CEE 320 Winter 2006 Trip Generation and Mode Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Advertisements

THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
DEVELOPMENT OF MODE CHOICE MODEL FOR WORK TRIPS IN GAZA CITY State of Palestine Ministry of Transport Sadi I. S. AL-Raee EuroMed Regional Transport Project:
Vehicle Dynamics CEE 320 Steve Muench.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Traffic Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS TWO Denver Regional Council of Governments June 30, 2011.
Geometric Design CEE 320 Steve Muench.
1 Transportation Modeling Approach Direct vs. Sequence Meeghat Habibian Modeling approach.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 2 Exploring Data with Graphs and Numerical Summaries Section 2.1 Different Types of.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
Module 6: Continuous Probability Distributions
Modal Split Analysis.
Final Exam Tuesday, December 9 2:30 – 4:20 pm 121 Raitt Hall Open book
QUALITATIVE AND LIMITED DEPENDENT VARIABLE MODELS.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Queuing CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Trip Generation and Mode Choice CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Queuing and Transportation
CEE 320 Spring 2007 Queuing CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Travel and Transportation © Allen C. Goodman, 2009.
Discrete Choice Models for Modal Split Overview. Outline n General procedure for model application n Basic assumptions in Random Utility Model n Uncertainty.
Estimating Congestion Costs Using a Transportation Demand Model of Edmonton, Canada C.R. Blaschuk Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
CEE 320 5Winter 2005 Mode Choice Survey Results. CEE 320 5Winter 2005 Utility Models U(Walking)= (ShortDistance) U(Bicycle)=3.797(ShortDistance)
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Mode Choice Survey Results. CEE 320 Fall 2008 Which variables do you think matter? What is your age? How far from campus do you live?
Signalized Intersections
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Steve Muench.
12. TRACTIVE EFFORT AND TRACTIVE RESISTANCE
MODELS OF QUALITATIVE CHOICE by Bambang Juanda.  Models in which the dependent variable involves two ore more qualitative choices.  Valuable for the.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
A COMPARISON OF TRIPS TO SCHOOLS IN SUBURBAN BANGKOK Nattapol PIYAEISARAKUL King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi and Associate Professor Viroat.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2008McGraw-Hill/Irwin Probability Distributions Chapter 6.
23e Congrès mondial de la Route - Paris 2007 Public Transport in Gauteng Province: Order out of Chaos Prof Nevhutanda Alfred Department of Transport(South.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
Behavioral Modeling for Design, Planning, and Policy Analysis Joan Walker Behavior Measurement and Change Seminar October UC Berkeley.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
Copyright © 2014, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Chapter 18 Inference for Counts.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5-1 Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach 8 th Edition Chapter 5 Discrete.
Review- Observation-Inference-Prediction Carefully look at each image/graph and for each image/graph come up with – o 1 Observation o 1 Inference o 1 Prediction.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Measuring road traffic volume through passenger mobility surveys Vasilis Nikolaou AGILIS SA Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle-kilometres),
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
ILUTE A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model Incorporating Inter-Personal Interactions Within the Household Matthew J. Roorda Eric J. Miller UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Traffic Flow Characteristics. Dr. Attaullah Shah
Estimating the Benefits of Bicycle Facilities Stated Preference and Revealed Preference Approaches Kevin J. Krizek Assistant Professor Director, Active.
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Improving the Residential Location Model for the New York Metropolitan Region Haiyun Lin City College of New York Project Advisors: Prof. Cynthia Chen,
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2008McGraw-Hill/Irwin Probability Distributions Chapter 6.
Elementary Statistics:
Car, walk or public transport?
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Trip Generation and Mode Choice
Mode Choice Survey Results
Modeling Approach Direct vs. Sequenced
Transportation Demand Analysis
Travel Demand and Traffic Forecasting
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Trip Generation I Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Presentation transcript:

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Trip Generation and Mode Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Outline 1.Trip Generation 2.Mode Choice a.Survey

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Trip Generation Purpose –Predict how many trips will be made –Predict exactly when a trip will be made Approach –Aggregate decision-making units –Categorized trip types –Aggregate trip times (e.g., AM, PM, rush hour) –Generate Model

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Motivations for Making Trips Lifestyle –Residential choice –Work choice –Recreational choice –Kids, marriage –Money Life stage Technology

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Reporting of Trips - Issues Under-reporting trivial trips Trip chaining Other reasons (passenger in a car for example)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Trip Generation Models Linear (simple) Poisson (a bit better)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Poisson Distribution Count distribution –Uses discrete values –Different than a continuous distribution P(n)=probability of exactly n trips being generated over time t n=number of trips generated over time t λ=average number of trips over time, t t=duration of time over which trips are counted (1 day is typical)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Poisson Ideas Probability of exactly 4 trips being generated –P(n=4) Probability of less than 4 trips generated –P(n<4) = P(0) + P(1) + P(2) + P(3) Probability of 4 or more trips generated –P(n≥4) = 1 – P(n<4) = 1 – (P(0) + P(1) + P(2) + P(3)) Amount of time between successive trips

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Poisson Distribution Example Trip generation from my house is assumed Poisson distributed with an average trip generation per day of 2.8 trips. What is the probability of the following: 1.Exactly 2 trips in a day? 2.Less than 2 trips in a day? 3.More than 2 trips in a day?

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Example Calculations Exactly 2: Less than 2: More than 2:

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Example Graph

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Example Graph

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Example: Time Between Trips

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Example Recreational or pleasure trips measured by λ i (Poisson model):

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Example Probability of exactly “n” trips using the Poisson model: Cumulative probability –Probability of one trip or less:P(0) + P(1) = 0.52 –Probability of at least two trips:1 – (P(0) + P(1)) = 0.48 Confidence level –We are 52% confident that no more than one recreational or pleasure trip will be made by the average individual in a day

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Mode Choice Purpose –Predict the mode of travel for each trip Approach –Categorized modes (SOV, HOV, bus, bike, etc.) –Generate Model

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Dilemma Explanatory Variables Qualitative Dependent Variable

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Dilemma Home to School Distance (miles) Walk to School (yes/no variable) = no, 0 = yes = observation

CEE 320 Winter 2006 A Mode Choice Model Logit Model Final form Specifiable partUnspecifiable part s = all available alternatives m = alternative being considered n = traveler characteristic k = traveler

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Discrete Choice Example Regarding the TV sitcom Gilligan’s Island, whom do you prefer?

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Ginger Model U Ginger = – (carg) (mang) (pierceg) – (genxg) carg=Number of working vehicles in household mang=Male indicator (1 if male, 0 if female) pierceg=Pierce Brosnan indicator for question #11 (1 if Brosnan chosen, 0 if not) genxg=generation X indicator (1 if respondent is part of generation X, 0 if not)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Mary Anne Model U Mary Anne = – (privatem) – (agem) – (sinm) – (housem) (seanm) (collegem) – (llm) (boomm) privatem=number of years spent in a private school (K – 12) agem=age in years sinm=single marital status indicator (1 if single, 0 if not) housem=number of people in household seanm=Sean Connery indicator for question #11 (1 if Connery chosen, 0 if not) collegem=college education indicator (1 if college degree, 0 if not) llm=long & luxurious hair indicator for question #7 (1 if long, 0 if not) boomm=baby boom indicator (1 if respondent is a baby boomer, 0 if not)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 No Preference Model U no preference = – x10-6(incn) – (gunsn) (nojames) (cafn) (ohairn) incn=household income gunsn=gun ownership indicator (1 if any guns owned, 0 if no guns owned) nojames=No preference indicator for question #11 (1 if no preference, 0 if preference for a particular Bond) cafn=Caffeinated drink indicator for question #5 (1 if tea/coffee/soft drink, 0 if any other) ohairn=Other hair style indicator for question #7 (1 if other style indicated, 0 if any style indicated)

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Results Average probabilities of selection for each choice are shown in yellow. These average percentages were converted to a hypothetical number of respondents out of a total of 207.

CEE 320 Winter 2006 My Results U ginger =– U mary anne =– U no preference =–

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Primary References Mannering, F.L.; Kilareski, W.P. and Washburn, S.S. (2005). Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis, Third Edition. Chapter 8 Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway Capacity Manual National Research Council, Washington, D.C.