Please note before delivering this presentation This slide pack can be adapted for local use by YOTs to meet local conditions and the local audience. It.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Barnardos Registered Charity Nos and SC Barnardos Domestic violence: Risk Assessment Model.
Advertisements

Barnardo’s Core Presentation Slide No. 1
Working Together Briefing Tim Beach: Independent Chair BSCB & Helen Elliott BSCB Manager.
Priority Youth Offender Project Alice Chapman Director Youth Conference Service Youth Justice Agency.
“Inspiring public confidence by cutting crime” Transforming Rehabilitation Information for East Sussex Partnerships January 2014 Mary D’Arcy Surrey and.
Referral Orders CJI Act changes and revised guidance.
Scaled Approach and Youth Rehabilitation Order YOT Briefing pack v1.2
Delivering the Tri-borough programme YOUTH OFFENDING SERVICE Combining services to tackle common problems, improve people’s lives and make public money.
Recent Changes to London Probation service and the London CRC’s response to the gang agenda Middlesex University Conference 5 th September 2014 Patsy Wollaston.
Bob Smith Head of Derbyshire Youth Offending Service Prevention and Support… The Pre Court Team.
Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) Mike Cladingbowl Her Majesty's Inspector, Ofsted 21 April 2009.
Electronic Monitoring The Scottish Experience Norman Brown Communications Director.
Donna Monk MAPPA Co-ordinator.  Understand the purpose and function of MAPPA  Understand the language and terminology of MAPPA  Explore the framework.
Pathways to care in the absence of a local specialist Forensic Service, what we do in York. By Bekki Whisker.
Safeguarding and behaviour management: Staff and young people, community and custody Phil Sutton Head of Business Change and Benefits Realisation, YJB.
YJB Practice and Performance Directorate Neighbourhood Renewal and Youth Crime.
Disability and special educational needs: local area responsibilities under the Children and Families Act, 2014 Charlie Henry HMI National lead for disability.
Appropriate Adult scheme models December Contents Introduction to Appropriate Adults Appropriate Adult scheme models What models are available?
Restorative Justice & The Probation Service
Development of Barring Criteria for the Protection of Vulnerable Groups Scheme Voluntary Sector Issues Group 16 February 2009.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
MASH Understanding Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs 1.
The Heart of the Matter: supporting family contact for fostered children.
NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention 2006 Briefing Information Session Child Protection Senior Officers Group.
CHILDREN’S HEARING SYSTEM. CHILDREN’S HEARINGS Need to know: Why a child may appear before a hearing How the hearings system works Actions that can be.
Please read before using this briefing This presentation forms the basis of a workshop for operational managers and other relevant staff to review quality.
Needs Assessment: Young People’s Drug and Alcohol Services in Edinburgh City EADP Children, Young People and Families Network Event 7 th March 2012 Joanne.
3-MINUTE READ Draft SEN Code of Practice: for 0 to 25 years.
Local Children’s Partnerships 27 September Delivery Plans 50% received to-date Most still in draft Positive features: –Good local profiling –Sound.
Understanding Need and Risk. GIRFEC History and Background –Numerous policies relating to Multi-Agency working Principles –Co-ordinated Support for Families.
AS Level Law Machinery of Justice Sentencing. AS Level Law What you need to know and discuss: the need for a criminal justice system the main aims of.
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme Detective Sergeant Louise Wall National Coordinator for the Child Sex Offender Disclosure.
Annex A ASBOs are a powerful tool for protecting victims and stopping anti-social behaviour. Much effort goes into getting the ASBO by the agencies involved.
Getting it Right for Every Learner in Renfrewshire: A Partnership Approach for Additional Support Needs (Draft Revised Renfrewshire ASL Act Implementation.
Youth to adult transitions 14 March 2013 Frances Done Chair Youth Justice Board for England and Wales.
Southend Children’s Partnership SOUTHEND YOUTH OFFENDING SERVICE Report to Children & Lifelong Learning Scrutiny Committee JULY 2009.
Changes to the Youth Re-offending Measure. YJB position statement The YJB supports the concept of the new measure and the advantages it presents for aligning.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Safeguarding and Looked After Children’s Services Early Intervention and Prevention.
Towards a health and wellbeing service framework a discussion paper for consultation.
Developing RJ in England and Wales Roger Cullen Senior Policy Adviser.
This slide pack can be adapted for local use by YOTs to meet local conditions and the local audience. It is designed to be used in conjunction with the.
The SaferMK Plan Richard Solly. Core Principles To be Proactive SaferMK Plan Partnership Focus Realistic Outcome focus AliveConciseTransparent.
Developing a Strategic Approach Helen Attewell – Chief Executive, Nepacs Dr. Chris Hartworth – Barefoot Research Rob Brown – Head of Stronger Communities,
The National Probation Service Who we are and what we do.
Practice Governance two years on… Practice Learning Network North 3 rd March 2009.
1 Please note before delivering this presentation Your management board may ask you questions relating to the implications of the changes for YOT resources.
National Standards for Youth Justice Service 2013: Summary of the key changes.
Providing assurance and promoting improvement through inspection of Youth Offending Work - the 2012 framework The programmes are new but the purpose is.
… because safeguarding children is everyone’s responsibility Enfield Safeguarding Children Board (ESCB) Annual Report 2014/15 Geraldine Gavin – ESCB Independent.
DEVELOPMENTS IN RISK PRACTICE FRAME: Framework for Risk Assessment, Management and Evaluation LS/CMI: Level of Service Case Management Inventory Liz Coates.
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
Developing a Strategic Framework for Early Intervention: Children, Young People and Families Faith Mann Director of Targeted and Early Intervention Services.
Roles and Responsibilities of the IRO. Role and Responsibilities of IRO When consulted about the guidance, children and young people were clear what they.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Early Help Hubs. Progress so far Date – 03/12/15.
Team Around the Family Training 1. G ROUND RULES Time keeping Confidentiality Respect Mobiles off Networking opportunity –sharing of roles Challenge Jargon.
Key changes: Investing in Children Programme An Aspirational Roadmap for Transforming Care, Protection and Youth Justice Services – A Living Document Engaging.
Youth Support Service Carmarthenshire. ‘ By the time a young offender stands before a youth magistrate we may be ten years too late in addressing some.
Breaking the cycle: effective punishment, rehabilitation and sentencing of offenders Ministry of Justice Green Paper.
Sentencing of Young Offenders
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
Effective Support for Children and Families in Essex – July 2017
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
SEFTON MASH The Decision Making Process of MASH and how the current restructure will affect MASH.
Criminal Process General principles of sentencing of youths.
SEND Single Route of Redress - National Trial
Investing in Children Programme
Our new quality framework and methodology:
Out of Court disposals.
Presentation transcript:

Please note before delivering this presentation This slide pack can be adapted for local use by YOTs to meet local conditions and the local audience. It is recommended that you develop some local case studies and training materials to illustrate what impact the changes might have. Pilot YOTs and pilot YOT youth offender panel members strongly recommended “simulation” and Asset “scoring” exercises as helping panel members to understand the Scaled Approach intervention level changes. The Criminal Justice & Immigration Act contains some significant revisions to the conditions under which Referral Orders can be imposed. Panel members will have questions about these changes and the implications for their role. Therefore you should read through this presentation thoroughly before using it. Important information to assist you in delivering the presentation is contained in the notes pane accompanying each slide. Please ensure, these are read prior to using this presentation.

Referral Orders and the Scaled Approach Implementation date: 30 November 2009 Panel members’ briefing ●Insert date

3 Agenda (adapt for local use) The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 ●Key changes ●Purposes of sentencing ●Changes to Referral Orders Scaled Approach ●What is it? ●Why develop it? ●How was it developed? ●What are its key principles? Implications for panel members ●Is there a change in my role? ●How does it work in practice? ●Where can I learn more?

Criminal Justice and Immigration Act

5 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 Key changes: ●Purposes of sentencing ●Youth Rehabilitation Order (YRO) ●Changes to Referral Orders ●Youth Conditional Caution ●Custody-related changes ●Anti-social behaviour, Youth Default Orders, Rehabilitation of Offenders The Scaled Approach

6 Purposes of sentencing When sentencing a young offender the court must have regard to : ●the principal aim of the youth justice system (to prevent offending and reoffending) ●the welfare of the offender ●the purposes of sentencing, which are  punishment  reform and rehabilitation  protection of the public  reparation to persons affected by offences ●Criminal Justice Act 2003 restriction of liberty must be proportionate to seriousness of offence still applies The Scaled Approach

Referral Order changes in the Criminal Justice & Immigration Act From April 2009, Courts can make Referral Orders where: ●There is one previous conviction and Referral Order not given ●Previous bind over or Conditional Discharge ●In exceptional circumstances on YOT recommendation in case with previous Referral Order ●Also includes where a previous custodial sentence has been given And court discretion: ●Discharge Referral Orders early for good behaviour ●extend up to three months at YOT recommendation e.g. non- compliance

The Scaled Approach

The Scaled Approach – what is it? ●The Scaled Approach is a new way to match the intensity of YOTs’ work with children and young people who offend to their assessed likelihood of reoffending and their risk of serious harm to others ●The model, which was developed in partnership with YOTs, provides greater information from which the judiciary can make decisions about a young person’s sentence ●It affects:  how YOTs plan interventions with young people  format and content of YOT reports to courts and youth offender panels ●It is used when a young person is on a Referral Order Contract, a YRO or during the community element of a custodial sentence ●The Scaled Approach has been designed to support the new YRO sentencing structure to be brought in by the Government in November 2009

The Scaled Approach – why develop it? ●Clear recommendation from Audit Commission (2004) ●Significant evidence base (reflected in the Key Elements of Effective Practice) ●An existing tiered framework of interventions in the adult sector ●A risk-based approach was already existing practice in number of YOTs ●A scaled approach was supported by evidence from the risk-based pilots (in four YOTs)

The Scaled Approach – how was it developed? Used all available evidence Piloted and evaluated risk based approaches with four YOTs Consulted widely with key people to ensure any concerns were addressed Developed three intervention level bandings Obtained legal advice from the Ministry of Justice Developed and published the draft model in February 2009

12 The Scaled Approach – key principles ●Assessment determines frequency of YOT contact and type of intervention (but quality is paramount as reflected in Key Elements of Effective Practice) ●Focus on:  Assessed likelihood of reoffending  Risk of serious harm to others  Consider the impact on the victim ●Interventions designed to:  reduce the likelihood of reoffending  reduce the risk of serious harm to others  support the new sentencing framework  Intervention tailored to individual risk and need

13 The Scaled Approach is used by the YOT to determine the level of intervention (either standard, enhanced or intensive) required when a child or young person is subject to one of the following court orders: Referral Order YRO Community element of a custodial sentence The Scaled Approach – a summary

How will my role change? What does this mean for panel members?

Messages from panel members in pilot YOTS ●Quality of reports to the panel improved immensely as a consequence of the risk-based model ●The risk-based approach provides consistency and clarity and moves away from individual YOT officer “idiosyncrasy” ●It enabled a more uniform approach for panel members, provided a clearer way of working  Improves practice because it helps focus on decision making and contract consistency “You do not lose your autonomy or ability to think laterally” “you can insert additional areas of intervention as deemed appropriate” ‘‘the risk-based approach promotes consistency for panel members”

Some questions raised by the pilots QuestionResponse How can the panel reconcile risk and proportionality? Proportionality is a matter the court in setting the length of the referral order Assessments of risk and need are critical to determining the types of interventions which YOT staff will propose to you in Referral Order reports What if the panel feels the young person’s welfare needs require more support than will be offered by statutory appointments alone? It is important that welfare needs do not result in statutory appointments (for which young people can be breached) Where welfare needs are identified, Referral Order reports will outline plans for addressing them on a voluntary basis (i.e. in order that they do not form part of the statutory contacts)

Court imposes Referral order Populate Asset (and ROSH if applicable) Determine Scaled Approach intervention level Apply professional judgement if applicable and seek managerial sign off Recommend possible contract items Prepare Referral Order report based on all available info The Scaled Approach – how does it work in practice Panel defines contract YOT undertakes a full assessment YOT undertakes assessment Gather info from range of sources

Determining intervention level Child/young person profileIntervention Level Low likelihood of reoffending (as indicated by Asset score [dynamic and static factors] between 0 and 14 inclusive) AND Low risk of serious harm (as indicated by no risk of serious harm assessment being required, or low risk of serious harm assessment) Standard Medium likelihood of reoffending (as indicated by Asset score [dynamic and static factors] between 15 and 32 inclusive) OR Medium risk of serious harm (as indicated by risk of serious harm assessment) Enhanced High likelihood of reoffending (as indicated by Asset score [dynamic and static factors] between 33 and 64 inclusive) OR High and Very high risk of serious harm (as indicated by risk of serious harm assessment) Intensive

19 The level of statutory contacts for assessed intervention level Intervention Level (Likelihood of reoffending score) Contacts per month for first 3 months Contacts per month for rest of order Standard (0 – 14 inclusive) 21 Enhanced (15 – 32 inclusive) 42 Intensive (33 – 64 inclusive) 124

20 Benefits of the Scaled Approach More efficient and effective allocation of YOT resources Strengthened case management across the youth justice system Improved practice in assessment quality, pre-sentence reports and intervention planning Tailored interventions based on the young person’s risks and needs Fewer young people in custody Reduced reoffending Reduced risk of serious harm to others Increased public confidence

21 So when will it all happen? Go live date 30 November 2009

Workgroups

For more information about the Scaled Approach and the YRO ●Please speak to your local Referral Order co-ordinator ●Please access the YJB website at gb/practitioners/CourtsAndOrders/Disposals/ReferralOrder ●To view the Referral Order guidance and other materials please access the Ministry of Justice website at ●The guidance document is available at