A Survey on Wireless Mesh Networks IAN F. AKYILDIZ, GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY XUDONG WANG, KIYON, INC. IEEE Radio Communications September 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cross-layer Design in Wireless Mesh Networks Hu Wenjie Computer Network and Protocol Testing Laboratory, Dept. of Computer Science & Technology, Tsinghua.
Advertisements

CSE 6590 Department of Computer Science & Engineering York University 1 Introduction to Wireless Ad-hoc Networking 5/4/2015 2:17 PM.
Fault Tolerant Routing in Tri-Sector Wireless Cellular Mesh Networks Yasir Drabu and Hassan Peyravi Kent State University Kent, OH
Priority Queuing Achieving Flow ‘Fairness’ in Wireless Networks Thomas Shen Prof. K.C. Wang SURE 2005.
Multicasting in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (MANET)
Wireless Mesh Networks 1. Architecture 2 Wireless Mesh Network A wireless mesh network (WMN) is a multi-hop wireless network that consists of mesh clients.
Arsitektur Jaringan Terkini
Web Caching Schemes1 A Survey of Web Caching Schemes for the Internet Jia Wang.
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Wireless Mesh Networks Neil Tang 1/26/2009.
A Survey on Wireless Mesh Networks Sih-Han Chen 陳思翰 Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Taipei University of Technology.
A Survey on Sensor Networks Rick Han CSCI 7143 Secure Sensor Networks Fall 2004.
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Cognitive Radio Networks Neil Tang 1/28/2009.
SUMMARY COMMENTS ON SENSOR NETWORKS Ian F. Akyildiz Broadband & Wireless Networking Laboratory School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute.
Wireless Mesh Networks I. F. Akyildiz, et. al
Members Suman Raj Adhikari Saroj Raj Regmi
Wireless Mesh Networks
Wireless Mesh Networks The notes of this talk are excerpted from the lecture notes by Prof. Akyildiz at Georgia Institute of Technology By Cunqing Hua.
Wireless MESH network Tami Alghamdi. Mesh Architecture – Mesh access points (MAPs). – Mesh clients. – Mesh points (MPs) – MP uses its Wi-Fi interface.
NAME: NASIRAHMADPROGRAM: B.S TELECOMSEMESTER: 7THREG#: SU/ PRESENTED TO: ENGR. GUL ZAMEEN KHANDATE: UNIVERSITY: SARHAD UNIVERSITY.
Mehmet C. Vuran Vehbi C. Gungor Özgür B. Akan School of Electrical & Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA {mcvuran,
COGNITIVE RADIO FOR NEXT-GENERATION WIRELESS NETWORKS: AN APPROACH TO OPPORTUNISTIC CHANNEL SELECTION IN IEEE BASED WIRELESS MESH Dusit Niyato,
WIRELESS MESH NETWORKS Ian F. AKYILDIZ* and Xudong WANG** * Georgia Institute of Technology BWN (Broadband Wireless Networking) Lab ** TeraNovi Tachnologies.
Doc.: IEEE /216 SubmissionPeter Stanforth, Vann Hasty, MeshNetworks Self Forming Self Healing Networks Peter Stanforth & Vann Hasty MeshNetworks.
Capacity Scaling with Multiple Radios and Multiple Channels in Wireless Mesh Networks Oguz GOKER.
Architecture and Algorithms for an IEEE based Multi-channel Wireless Mesh Network Ashish Raniwala, Tzi-cker Chiueh Stony Brook University Infocom2005.
Wireless Mesh Networks Myungchul Kim
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) Izzeldin Shibeika – April, UNCC -
Jason Ernst and Mieso Denko
BEYOND OFDM A Systems Approach to Non-Line-of-Sight Fixed Wireless Rajeev Krishnamoorthy Broadband World Wireless Forum, San Francisco, CA February 19,
Cross Layer Design (CLD) for Wireless Networks. Future Wireless Systems Nth Generation Cellular Wireless Internet Access Wireless Video/Music Wireless.
KAIS T CS712 병렬처리 특강 - 차세대 무선네트워크 응용 및 보안 - Syllabus Network & Security Lab.
A novel approach of gateway selection and placement in cellular Wi-Fi system Presented By Rajesh Prasad.
Gürkan RAKANOĞLU. Outline Overview of Wireless Mesh Networks Video Streaming over Wireless Networks Applications of Video over Wireless Networks.
Wireless Mesh Network 指導教授:吳和庭教授、柯開維教授 報告:江昀庭 Source reference: Akyildiz, I.F. and Xudong Wang “A survey on wireless mesh networks” IEEE Communications.
1 Mobile ad hoc networking with a view of 4G wireless: Imperatives and challenges Myungchul Kim Tel:
From “input” to “parameter”: The Topology Dichotomy in the Future Wireless Internet NSF FIND Mobility Workshop, Sep. 27, 2007 Ram Ramanathan BBN Technologies.
COST289 14th MCM Towards Cognitive Communications 13 April Towards Cognitive Communications A COST Action Proposal Mehmet Safak.
Cognitive Radio Networks
Overview of Research Activities Aylin Yener
Jason Ernst, University of Guelph 1.  Introduction ◦ Background Information ◦ Motivation for Research / Current Problems  Proposed Solution ◦ Algorithm.
Ch 11. Multiple Antenna Techniques for WMNs Myungchul Kim
CROSS-LAYER OPTIMIZATION PRESENTED BY M RAHMAN ID:
5 SECTION A 1 Network Building Blocks  Network Classifications  LAN Standards  Network Devices  Clients, Servers, and Peers  Physical Topology  Network.
ECE External Research Board Meeting Wireless Network and Communications Tan F. Wong Wireless Information and Networking Group
1 Exploiting Diversity in Wireless Networks Nitin H. Vaidya University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presentation at Mesh.
An Efficient Wireless Mesh Network A New Architecture 指導教授:許子衡 教授 學生:王志嘉.
Doc.: IEEE 11-04/0319r0 Submission March 2004 W. Steven Conner, Intel Corporation Slide 1 Architectural Considerations and Requirements for ESS.
Dipankar Raychaudhuri, Joseph B. Evans, Srinivasan Seshan Sin-choo Kim
Ch 10. Multimedia Communications over WMNs Myungchul Kim
Wireless Mesh Networks Myungchul Kim
Improving the scalability of MAC protocols in Wireless Mesh Networks Mthulisi Velempini (Mr.)
Why PHY Really Matters Hari Balakrishnan MIT CSAIL August 2007 Joint work with Kyle Jamieson and Ramki Gummadi.
Ch 10. Multimedia Communications over WMNs Myungchul Kim
Glenn Research Center Satellite Networks & Architectures Branch Communications Technology Division IEEE Aerospace Conference March Architecture.
INTRODUCTION:- The approaching 4G (fourth generation) mobile communication systems are projected to solve still-remaining problems of 3G (third generation)
© Saravanan Kandasamy, Ricardo Morla, and Manuel Ricardo,INESC Porto 1 Improving the Performance of IEEE802.11s Networks using Directional Antennas over.
Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges Ian. F. Akyildiz, Ismail H. Kasimoglu
-1/16- Maximum Battery Life Routing to Support Ubiquitous Mobile Computing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks C.-K. Toh, Georgia Institute of Technology IEEE.
1 Wireless Networks Lecture 31 Wireless Mesh Networks Dr. Ghalib A. Shah.
Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E. Cayirci.
System Architecture for C2C Communications Based on Mobile WiMAX Michiyo ASHIDA VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Seminar on Wireless Mesh Networking Presented By: Mankiran Kaur ( ) M.Tech(C.S.E)
1 Wireless Networks Lecture 32 Wireless Mesh Networks Part II Dr. Ghalib A. Shah.
Introduction to SkyPilot Networks November 2005
IMPROVING OF WIRELESS MESH NETWORKS.
Mobile and Pervasive Computing – 10 Wireless Mesh Networks
Multi-channel, multi-radio wireless networks
Issues in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks
Xiuzhen Cheng Csci332 MAS Networks – Challenges and State-of-the-Art Research – Wireless Mesh Networks Xiuzhen Cheng
Presentation transcript:

A Survey on Wireless Mesh Networks IAN F. AKYILDIZ, GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY XUDONG WANG, KIYON, INC. IEEE Radio Communications September 2005

2 Contents Abstract Introduction Network Architectures Critical Design Factors Network Capacity Layered Communication  PHY  MAC  Routing  Transport  Cross Layer Design

3 Abstract Wireless mesh networks (WMNs)  A key technology for next-generation wireless networking Advantages over other wireless networks Rapid progress and inspiring numerous applications  Many technical issues exist

4 Introduction WMNs  Self-organize  Self-configure  Automatically establishing an ad hoc network  Maintaining the mesh connectivity WMNs are comprised of 2 types of nodes  Mesh routers  Mesh clients

5 Introduction Mesh router  Additional routing functions Support mesh networking  Lower transmission power Same coverage multi-hop communications  Same or different wireless access technologies Usually equipped with multiple wireless interfaces  Minimal mobility  Mesh backbone for mesh clients  Integration various other networks Gateway/bridge functionalities

6 Introduction Mesh client  Hardware platform & software simpler  light-weight Communication protocols  Only a single wireless interface is needed WMNs capabilities of ad-hoc networks  Low up-front cost  Easy network maintenance  Robustness  Reliable service coverage

7 Network Architecture 1. Infrastructure/Backbone WMNs

8 Network Architecture 1. Infrastructure/Backbone WMNs  Mesh routers for clients  Using various types of radio technologies  Connected to the Internet  Conventional clients with an Ethernet interface can be connected to mesh routers via Ethernet links  Same radio technologies (clients, routers) -> Directly communicate with mesh routers  Different radio technologies (clients, routers) -> Clients communicate with their BS

9 Network Architecture 2. Client WMNs  Peer-to-peer networks among client devices  Mesh router is not required  Using one type of radios on devices Same as a conventional ad hoc network

10 Network Architecture 3. Hybrid WMNs  Combination of infrastructure and client meshing  Clients can access the network through mesh routers

11 Network Architecture The characteristics of WMNs  Support ad hoc networking  Capability of self-forming, self-healing, self-organization  Multi-hop wireless networks  Decreases the load (mesh clients, other end nodes) Mesh routers have minimal mobility Dedicated routing and configuration  Mobility of end nodes is supported  Mesh routers integrate heterogeneous networks  Different Power-consumption constraints mesh routers, clients  Need compatibility, interoperability

12 Critical Design Factors 1. Radio Techniques.  Increase capacity, flexibility approaches Directional & smart antennas Multiple input multiple output (MIMO) systems Multi-radio/multi-channel systems  Advanced radio technologies Reconfigurable radios Frequency agile/cognitive radios Software radios Need design with higher-layer protocols  MAC and routing protocol

13 Critical Design Factors 2. Scalability  Without support Scalability Network performance degrades as the network size increases. Example  Routing protocols  can’t find a reliable routing path  Transport protocols  loose connections  MAC protocols  significant throughput reduction  Ensure the scalability  All protocols need to be scalable

14 Critical Design Factors 3. Mesh Connectivity  Many advantages of WMNs  Ensure reliable mesh connectivity Require Network self-organization & topology control algorithms  Topology-aware MAC & routing protocols Improve performance 4. Broadband and QoS  Applications Broadband services & Heterogeneous QoS requirements  Protocol consider End-to-end transmission delay, fairness, delay jitter, aggregate and per-node through-put, and packet loss ratios

15 Critical Design Factors 5. Security  Security schemes are still not fully applicable 6. Ease of Use  Enable the network to be as autonomous as possible Consider Protocols designed  Require network management tools Maintain the operation, monitor the performance, configure the parameters 7. Compatibility & Inter-operability  Require backward compatible

16 Network Capacity Researchs  Using the similarities between WMNs and ad hoc networks  Limitation Do not consider different medium access control, power control, routing protocols New analytical results need!

Layered Communication Protocol for WMNs 17

18 Layered Communication Protocols - Physical Layer Advanced Physical-Layer Techniques  Multiple transmission rates Different modulation & Coding rates Combination  Link adaptation  Adaptive error resilience  high-speed transmissions OFDM UWB techniques  Increase capacity & mitigate the impairment Antenna diversity Smart antenna MIMO systems

19 Layered Communication Protocols - Physical Layer  Software radio platform Programmable Channel access modes, Channel modulations Not a mature technology yet Open Research Issues.  Complexity of OFDM, UWB and cost  Best utilize Higher-layer protocols, MAC protocols need to work interactively with the physical layer

20 Layered Communication Protocols - MAC Layer MAC Differences (WMNs, classical wireless networks)  Concerned with more than one-hop communication  Distributed MAC  Needs to be collaborative  Works for multipoint-to-multipoint communication  Network self-organization is needed for better collaboration  Low Mobility

21 Layered Communication Protocols - MAC Layer Single-channel MAC  Modifying Existing MAC Protocols Adjusting parameters of CSMA/CA Cannot reduce the probability of contentions  Cross-layer Design Directional antenna-based MACs  Eliminates exposed nodes  Directional transmission -> More hidden nodes produce  Difficulties -> Cost, system complexity, practicality of fast steerable directional antennas

22 Layered Communication Protocols - MAC Layer MACs with power control.  Reduces exposed nodes, especially in a dense network  Low transmission power  Improve the spectrum spatial reuse factor  Lower transmission power  Reduce the possibility of detecting a potential interfering node  Hidden nodes issue become worse  Proposing Innovative MAC Protocols. Poor scalability in a multi-hop network  CSMA/CA are not an efficient solution  Revisiting the design of MAC protocols based on TDMA or CDMA is indispensable Problems  Complexity & Cost  Compatibility of TDMA (or CDMA) MAC with existing MAC protocols.

23 Layered Communication Protocols - MAC Layer Multi-Channel MAC.  Multi-Channel Single-Transceiver MAC Low cost & compatibility  One transceiver on a radio Only one transceiver is available  Only one channel is active at a time in each network node  Multi-Channel Multi-Transceiver MAC Multiple parallel RF front-end chips & baseband processing modules  Support several simultaneous channels

24 Layered Communication Protocols - MAC Layer Open Research Issues  Scalable MAC  MAC/Physical Cross-Layer Design  Network Integration in the MAC Layer

25 Layered Communication Protocols - Routing Layer Optimal routing protocol for WMNs  Multiple Performance Metrics Minimum hop-count  ineffective  Scalability Setting up or maintaining a routing path take a long time  Critical to scalability routing protocol  Robustness Robust to link failures or congestion Perform load balancing  Efficient Routing with Mesh Infrastructure Minimal mobility and no power consumption constraints  Simpler routing protocols

26 Layered Communication Protocols - Routing Layer Open Research Issues  Scalability  Better Performance Metrics New performance metrics need to be developed  Routing/MAC Cross-Layer Design Interact with the MAC layer in order to improve performance  Efficient Mesh Routing Much simpler and more efficient routing protocol need

27 Layered Communication Protocols - Transport Layer Reliable Data Transport  TCP variants Non-Congestion Packet Loss  Classical TCPs do not differentiate congestion & non-congestion losses Unknown Link Failure  Wireless channels & mobility  link failure happen  To enhance TCP performance, link failure needs to be detected Network Asymmetry Large RTT Variations  Mobility  Large RTT variations  Degrade the TCP performance

28 Layered Communication Protocols - Transport Layer  New transport protocols Better performance than the TCP variants Integrated many other wireless networks  transport protocols need to be compatible with TCPs  New transport protocols is not compatible Real-Time Delivery  Require Rate control protocol (RCP) To support end-to-end delivery of realtime traffic Work with UDP  No schemes are available

29 Layered Communication Protocols - Transport Layer Open Research Issues  Reliable Data Transport Cross-layer Solution to Network Asymmetry  All problems of TCP performance degradation are actually related to protocols in the lower layers Adaptive TCP  Integrating various wireless network  compatible is important  adaptive TCP  Real-time transport Entirely new RCPs need

30 Layered Communication Protocols - Cross Layer Design Approachs  1.Taking into account parameters in other protocol layers keeps the transparency between protocol layers  2.To merge several protocols into one component achieve much better performance through closer interaction between protocols Cross-layer designs risks  Protocol-layer abstraction loss  Incompatibility with existing protocols  Unforeseen impact on the future design  Difficulty in maintenance and management