UNDP/GEF Main Streams of Life (MSL) Wetland PA System Strengthening for Biodiversity Conservation Programme National Level Project Beijing, June 7th, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of NAPA Implementation in Bangladesh Least Developed Countries Expert Group stocktaking meeting on NAPA preparation and implementation Bangkok,
Advertisements

1 Overview of the UNEP/GEF Siberian Crane Wetlands Project GOAL: Secure the ecological integrity of a network of critical wetlands needed for the survival.
Key Lessons from UNDP-GEF biodiversity conservation projects in the Asia Pacific Region Sameer Karki Regional Technical Adviser UNDP Regional Centre in.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Schlosser & Pfirman, Nature Geosciences, 2012 Integrated Approach Pilots: Charting a New Frontier for the Global Environment.
The Resilient Coasts Initiative A Partnership Response.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
GEF and Environmental & Conservation Funds Presentation for the Workshop on “Management of Environmental Funds for the Financial Sustainability of Biodiversity.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
Main Streams of Life (MSL) - Wetland PA Programme Midori Paxton Regional Technical Adviser Ecosystems and Biodiversity Energy and Environment Group.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool and Suggested Structure for Assessment United Nations Statistics.
The Project Preparation Phase Inception Workshop and the First Steering Committee Meeting of the UNEP/GEF Project “Piloting Integrated Processes and Approaches.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia Bangkok, Thailand 7-8 April 2009 Tracking national portfolios and assessing results.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland, New Zealand, September 2008.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia May 2008, Manila.
SWITCH – ASIA POLICY SUPPORT COMPONENT 1. What is about? 2  Create an enabling environment to strengthen or initiate policies helping to mainstream SCP.
1 Capacity Building: Strategy and Action Plan GEF-UNDP Strategic Partnership Capacity Development Initiative.
The GEF Replenishment How does it come about? Gustavo Fonseca Head, Natural Resources Biodiversity, International Waters, Land Degradation, SFM/REDD+ Global.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Preliminary theory of change for the South China Sea Project Cluster Neeraj Negi Reference Group Meeting Bangkok, Thailand September 27, 2010.
Project Overview, Objectives, Components and Targeted Outcomes
The Why, What, When & How The Why, What, When & How Midori Paxton & Doley Tshering Regional Technical Adviser Ecosystems and Biodiversity CBPF-MSL Programme.
GEF IN TAJIKISTAN Dr. Neimatullo SAFAROV CBD and CPB National Focal Point Republic of Tajikistan.
Roles of GEF National Focal Points & Experiences in GEF Coordination and Integration Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland,
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
UNDP Project Document and GEF CEO Endorsement Request Document Midori Paxton & Doley Tshering Regional Technical Advisers Ecosystems and Biodiversity Energy.
Country Presentation- GEF Operational Focal Point, Sri Lanka GEF Sub-Regional Workshop 2-3 December 2007, Bali, Indonesia Anura Jayatilake Director, Environmental.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
GEF Project Cycle GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 11 – 13 October 2011 Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
United Nations Development Programme in the Russian Federation Moscow: Ostozhenka, 28 Tel: (095) Fax: (095) Integrating.
UNDP/GEF Main Streams of Life Wetland PA System Strengthening for Biodiversity Conservation Developing “Report Templates” to assist in ProDoc formulation:
Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.
Data/info/stakeholders to collect / consult UNDP/GEF MSL ProgrammeBeijing, China7 June 2012 Dr J Marc Foggin, Plateau Perspective (Xining, Qinghai, China)
NCSA AS A TOOL FOR INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (ARMENIA EXPERIENCE) Anahit Simonyan June, 2004 Bratislava UNDP ARMENIA.
GEF Biodiversity Portfolio & Strategic Priorities for GEF-3 Kanta Kumari Biodiversity Program Manager Global Environment Facility.
Environment and Energy Community of Practice meeting, Bratislava, 24 – 26 September, 2007 BIODIVERSITY.
The China Biodiversity Partnership And Framework for Action (CBPF) A Programmatic Approach for Biodiversity Conservation.
Yoko Watanabe & Ulrich Apel Natural Resources Team GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 Mobilizing Resources through Programmatic.
Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Nairobi, Kenya May 2007.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
Xinjiang Altai Landscape project Core team Marc Foggin Yu Changqing Cao Dinggui.
International Workshop on the future of the CBD PoWPA, Jeju, 2009 Summary: International Workshop on the Future of the CBD Programme of Work on Protected.
U N C C D The new monitoring and reporting system of the UNCCD, looking for synergy options in reporting Cambridge, 10 February 2010.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Experience in Turkey and SEC.  Regular communication with stakeholders  Attending seminars and conferences for FAO visibility  Following possible funds.
Piloting Integrated Processes and Approaches To Facilitate National Reporting to Rio Conventions – a GEF/UNEP project CBD SBSTTA 14 May 2010, Nairobi,
GEF Familiarization Seminar January 17 – 19, 2012 Mark Zimsky, Biodiversity Coordinator Senior Biodiversity Specialist, Global Environment Facility GEF-5.
GEF Project Cycle GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 1-3, 2011 Belize City, Belize.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting Globally-important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project Rome, 7-9 June 2004 Components and Processes.
NFM: Modular Template Measurement Framework: Modules, Interventions and Indicators LFA M&E Training February
Scorecard for financial sustainability of national protected area systems Helen Negret Valuing and Financing Protected Areas Workshop Bogota, November.
Mobilizing Resources through Programmatic Approaches GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 1-2, 2011 Belize City, Belize.
Dr. Vladimir Mamaev UNDP Regional Technical Advisor Integrated Natural Resource Management in the Baikal Basin Transboundary Ecosystem Russian Federation.
Project Debriefing Debriefing meeting on the implementation status of two ADB- JFPR funded projects: (i) Technical Assistance Strengthening Coordination.
Preliminary theory of change for the South China Sea Project Cluster
Strengthening the integration of gender in national and regional statistical strategies Proposed PARIS21 & UN Women collaboration.
Session with Partners, 8 October 2014
UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Revising GEF’s M&E Policy
Mobilizing Resources through Programmatic Approaches
Sustainable Transition / Handover of malaria TB and HIV Global Fund Grants Generic 2018.
Mobilizing Resources through Programmatic Approaches
GEF Project & Program Cycle & Key Policies GEF-7 National Dialogue
SNA Work Plan and Budget Revision 2015 (additional activities)
Mobilizing Resources through Programmatic Approaches
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points
Mobilizing Resources through Programmatic Approaches
Presentation transcript:

UNDP/GEF Main Streams of Life (MSL) Wetland PA System Strengthening for Biodiversity Conservation Programme National Level Project Beijing, June 7th, 2012

THE BIG PICTURE: CHINA BIODIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP FRAMEWORK (CPBF) UNDP/GEF CBPF: Framework for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use. Strategic partnership-based approach for cooperation around CBPF’s partners projects. Shift the national approach to biodiversity and more fully integrate it into development at all levels.

“NOT THE FIRST UNDP-GEF WETLANDS PROJECT” UNDP-GEF- Government of China Project “Wetland Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use in China” (2009) Objective: To establish wetland biodiversity conservation as a routine consideration in national, provincial and local government decision making and action (ca. US$15 Million) Weaknesses: Geographically very dispersed; Ecosystem point of view very diverse (tidal mudflats, high elevation peat bogs, open wetlands); Some of these systems (e.g. Ruoergai peat bogs) are extremely complex from an anthropological, social and economic point of view Credibility loss as a result of its suspension in 2002 Absence of a well developed M&E system Despite these Shortcomings: Impressive information/data bases were set up; Monitoring systems improved or put in place Information made available at all levels; Mechanism of policy dialogue and cooperation enhanced; Staff at all levels were given specialised training or for study tours, national and international.

UNDP/GEF MAIN STREAMS OF LIFE (MSL) WETLAND PA SYSTEM STRENGTHENING FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PROGRAMME - Sub-set of the CBPF Results Framework Goal: Catalyze the sustainability of the National Protected Area System for Conservation of Globally Significant Wetland Biodiversity “Long-term solution” to safeguard wetland biodiversity: to build a stronger PA system that has a far more robust governance framework to deliver improved conservation across the country. Barriers 1: Weak systemic and institutional capacity for effective PA management at the national, provincial and local levels. 2: Disconnect between PA planning and management and national development and sectoral planning plus low financial security 3: Insufficient availability and accessibility of information and data and insufficient awareness

PROGRAMMATIC APPROACH: MSL A National-Level Project and Six Provincial Projects

Project Submitted for Council Approval in this Work Programme + Future Submissions: Project Title GEF Amount ($) Agency Fee ($)Total ($) Expected Submission Date Focal Area 1Focal Area 2Total Project FSP submitted with PFD in the work programme CBPF-MSL Strengthening the management effectiveness of the sub- system of wetland protected areas for conservation of globally significant biodiversity (UNDP) 2,654, ,929.42,893,700.4August 2011 CBPF-MSL Strengthening the management effectiveness of the protected areas in Altai Mountains and Wetlands Landscape in Xinjiang Autonomous Region (UNDP) 3,544, ,021.13,863,700.1August 2011 CBPF-MSL Protection and Sustainable Use of Poyang Lake Wetland Ecosystem (FAO) 5,302, ,223.65,779,696.6August 2011 TOTAL11,501,923 1,035, ,537,097.1 FSP projects to be submitted in future work programme CBPF-MSL Strengthening the management effectiveness of the wetland protected area system in Hainan Province (UNDP) 2,654, ,929.42,893,700.4October 2011 CBPF-MSL Strengthening the management effectiveness of protected areas in the Daxing’anling Landscape (UNDP) 3,544, ,021.13,863,700.1February 2012 CBPF-MSL Strengthening the management effectiveness of the Honghu PA sub-system in Hubei Province (UNDP) 2,654, ,929.42,893,700.4February 2012 CBPF-MSL Strengthening the management effectiveness of Shenjinghu PA sub-system in Anhui Province (UNDP) 2,654, ,929.42,893,700.4February 2012 TOTAL 11,508, ,035, ,544,801.3 GRAND TOTAL 23,010,9150 2,070, ,081,897.4

PROPOSED PPG ACTIVITIES Project Preparation Activities Outputs of the PPG Activities Activity 1: Systemic and institutional capacity for managing the sub-system of wetland PAs: Detailed analysis report on systemic (legal/policy) and institutional capacity at the national and provincial (Xinjiang, Hainan, Heilongjiang, Inner Mongolia) for managing sub-system of wetland PAs Activity 2: Situation Analysis on National Development and Sector Planning Process: A comprehensive analysis report provisionally titled “Anatomy of the National and Provincial Development and Sector Planning Process and Opportunities for Mainstreaming.” Activity 3: Profiling of wetland PA sub-system and identification of priorities for consolidation Report provisionally entitled “Wetland PA Sub-System in China and Strategy for Consolidation.” Activity 4: Wetland Biodiversity Health Index Development Develop the wetland Biodiversity Health Index (BHI) and apply it to the programme demonstration sites under the four projects, establishing the baseline and targets for the projects. Activity 5: Assessment of PA information and data management system Assessment report on PA and wetland information and data management system. Activity 6: Knowledge Attitudes and Practices (KAP) Survey, community participation and gender assessment (i) KAP survey (ii) Community participation plan for the provincial projects. (iii) gender assessment for the national and provincial projects. Activity 7: Wetland PA financing needs, management effectiveness assessment and PA site profiling Complete GEF BD-1 Tracking Tools. Activity 8: Feasibility analysis and budgetVarious

HIGH COMPLEXITY: MANY MOVING PIECES GEF Council UNDP ProDoc National-Level Stakeholders Provincial-Level Stakeholders Budgets Formats Time-Constraints M&E International Consultants National Consultants Project Partners

Results Framework (National-Level Project) Objective: To strengthen the management effectiveness of the sub-system of wetland protected areas to respond to existing and emerging threats to the globally significant biodiversity. Project ComponentExpected Outcomes GEF (US$) Co-financing (US$) 1. Systemic and national institutional capacity for managing the sub-system of wetland PAs  Coverage of natural wetlands in the national PA network increased from the baseline of 50.3% to 52%; adding an extra 600,000 hectares…  BD health status index monitoring system and better staff competencies…. 0.9M5.308M 2. Mainstreaming wetland PAs in sectoral planning  Strengthened national development and sector planning framework provides: (i) Safeguards, (ii) Increased financing for wetland PA management. 1.1M4.135M 3. Knowledge management, lessons sharing, and awareness  Improved data sharing platform being regularly updated.  Public and government have better understanding and better access to information about wetland issues (KAP).  Programmatic impact assured and monitored and knowledge and lessons documented and disseminated widely M 1.007M

DELIVERABLES OF THE NATIONAL-LEVEL PROJECT PREPARATION Technically cleared project documents and CEO endorsement request documents of the national policy project under the Programme, with all necessary information and annexes, including, inter alia;  Systemic and institutional capacity assessment;  Situation Analysis on National Development and Sector Planning Process;  Profiling of wetland PA sub-system and identification of priorities for consolidation;  Assessment of PA information and data management system;  Wetland Biodiversity Health Index;  Financial Sustainability Scorecard Assessment at the national and provincial and subprovincial levels for wetland PA sub-system management;  Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) assessment for the project;  Capacity development scorecard assessments.

TEAM OF THE NATIONAL-LEVEL PROJECT Dr. Gonzalo Castro de la Mata (International Consultant) Dr. Zhang Mingxiang (National Co-Leader) Dr. Yali Wen (Legal and Institutional Capacity) Dr. Lei Guangchun (Sector Planning)

TIMELINE CBPF - MSL NATIONAL PROJECT AprilMayJuneJulyAugust Septembe rOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuary Contracting International Consultant Document Review Contract National Consultants Inception Meeting Beijing Detailed Work Plan for National Consultant Agreed Work on CEO Endorsement Document (Standard Sections) Work on UNDP Pro-Doc National Consultant Gathers Specific Information Review of Information Produced by Natioanl Consultant First Draft of CEO Endorsement Document for UNDP Comments Incorporation of UNDP Feedback Preparation of Draft for Translation for Consultation Validation Workshop (Second Trip to Beijing) Final Document to Ministry of Finance Final Draft UNDP Pro-Doc Submission to GEFSEC and Revisions Final Project Documents to GEFSEC Signed ProDoc Prodoc by MOF, UNDP, and SFA/PFDs

The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese

CHALLENGES Multiple Clients (GOC, Provinces, GEF, UNDP, BD!) Producing Paper is a “Means to an End” Feeding the Beast: Do it but Don’t get Excited Keep the Eye on the Ball: BD Impacts Design a Project that can be Implemented Design Targets that can be Achieved