Cognition domain Cognition domain 10th Washington Group meeting Luxembourg 3-5 November 2010 Andres Montes ESCAP Statistics Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COGNITION. Cognition Questions Do you have difficulty remembering or concentrating? Split Interviews: How often do you have difficulty remembering important.
Advertisements

What your Families, Children & Young People think…
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Statistical Project Monitoring Section B 1.
UPPER BODY Lifting and Picking Up. Upper Body-Lifting Questions Do you have difficulty raising a 2 liter jug of water from waist to eye level? Do you.
10 th Meeting of the Washington Group Results from the UNESCAP and the Granada Group testing Luxembourg November 3 – 5, 2010.
Testing Hypotheses About Proportions Chapter 20. Hypotheses Hypotheses are working models that we adopt temporarily. Our starting hypothesis is called.
VISION Results of the Cognitive and Field Tests 10 th Washington Group Meeting Luxembourg, 3-5 November 2010.
Scientific Method The 7-step process to scientific investigations
Second Legislated Review of Community Treatment Orders Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care November 9, 2012.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. Usability Testing Emphasizes the property of being usable Key Components –User Pre-Test –User Test –User.
BY: SHAREEN BOOMGAARD PROFESSIONAL NURSE LUTHANDO CLINIC CHRIS HANI BARAGWANATH HOSPITAL BASIC MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT.
Exploring the Washington Group Data from the 2011 U.S. National Health Interview Survey Julie D. Weeks, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics, USA.
Jennifer Madans Associate Director for Science
Presentation on Communication Question 6 6 th Meeting of the Washington Group Kampala,Uganda 10 – 13 th October 2006.
Cognitive test results and Finalization of the Module on Child Functioning and Disability Mitchell Loeb / Kristen Miller / Meredith Massey NCHS Washington,
General Disability Measures Used in Developed Countries: Question Characteristics Beth Rasch representing the collaborative work of the UN, ISTAT, and.
Governor Parent Questionnaire Results Summary Autumn 2013 FGB 2 nd December 2013.
SECTION 7 Depression.
HEARING DOMAIN 10th Washington Group meeting Luxembourg 3-5 November 2010 B.Tserenkhand National Statistical Office of Mongolia.
The Nature of Science Chapter 1. Section 1 What is Science? You should know this by now!!!
Sixth Meeting of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Session 3: In-depth review of cognitive and field test results and experiences Cognition.
Vocational Rehabilitation Center, AIR, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Birgitta Magnusson, OT Anette Jacobson, OT
Report on the Budapest Initiative* *Joint UNECE/WHO/Eurostat Task Force on Measurement of Health Status Jennifer H. Madans National Center for Health Statistics,
STOP DOING MATH LONG ENOUGH TO LEARN IT How to Study Math –Short Version Delano P. Wegener, Ph.D. Spring 2005.
1 Psych 5500/6500 Populations, Samples, Sampling Procedures, and Bias Fall, 2008.
Journal Write a paragraph about a decision you recently made. Describe the decision and circumstances surrounding it. How did it turn out? Looking back,
Exam Taking Kinds of Tests and Test Taking Strategies.
1 Science as a Process Chapter 1 Section 2. 2 Objectives  Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor.  Identify the steps that.
The Definition and Measurement of Disability: The Work of the Washington Group (continued) Daniel Mont Disability and Development Group The World Bank.
Inductive Generalizations Induction is the basis for our commonsense beliefs about the world. In the most general sense, inductive reasoning, is that in.
CGO 4M ISP By: Kelli Bradley.  In my ISP I decided to analyze data on the ethnic origins of immigrants and weather or not there is a direct relationship.
1 Introduction to Cognition Cognitive processes are very familiar and taken for granted. –These processes are performed without effort so we perceive them.
Participate in a Team to Achieve Organizational Goal
FATIGUE Results of ESCAP Testing Barbara M. Altman Disability Statistics Consultant Washington Group, November 3-5, 2010, Luxembourg.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 20 Testing Hypotheses About Proportions.
PAIN. Pain Questions Do you have frequent pain? Do you use medication for pain? If yes: In the past 3 months, how often did you have pain? Some days,
ME AS A LEADER BLOCK 3. I am 18 years old, I have an older brother and a younger brother, I also work as a waitress at Rams Horn and I plan to go to college.
Learning Objectives: 1. Identify different personality types 2. Understand our own personality type 3. Relate our personality type to career and college.
+ Chapter 1: Exploring Data Section 1.1 Analyzing Categorical Data The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition - For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Statistics.
Learning Objectives: 1. Identify different personality types 2. Understand our own personality type 3. Relate our personality type to career and college.
Analyses of extended set questions using the U.S. National Health Interview Survey Mitchell Loeb / Jennifer Madans National Center for Health Statistics/
The DHS Program Pilot of a Household Survey Disability Module 6 OCTOBER 2015.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Testing and Documentation Part II.
What is the purpose of inquiry design? Inquiry/Experimental Design is a series of steps used to investigate natural occurrences/phenomena.
Science Science is  The process of trying to understand the world  A way of knowing, thinking and learning  Based on observation and experimentation.
Science Fair Project Type your project title here Type your category here (For the experimental design labs, the category is Physical Science) Type your.
Cognitive test results and Finalization of the Module on Child Functioning and Disability Mitchell Loeb (with Kristen Miller & Meredith Massey) NCHS Washington,
Basic Business Communications Nick Mercuro, Austin Moore, John Skinner.
Speaking Test PET.
Analyses of extended set questions using the U.S. National Health Interview Survey Mitchell Loeb / Jennifer Madans (with Julie Weeks, Laurie Pratt & Nazik.
Comments on vision domain 10th Washington Group meeting Luxembourg 3-5 November 2010 Andres Montes ESCAP Statistics Division.
Scientific Inquiry. The Scientific Process Scientific Process = Scientific Inquiry.
MOROCCAN EXPERIENCE ON DISABILITY STATISTICS THE KINGDOM OF MOROCCO HIGH COMMISSION OF PLANNING BY ZINEB EL OUAZZANI TOUAHAMI Statistician Engineer Directorate.
The veteran experience from a spousal perspective Elin Gustavsen PhD student Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies.
Memory and Aging Educational Presentation Presented by Tessa Lundquist, M.S. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG16)
School leadership models: Current Landscape 45_84 95_84 51_84 School leadership models: Current Landscape Common practice Incremental leadership.
UNICEF/WG MODULE ON CHILD FUNCTIONING: TESTING and ANALYSIS
What is our goal in our TL Class?
Symbolic Interactionism
Testing Hypotheses About Proportions
Thinking Like a Scientist
Notes for helpers Supporting everyone to tell their story
Cognitive Interview Obstacles
Testing Hypotheses about Proportions
Gathering and Organizing Data
DISCUSSION ON MEASURING DISABILITY IN POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS
Care and support of people growing older with a learning disability
Testing Hypotheses About Proportions
Comments written by Pupils about particular strategies used in English which helped their writing As you will read, some of our pupils commented about.
Presentation transcript:

Cognition domain Cognition domain 10th Washington Group meeting Luxembourg 3-5 November 2010 Andres Montes ESCAP Statistics Division

Definition  Cognition is a mental function which includes specific activities such as remembering, concentrating, learning and being able to analyze problems, find solutions and taking decisions.  Problems in cognition, when severe, typically lead to a loss of independence that is difficult to manage since there are no assistive devices.

Cognitive test main results  Based on the results from the cognitive test, it was decided to retain the main question COG_SS for the field test and add COG_1 to address the issue of whether COG_SS is double-barreled;  Also kept COG_2 eliminating the phrase ‘important things’;

Cognitive test main results  Retained questions COG_3 and COG_4;  Given the wide range of different items reported between those answering ‘some difficulty’ and those responding a ‘lot of difficulty’ and ‘cannot do at all’, a set of probe questions P_COG_3 was included to investigate what respondents were thinking about when answering positively to having difficulty remembering and concentrating.

Field test questions  COG_SS. Do you have difficulty remembering or concentrating - no difficulty, some difficulty, a lot of difficulty, cannot do at all  COG_1. Do you have difficulty remembering, concentrating, or both? - difficulty remembering only; difficulty concentrating only; difficulty with both remembering and concentrating  COG_2. How often do you have difficulty remembering? - sometimes, often; all of the time

Field test questions COG_3 Do you have difficulty remembering a few things, a lot of things, or almost everything? - a few things; a lot of things; almost everything P_COG_3 Which of the following statements, if any, describe your difficulty remembering? a) I forget things because I am busy and have too much to remember; b) My difficulty is getting worse; c) My difficulty has put me or my family in danger; d) I only forget little or inconsequential things; e) I must write down important things, such as my address or when to take medicine, so that I do not forget; f) My family members or friends are worried about my difficulty remembering; g) My difficulty is normal for someone my age

Field test questions  COG_4 – ‘if difficulty concentrating only’ to COG_1, how much difficulty do you have concentrating for ten minutes? - a little; a lot; somewhere in between a little and a lot  COG_6 How old were you when the difficulty remembering or concentrating began?  COG_7 How much does your difficulty remembering or concentrating limit your ability to carry out daily activities? - not at all; a little; a lot; completely

Field test results  COG_SS The rate of self-identified cognitive difficulty was similar across pilot test countries, except for Cambodia. 74% reported no difficulty; 24 % some difficulty, and 4% a lot of difficulty.  More women reported having ‘some’ or ‘a lot of difficulty’ remembering and concentrating than men. The age profile of respondents didn’t produce any surprises.

Field test results  COG_SS & COG_1 The ‘concentrating only’ category never surpasses 10 percent. This points to the fact that concentrating is not recognized as the main difficulty in this question by the large majority of respondents.

Field test results  COG_2 & COG_3 produce reasonably consistent results (also in relation to COG_SS)

Field test results  Probe

Field test results  COG_4 Difficulty concentrating

Field test results  Given that cognitive test results were inconclusive, we added a set of behavioural probes to observe whether the respondent had any particular difficulties in understanding and making sense of this question.

Field test results  COG_7 asks respondents about the impact of their difficulty on their everyday activities. It is expected that the degree of impact should be directly related to the degree of difficulty in remembering and concentrating.

Conclusions  The principal conclusion of this chapter is that the vast majority of respondents report having difficulties remembering only, or both remembering and concentrating.  Extensive analysis of the cognitive data, as well as of all field test questions – including the probes – lead to the conclusion that the threshold between ‘in scope’ and ‘out of scope’ responses can be delineated with reasonable confidence.

Conclusions  The relationship between the level of difficulty remembering and concentrating (COG_SS), the frequency of forgetting (COG_2) and number of things forgotten (COG_3) is close.  There is not enough information in both the cognitive and the pilot tests to allow for concrete recommendations on the concentrating question (COG_4) for which further testing is required.

Recommended questions  1. Do you have difficulty remembering or concentrating? 1) no difficulty (if ‘no difficulty’, skip Cognition domain) 2) some difficulty 3) a lot of difficulty 4) Cannot do at all/ unable to do  2. Do you have difficulty remembering a few things, a lot of things, or almost everything? 1) A few things 2) A lot of things 3) Almost everything

Recommended questions  3. How old were you when the difficulty remembering or concentrating began? Age in years _____  4. How much does your difficulty remembering or concentrating limit your ability to carry out daily activities? 1. Not at all 2. A little 3. A lot 4. Completely

Thank you