MedBiquitous Virtual Patient Specification Status: Draft The opportunity Virtual patients are notoriously difficult to author, adapt and exchange. Historically.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Where There’s a Will, There’s a Way:” Developing E-learning From the Perspective of Two Generalists Audrey Kuntz, EdD, RN Vanderbilt University Medical.
Advertisements

® MedBiquitous Annual Conference 2007 Don Detmer, MD, MA Chairman, Board of Directors President & CEO, AMIA.
October2008 PREVIEW: Virtual Patients in Second Life Learning in Immersive worlds Emily Conradi, Sheetal Kavia, Luke Woodham, Terry Poulton St George’s.
What Does That Mean? Author Selection Of Virtual Patient Metrics Rachel Ellaway, David Topps, Richard Witham Northern Ontario School of Medicine.
® Checkup! A MedBiquitous Progress Update Peter Greene, MD Executive Director, MedBiquitous April 17, 2006.
September 2006 eViP. To create a shared online bank of VPs, adapted for multicultural, multilingual use: for the improved quality and efficiency of healthcare.
® Practical Steps for Moving Forward: Virtual Patients Chris Candler, M.D. MedBiquitous Annual Conference.
Time And Effort Of Repurposing Virtual Patients From CASUS To CAMPUS Using The eViP Standard: Automated Vs. Manual Transfer Centre for Virtual Patients.
® MedBiquitous Virtual Patient Standard: An Educator’s Overview.
SkelML and KAMLs The thigh bone’s connected to the hip bone: SKELML and the development of KAMLs Rachel Ellaway and David Topps Northern Ontario School.
® MedBiquitous Annual Conference 2014 David Nichols, MD, MBA Chairman, Board of Directors.
® Development of Technology Standards for the Performance Framework: Progress Report by the Competencies Working Group Rosalyn P. Scott, M.D., M.S.H.A.
Support Lifelong Learning: AAMC & NBME’s New Electronic Portfolio Connector Angelique Johnson Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Leta S. Rose.
® MedBiquitous Annual Conference 2013 Don Detmer, MD, MA Chairman, Board of Directors.
® MedBiquitous Orientation Valerie Smothers MedBiquitous MedBiquitous Annual Conference May 13, 2008.
Printed by THE USE OF MEDEdPORTAL TO TEACH AND ASSESS THE MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION IN A SECOND YEAR CLINICAL SKILLS COURSE Jose.
® Realizing Collaboration: A MedBiquitous Update Peter Greene, MD Executive Director, MedBiquitous May 14, 2008.
® Performance Framework Orientation October 9, 2012.
Implementation Of A MedBiquitous Virtual Patient Compatible Web-Player Hess F, Heid J, Huber S, Haag M Centre for Virtual Patients, University Hospital.
Update on the MedBiquitous Curriculum Inventory Standard Terri Cameron, MA Senior Program Manager, MedAPS.
Authoring and implementation of virtual patients in nursing and obstetrics – the new challenge at the Jagiellonian University Medical College A. Stachoń,
The eViP Consortium What is a Virtual Patient? “An interactive computer simulation of real-life clinical scenarios for the purpose.
National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers Including Artifacts.
Sheetal Kavia, Supriya Krishnan, Luke Woodham, Trupti Jivram, Narain Ramluchumun, Terry Poulton and Sean Hilton St George’s University of London Playing.
Healthcare Learning Object Metadata Status: Candidate standard The opportunity For organizations that create a lot of learning content and activities,
An Online Application Enabling Remote Encounters between Learners and Standardized Patients for the Practice, Assessment, and Remediation of Clinical Skills.
Activity Report Status: Draft The opportunity Continuing health professions education and certification is a highly fragmented industry. A plethora of.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
September T. Calinici, D. Davies, J. Donkers, I. Hege, J. Heid, A. Kononowicz, L. Woodham, N. Zary (Technical reference group.
Leveraging Competency Frameworks Health professions educators are increasingly identifying the outcomes expected of the educational process, and specialty.
Virtual Patient: Opportunities and Limitations Virtual patients are notoriously hard to author, adapt and exchange. Historically this has limited their.
® Laying the Groundwork for Collaboration: A MedBiquitous Update Peter Greene, MD Executive Director, MedBiquitous April 29, 2008.
® MedBiquitous’ Emerging Virtual Patient Architecture Valerie Smothers Deputy Director MedBiquitous Prepared for the Johns Hopkins Division of Health Sciences.
® MedBiquitous Annual Conference 2012 Don Detmer, MD, MA Chairman, Board of Directors.
Needs analysis for virtual patients: a report from the eViP programme David Davies, The University of Warwick, UK Chara Balasubramaniam,
® Advancing Health Education: A MedBiquitous Update Peter S. Greene, MD Executive Director, MedBiquitous CMIO, Johns Hopkins Medicine MedBiquitous Annual.
® MedBiquitous Virtual Patient Standard: An Educator’s Overview.
Virtual Patients in a Virtual Clinic in a Virtual Hospital Neil Gesundheit, Patricia Youngblood, Pauline Brutlag, Eleonor Ekorn, Nabil Zary, Uno Fors,
TUSK Competency Framework Project November 20, 2008.
® MedBiquitous Virtual Patient Standard: A Technical Overview.
Leveraging Competencies in Education Health professions educators are increasingly defining the outcomes expected of the educational process in the US.
Standardized And Extensible JavaScript-API For Logging Functionality For the MVP Player Heid J, Hess F, Huber S, Haag M, Huwendiek S.
Interoperability of case-based training systems in medicine Alexander Hörnlein Universität Würzburg Matthias Holzer Universität München for the CASEPORT.
Requirements on Virtual Learning Environments generated by the use of virtual patients Andrzej A. Kononowicz 1, Inga Hege 2, Martin Adler 3, Bas de Leng.
MedBiquitous XML Design Patterns Rachel Ellaway 1, Valerie Smothers 2, Joel Farrell 3, Daniel Rehak 1 Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 2 MedBiquitous,
September Zary N, Hege I, Heid J, Kononowicz A, Woodham L, Donkers J Enabling Interoperability, Accessibility and Reusability.
September 2006 eViP By Chara Balasubramaniam on behalf of the eViP team St George’s University of London The story so far Introduction.
® MedBiquitous Annual Conference 2009 Don Detmer, MD, MA Chairman, Board of Directors President & CEO, AMIA.
® MedBiquitous Annual Conference 2008 Paul Miles, M.D. Senior Vice President for Quality and Maintenance of Certification American Board of Pediatrics.
Healthcare Learning Object Metadata Status: Candidate standard The opportunity For organizations that create a lot of learning content and activities,
Co-funded by European Commission eContentplus Sharing Practices and Experiences on the Authoring and Adaptation of Open Educational Resources Alexander.
Introduction to the Conference Valerie Smothers Chara Balasubramaniam on behalf of the organizing committee.
Applying the Performance Framework Data Model: A Conceptual Overview January 9, 2014.
LEARN. CARE. COMMUNITY. PNWU.edu Figure 1: Concept Map for IPE Fidelity 1.Determine the rubric score that represents high, medium, and low fidelity. 2.Identify.
NAACCR Interoperability Activities Lori A. Havener, CTR Program Manager of Standards.
VIRTUAL PATIENT - Computer based teaching CAMPUS SOFTWARE Srdjan Masic, MBI, MPH Dejan Bokonjic, MD, PhD.
Making WAVES: the progress of collaborations to further the use of Virtual Patients Sheetal Kavia e-Learning Unit St George’s, University of London, UK.
MedBiquitous Standards Implementation Workshop
Further Information please contact:
MedBiquitous Annual Conference 2015
Textbook Engineering Web Applications by Sven Casteleyn et. al. Springer Note: (Electronic version is available online) These slides are designed.
Peter S. Greene, M.D., Executive Director May 16, 2016
ePBLNet eViP Luke Woodham, St George's University of London
Peter S. Greene, M.D., Executive Director June 5, 2017
Peter Greene, MD Executive Director May 18, 2015
Virtual Hospitals: a panel presentation
SDMX : General introduction H. Linden, Eurostat, Unit B5
MedBiquitous Annual Conference 2011
Introduction to the Conference
Presentation transcript:

MedBiquitous Virtual Patient Specification Status: Draft The opportunity Virtual patients are notoriously difficult to author, adapt and exchange. Historically this has limited their uptake and utility, despite their being able to provide high quality learning opportunities. The MedBiquitous standards organization has developed a data standard for virtual patients to help to address these problems. MedBiquitous defines a virtual patient as “an interactive computer simulation of real- life clinical scenarios for the purpose of health professions training, education, or assessment. Users may be learners, teachers, or examiners” (Ellaway, Candler et al. 2006). The MedBiquitous Virtual Patient (MVP) specification has been designed to be sufficiently abstract and adaptable so that it can accommodate a wide range of applications. The MVP consists of five data components, each of which can be accessed and assembled in a number of different ways. The components can be delivered in a SCORM content package. A standards-based approach Standards for the exchange and delivery of virtual patients enable institutions developing virtual patients to join forces in the development of virtual patient content for use in learning and assessment in all disciplines and at all levels. Implementations include the European Commission co-funded eViP project to develop a bank of shared virtual patient content for European healthcare education. More Information virtual_patient/index.html Draft data and player specifications and schemas available. Other Standards and Specifications Used: SCORM and Healthcare Learning Object Metadata Working Group Members Spenser Aden Susan Albright Ben Azan Dmitriy Babinchenko Chara Balasubramaniam Linda Bell Chris Candler Emily Conradi David Davies Parvati Dev Jeroen Donkers Shona Dippie Uno Fors Robert Galbraith Dennis Glenn Michael Hagen Frank Hess Jörn Heid Matthias Holzer Where Next? The standard is currently in beta testing with a number of groups involved in pilot projects (including Karolinska Institute, Tufts University, and Northern Ontario School of Medicine) using different authoring and delivery tools and platforms. Once beta testing is complete it will go forward as a candidate for a full ANSI standards registration. Components of the MedBiquitous Virtual Patient Specification The same virtual patient activity imported to and delivered within three different virtual patient systems within different institutions Ellaway, R., Candler, C., Greene, P. and Smothers, V. (2006). "An Architectural Model for MedBiquitous Virtual Patients". Baltimore, MD, MedBiquitous Virtual Patients Working Group Rachel Ellaway and J.B. McGee, Co-chairs ® Grace Huang Soeren Huwendiek Patrik Jonsson Carol Kamin Peter Kant Joy Leffler Sandra McIntyre Yanko Michea Dick Moberg Nancy Posel Beth Powell Narain Ramluchumun Dan Rehak Kathie Rose Deborah Sher Gurjeet Shokar Arnold Somasunderam Chris Toth Marc Triola Dan Walker Pat Youngblood Nabil Zary Authoring System A Authoring System BAuthoring System C