John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA The use and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genomic imputation and evaluation using 1074 high density Holstein genotypes P. M. VanRaden 1, D. J. Null 1 *, G.R. Wiggans 1, T.S. Sonstegard 2, E.E.
Advertisements

John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA Applications.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansCroatian.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
2003 Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-1) Performance of dairy cattle clones and evaluation of their milk composition H. Duane Norman*,1 and Marie K.
2002 7WCGALP (HDN-1) Performance of Holstein clones in the United States H.D. NORMAN,*,1 T.J. LAWLOR, 2 and J.R. WRIGHT 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD 2011 Avoiding bias from genomic pre- selection in converting.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
2006 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Fertility Trait.
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
John B. Cole 1, Daniel J. Null *1, Chuanyu Sun 2, and Paul M. VanRaden 1 1 Animal Genomics and Improvement 2 Sexing Technologies Laboratory Navasota, TX.
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, Jan Wright, Chuanyu Sun, and Jana Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD National Association of Animal.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2009 Mixing Different SNP Densities Mixing Different.
Cooper, 2014CDCB Meeting Aug. 5(1) T.A. Cooper, G.R. Wiggans and P.M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service,
John B. Cole Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Using.
John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
T. A. Cooper and G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Council.
2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
2003 Melvin Tooker, Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Paul VanRaden, 1 Katie Olson, 2 Dan Null, 1 Mehdi Sargolzaei, 3 Marco Winters, 4 and Jan-Thijs van Kaam 5 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, ARS,
J. B. Cole * and P. M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2006.
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
G.R. Wiggans* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
7 th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod Selection of dairy cattle for lifetime profit Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.
J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.
Adjustment of breeding values for past and future inbreeding Paul VanRaden*, Lori Smith Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
2007 Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory 2010 Gains in reliability from combining subsets.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Jeff O’Connell 2, George Wiggans 1, Kent Weigel 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2 University of Maryland.
John B. Cole Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD What.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
Multibreed Genomic Evaluation Using Purebred Dairy Cattle K. M. Olson* 1 and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 Department of Dairy Science Virginia Polytechnic and State.
2005 Paul VanRaden and Mel Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2006 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Predicting Genetic.
2007 John Cole, Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, and Melvin Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD,
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansADSA 18.
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 New.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2007 Genetic evaluation.
G.R. Wiggans, T. A. Cooper* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4, Paul VanRaden 1, Curt.
John B. Cole Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2016 AGIL Report.
Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2014 Paul VanRaden Advancing.
H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT
Y. Masuda1, I. Misztal1, P. M. VanRaden2, and T. J. Lawlor3
Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle
Percent of total breedings
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Economics of Reproduction: the Quality of the Pregnancy
Presentation transcript:

John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA The use and economic value of genomic testing for calves on dairy farms

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (2) Cole Introduction l Genomic selection increases selection response. l Bulls were genotyped first due to cost. l Many more cows than bulls have now been genotyped. l How can you use genomics to make better decisions on your farm?

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (3) Cole Many animals have been genotyped Evaluation Date (YYMM) Genotypes 335,929 genotyped animals

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (4) Cole Why are good decisions important? M:FP = price of 1 kg of milk / price of 1 kg of a 16% protein ration Month Milk:Feed Price Ratio July 2012 Grain Costs Soybeans: $15.60/bu (€0.46/kg) Corn: $ 7.36/bu (€0.23/kg)

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (5) Cole How does genetic selection work? l ΔG = genetic gain each year reliability = how certain we are about our estimate of an animal’s genetic merit (genomics  ) selection intensity = how “picky” we are when making mating decisions (management can  ) l genetic variance = variation in the population due to genetics (we can’t really change this) generation interval = time between generations (genomics  )

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (6) Cole Can I afford genomic testing? Number of SNP9K50K800K U.S. Price€32€92€184 International Price€41€100€192

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (7) Cole Four ways to use use genomics l Animal ID and parentage verification w Is this the animal that I think it is? l Early culling decisions w Am I raising the right animals? l Mate selection w How do I produce the best calves? l Identification of elite cows

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (8) Cole …if the missing relative has been genotyped: 92% Animal Missing 98% 100% If a missing parent is genotyped, we will find it!

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (9) Cole 73% of genotyped US Holsteins are < 15 mo old! Genotyped heifers in the US

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (10) Cole Now we know which heifer is best The best has a PTA NM$ of +868 and a REL of 73%. The worst has a PTA NM$ of +48 and a REL of 68%. PLANET has 3,783 genotyped daughters – which one do you want in your herd?

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (11) Cole Without any pedigree information, they all appear the same! Genetic Merit for NM$ 46 US Holsteins – unknown parents

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (12) Cole Genetic Merit for NM$ 46 US Holsteins – genotyped

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (13) Cole Genetic Merit for NM$ The poorest animals can be culled

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (14) Cole How should you select mates? l Selected 3 Jersey herds from the US l Compared actual matings with other possible choices w Could the herd manager have selected better mate pairs? w Data included 220 actual matings from 142 mate pairs

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (15) Cole Comparison to actual matings l Three strategies tested in simulation w Mating plans using traditional and genomic PTA as in Pryce et al. (2012) w Selection of mate pairs with greatest mean DGV w Bulls limited to 10 matings

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (16) Cole What bulls were available? Bulls used in herd Cows in herd Genotyped calves Consider each bull as a mate for each cow using different strategies. Actual calves born to these parents. Simulated calves

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (17) Cole Actual DGV and inbreeding Similar distribution of direct genomic values (DGV) Different distribution of relation- ships – different sire portfolios

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (18) Cole What did we learn about mating? l Each of the 3 herds could have made better mating decisions w Differences between the methods were moderate w Inbreeding continues to be a concern l In the US, many farmers do not use mating programs!

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (19) Cole Identify your elite animals l When you genotype your cows you will know which animals to contract as bull dams l You will also know which embryos from a flush are the good ones and bad ones l The sale of elite genetics can supplement your income from milk sales mbryo_transfer_service.html

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (20) Cole Conclusions l Genotyping can increase rates of genetic gain l Pedigree errors can be found and fixed l Accurate culling decisions save money l Better mate selection produces better offspring l Elite genetics can be marketed

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (21) Cole Acknowledgments Tom Lawlor Holstein Association USA Brattleboro, VT Albert De Vries Department of Animal Sciences University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Paul VanRaden, Dan Null, and Tabatha Cooper Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, ARS, USDA Beltsville, MD

ANAFI Workshop, Cremona, Italy, 7 February 2013 (22) Cole Questions?