONS OF INTEGRATION Work APPLICATIONS OF INTEGRATION In this section, we will learn about: Applying integration to calculate the amount.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 4/10/03.
Workshop A12-1 Fatigue: Stress-Life.
GLAST LAT ProjectDecember 2, 2003 R. Johnson Engineering Meeting 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS Tracker EM Vibration Test Status.
Why Things Float D. Crowley, 2007.
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Recent Study Topics Full length model with wafers, hybrids and cable as dead weight.
Minimum Weight Wing Design for a Utility Type Aircraft MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AE 462 – Aerospace Structures Design DESIGN TEAM : Osman Erdem.
GLAST LAT Project ACD CDR Jan 7-8, Section 7 Mechanical Ground Support Equipment GLAST Large Area Telescope: AntiCoincidence Detector (ACD) Mechanical.
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Section Mechanical Systems X-LAT Assy1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Mechanical.
LAT-TD GLAST LAT ProjectJune 28, 2006 Mechanical Systems GLAST LAT Mass Properties Test Readiness Review Mechanical Systems GLAST LAT Mass Properties.
LATLAT Beam Test Workshop 20th March GLAST Program Beam Test Workshop CU Outer Shipping Container Michele Pinchera
LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project 1x4 Grid Lift Fixture Weld Analysis September 19, 2003 Youssef Ismail.
Redesign of the STOL CH 701 Landing Gear Strut
NSTXU-CALC Vessel Port Rework for NB and Thomson Scattering
Sag of ZTF components Callahan 9/4/2014. Corrector Trim Plate analysis.
 Force Due to Gravity. What’s the difference between Mass and Weight?  Mass (m) is the amount of material an object is made from. Also, mass is the.
Gravity and Free Fall.  Gravity - attraction between objects with mass  Gives weight  Causes free fall Gravity.
Torque Calculations with Pulleys
The center of gravity of an object is the point at which its weight can be considered to be located.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, H Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS H: Tower Shipping and Storage.
MOMENTS. If we consider a particle under the action of two equal and opposite forces: The particle will have a zero resultant, and will be in equilibrium.
Finite Element Analysis of the18 Turn Beam H. F. Fan November 5, 2004.
TVAC Trolley Design Review1 GLAST LAT Project8 September 2005 TVAC Trolley Design Status Review 8 September 2005 TVAC Trolley Design Status Review 8 September.
Learning Target 5 → Free Fall: I can use the acceleration of gravity to describe and calculate an object's motion 5.1 I can describe how and why the rate.
LAT Transport Container1 GLAST LAT Project8 September 2005 LAT Transport Container Design Review 8 September 2005 LAT Transport Container Design Review.
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF CARTILAGE DEFORMATION WITH ELECTROKINETIC COUPLING  ITC Software All rights reserved.
Engineering Analysis October 23, 2006 Team Moondogs Chris Culver Rahul Kirtikar Elias Krauklis Christopher Sampson Michael Widerquist.
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
LAT Design Integration and Analysis1 GLAST LAT Project24 May 2005 LAT Monthly Status Review 24 May 2005 Design Integration and Analysis LAT Monthly Status.
F = ma F = Force m = Mass a = Acceleration. The Manned Manoeuvring Unit.
LAT MPSRLAT Structural Analysis-1 GLAST LAT ProjectNov-04 Structural Analysis: Completed Tasks LAT System Level –LAT Environmental TIM Support A success.
GLAST LAT Project I&T Integration Kickoff Meeting 03/09/04 LAT I&T MGSE Page 1 of 11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I&T Integration Kickoff Meeting MGSE March.
EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED D. ALVAREZ FEITO J.C. BATISTA LOPES C. BAULT O. BELTRAMELLO A.CATINACCIO.
Probability of ship fracture John Kent Contents 1What is brittle fracture 2Material fracture toughness 3Calculation overview 4Results.
The Hoover - USA. The Three Gorges - China Thrust on an immersed plane surface P5calculate the resultant thrust and overturning moment on a vertical.
Understand the principles of statics Graphical vectors Triangle of forces theorem Parallelogram of forces theorem Concept of equilibrium
Aim: How can we apply work- energy to motion problems? Do Now: In your own words, what does energy mean to you? In your own words, what does energy mean.
Tracker Subsystem GLAST LAT Project 1 ANNEX 1 to NCR/FM/INFN/PI/372 STATIC TEST TORQUE LOSS OUT OF SPEC’S ON BOTTOM TRAY S/N 005 Andrea Tenze
Gravity and Free Fall.
End of Line “Pass Through” Conveyor
Question 3 A car of mass 800kg is capable of reaching a speed of 20m/s from rest in 36s. Work out the force needed to produce this acceleration. m = 800kg v.
Work, Power Problems Answers
Platform for Target Spectrometer using linear montion drive Rexroth
Mass vs. Weight.
Work Whoa!!! Now I do!!!  I just don’t have any energy 
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
How to calculate the torque due to the balance stick
Stress Analysis of Universal Tilt Kit Attachment Points
Newton’s Second Law How does mass affect acceleration? 2.How does mass
Gravity.
Work notes: In science, ‘work’ has a specific meaning
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Welding Jig Redesign CATIA Project
Evaluation of shell thicknesses Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,
Math – Work.
Vectors and Free Body Diagrams
Shipping Support Post Review
Presentation transcript:

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Tracker Inner Shipping Container Analysis and Test Results Tracker Inner Shipping Container Analysis and Test Results August 20, 2003 Michael Opie

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Side Drop Qualification and Vertical Lift Proof Test Loads Qualification for side loading due to side drop at 17.6 g Proof test for vertical lift load at 2g

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Side Drop Load

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Vertical Drop Load

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Side Drop Load Simulation Qualification for side loading associated with side drop at 17.6 g 9475 N (2130 lbf)

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Side Drop Load Simulation Loading Procedure 7901 N (1776 lbf)9475 N (2130 lbf) Load up to 7901 N without support at the end. Continue loading up to 9475 N with support at the end.

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Test predictions: FEM Mesh Node Node Node 90000

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Test predictions: Von Mises Stress Stress for load case 2Stress for load case 1 MS = 276/1.4/ = 3.82MS = 276/1.4/ = 4.42

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Test predictions: Applied Loads

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Test predictions: Applied Loads –Load 1 is applied as an enforced displacement. This produces a force of 7901 N at the center of the container (node 70000) a moment of 2917 N-m at the support (node 90000). –Load 2 is applied as a force of 1728 N at the free end of the container. This increases the load at the center to 9474 N but reduces the moment at the support to 2238 N-m. –These are thus the required load combinations to produce a moment of 2239 N-m at the support, 639 N-m at the center.

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Margins of Safety – Side Load LC 1

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Margins of Safety – Side Load LC 2

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Vertical Lift Load Proof Test The following calculation shows the amount of weight that needs to be added for the proof load of the tracker shipping container vertical lift. Mass of TKR and Base Plate = (31.8 kg kg)*1.10 = 41 kg Mass of Ship Container and Cable Hold. Plate = (27.9 kg kg)*1.10 = 34 kg Additional Mass for 2g lift = 2*(41 kg) + 34 kg = 116 kg = 256 lbf So we need to add an additional 256 lbf for the vertical proof load. Procedure Add 256 lbf (1139 N) of ballast. Perform 4 point lift from corners. Perform 1 point lift from center.

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Test predictions: Vertical Lift FEM Mesh

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Test predictions: Vertical Lift Von Mises Stress Stress for vertical load case 2Stress for vertical load case 1 MS = 276/1.4/ = 10.9MS = 276/1.4/ = 8.48

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Margins of Safety – Vertical Lift LC 1

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Margins of Safety – Vertical Lift LC 2

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Calculations Showing Helicoil Capability

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Minimum Margin of Safety Summary

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Side Load Test Results Test equipment weighed 130 lbf. So the target loads where reduced to the following: Load Case 1 = 1646 lbf (7322 N) Load Case 2 = 2000 lbf (8896 N) Actual loads achieved during test where: Load Case 1 = 1725 lbf (7673 N) Load Case 2 = 2150 lbf (9564 N) The test resulted in no anomalies. Test deemed successful.

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Cable Holding Plate Mounted to Test Fixture

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Displacement Gage to Indicate Slip Relative to Test Fixture

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Set-up for Side Load Case 1

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Application of Force via Turn-buckle for Side Load Case 1

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project View from Top

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Application of Force via Hydraulic Lift for Side Load Case 2

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Vertical Lift Load Test Results Actual added mass simulator load was 260 lbf (1157 N) versus required 256 lbf (1139 N). The test resulted in no anomalies. Test deemed successful.

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Proof Test for Vertical Lift Load Case 1

LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project Proof Test for Vertical Lift Load Case 1