Ayanori Sato 1), Nicholas Bowler 2) 1 Railway Technical Research Institute 2 RSSB 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Hakamies-Blomqvist Lecture under the aspect of road user behaviour.
Advertisements

Are you ready?. Welcome to Signal Indication JEOPARDY !
DT Coursework By D. Henwood.
RSSB Fatigue Projects Presentation for Track Safety Alliance Staff Reps Conference 3rd February 2015 © RSSB 3 Feb 2015.
Signal Basics. Signals: –Allow for safe operation of trains – protecting your train, other trains, and the equipment –Lets the railroad operate more efficiently.
Do Now for 5/16/13 Take out E83 #3 and get it ready to hand in.
Emotion Regulation of Others and Self Variability in emotions and emotion regulation Andy Lane, Paul Davis and Tracey Devonport.
OLDER AND YOUNGER DRIVER PERFORMANCE AT COMPLEX INTERSECTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR USING PERCEPTION- RESPONSE TIME AND DRIVING SIMULATION Professor: Liu Student:
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY What needs quick thinking and concentration? Intersection, junctions, roundabouts & U turns all require your.
Ken KUSUKAMI Director Safety Research Laboratory Research and Development Center of JR East Group East Japan Railway Company Development of human factors.
Application of Computer Simulation in Traffic Analysis Presented By: Lei Huang.
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 939–953 Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a.
Mobile Phone Use in a Driving Simulation Task: Differences in Eye Movements Stacy Balk, Kristin Moore, Will Spearman, & Jay Steele.
The art and science of measuring people l Reliability l Validity l Operationalizing.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 19 Affective Behavior.
The art and science of measuring people l Reliability l Validity l Operationalizing.
National Four/Five Characterisation Revision Created by L McCarry.
Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a breaking response. [1] IE484 Lab Section 1 Jennifer Powell.
Why do people make mistakes? Learning Lite
LINC 2007 M-Learning from a Cell Phone: Improving Students’ EMP Learning Experience through Interactive SMS Platform By: Jafar Asgari Arani
Methods of Psychology Hypothesis: A tentative statement about how or why something happens. e.g. non experienced teachers use corporal punishment more.
The Effect that Fear of Public Speaking Has On NNMC Students’ Performance in Classes Oliver Gallegos Northern New Mexico College Department of Integrated.
Descriptive and Causal Research Designs
Questionnaires and Interviews
Establishing MME and MEAP Cut Scores Consistent with College and Career Readiness A study conducted by the Michigan Department of Education (MDE) and ACT,
1 Surveys for Standardization of AVAS in Japan Results of questionnaires investigating in which situations quietness of HV/EV works against people JASIC.
Cognitive demands of hands-free- phone conversation while driving Professor : Liu Student: Ruby.
Report Exemplar. Step 1: Purpose State the purpose of your investigation. Pose an appropriate comparison investigative question and do not forget to include.
Effects on driving behavior of congestion information and of scale of in-vehicle navigation systems Author: Shiaw-Tsyr Uang, Sheue-Ling Hwang Transportation.
Speech Delivery. What is good delivery You cannot make a good speech without having something to say. But having something to say is not enough. You must.
Human Supervisory Control May 13, 2004 Measuring Human Performance: Maintaining Constant Relative Position to a Lead Vehicle in a Simulation Paul.
Presented to: Presented by: Transportation leadership you can trust. Second Day Response Rates: Implications for CMAP’s Travel Tracker Survey 13th TRB.
System Analysis-Gathering Requirements.  System analysis is the process of gathering info about existing system, which may be computerized or not, while.
The Differences in Tailgating Between Men and Women Carla Kuhl & Rebekah Whited, Psychology Mentor: Dwight A. Hennessy, Ph.D. This study investigated the.
Advancing SPAD Management & Operational Performance Through Enhanced Driver Attentiveness Fatigue Management Solutions Ltd. ©Fatigue Management Solutions,
Incident Factor Classification System and Signals Passed at Danger Huw Gibson, Ann Mills, Dan Basacik, Chris Harrison.
The product of evaluation is knowledge. This could be knowledge about a design, knowledge about the user or knowledge about the task.
MASTER CLASS HIGHER PE Command Words.
The purpose of this project is to determine who has a better memory, males or female? The reason why this is important is because if you had something.
Introduction Disordered eating continues to be a significant health concern for college women. Recent research shows it is on the rise among men. Media.
A Psychophysiological Investigation of the State of Monotony amongst Air Traffic Controllers ICRAT 2004, Zilina Sonja Straussberger, Wolfgang Kallus &
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Testing and Documentation Part II.
Chapter Six: The Basics of Experimentation I: Variables and Control.
Age Differences in Visual Search for Traffic Signs During a Simulated Conversation 學生:董瑩蟬.
Nationwide educational campaign „Stop drunk driver” The State Agency for Prevention of Alcohol-Related Problems.
Chapter 14: Affective Assessment
Evaluation of ITS applications on the Køge Bugt Motorway, Denmark Jens Toft Wendelboe Technical Consultant Traffic Management Department Danish Road Directorate.
Measurement Experiment - effect of IV on DV. Independent Variable (2 or more levels) MANIPULATED a) situational - features in the environment b) task.
Towards an express-diagnostics for level of processing and hazard perception Boris M. Velichkovsky et al. Transportation Research Part F 5 (2002)
Performance Indicator 4.08 Creating a Survey Describe the use of technology in the marketing-information management function.
Dynamic Turn Indicator: Research/Investigation Findings Informal document GRE (70th GRE session (21-23 October 2013, agenda item 5(f))
Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.
CE2303 Railway Engineering
Hypothesis Tests l Chapter 7 l 7.1 Developing Null and Alternative
Guide for the application of CSM design targets (CSM DT)
BY :SALEEQ AHMAD ROLL NO: 06
MASTER CLASS HIGHER PE Command Words.
Sunu Bagaskara Universitas YARSI
Driving in City Traffic
Methods of Practice AS Skill Acquisition.
WORD BLAST.
Asist. Prof. Dr. Duygu FIRAT Asist. Prof.. Dr. Şenol HACIEFENDİOĞLU
RECAP – name the type of sampling
Social Practical Charlie.
Boys vs. Girls.
National 5 PE Command Words.
Monitoring & Evaluating Mental / Emotional Factors
Development of Patient Defined Migraine Assessment
MEASUREMENT AND QUESTIONNAIRE CONSTRUCTION:
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, College of Aviation
Presentation transcript:

Ayanori Sato 1), Nicholas Bowler 2) 1 Railway Technical Research Institute 2 RSSB 1

RTC Risk Triggered Commentary driving (RTC) RTC is a rehearsal technique where train drivers speak aloud what they are thinking while driving. This technique was produced in the UK around The effects of RTC Helps prevent the user forgetting to do something (prospective memory error) Helps keep concentration levels raised 2

Situations for using RTC No.SituationPurpose 1On approach to a restrictive signal Reduce likelihood of a SPAD. 2On approach to a speed restriction Reduce likelihood of speeding 3Checking the route indictor is displaying the correct route Reduce likelihood of continuing on the wrong route. 3

P & C Point and Call Check (P & C) P & C is a check method that originated in Japan. Point to target and call its state loudly. P & C is another rehearsal technique. The effects of P & C Preventing misperception Preventing action slip Keep concentration level STOP! 4

Situations for using Point and Call checks Train Drivers check: Traffic Signal Timetable Time Brake Gauge 5

Purpose of this research Both RTC and P & C are rehearsal techniques used to prevent human error. Their methods of use are similar. However, few studies have been conducted investigating how to use these techniques effectively. Purpose This study investigated how to use these techniques effectively using train simulators in the UK. 6

RTC: the case of SPADs In some cases, RTC is used for preventing SPADs 7 train Platform Event Pass another train Track maintenance worker Driver Reduce speed Respond to AWS Memorize red signal Driver Reduce speed DRA Forgetting the red signal Event Conversation with passenger 20 40

The Case of using RTC 8 train Plat home Event Another train Track maintenance worker Event Conversation with passenger Event Driver does not accelerate Driver Reduce Speed Respond to AWS train Driver Reduce Speed DRA train Comment train Comment 20 40

Investigating the different methods of using RTC It is unclear how to use RTC effectively. In this research, two methods of using RTC were investigated. 1. Continuously repeating the commentary This method required participants to speak aloud “next signal is red” every 2 seconds, after passing the yellow signal. 2. Voluntarily repeating the commentary This method allowed the paticipants to voluntarily repeat the commentary at intervals they themselves felt suitable to remind them of the impending danger signal ahead. 9

Investigating the different methods of using RTC MethodAdvantageDisadvantage Voluntary RTC Requires fewer cognitive resources Likely forget the information due to the lower frequency of using RTC Repeating RTC Unlikely to forget the information Increased workload Cause semantic satiation 10 Table 1. The hypothesized advantages and disadvantages of the two different methods of using RTC. Which method is more effective at preventing SPADs?

Investigating the situations that benefit most from using P & C In this research, the use of P & C was investigated in two situations. 1. Single signal situation There was only one signals in the driver’s view. 2. Multi-signal situation There were more than two signals in the driver’s view. It is thought that P & C has an effect of preventing drivers misreading signals (Shigemori et al., 2013). 11 Hypothesis Participants would prefer the use of P & C in multi-signal situations as pointing at the signal would reduce the likelihood of error.

Experiment 12

P & C Stage (Multi-signal) With P & C V.S. Without P & C P & C Stage (Single-signal) With P & C V.S. Without P & C Method Participants Nine train drivers from two railway companies in GB participated in this experiment. All participants were male with an average age of 49. The design of this experiment 13 RTC Stage Repeating RTC V.S. Voluntary RTC P & C Stage (Multi-signal) With P & C V.S. Without P & C P & C Stage (Single-signal) With P & C V.S. Without P & C After each trial in the simulator, the participants completed a questionnaire about their use of RTC and P&C in that trial.

Route- RTC 14 train Platform

Route P & C 15 Single signal route Multi signal route Yellow Signal Green Signal Green Signals

Questionnaire items about RTC No.TitleQuestion 1Confidence How confident were you that you wouldn’t forget the presence of the red signal while driving? 2Difficulty How difficult was it to use RTC? 3 Reduce meaning At any time did you feel repeating the commentary removed the meaningfulness of what you were saying? 4Boredom How bored did you feel while driving? 5Prevent SPADs How effective do you feel using RTC in this way is to prevent SPADs? 16 The five question items from 1 to 5 were answered on using a 7-point Likert scale. Table2. The questions asked after each trial drive in the simulator on RTC routes.

Question items about P & C No.TitleQuestion item 1Confidence How confident were you that you wouldn’t misread the signal aspect while driving? 2Boredom How bored did you feel while driving? 17 Table 3. The questions asked after each trial drive in the simulator on P&C routes. The above two question items were 7-point Likert scale.

Results 18

RTC 19 It can be concluded from these results that participants found the voluntary repetition of the RTC more effective than continuously repeating RTC. It can be concluded from these results that participants found the voluntary repetition of the RTC more effective than continuously repeating RTC. Figure 1. The evaluation to RTC in each question items.

P & C - Confidence - 20 Figure 2. Average participant’s feeling of how confident they were that they would not misread the signal aspect.

P & C - boredom - 21 Figure 3. Average participant’s feeling of boredom.

Discussion 22

RTC The results indicated that participants preferred to use RTC when given the option to use the voluntary repetition method. Workload and difficulty of using constantly repeating RTC was higher than the voluntary repeating RTC. The participants felt the meaningfulness of the commentary was stronger when voluntarily repeating it. The degree of boredom experienced by participants was higher in the constantly repeating RTC condition. 23 The participant‘s perceptions of the effect of RTC on preventing SPADs was larger in the voluntary repeating RTC condition

P & C In this experiment, the effect of P & C was not confirmed despite other studies finding this effect. Why ? Participants were not used to using P & C. The distance of route in this experiment was too short. The number of participants was too few. But the reason for this effect not emerging is unclear. Further research is needed to improve the reliability and validity of these results and to clear the effect of P & C 24

Thank you for your attention. 25