Status of the OPERA experiment Akitaka Ariga LHEP, University of Bern on behalf of the OPERA collaboration  CC event with charm production Candidate (Data)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oscillation Project with Emulsion tRacking Apparatus F. Juget Institut de Physique Université de Neuchâtel Neutrino-CH meeting, Neuchâtel June
Advertisements

Neutrino Oscillation Appearance with OPERA Amina ZGHICHE Oscillation Project with Emulsion tRacking Apparatus.
1 Status report of the PEANUT analysis Giovanni De Lellis Collaboration Meeting, June 5th 2007, Maiori.
New results from the CHORUS Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Pasquale Migliozzi CERN XXIX International Conference on High Energy Physics UBC, Vancouver,
Short Baseline neutrino experiments Jaap Panman, CERN Neutrino 2004, Paris, 15 June 2004 Outline Status of oscillation experiments Charm production Summary.
Π 0 search N.Kitagawa Flab Nagoya University OPERA Emulsion Workshop 2008/01/22-23.
Emulsion scanning: present status and plans for the coming run Giovanni De Lellis.
OPERA experiment T.Toshito (Nagoya univ. Japan) for the OPERA collaboration Apr
Report of the Oscillation Working Group and status of Charm study 1 F. Juget – D. Duchesneau Ankara, April 1rst 2009.
OPERA 2008 run: a report from the Swiss scanning lab Ciro Pistillo LHEP Bern university for the Swiss scanning team OPERA Collaboration meeting Ankara,
Status of OPERA N. Naganawa (Nagoya University) Flavor physics.
Kouji Narita Nagoya University, Japan CHORUS collaboration Study of charm production in neutrino interactions.
Vertex localization in Lyon Emulsion Workshop 7th-9th Dec. 2006, Nagoya Luisa Arrabito – IPN Lyon.
Evaluation of SySal efficiencies for 1  sample Chorus Collaboration Meeting Ishigaki,7-8 April 2003 Emiliano Barbuto, Chiara Sirignano, Salvatore Sorrentino.
Neutrino Event location Connection from Electric Detector to Emulsion Detector Tsutomu FUKUDA Fundamental Particle Physics Lab, Nagoya-univ 9th March,
Umut Kose Neutrino interaction location in the OPERA Experiment New Development of Flavor Physics, , Tennomaru, Gamagori Nagoya University.
1 Status of Located Event Analysis On behalf of Nagoya Scanning Group Umut KOSE OPERA Emulsion Workshop, January 2008, Nagoya, JAPAN.
The OPERA Experiment 12 th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors (IPRD10) 7-10 June 2010, Siena, Italy Jonas Knüsel Albert Einstein.
Interaction point analysis Judgment  /  March 10, 2009 Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
Hybrid emulsion detector for the neutrino factory Giovanni De Lellis University of Naples“Federico II” Recall the physics case The detector technology.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
EM shower reconstruction and located neutrino event analysis Ciro Pistillo (Bern LHEP) on behalf of the Swiss OPERA groups.
Status and the preliminary results of the OPERA experiment V.Tioukov (INFN, Napoli) on behalf of the OPERA collaboration V. Tioukov QFTHEP11, Sochi.
A. Chukanov On behalf of OPERA collaboration JINR, Dubna TAUP 2011, Munich, 5-9 september, 2011.
Status and results from the OPERA experiment Tsutomu FUKUDA ( Nagoya University ) On behalf of the OPERA Collaboration NNN10, 14 Dec 2010, Toyama International.
MTM Bologna, 17/6/ 2005 We know that in Nature there are three kinds of neutrinos and in particular atmospheric neutrinos show a deficit of  This effect,
1 RUN 2008 OPERA events: Status Report M. Ieva on behalf of Bari Emulsion Lab OPERA Collaboration Meeting, April 1st - 5th, 2009.
1 The OPERA emulsion detector for a long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment H.Shibuya Toho Univ., Japan K.Hoshino, M.Komatsu, K.Niwa Nagoya Univ.,
Caren Hagner, Universität HamburgDESY Seminar, OPERA and its Tau Neutrino Candidate  Neutrino mass, mixing and neutrino oscillations  OPERA.
September 11th, 2006LNGS and the Neutrinos from CERN OPERA 1 OPERA O scillation P roject with E mulsion-t R acking A pparatus.
OPERA Experiment, Brick Finding Program A. Chukanov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research ISU, 12 th February, 2007.
Tsutomu Fukuda Nagoya University, JAPAN
Status and results from OPERA Tomoko Ariga LHEP, University of Bern on behalf of OPERA Swiss groups of Bern and ETHZ.
OPERA Status Report D. Autiero, IPN Lyon (on behalf of the OPERA Collaboration) Introduction Running in Analysis results A first tau candidate.
Operation of and results from OPERA Ciro Pistillo LHEP Bern University CHIPP Plenary meeting Lausanne, EPFL-LPHE September
First neutrino events in the OPERA emulsion target Ciro Pistillo LHEP Bern University for the OPERA collaboration Rencontres de Moriond: Electroweak interactions.
Status of the OPERA Neutrino Oscillation Experiment 5-8 January 2010, Cracow, Poland Sergey Dmitrievsky Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna on.
1 Recent results on the observation of    oscillation in the OPERA experiment NakatsukaYuji Nagoya University On behalf of OPERA collaboration ICISE.
New results from the OPERA experiment
Neutrino Oscillations Studies with the Opera Experiment
Studies of Charmed Particle Production and Decay in the CHORUS Experiment Emiliano Barbuto University of Salerno and INFN (Italy) For the CHORUS Collaboration.
1 NuFact’01 WG1 : Neutrino Oscillation Physics May 24-30, 2001 An appearance experiment to search for  -  oscillations in the CNGS beam CNGS1 O scillation.
Study of hadron interactions in OPERA-like bricks Aim: background study of   h, hhh decays 4 th September 2012 H. Shibuya, H. Ishida, T. Matsuo, T. Fukuda,
Search for  appearance via neutrino oscillations in the  CNGS beam with the OPERA experiment Amina ZGHICHE For the OPERA Collaboration (LAPP-Annecy.
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
T2K muon measurement 2014 Momentum module A.Ariga, C. Pistillo University of Bern S. Aoki Kobe University 1.
Recent results of the OPERA search for       oscillations T. OMURA On behalf of The OPERA Collaboration 1/17 Belgium ULB Brussels Croatia IRB Zagreb.
OPERA Experiment, Brick Finding Program A. Chukanov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, 25 th January, 2007.
Status and oscillation results of the OPERA experiment Florian Brunet LAPP - Annecy 24th Rencontres de Blois 29/05/2012.
Search for exotics by emulsion J.Kawada & U.Kose (Nagoya)
NBI2006 Starting OPERA data-taking with the CNGS beam D.Autiero IN2P3/IPN Lyon 5/9/2006.
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
Emulsion Test Beam first results Annarita Buonaura, Valeri Tioukov On behalf of Napoli emulsion group This activity was supported by AIDA2020.
Esperimento OPERA Commissione II INFN Roma 28 Settembre 2010 CNGS beam Detector operation Run 2008, 2009, 2010 Richieste finanziarie S. Simone Università.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Electromagnetic shower reconstruction with emulsion films in the OPERA experiment F. Juget IPH Université de Neuchâtel On behalf of the OPERA collaboration.
Characterization of muon beam in T2K with emulsion detectors A. Ariga, T. Ariga, C. Pistillo AEC-LHEP University of Bern 1.
Status and results from the OPERA experiment Tomoko Ariga on behalf of the OPERA collaboration A. Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics LHEP, University.
Nuclear emulsions One of the eldest particle detectors, still used in particle physics experiment (CHORUS, DONUT, OPERA) for its unique peculiarities:
Current Status of The OPERA Experiment
Muon spectrometer (Magnet+RPC+PT)
More results from the OPERA experiment
Status of the OPERA experiment
OPERA Stato dell’esperimento Run 2007
Results from OPERA Pablo del Amo Sánchez for the OPERA collaboration
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
Bari emulsion lab: status report
Location summary.
Neutrino and Charm Physics with CHORUS
Study of charm hadroproduction Tau neutrino production at CERN SPS
Presentation transcript:

Status of the OPERA experiment Akitaka Ariga LHEP, University of Bern on behalf of the OPERA collaboration  CC event with charm production Candidate (Data)

OPERA experiment Aiming to prove the Flavor-Mixing neutrino oscillation hypothesis by appearance method. – Appearance of new flavor:    – Search in the region predicted by disappearance experiments (SK, K2K, MINOS). Direct observation of  events in Nuclear Emulsion detectors. – Only detector which can detect   (DONUT exp.). – Sub-micron position resolution – mrad angular resolution. – 1.25 kt of target mass  (F.L. ~500  m) 1ry vertex non-mu  CC interaction 

CNGS beam 17 GeV L730 km ( e + e ) /  0.87%  /  4%  prompt negligible  Expected produced interactions (22.5x10 19 ): ~25400  CC + NC ~170 e + e CC ~125  CC (  m 2 = 2.5 x eV 2 ) L = 732 km CERN LNGS T flight = 2.44 ms CERN LNGS 730 km ~10 tau decays are expected to be observed Less than 1 background after 5 years running

20μm π - 10GeV/c Electron ~ 100keV Intrinsic resolution 50nm Emulsion film by FUJI Film Deviation from linear-fit line. (2D) sensitivity 36grains/100micron 4 Cross-sectional view (SEM) Plastic Base (205micron) Emulsion Layer Emulsion Layer (44micron) A minimal detector AgBr Cristal, Size = 0.2micron Detection efficiency = 0.16/crystal channels in a film 2009/6/104

10.2 cm 12.5 cm 7.5 cm 10 X0 neutrino OPERA Film × 57 plates Lead x 56 plates OPERA Film 2 emulsion layers (44  m thick) poured on a 205  m plastic base 1mm 0.3mm The OPERA target consists of about 150,000 bricks. Total target mass: 1.25 kton OPERA target & main detector ECC brick Lead plate Hybrid target structure. (CS)

OPERA detector SM1SM2 Target area (ECC + CS + TT) Muon spectrometer (Magnet+RPC+PT) Brick Manipulator System Brick Wall and Brick Manipulation system.

OPERA detector SM1SM2 Brick Manipulator System Extract Brick and CS, scan CS. Confirm the event in the ECC brick. Develop brick and send to scanning labs. Target area (ECC + CS + TT) Muon spectrometer (Magnet+RPC+PT)

ECC validation by CS Select proper ECC brick which contains neutrino interactions. – Save analysis time – Minimize the loss of target mass CS Develop this brick

CS Scanning Stations Nagoya (Japan) LNGS (Italy) European Scanning System Super-UltraTrackSelector 11

Parallel analysis of ECC bricks Validated bricks are sent to the scanning labs. – 10 scanning labs share the scanning. (Increasing!) To Japan Padova To Mosccow GS Scanning station in LHEP Bern

11 ECC Large area scan ~100cm 2 Point Scan ~100x100m 2 Lead emulsion Lead emulsion Lead emulsion Lead emulsion Lead emulsion Lead emulsion Lead emulsion neutrino Flow of Location – ECC Scanback – CS TT

12 Lead emulsion Lead emulsion Lead emulsion Lead emulsion Lead emulsion Lead emulsion Lead emulsion neutrino Flow of Location – Volume Scan – CS TT ECC Volume scan  topology analysis 5 plates upstream 10 plates downstream

Located neutrino interaction Emulsion gives 3D vector data, giving a micrometric precision of the vertexing accuracy. (The frames correspond to scanning area. Yellow short lines  measured tracks. The other colored lines  interpolation or extrapolation. The colors indicate the Z-depth in the module.) 1 cm

1.78·10 19 pot Status and prospect of Data taking May 9 th Time Extrapolation to end of 2009 run = 3.5 x POT 1.93·10 19 pot Sep 6 th Unix Time pot 18 June 03 Nov x10 19 pot0 int.Commissioning x10 19 pot38 int.Commissioning x10 19 pot1598 int.First physics run x10 19 pot up to now (Sep 6 th ) 2036 int.Extrapolation is 3.5x10 19 pot at end of the run. (~2 tau expected in total) Nominal4.5 x pot x 5 year. total 22.5 x pot

Status of event location in ECC for 2008 run Scanning for 2008 run will be completed by September with muonwithout muonTotal Events in target Bricks developed Vertices located in ECC Vertices located in the dead material16622 X (  m) Y (  m)

Impact parameters IP = Distance from the reconstructed vertex IP ZZ emulsionlead MC Data  Z profile plot

Improvement of analysis speed in ECC validation by CS Red : ’08Run Black : ’09Run Av ’08Run : 55.3 days Av ’09Run : 5.5 days day Red : ’08Run Black : ’09Run Most of events in 2009 are processed with in a few days. Long tail in 2008 run day Trigger ECC extraction ECC validation by CS ECC development ECC analysis (Zoom up)

Gamma detection and π 0 reconstruction E ~0.5 GeV E ~8.1 GeV 2 e-showers give a reconstructed mass ~ 160 MeV/c 2 70% of 1-prong hadronic tau decays include one or more  0. Important to detect gamma from tau decay to improve S/N. Gamma detection detection of shower detection e-pair at start point π 0 reconstruction is in progress.   e-pair e+ e-    hadron

muon 2.2 cm 7 mm Primary vertex Secondary vertex Example of Gamma to vertex attachment  CC interaction with hadronic re-interaction

6  reconstructed around the vertex 7 mm 2.2 cm muon Example of Gamma to vertex attachment

4  attached to primary vtx and well separated from secondary vtx: - IP at 1ry vtx:  m - IP at 2ry vtx:  m 7 mm 2.2 cm 6  reconstructed around the vertex muon Example of Gamma to vertex attachment

2  attached to secondary vtx and well separated from primary vtx: - IP at 2ry vtx:  m - IP at 1ry vtx:  m 7 mm 2.2 cm 6  reconstructed around the vertex muon Example of Gamma to vertex attachment Not only detection, but also pointing of vertex

Gamma study and MC/data comparison preliminary Gamma multiplicity attached to 1ry vertex IP of gamma to 1ry vertex dZ from 1ry vertex to start point

Analysis for located events 2008 run – Nu-tau detection 0.7 event observation is expected Background 0.05 event. – Check nu-tau detection efficiency by detecting charmed particles (similar life time and mass with tau) Charm particles are produced in nu-mu CC interactions (~4.5%) Parti cle Mass (MeV/c 2 ) Life time ( s) cτ (micron ) τ D+D Ds+Ds Λc+Λc  CC-int  CC-int +  charm production  Charm  , e, hadron

Example of Detected Topologies 1. A Muon is isolated from the vertex. muon (animation) Yellow short line is data. Lines with other color are extension. IP w.r.t. muon (micron) IP w.r.t. decay point (micron) Momentum (GeV/c) Daughter Daughter mm muon emulsion

muon Lead plate (1 mm) Hypothesis (1) D 0 candidate Hypothesis (2)  candidate? minimum kink angle: 312 mrad muon momentum: 17 GeV/c Decay Pt > 5.3 GeV/c Excluded by Pt: Pt > maximum decay Pt of  (about 0.9 GeV/c) 1ry vertex 1ry vertex D0D0 

A muon kink detected in rather short flight length. -- Kink angle 15 mrad F.L. 1.8 mm Tilted view Beam view -- Example of Detected Topologies 2. 1ry vertex 1.8mm  6GeV/c Kink angle 15mrad, Pt = 90MeV/c 1ry vtxkink vtx Em Topology looks similar to tau decay. Kink angle = 7 sigma away from the resolution. Rejected by Kinematical analysis (Pt cut). Pt cut for tau decay : Pt>250MeV/c Possibly, muon single large-angle scattering or hadronic particle decay (pi, K) into muon. 1ry vtx kink vtx

Current status for 2008 run. Branching ratioNumber of candidates 1-prong37 %7 2-prong30 %5 3-prong19 %2 4-prong7 %1 Tau candidates Analysis ongoing. No candidate yet. (0.7 expected, 0.05 BG) Charm candidates. Analysis ongoing for located ~700 nu-mu CC events. Up to now, we have collected 15 candidates. Agreement with our expectation

A strong earthquake (M I =6.2) hit L’Aquila on April 6 th The epicenter was 15 km away from the Gran Sasso laboratory. 306 killed, 1600 injured, many houses collapsed, buildings were damaged. OPERA found basically intact, geometric measurements showed no significant alignment changes. Gran Sasso activities, stopped for ~1.5 months. Big OPERA effort to let CNGS start with only 2 weeks delay ! The L’Aquila earthquake 28

30 TT and the earthquake amplitude of the oscillation ~10 mm No other consequences of the earthquake were observed, thanks to the anti-seismic studies made for OPERA

Summary The OPERA experiment is taking data in the CNGS beam. 1.78x10 19 pot were collected during the first physics run in – 800 out of 1600 located in ECC – Scanning to be finished this month The analysis of 2008 data is in progress. – Expected detector performances. – No nu tau signal yet. – Several charmed candidates are detected as expected. The evaluation of total efficiencies and background is ongoing. In 2009 run, 1.93x10 19 pot were already collected. – 4.5x10 19 pot are requested. – 3.5x10 19 pot are expected at the end of the run. – Detection of ~2 nu-tau events is expected…SOON.

Charm candidate: (di-muon event) kink x-view 1ry vertex 4 mm 1.3 mm flight length: 1330 micron kink angle: 209 mrad IP of daughter: 262 micron daughter muon: 2.2 GeV/c decay Pt: 0.46 GeV/c 1ry muon daughter muon (animation )

BACKUP

34 Emulsion layers 44micron Base 205micron 12.5cm OPERA film x 2 10cm Neutrino beam Changeable Sheet (CS) 600micron 160micron OPERA film X Z Pick up tracks from neutrino interaction Helps tagging ECC  Saving Scanning load and Target Mass Roles of CS

Scanning and reconstruction Raw-tracks in each layer. Reconstructed tracks between base. Base Emulsion Computing ~ 5 min. Computing ~ 5 min Reconstructed tracks between films Analysis Scanning ~ 10 min / cm 2 Most time consuming. Single base-track

OPERA signal and background  decay channel B.R. (%) Signal  m 2 = 2.5 x 10-3 eV 2 Background        e   h   3h Total Full mixing, 5 years run, 4.5x10 19 pot /year Main background sources: Production and decay of charmed particles Hadron re-interactions Large angle muon scattering

Tau background by D 0  Neutral charmed particle decay vertex mistaken as primary vertex in events where only a muon and D 0 are produced at primary vertex    channel Cut on the invariant mass to be used to reduce this background source

38 Momentum measurement in ECC by Multiple Coulomb Scattering. Pion 6 GeV  test beam P MCS (GeV) P beam (GeV) Pion 2 GeV Evaluate scattering of particles Data from Test exposure to pion beam

Pt cut Daughter particle of τ Daughter particle of hadronic re-interactions Pt(GeV/c) MC

muon single stop at pl 22. a vertex found 342  m upstream from pl 22. minimum distance w.r.t muon trk  m (confirmed in CS) trk  m --