Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 (12.0.6.1) p3, p4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SU1 sample 176 k events Athena Full Reconstruction.
Advertisements

J. Nielsen1 Measuring Trigger Efficiency Important component of cross section measurement: it is NOT in general 1.0! Need to measure this from data because.
QCD Background… and the Resolution Saminder Dhaliwal August 30 th 2005.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka (University of Tokyo) page 1 11 Sep 2007.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
Top Physics Validation: Reconstruction, Simulation and Bytestream Paul S Miyagawa The University of Manchester.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 21 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 21 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
1 Measuring the Top Quark Cross Section in the Semileptonic Channel Andrea Bangert.
1 W’  tb  lnubb: the first read. 2 introduction sample: W’  tb  lnubb generator: PYTHIA number of events: 5000 will only use events in the good run.
1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 9 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 9 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.
Alpgen MC Samples Jet Flavour Identifier Lepton ID Plots.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Taikan Suehara et al., TILC09 in Tsukuba, 2009/04/18 page 1 Tau and SUSY study in ILD Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo Jenny List, Daniela Kaefer.
Tth study Lepton ID with BDT 2015/02/27 Yuji Sudo Kyushu University 1.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
W/Z+Jets production studies in ATLAS
1 Pythia versus Alpgen for W+jets (High Mass Dibosons work) Sarah Allwood 07/12/06.
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
28/4/2006Chris Collins-Tooth tth, (h → bb) with EventViews Chris Collins-Tooth, Christian Shaw 03-May-2006.
VBF H- > ττ- > lept had Electron Channel Jaspreet Sidhu ATLAS Toronto meeting
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
C.Clement Eta RegionTraining regionVariable set |  |
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Ivo van Vulpen Summary ATLAS Trigger and Physics week November 2006
OverView Rel.16 SM D3PD skimmed(130GB) for local use with custom di-lep filters requiring at least ONE pair out of e/e, e/μ, μ/μ leptons which satisfying.
Electron Identification Efficiency from Z→ee Maria Fiascaris University of Oxford In collaboration with Tony Weidberg and Lucia di Ciaccio ATLAS UK SM.
Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.
Search for the Higgs in ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
VBF H- > ττ- > lept had Electron Channel Analysis Jaspreet Sidhu
Photon Reconstruction Efficiencies in Higgs → γγ Events Neil Cooper-Smith RHUL ATLAS UK Higgs Meeting - Durham 11/01/07.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Estimating the isolated lepton rate in multi-jet events Manuel & Alexander Ivo, Stan, Martijn, Auke, Els et al.
2nd lepton veto, in the one-lepton SUSY analysis
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
CDS comments on supporting note
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Electron Identification Based on Boosted Decision Trees
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
tt+jets simulation comparisons
Fake Jet Rejection: Sum Jt
semileptonic ttbar + jet events
tth, (h→bb) with EventViews
ttbar + jets AOD analysis
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Samples and MC Selection
Higgs  update Catalin and Tony May 22, 2007
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4 efficiency and fake rate for T1 ( ) p5, p6 topology dependence of efficiency p7 topology dependence of fake rate p8 data samples p9 Page.1 Sep 8, 2007 Backup without isolation condition on Truth topology dependence of the fake rate

definitions of lepton for comparison Reconstructed Lepton Electron ID egamma Algorithm (not softe) isEM mask 0x3ff Isolation: ET(cone0.2) < 10GeV |eta| 20GeV Muon ID MuID Algorithm Combined Muon Track match chi2 0) Track fit chi2 / DoF < 5 Isolation: ET(cone0.2) < 10GeV |eta| 20GeV ※ in the calculation of lepton efficiency for the truth lepton (pT>20GeV), the pT threshold of the reconstructed leptons (candidates of the matching) is 15GeV considering to the resolution. Truth Lepton definition1: generator-level lepton come from SUSY, W, Z, tau definition2: leptons of def.1 and generator-level lepton come from others (such as b,c hadrons) definition3: leptons of def.2 and leptons generated by G4 with the condition Isolation: ET(cone0.2) < 10GeV |eta| 20GeV ※ in the calculation of fake lepton for the reconstructed lepton (pT>20GeV), the pT threshold of the truth leptons (candidates of the matching) is 15GeV considering to the resolution. The isolation cut is not applied on the truth lepton. Page.2 Truth Jets for the fake study Tower Clustering with cone 0.4 |eta| 20GeV overlaps to electron are removed with R=0.2

Lepton efficiency for SU3 ( ) (trig1_misal1_csc SU3_jimmy_susy.recon.AOD.v _tid006978) truth leptons(definition2) match reconstructed leptons with DR<0.02 Electron pT dep. Electron eta dep. (pT>30GeV) Muon eta dep. (pT>30GeV) Muon pT dep. 75.6±0.5% 76.6±0.5% 85.6±0.4% 85.6±0.5% ※ pT and eta are those of truth leptons Page.3

#event =49250 (197 files) #Truth Jet = (before e removal, ) Reco.Truth (def1)Truth (def2)Truth (def3) Electron(>20GeV) Muon(>20GeV) # rec. candidates (pT>15GeV) pT>20GeV |eta|<2.5 region1 (0 ~ 0.7) region2 (0.7 ~ 1.35) region3 (1.35 ~ 1.65) region4 (1.65 ~ 2.5) Electron(def1) ± ± ± ± ±1.6 Electron(def2) ± ± ± ± ±1.6 Muon(def1) ±0.4 Muon(def2) ±0.4 # truth candidates (pT>15GeV, no isol. cut) # fake leptonFake ratetau jet contribution (truth tau found in 0.4) Electron(def1) (tau: 227)2.0×10 -3 ±0.1× ×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 Electron(def2)12672 (+b,c)376 (tau: 222)1.7×10 -3 ±0.1× ×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 Electron(def3)61273 (+pi0  γγ  )318 (tau: 189)1.4×10 -3 ±0.1× ×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 Muon(def1) (tau: 3)0.37×10 -3 ±0.04×10 -3 Muon(def2)12220 (+b,c)4 (tau: 3)0.02×10 -3 ±0.01×10 -3 Muon(def3)12355 (+decays?)3 (tau: 2)0.01×10 -3 ±0.01×10 -3 fake rate ( not matched lepton / number of TruthJet ) efficiency (%) numbers of denominator numbers, efficiency, fake rate for SU3 ( ) Page.4 ※ # truth tau (hadronic decay) 7517 (pT>20GeV,|eta|<2.5) fake rate from tau hadronic decay is about 3%

Lepton efficiency for T1 (trig1_misal1_mc T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy.recon.AOD.v _tid007900) truth leptons(definition2) match reconstructed leptons with DR<0.02 Electron pT dep. Electron eta dep. (pT>30GeV) Muon eta dep. (pT>30GeV) Muon pT dep. 73.3±0.3% 74.0±0.3% 86.0±0.2% 86.0±0.3% ※ pT and eta are those of truth leptons Page.5

#event =59300 (238 files, file is 50events) #Truth Jet = (before e removal, ) Reco.Truth (def1)Truth (def2)Truth (def3) Electron(>20GeV) Muon(>20GeV) # rec. candidates (pT>15GeV) pT>20GeV |eta|<2.5 region1 (0 ~ 0.7) region2 (0.7 ~ 1.35) region3 (1.35 ~ 1.65) region4 (1.65 ~ 2.5) Electron(def1) ± ± ± ± ±0.8 Electron(def2) ± ± ± ± ±0.8 Muon(def1) ±0.2 Muon(def2) ±0.2 # truth candidates (pT>15GeV, no isol. cut) # fake leptonFake ratetau jet contribution (truth tau found in 0.4) Electron(def1) (tau: 104)2.7×10 -3 ±0.1× ×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 Electron(def2)26118 (+b,c)373 (tau: 104)1.6×10 -3 ±0.1× ×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 Electron(def3)40511 (+pi0  γγ  )322 (tau: 89)1.3×10 -3 ±0.1× ×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 Muon(def1) (tau: 1)1.7×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 Muon(def2)26501 (+b,c)2 (tau: 0)  00 / jets Muon(def3)26552 (+decays?)2 (tau: 0)  00 / jets fake rate ( not matched lepton / number of TruthJet ) efficiency (%) numbers of denominator numbers, efficiency, fake rate for T1 Page.6 ※ # truth tau (hadronic decay) 2320 (pT>20GeV,|eta|<2.5) unfortunately ΔR or eta of muon is on the threshold !

topology dependence of efficiency pT>20GeV |eta|<2.5 region1 (0 ~ 0.7) region2 (0.7 ~ 1.35) region3 (1.35 ~ 1.65) region4 (1.65 ~ 2.5) SU375.6± ± ± ± ±1.6 T173.3± ± ± ± ±0.8 Tt(lνqq)+3j74.0± ± ± ± ±2.4 Tt(lνqq)+2j73.8± ± ± ± ±1.8 Tt(lνqq)+1j73.3± ± ± ± ±2.7 Tt(lνlν)+3j74.6± ± ± ± ±1.3 W(eν)+5j67.1± ± ± ± ±2.1 pT>20GeV, |eta|<2.5 SU385.6±0.4 T186.0±0.2 Tt(lνqq)+3j85.5±0.6 Tt(lνqq)+2j86.2±0.5 Tt(lνqq)+1j85.0±1.0 Tt(lνlν)+3j84.8±0.4 W(μν)+5j86.7±0.7 Electron efficiency (definition2 for truth, %) Muon efficiency (definition2 for truth, %) the efficiency for each eta region is stable. But inclusive electron efficiency depends on the topology (for example tt or W). This is because the eta distributions differ for those topologies. the efficiency for muon is stable Page.7

topology dependence of fake lepton pT>20GeV, |eta|<2.5not from tau jet SU31.7×10 -3 ±0.1× ×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 T11.6×10 -3 ±0.1× ×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 J10.04×10 -3 ±0.04×10 -3 J20.4×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 J30.7×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 J40.4×10 -3 ±0.1×10 -3 pT>20GeV, |eta|<2.5 SU30.02×10 -3 ±0.01×10 -3 T10 / jets J10 / jets J20.02×10 -3 ±0.02×10 -3 J30 / jets J40.01×10 -3 ±0.01×10 -3 Muon (not matched lepton / number of TruthJet, definition2 for truth but no isolation cut) Electron (not matched lepton / number of TruthJet, definition2 for truth but no isolation cut) Page.8 ~ ~ 10 -4

data samples SU3 (197files) trig1_misal1_csc SU3_jimmy_susy.recon.AOD.v _tid T1 (238files) trig1_misal1_mc T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy.recon.AOD.v _tid Alpgen samples tt(lνqq)+3j trig1_misal1_mc AlpgenJimmyToplnqqNp3.recon.AOD.v _tid tt(lνqq)+2j trig1_misal1_csc AlpgenJimmyToplnqqNp2.recon.AOD.v _tid tt(lνqq)+1j trig1_misal1_csc AlpgenJimmyToplnqqNp1.recon.AOD.v _tid tt(lνlν)+3j trig1_misal1_mc AlpgenJimmyToplnlnNp3.recon.AOD.v _tid W(eν)+5j trig1_misal1_mc AlpgenJimmyWenuNp5.recon.AOD.v _tid W(μν)+5j trig1_misal1_mc AlpgenJimmyWmunuNp5.recon.AOD.v _tid Pythia samples J1 trig1_misal1_csc J1_pythia_jetjet.recon.AOD.v J2 trig1_misal1_csc J2_pythia_jetjet.recon.AOD.v J3 trig1_misal1_csc J3_pythia_jetjet.recon.AOD.v J4 trig1_misal1_csc J4_pythia_jetjet.recon.AOD.v Page.9

without isolation condition on Truth for the comparison to other groups

SU3( )SU3( )T1( ) Electron (def-1)00.0%±0.5%75.6%±0.5%73.4%±0.3% Electron (def-2)00.0%±0.5%75.6%±0.5%73.3%±0.3% Muon (def-1)00.0%±0.4%85.6%±0.4%86.0%±0.2% Muon (def-2)00.0%±0.4%85.6%±0.4%86.0%±0.2% SU3( )SU3( )T1( ) Electron (def-1)72.1%±0.5%72.2%±0.5%70.9%±0.3% Electron (def-2)55.5%±0.5%55.9%±0.5%63.1%±0.3% Muon (def-1)81.8%±0.5%82.1%±0.4%83.5%±0.3% Muon (def-2)64.4%±0.5%65.1%±0.5%74.2%±0.3% with isolation cut on truth without isolation cut on truth page1

Topology dependence of the fake rate

fake electron matched jet (origin of fake electron) pT (GeV) T1 fake ratio (matched jets / jet spectrum) pT (GeV) T1 J3 J1 SU3 T1 Topology dependence 1. pT spectrum of jets Matched jets are higher than fake electrons due to e/h correction or loose isolation condition ? pT spectrum of jet highly depends on the topology  We should use fake rate as a function of pT of jets pT spectrum of jets dropped by pT threshold of fake electron (20GeV) page1

Topology dependence 2. tau jets contribution SU3 T1J3 Black plot … all jets contribution Red plot … non tau jets contribution SU3, T1 samples are tau rich, J samples are not.  tau jet contribution makes some difference tau jet (hadronic decay) contribution page2

Topology dependence 3. effect of isolation condition J3 We uses the following isolation condition of reconstructed electron ET (cone 0.2) < 10 GeV ET (cone 0.2) < 10 GeV && ET (cone 0.2) < 0.1 × ET of electron But, more strict condition drops the fake rate J3 page3

ET (cone 0.2) < 10 GeV ET (cone 0.2) < 10 GeV && ET (cone 0.2) < 0.1 × ET of electron T1 73.3% T1 70.6% loose isolation condition strict isolation condition We applied isolation condition on the Truth electron ET (cone 0.2) < 10 GeV page4