IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February 2010 o IBL Status, TDR & MOU ATLAS Week CERN, February 26, 2010 G. Darbo - INFN / Genova Indico agenda page:

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Talk Overview Update on technical progress in the IBL FE-I4: November readiness review, next submission. Stave: December review, baseline Sensor prototype program R/O: towards a baseline Schedule Chamonix impact on schedule TDR and interim-MoU

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Project Goals Improve Physics performance of the present Pixel Detector: Reduce material budget to an “aggressive” 50% of B-Layer, i.e. <1.5 X/X 0 at η=0 Have low R/O inefficiencies at LHC ultimate luminosity and above (2.3x10 34 ÷ 3x10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) Increase radiation hardness by a factor five: 5x MeV neutrons/cm 2 Back-up existing tracking system in case of serious failure of the B-layer Keep installation schedule for end of 2015 Insurance for hard failures of existing B-Layer and Pixel system Need a long LHC shutdown (8 months): no long term plans after 2012, but machine needs many shutdowns for the long list of upgrades to bring to the nominal and ultimate luminosity (phase I). Work for a safe procedure to extract beam-pipe and insert IBL: Damage could result in a downgrade more than an upgrade! Let’s go through the major IBL Technical progresses

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Sensors - Convergence 3 sensor technologies considered for IBL Planar, 3D and Diamonds Full scale prototypes with FE-I4 – Decision on spring 2010 Common agreed specifications: Max fluence > 5 x MeV neutrons / cm 2 Max power after full life dose < 200 mW/cm 2 Low dead area in Z: slim or active edge Maximum bias voltage (system issue) : 1000 V Planar promising slim edge Hamamatsu has shown <500µm edge can stand ~1000 V (on b-type at moment) – one or two guard-rings Diamonds: new producer – very promising results. “II-IV Incorporated”: measured very promising Charge Collection Distance (CCD) of V/µm (not saturated) on 4 FE-I4 size sensors from a 1.5 mm thick wafer (standard production, not designed for HEP). II-IV Incorporated 4 FE-I4 size sensors Ref: M. Mikuž– IBL GM 12/2/2010

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February D Sensor – Common Floorplan The 4 producer facilities work on a common floorplan for FE-I4: 150 wafers (same raw material bought in common), double side and single side (active edge). Sharing process steps (wafer bonding, poly-silicon column filling). Processing runs starting now, expected (plenty of) sensors by summer. Producers 8 x FE-I4 Ref: C. Da Vià – IBL GM 12/2/2010

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February FE-I3  FE-I4 FE-I4 Collaboration: Bonn: D. Arutinov, M. Barbero, T. Hemperek, A. Kruth, M. Karagounis. CPPM: D. Fougeron, M. Menouni. Genova: R. Beccherle, G. Darbo. LBNL: S. Dube, D. Elledge, M. Garcia- Sciveres, D. Gnani, A. Mekkaoui. Nikhef: V. Gromov, R. Kluit, J.D. Schipper The first version of full FE-I4 chip will be submitted by end of March 2010 ~70 million transistors, 0.13 µm CMOS technology 6 Cu and 2 Al routing layers. 7.6mm 8mmactive 2.8mm FE-I3 74% 20.2mm active 16.8mm ~2mm ~200 μ m FE-I4 ~89% Chartered reticule (24 x 32) IBM reticule ~19 mm FE-I3FE-I4 Pixel size [µm 2 ]50x40050x250 Pixel array18x16080x336 Chip size [mm 2 ]7.6x x19.0 Active fraction74%89% Analog current [µA/pix]2610 Digital current [µA/pix]1710 Analog Voltage [V] Digital Voltage [V] Pseudo-LVDS out [Mb/s]40160

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February FE-I4: Submission Status Second FE-I4 review (Nov 3÷4) Review board: F. Anghinolfi/CERN, R. Van Berg/U Penn, K. Einsweiler/LBNL, Ph. Farthouat/CERN, A. Grillo/UCSC, K. Kloukinas/CERN. X. Llopart/CERN, M. Newcomer/U Penn. I. Peric/Heidelberg. N. Spencer/UCSC. The review agenda with documentation and reviewer’s report (ATU-TC-MR-0002) are available at: Report Summary: The second design review of the FEI4 was held on 3 and 4 November This report gives remarks and recommendations to the design team. Progress is excellent, but it is recommended to hold a brief final design review before the actual submission takes place. Next steps: March 17 (or 16 or 18 still TBD): sign off meeting with review committee March 24: Final meeting – Probably engineer’s final sign-off. March 29:submission

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February BOC/ROD Convergence in the VME BOC/ROD to a common design (Bologna, Genova, Göttingen, LBNL, Heidelberg, Wuppertal): workshop at CERN in Feb. Reduce overall design to 3 FPGA: one with a PowerPC core to replace master DSP functionality. Move functionality from the 4 slave DSP (for parameter fitting made during calibration) to external (standard) PCs: transfer raw histograms by Gbit ethernet for fittings in the PCs: a today PC core has an equivalent processing power of ~10 DSP of the existing ROD. The modernized VME system has advantage in performance (speed and double channel density) and simplified design (less components and unique software framework to design FPGA with embedded PowerPC) Already some work done in porting DSP code to standard PC and compiling the multi FPGA VHDL code into a single device. Alternative option (SLAC) considers ACTA (Advanced Computer Telecommunication Architecture) technology (SLAC. Stony Brook) Use the ACTA standard instead of VME Other components in the standard ATLAS TDAQ need to be modified in hardware and software (no TIM, no SBC). Development system in place at CERN with a prototype board to read FE-I3 module.

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Stave: Review and Baseline Stave review hold on Dec.17: Reviewers: F. Cadoux, A. Catinaccio, M. Gilchriese, T. Jones, G. Viehhauser Two main recommendations: Coolant and cooling pipe/fittings Coolant: “Adopt CO 2 cooling as the baseline for the IBL. The cooling plant should be a copy of the LHCb VELO plant, with minimal modifications to adapt the system to the ATLAS geometry.” Pipe: Adopt metal cooling pipes as the baseline for the IBL. Significant efforts have already been invested in Titanium pipes, but more R&D is required for this technology (bending, connections etc.). Decision from IBL Management and TC IBL management and Institutes (D, F, I, CERN) participating in the Stave project fully support the two recommendations. R&D and prototyping on C 3 F 8 and Carbon Fiber pipes continue, but priority is given to baseline: CO 2 and titanium pipes. From ATLAS TC side CO 2 cooling plant and services are accepted. For maintenance and operation the IBL CO 2 plant can be incorporated in the ATLAS cooling (similar to the other plants that exist already). There is no obvious show stopper to the installation of plant and services. There are no safety concerns given the very small number of pipes and very small quantity of CO 2 (20g/s).

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Stave Prototype Options STAVE CARACTERISTICSSIMULATION RESULTS Pipe ID/OD [mm] Omega Thickness [µm] Foam Density [g/cm 3 ] CoolantX/X 0 [%]Thermal Figure of Merit (Γ) [ºCcm 2 /W] Bare Stave with Coolant Full layer (+ Module + Flex) CF pipe, heavy foam 2.4 / C3F8C3F CF pipe, light foam 2.4 / CO Ti 3mm pipe, light foam 2.8 / C3F8C3F Ti 2mm pipe, light foam 2.0 / CO / Module parameters Sensor thickness = 250 µm FE-I4 thickness = 90 µm Flex Hybrid (η = 0) = 0.18 % of X 0 Additional technical requirements & prototype work: Max pressure of cooling pipe: 100 bar. Gravitational / thermal deformation < 150 µm. Develop pipe joints and fittings. Isolation of the carbon foam from sensor high voltage. Mock-up for thermal measurements. Carbon Foam 0.25g/cm 3

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February IBL Layout Baseline layout decided 14 Staves, “reverse turbine” (there were two main options in Barcelona) Beam-pipe reduction: Inner R: 29  25 mm Very tight clearance: “Hermetic” to straight tracks in Φ (1.8º overlap) No overlap in Z: minimize gap between sensor active area. Layout parameters: IBL envelope: 9 mm in R 14 staves. = 33 mm. Z = 60 cm (active length). η = 2.5 coverage.

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Extraction/Insertion Progresses on many areas: Installation mock-up (Geneva) in bld 180 Extraction/Insertion “table” (CERN/LPSC Grenoble) Guiding tube (Brandeis) Beam-pipe flanges IBL Envelopes ALARA Installation Mock-up in bld.180

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Guiding Tube To extract beam pipe and insert IBL use a “Guiding Tube” Gravity sag of a simple unloaded 7 m-long tube (40 mm) is not acceptable Working Model of the Long Guide Tube (Brandeis Un.) – Used by the muons Extruded tube with hole for tension rod and guide for RASNIK inserts. Preformed so that it “falls” into a straight tube when unloaded. Additional instrumentation: temperature sensors and load cells. Control system to adjusted tensions based on RASNIK readings as load changes. Internal sensors include 4 overlapping RASNIKs and temperature sensor. Ref: J. Bensinger – IBL GM 12/2/2010

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Other Areas of Activity Most of the project is covered and many design, prototype work ongoing FE-I4 single module test system (Bonn, Göttingen) Bump-bonding (Barcelona, Bonn, Milano) Prototyping with dummies at IZM and Selex Flex-hybrid: (Bonn, Genova) Multi-layer Cu/Al and stackable single layer/single module technology test prototypes. Internal services and data transmission (SLAC) Opto-link, opto-boxes (Ohio SU, Oklahoma and Oklahoma SU) LV PP2 (Milano), DCS (Wuppertal) Module loading (Geneva, Marseille) Test beam, telescope,…

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Software Simulation Software simulation work ongoing: IBL Geometry implemented in the ATLAS ATHENA/GEANT4 framework Digitization for planar and 3D sensors Preliminary results with single track ttbar (and other physics) benchmark results ready (in discussion) In a few week expected to have results of physics performance. ATLAS no IBL d 0 for 1GeV muons z 0 for 1GeV muons ATLAS no IBL ATLAS with IBL Disclaimer: plot below to show that the full machinery works… under discussion - need to be validated! Ref: D. Tsybychev et al.

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February IBL Schedule & Milestones Major milestones: FE-I4.v1 submission: end of March 2010 Dummy-sensor bump-bonding prototyping: from now to ~Nov 2010 Start bump bonding 1 st batch of sensors & chips: August 2010 First modules available: October 2010 Sensor decision: in Jan 2011 or May 2011 Submission of FE-I4.v2: March 2010: (is optimistic?! given the complexity of the chip and the measurements on version 1) Sign-off on stave design and release production: Oct 2011 Loaded Staves completed: end 2013 Service installation in the pit 2012 Integration first half 2014 Installation earliest: end 2014 Ref: H. Pernegger – IBL GM 12/2/2010

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February IBL Technical Design Report Editors: M.Capeans (CERN), K. Einsweiler (LBNL) Chapter Editors: G.Darbo, T.Flick, M.Garcia-Sciveres, C.Gemme, H.Pernegger, O.Rohne, R.Vuillermet and quite many Contributors to different chapters: A.Andreazza, O.Beltramello, A.Catinaccio, I.Dawson, D.Ferrere, KK.Gan, D.Giugni, Y.Gousakov, N.Hartman, I.Hinchliffe, F. Huegging, S.Kersten, N.Massol, P.Morettini, D.Muenstermann, L.Nicolas, M.Raymond, S.Rozanov, D.Su, W.Trischuk, C.da Via, E.Vigeolas and S.Wenig Chapters’ Structure: 1.Overview – IBL history, lifetime and failure issues, requirements, physics 2.Modules – sensors (3 technologies), FE electronics, integration (bump-bonding, “mini- Flex”) 3.Staves - mechanical concept for the stave, module loading, cooling and thermal issues, electrical integration, internal services 4.Integration - mounting staves with beampipe, services integration, final surface testing 5.Control, Readout, and Integration - power supplies, opto-links, off-detector readout electronics, external services, cooling plant, DCS, integration with the present detector DAQ/DCS 6.Installation – beampipe extraction, mock-up, IBL transport and installation, connection and testing 7.Commissioning – calibration, early data-taking plan with random triggers, charge injection, cosmic ray data-taking 8.Prototyping, Production Testing, System Testing 9.Critical Integration Issues – cooling, bakeout, powering, material budget… 10.Project Management and Organization © M.Capeans, K.Einsweiler – Feb 2010

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February M.Capeans, K.Einsweiler - Feb 2010 © M.Capeans, K.Einsweiler

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February IBL TDR, Status and Outlook Excellent technical progress in the project overall Fairly complete internal draft ready About 160 pages available at Reviewed by a team of experts till March 21 st : A.Andreazza, A.Catinaccio, A.Clarck, N.Hessey, L.Rossi, S.Stapnes, G.Viehhauser, N.Wermes Expect to distribute a complete first draft to the IBL collaboration by end of April 2010; two iterations foreseen This could allow submission of the IBL TDR to the LHCC in June 2010 © M.Capeans, K.Einsweiler – Feb 2010

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Memorandum of Understanding IBL MoU: Between The ATLAS COLLABORATION, and Funding Agency/Institution of the ATLAS Collaboration (for the ATLAS construction was between Institutes and CERN) Decided to go to an interim-MoU: Decision on sensor technology (early 2011) Consolidate interest of Institutes and availability of funds Draft i-MoU Document body: “Political & Binding rules” In discussion with NCP’s “Annexes”: Project divided into “11 MoU Items”: share of contribution in cost and manpower/responsibilities. Table filled following “item by item” discussion with interested institutes (Institute Leaders or their Proxies) Common discussion in the Pixel Extended IB on March 1st …

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February i-MoU Annex 1: Items (Sensor Example)

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Annex 4: Tentative Contribution to IBL Note: the numbers in the table "are not final, nor are the suggested financial contributions yet firm, but are meant for a common overall discussion.” Technology options refer to supplementary costs that are sensor technology specific and will be known before the definite MoU takes effect.

IBL Status, TDR & MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova ATLAS Week, 26 February Conclusion IBL Project well advancing Most of it covered with design and prototype work TDR Big progress, little delay (~2 months) Memorandum of Understanding In discussion, first Pixel Extended IB next Monday to discuss MoU IBL Collaboration very motivated: a lot of high quality work!