FLUKA Rechnungen für das CBM Experiment an FAIR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
NE Introduction to Nuclear Science Spring 2012
Interaction of radiation with matter - 5
HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
Plot Approval Yat Long Chan (CUHK) Igor Mandic (Ljubljana) Charlie Young (SLAC)
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
BLM review Mario Santana Leitner OUTLOOK ON FLUKA SIMULATIONS FOR UDULATOR DAMAGE AND BLM RESPONSE Mario Santana Leitner, Alberto.
Open Charm Everard CORDIER (Heidelberg) Grako meeting HD, April 28, 2006Everard Cordier.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Workshop on Physics on Nuclei at Extremes, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy.
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Vector meson study for the CBM experiment at FAIR/GSI Anna Kiseleva GSI Germany, PNPI Russia   Motivation   The muon detection system of CBM   Vector.
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
Sergey Ananko Saint-Petersburg State University Department of Physics
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
IFluka : a C++ interface between Fairroot and Fluka Motivations Design The CBM case: –Geometry implementation –Settings for radiation studies –Global diagnosis.
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
Radiation levels in CBM Radiation effects iFluka (Fluka C++ interface to CbmRoot) Fluka Geometry Models Results Conclusion.
IFluka : a C++ interface between Fairroot and Fluka Motivations Design The CBM case: –Geometry implementation –Settings for radiation studies –Global diagnosis.
UPHUK-3, September 2007, Bodrum Turkey -1- Ercan Pilicer, Ilhan Tapan, Nilgun Demir Uludag Univesity Physics Department Bursa-Turkey A RADIATION.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
The FLUKA high energy cosmic ray generator: predictions for the charge ratio of muons detected underground G. Battistoni, A. Margiotta, S. Muraro, M. Sioli.
MSL - SLAC11 Radiation Protection studies for SiD Mario Santana, SLAC / RP 2010 Linear Collider Workshop & International Linear Collider Meeting Tsinghua.
Modeling Production, Interactions and Transport Fermilab November 14, 2005 Fermilab ILC-CAL Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
Detector Simulation Presentation # 3 Nafisa Tasneem CHEP,KNU  How to do HEP experiment  What is detector simulation?
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
Towards comparisons between TFluka and TGeant3 ( within CbmRoot Framework) Denis Bertini (IT-GSI) Antonin Maire (IPHC Strasbourg)
20/12/2011Christina Anna Dritsa1 Design of the Micro Vertex Detector of the CBM experiment: Development of a detector response model and feasibility studies.
20/12/2011Christina Anna Dritsa1 The model: Input Charge generation The charge of the cluster is taken by random sampling of the experimental distribution.
Target Simulations for Hadron, Electron and Heavy-Ion Beams 2 nd High-Power Targetry Workshop Oak Ridge, TN October 10-14, 2005 Fermilab High-Power Targetry.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Introduction to Irradiation Facilities 1. Challenges at LHC and Why we need Irradiation Facilities (Mar CAPEANS) 2. PH Department Proton and Neutron Facilities.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Radiation Fields.
An introduction Luisella Lari On behalf of the FLUKA collaboration CAoPAC: Computer-Aided Optimization of Particle Accelerator Workshop March 2015.
Update on radiation estimates for the CLIC Main and Drive beams Sophie Mallows, Thomas Otto CLIC OMPWG.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano Icarus: a multipurpose.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
Design of novel GEM-based neutron spectrometer E. Aza 1,2* 1 CERN, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland, 2 AUTH, Department of Physics, Thessaloniki, Greece,
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
Seoul National University Han-wool Ju CUNPA Kick-off Meeting Aug.22-23, 2013.
14TeV CMS Simulations and Webtools John Farmer (Clemson University) Supervisor: Pushpa Bhat 1.
Pedro Brogueira 1, Patrícia Gonçalves 2, Ana Keating 2, Dalmiro Maia 3, Mário Pimenta 2, Bernardo Tomé 2 1 IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, 2 LIP, Laboratório.
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
– a CBM full system test-setup at GSI
U.Frankenfeld GSI Darmstadt
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
ADvanced MOnolithic Sensors for
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
How a Particle Detector works
Physics Validation of LHC Simulations
Alexandru JIPA, Ionel LAZANU, Marius CĂLIN, Tiberiu EŞANU,
Radiation Backgrounds in the ATLAS New Small Wheel
Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
ACCELERATORS AND DETECTORS
FLUKA SIMULATION OF MUON DETECTOR,MUCH,
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Background Simulations at Fermilab
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Presentation transcript:

FLUKA Rechnungen für das CBM Experiment an FAIR Anna Senger FAIR@GSI, CBM Detektoren

Outlook FLUKA tool and radiation environment predictions The CBM experiment FLUKA calculations for the CBM detector development Conclusions FLUKA "The FLUKA code: Description and benchmarking" G. Battistoni, S. Muraro, P.R. Sala, F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, S. Roesler, A. Fasso`, J. Ranft, Proceedings of the Hadronic Shower Simulation Workshop 2006, Fermilab 6--8 September 2006, M. Albrow, R. Raja eds., AIP Conference Proceeding 896, 31-49, (2007) "FLUKA: a multi-particle transport code" A. Fasso`, A. Ferrari, J. Ranft, and P.R. Sala, CERN-2005-10 (2005), INFN/TC_05/11, SLAC-R-773 FLAIR V.Vlachoudis "FLAIR: A Powerful But User Friendly Graphical Interface For FLUKA“ Proc. Int. Conf. on Mathematics, Computational Methods & Reactor Physics (M&C 2009), Saratoga Springs, New York, 2009

FLUKA www.fluka.org FLUKA is a general purpose tool for calculations of particle transport and interactions with matter, covering an extended range of applications spanning from proton and electron accelerator shielding to target design, calorimetry, activation, dosimetry, detector design, Accelerator Driven Systems, cosmic rays, neutrino physics, radiotherapy etc. Transport limits: Secondary particles Primary particles charged hadrons 1 keV-20 TeV * 100 keV-20 TeV * ** neutrons thermal-20 TeV * thermal-20 TeV * antineutrons 1 keV-20 TeV * 10 MeV-20 TeV * muons 1 keV-1000 TeV 100 keV-1000 TeV ** electrons 1 keV-1000 TeV 70 keV-1000 TeV (low-Z materials) ** 150 keV-1000 TeV (high-Z materials) ** photons 100 eV-1000 TeV 1 keV-10000 TeV heavy ions <10000 TeV/n <10000 TeV/n * upper limit 10 PeV with the DPMJET interface ** lower limit 10 keV in single scattering mode thermal ~ 10-5 eV

MATERIAL CAUSE RADIATION EFFECT Radiation Effects MATERIAL CAUSE RADIATION EFFECT Semiconductors Electron-hole pair dose ionization Photon interaction photon absorption Lattice displacement nuclear collision Polymers Main and side chain rupture dose ionization cross-linking degradation dose ionization gas evolution, radical production dose rate Ceramics Lattice displacements nuclear collision trapped charge carriers dose ionization color centers dose ionization Metals Lattice displacements nuclear collision nuclear reactions producing clusters nuclear collision voids and bubbles nuclear collision

Radiation environment during the experiments Dose in shielded areas (where the electronics is usually located) is mainly due to neutrons (and associated photons) Dose and neutron fluxes have a very close correlation Cumulative damage comes from Energy deposition (ionizing dose) Lattice displacement (1-MeV n equivalent particle fluxes) Stochastic failures can occur (SEU) and are mostly due to “high” energy hadrons (“E>20 MeV”) No safe limit exists, only a risk level can be determined Risk level for commercial electronics is poorly known and varies by orders of magnitude between different devices and series Only a combination of the following can assure safe operation: Simulation studies of related radiation levels (Dose, 1MeV, 20MeV) Careful selection and testing of required electronics Shielding and displacement considerations

Radiation Effects microscopic effect (detectors) Displacement Damage. Hadrons can interact and cause significant damage to the crystal lattice. The amount and type of damage depends on the particle type and energy. The damage is usually quantified by the amount of Non-Ionizing Energy Loss Ionizing Radiation is of high energy, capable to penetrate in the matter, to produce ionization of the atoms and to break chemical bonds. macroscopic effect (electronics)

CBM experiment @ FAIR STS MuCh TRD ToF PSD MVD + STS RICH TRD ToF ECAL Experimental tasks and detector systems tracking, momentum determination, vertex reconstruction: silicon pixel/strip detectors (MVD+STS) in a magnetic dipole field hadron identification: Time-of-Flight (ToF) measurements lepton identification: Muon detection system, RICH, TRD and ECAL for electrons (alternative measurements) determination of collision centrality and event plane: projectile spectator detector (PSD) high speed DAQ and online event selection STS MuCh TRD ToF PSD MVD + STS RICH TRD ToF ECAL PSD Experimental and technical challenges high multiplicities (up to 1000 particles per reaction) high reaction rates (up to 10 MHz)

FLUKA CBM geometry CBM @ SIS300 full setup CBM @ SIS100 start version side view TRD ToF CBM @ SIS300 full setup vacuum beam pipe MVD + STS PSD RICH FLAIR side view CBM @ SIS100 start version ToF TRD MVD + STS PSD He bags RICH FLAIR

CAVE Non-Ionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) CBM @ SIS300 CBM @ SIS100 vacuum CBM @ SIS100: Au+Au @ 10 GeV/u, 109 Au/s CBM @ SIS300: Au+Au @ 35 GeV/u, 109 Au/s Non-Ionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) neq/cm2/2months side view vacuum beam pipe CBM @ SIS300 side view CBM @ SIS100 He bags

CAVE Ionizing dose CBM @ SIS300 CBM @ SIS100 vacuum beam pipe He bags CBM @ SIS100: Au+Au @ 10 GeV/u, 109 Au/s CBM @ SIS300: Au+Au @ 35 GeV/u, 109 Au/s Ionizing dose Gy/2months side view vacuum beam pipe CBM @ SIS300 side view CBM @ SIS100 He bags

MVD Ionizing dose CBM @ SIS300 CBM @ SIS100 5 cm 10 cm 15 cm CBM @ SIS100: Au+Au @ 10 GeV/u, 107 Au/s CBM @ SIS300: Au+Au @ 35 GeV/u, 107 Au/s Ionizing dose 5 cm 10 cm 15 cm Gy/2months CBM @ SIS300  10 cm  18.6 cm  22.8 cm CBM @ SIS100

MVD Non-Ionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) CBM @ SIS300 CBM @ SIS100 5 cm CBM @ SIS100: Au+Au @ 10 GeV/u, 107 Au/s CBM @ SIS300: Au+Au @ 35 GeV/u, 107 Au/s Non-Ionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) 5 cm 10 cm 15 cm neq/cm2/2months CBM @ SIS300  10 cm  18.6 cm  22.8 cm CBM @ SIS100

STS Ionizing dose CBM @ SIS300 CBM @ SIS100 30 cm 100 cm CBM @ SIS100: Au+Au @ 10 GeV/u, 107 Au/s CBM @ SIS300: Au+Au @ 35 GeV/u, 107 Au/s Ionizing dose 30 cm 100 cm Gy/2months CBM @ SIS300 48  40 cm2 96  100 cm2 CBM @ SIS100 electronics

STS Non-Ionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) CBM @ SIS300 CBM @ SIS100 30 cm CBM @ SIS100: Au+Au @ 10 GeV/u, 107 Au/s CBM @ SIS300: Au+Au @ 35 GeV/u, 107 Au/s Non-Ionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) 30 cm 100 cm neq/cm2/2months CBM @ SIS300 48  40 cm2 96  100 cm2 CBM @ SIS100 electronics

Detector damages 1014 n/cm2 104 Gy

live time without/mild damages Conclusions estimated CBM detector live time (only for hot regions) detectors beam intensity (s-1) live time without/mild damages MVD 107 6 months * STS 109 10 months * RICH 2 years ** MuCh 6 months ** TRD ToF PSD 108 1 year ** * sensitive to the NIEL ** sensitive to the ionizing dose