Options appraisal, the business case & procurement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mikko AJ Ramstedt Senior Project Adviser Financial Partnerships Unit
Advertisements

Value for Money – new requirements and challenges
Support for the coordination of activities Joint Technology Initiatives: Background and Current State of Play Presentation to the Meeting of High-Level.
The Role and Management o of the Scrutiny Unit Jessica Mulley, Head of the Scrutiny Unit June 2013.
Introduction to Public Private Partnerships
Developing an Evaluation Strategy – experience in DFID Nick York Director – Country, Corporate and Global Evaluations, World Bank IEG Former Chief Professional.
1 A risk-based approach to auditing procurement in English councils Mark Wardman Senior Manager Audit Commission 19 May 2014.
Engaging with the NHS Commissioning Board and the impact of the changes in the wider LHE Simon Weldon, NHS Commissioning Board London Regional Team London.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Indicative Business Case
THE STRATEGIC COUNCIL LEADERSHIP TRUST AND ENGAGEMENT NEW FUNDING SOURCES AND NEW DELIVERY VEHICLES Appendix 1 NEW FUNDING SERVOURCES AND NEW DELIVERY.
An Intro to Professionalizing Procurement & Strategic Sourcing
Buying Better Outcomes Workshop 4 Equalities and Contract Management If you do not take it seriously, why should the supplier?
LGAP’s Initiatives to Support Procurement in Local Government
AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM ACF Roundtable IT Governance – what does it mean to you as an audit committee member July 2010 The AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM is.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
Buying Better Outcomes Workshop 3 Equalities, Procurement and Corporate aims.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
The Crown and Suppliers: A New Way of Working Ways of Working14:20 – 15:05 Data Standards Open Source ICT Asset & Service Knowledgebase Agile Q&A Session.
Opportunities & Implications for Turkish Organisations & Projects
1 PMIG PUBLIC SECTOR PROCUREMENT BEST PRACTICES & LESSONS LEARNED Kevin James Barrie Kroukamp.
Supporting and investing in Camden’s voluntary and community sector (VCS) Proposed investment and support programme.
Facilities Management Category Management Plan Synopsis Version 1.1 (March 2015)
Corporate Services Grants Programme 2013 – August 2012.
New Procurement & Delivery Arrangements for the Schools’ Estate Presentation to Strategic Advisory Group 18 April 2005.
Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative VfM Criteria Owain Ellis 12 June 2008.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
Discussion Document By G How. History LeadershipStructureProcessesInformationEnvironment The path of Shared Services is littered with failed attempts.
Strategic Commissioning
Adult Care and Support Commissioning Strategies Sarah Mc Bride - Head of Commissioning, Performance and Improvement Ann Hughes – Acting Senior.
Click to edit Master title style Educational Psychology and Social Enterprise
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
James Aiello PricewaterhouseCoopers Africa Utility Week 06 International Good Practice in Procurement.
Information for New Members of Crown Entity Boards Crown copyright: State Services Commission, February
Alternative Service Delivery Models October
Evidence-based policies and indicator systems 2006 Conducting effective research and analysis to support policy delivery. The Green Book: Appraisal and.
An Integrated Control Framework & Control Objectives for Information Technology – An IT Governance Framework COSO and COBIT 4.0.
General Principles for the Procurement of Goods and Services Asst. Prof. Muhammad Abu Sadah.
Audit Advisory Committee Public health transition update 22 January 2013.
Building Capability.  In order to successfully operate an architecture function within an enterprise, it is necessary to put in place appropriate organization.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Selecting and Designing Concession / PPP Projects Martin Darcy.
Business Responsibility and Sustainability Dr Eshani Beddewela Week 04.
Document Number: Version: 1v0 © Outperform UK Ltd 1 Assessing the change capability of an organisation Jennifer Stapleton.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Need to Invest Investment Objectives and Case for Change Programme Option Identification and Assessment Analysis Strategic Case: Economic Case: Financial.
Disability Services Value for Money and Policy Review 29/11/20151 Value for Money and Policy Review of Disability Services in Ireland Presentation to the.
Mandy Forrest VAS/ Anne Giller SCC Commissioning for the Terrified.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
An Introduction to Becoming a Commissioning Organisation 30 April 2012 APACE Commissioning Event Simon Marshall Offender Services Co-Commissioning Group.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
12-CRS-0106 REVISED 8 FEB 2013 APO (Align, Plan and Organise)
Presentation to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport Assessment, Approval, Public Sector Benchmark and Procurement of PPPs 23rd September 2003.
Commissioning Support Programme Post-16 Commissioning David Brown NASS Conference 9 th October 2009.
PIC EU-28 Conference Paris, 26 – 27 November 2015 PIC An EU Approach Assurance Maps An Introductory workshop Nathan Paget United Kingdom.
Driving Value from IT Services using ITIL and COBIT 5 July 24, 2013 Gary Hardy ITWinners.
Home Care Support Provision Outcome Based Framework Workshop 5 th November 2009.
Internal Communications Overview: Acquisition Model and Considerations A tool from HFMA’s Value Project Toolkit: hfma.org/valueprojecthfma.org/valueproject.
1 Home Care Support Outcome Based Specification Workshop 26 th November 2009.
National Procurement Conference 7 February 2008 Transformation through market forces Peter Wilkinson Managing Director Policy, Research and Studies.
COBIT 5 Executive Summary © 2012 ISACA. All rights reserved.1.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
Internal Communications Overview: Affiliation Models and Considerations A tool from HFMA’s Value Project Toolkit: hfma.org/valueprojecthfma.org/valueproject.
Overview Training for Nottingham’s Commissioning Framework Liz Jones Head of Partnership Policy, NCC Nick Weatherall, Commissioning Officer, NCVS.
Better Commissioning Better Services Better Outcomes - The Leeds Approach.
D31SQ Service Procurement and Provision
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Occupational health and wellbeing
Presentation transcript:

Options appraisal, the business case & procurement Duncan Wood-Allum

Definitions An Options Appraisal is described as “The process of defining objectives, examining options and weighing up the costs, benefits, risks and uncertainties of those options before a decision is made.” (Source: HM Government: Green Book).

Definitions A Business Case presents clearly information necessary to support a series of decisions. These decisions, over time, increasingly commit an organisation to the achievement of the outcomes or benefits possible as a result of investment in business change. Early decisions focus on whether the investment is justified in value for money terms assessing: benefits, strategic fit, achievability, affordability, options and commercial aspects. (Source: Office of Government Commerce 2008). It enables you to objectively and systematically evaluate the best way to achieve your desired outcomes / optimal solution. This is achieved by exploring the relative costs and benefits of a particular option and then compare this fairly to how other options perform against the same set of evaluation criteria which you will have developed.

Definitions Procurement is defined as “the process of acquiring goods, works and services, covering both acquisition from third parties and from in-house providers. The process spans the whole life-cycle from identification of needs, through to the end of a services contract or the end of the useful life of an asset. It involves options appraisal and the critical 'make or buy' decision”. (Source: National Procurement Strategy for Local Government, October 2003).

Discussion - Option appraisal & procurement. Are your current services and activities aligned effectively to clearly defined local needs and desired outcomes? How would you go about identifying and considering delivery options for meeting needs and achieving the defined outcomes? How would you translate your requirements into effective working relationships with a delivery partner or range of delivery partners? What are you doing now to position yourself as a delivery partner in other commissioning processes going on around you?

Appraising options for meeting needs Priorities Needs Resources Users communities Delivery options Procurement Review Monitoring Service delivery Business case development After systematically defining the needs (See needs assessment guidance paper1) and outcomes you are seeking to achieve the process of Options Appraisal enables you to identify and evaluate all the possible ways of delivering services taking into account the resources available to ensure decisions made subsequently through Procurement processes are supported by a sound Business Case.

Options appraisal Typically, an options appraisal is used to assist Councils take the right decisions by ensuring that no policy, programme or project is adopted without first answering these key questions: Are there better ways to achieve our objectives? Are there better uses for the resources available? Is this the best way to achieve our desired outcomes? Typical examples of how they are used are: Policy, programme and project development - decisions on the level and type of services to be provided, now and in the future. New or replacement capital projects - decisions to undertake a project, its scale and location, procurement method, timing, and the degree of private / third sector involvement. Use or disposal of existing assets - decisions to sell land, or other assets, replace or relocate facilities or operations. Procurement decisions- decisions to purchase the supply of services. Options should not be ruled out simply because they are judged to be too ‘radical’, because appraisal will be difficult, or because they involve confronting difficult choices and vested interests. Options should be appraised on their costs and benefits, not on personal preferences of key stakeholders or individuals.

Options appraisal Key benefits: You achieve clarity on desired outcomes for your services. You have an objective, independent, transparent and open assessment that would stand up to internal / external scrutiny. You understand the nature and level of risk relating to the chosen option. You can select an optimal ‘best value’ solution. Typical examples of how they are used are: Policy, programme and project development - decisions on the level and type of services to be provided, now and in the future. New or replacement capital projects - decisions to undertake a project, its scale and location, procurement method, timing, and the degree of private / third sector involvement. Use or disposal of existing assets - decisions to sell land, or other assets, replace or relocate facilities or operations. Procurement decisions- decisions to purchase the supply of services. Options should not be ruled out simply because they are judged to be too ‘radical’, because appraisal will be difficult, or because they involve confronting difficult choices and vested interests. Options should be appraised on their costs and benefits, not on personal preferences of key stakeholders or individuals.

Options appraisal Key consequences of not conducting an effective appraisal: You may not achieve value for money. You may face a challenge. You may negatively impact on your Comprehensive Area Assessment. You may experience unforeseen financial, service and operational impacts. You may be at risk of a legal challenge by a supplier. You may be saddled with a poor solution for a significant period of time. Critically, you decrease your chances of achieving your desired outcomes / solution. It is important to take whole-life costs of a commissioning/procurement decision into consideration at all stages of designing services and evaluating potential solutions. With some operational contracts often being let for 10 to 15 years, the whole-life costs in terms of capital and revenue are considerable. Investment strategies for portfolios of facilities under contract are an important consideration, linked to who will take responsibility for maintenance and repair of buildings and plant. Procurement costs, potential termination costs and associated exit strategies need to be considered as part of the options appraisal process. It is important to remember that failure to assess the full costs of procurement means that both the decision may be flawed and the service and other services may be affected if additional unforeseen costs need to be found at any point in the future.

10 key steps Establishing the strategic need. Establish the range of resources available. Establishing the key outcomes and objectives you want to achieve in terms of meeting the strategic need. Establish your ‘do minimum’ or “baseline” position. Establish your organisation’s position on risk transfer. Develop your evaluation criteria for the long and short listing process. Identify the full range of options, which may be available to deliver your desired outcomes and objectives. Create a short list from a high level option appraisal. Evaluate fully the short-listed options against the evaluation criteria. Progressing the preferred option. 10 key steps Establishing the strategic need. Establish the range of resources available. Establishing the key outcomes and objectives you want to achieve in terms of meeting the strategic need. Establish your ‘do minimum’ or “baseline” position. Establish your organisation’s position on risk transfer. Develop your evaluation criteria for the long-and short-listing process. Identify the full range of options, which may be available to deliver your desired outcomes and objectives. Create a short-list from a high level option appraisal. Evaluate fully the short-listed options against the evaluation criteria. Progressing the preferred option. Establishing the strategic need (see needs assessment guidance paper 1). Depending on circumstances this may identify a problem to be solved such as providing new facilities or an opportunity for example, outcomes to be achieved such as improving community health as part of the sustainable community strategy. Establish the range of resources available. Resources will always be limited either in capital terms or revenue terms. The process of options appraisal may take place within defined resources for example a fixed budget or be geared to attracting new resources through a partnership agreement with a supplier or range of suppliers. Matching options to resources will a key part of making the business case. Establishing the key outcomes and objectives you want to achieve in terms of meeting the strategic need. This may be simply defining the change you want to achieve or involve defining ‘the likely solution’ such as providing a new facility, opportunity or a new service. This should not however constrain your approach to looking at the options. Establish your ‘do minimum’ or “baseline” position. There may be a bottom line in terms of costs or minimum outcomes that must be achieved for the project to continue. There may also be a minimum or “do nothing “solution to consider. Establish your organisation’s position on risk transfer. Generally, if your delivery partner is taking on all or most of the risk, they may price this into the contract, so you should consider where each risk best sits. Develop your evaluation criteria for the long and short listing process. You will need to be clear how you intend to come to a decision and what factors should and must be taken into account. This would need to ready when you start to procure. Identify the full range of options, which may be available to deliver your desired outcomes and objectives. Develop a long list of possible options to ensure the optimal solution is included in the options from the outset. Create a short list from a high level option appraisal. Use the evaluation criteria to select and exclude options that either fail to meet your objectives or exceed the resources available. This would always include the ‘do minimum’ option. Evaluate fully the short-listed options against the evaluation criteria. Use weighting and a scoring framework so it is clear how you came to your decision. Progressing the preferred option. After the above analysis has been completed, a preferred option or options will emerge. Depending on the nature of the agreed procurement, this may be one or more providers with which you wish to negotiate. Appropriate decision making and governance arrangements will clearly need to apply throughout the process to enable elected members to take well informed and clear decisions.

Supplier types In house Establishing the strategic need Establish the range of resources available. Establishing the key outcomes and objectives you want to achieve in terms of meeting the strategic need. Establish your ‘do minimum’ or “baseline” position. Establish your organisation’s position on risk transfer. Develop your evaluation criteria for the long and short listing process. Identify the full range of options, which may be available to deliver your desired outcomes and objectives. Create a short list from a high level option appraisal. Evaluate fully the short-listed options against the evaluation criteria. Progressing the preferred option. Supplier types In house Third Sector Social Enterprise (created from an in house operation) Third Sector Social Enterprise (already existing) Private Sector Operator Private Sector Operator with Social Enterprise Model (Hybrid) Mixed economy In house Directly employed and managed by the Council and funded through the Council’s revenue budget. Third Sector Social Enterprise (created from an in house operation) This would be created from the previous in house team that has been transferred over into an externalised social enterprise. This would be under new governance and legal arrangements. Normally, staff pensions, benefits and previous terms and conditions are transferred over, but these may not be always applied to new staff joining the social enterprise. These organisations are often but not always called Trusts. Third Sector Social Enterprise (already existing) An existing social enterprise which may be already functioning in the Culture and Sport sector or in another field of public service could be contracted to operate a facility and or provide services. These may range from leisure trusts operating in other Council areas to a wide range of specialist organisations that have developed out of the community and voluntary sector. (See guidance note 3 building capacity in the third sector.) Private Sector Operator A private sector operator could be contracted to operate a facility and / or provide services only. In some cases a partnership of private sector suppliers could be contracted to design, build and operate new facilities as is often found in BSF (Building Schools for the Future) or PPP (Public Private Partnership) projects. Private Sector Operator with Social Enterprise Model (Hybrid) In a hybrid trust the Council may set up or participate in a trust company that has not-for-profit objectives. The trust company is then granted the lease for the facilities and contracts with the Council for their management. In turn it enters into a performance based management contract with a private sector operator, with the National Non Domestic Rate savings being passed back to the Council, and the private sector company managing the service as an agent of the trust company. Mixed economy Many Councils will use a combination of the above suppliers to deliver their services. Voluntary and community organisations which may also be social enterprises are likely to have niche specialist expertise in service delivery and it is likely that both Councils and contractors will contract /subcontract these to deliver specialist services such as arts and sport development and outreach services to vulnerable people. (See the separate guidance note on building capacity in the third sector.)

Business Case The development of a business case runs in parallel to the commissioning process. High level business case Strategic Outline Full Implementation Benefits evaluation

Procurement – who’s involved? Establishing the strategic need Establish the range of resources available. Establishing the key outcomes and objectives you want to achieve in terms of meeting the strategic need. Establish your ‘do minimum’ or “baseline” position. Establish your organisation’s position on risk transfer. Develop your evaluation criteria for the long and short listing process. Identify the full range of options, which may be available to deliver your desired outcomes and objectives. Create a short list from a high level option appraisal. Evaluate fully the short-listed options against the evaluation criteria. Progressing the preferred option. Procurement – who’s involved? Project Sponsor Lead Member Project Director / Manager Key partners / stakeholders Finance (including audit) advice Legal advice Procurement advice

Procurement – other skill sets Establishing the strategic need Establish the range of resources available. Establishing the key outcomes and objectives you want to achieve in terms of meeting the strategic need. Establish your ‘do minimum’ or “baseline” position. Establish your organisation’s position on risk transfer. Develop your evaluation criteria for the long and short listing process. Identify the full range of options, which may be available to deliver your desired outcomes and objectives. Create a short list from a high level option appraisal. Evaluate fully the short-listed options against the evaluation criteria. Progressing the preferred option. Procurement – other skill sets Project management. Building surveying. Cost management. Development monitoring. Business planning / benchmarking. Performance management. Consultancy regarding output / outcome specifications. Legal advice regarding management agreements and contracts. Other specialist advice.

Soft Market Testing Can generate interest from the market Establishing the strategic need Establish the range of resources available. Establishing the key outcomes and objectives you want to achieve in terms of meeting the strategic need. Establish your ‘do minimum’ or “baseline” position. Establish your organisation’s position on risk transfer. Develop your evaluation criteria for the long and short listing process. Identify the full range of options, which may be available to deliver your desired outcomes and objectives. Create a short list from a high level option appraisal. Evaluate fully the short-listed options against the evaluation criteria. Progressing the preferred option. Soft Market Testing Can generate interest from the market Be clear on what you want to achieve and that it is achievable Used to refine elements of the business case Enables you to ascertain when it would be best to approach the market formally. It may be necessary to first build the capacity of the potential market

Competitive Dialogue Establishing the strategic need Establish the range of resources available. Establishing the key outcomes and objectives you want to achieve in terms of meeting the strategic need. Establish your ‘do minimum’ or “baseline” position. Establish your organisation’s position on risk transfer. Develop your evaluation criteria for the long and short listing process. Identify the full range of options, which may be available to deliver your desired outcomes and objectives. Create a short list from a high level option appraisal. Evaluate fully the short-listed options against the evaluation criteria. Progressing the preferred option. Competitive Dialogue

Supplier considerations Understand the true costs of providing your service You will need to ensure you will have the capacity to demonstrate the achievement of outcomes in your approach Have you fully considered the performance management implications in the contract? Make sure the contract is well thought through and protects the interests of both parties

Are your current services and activities aligned effectively to clearly defined local needs and desired outcomes? 1.

How would you go about identifying and considering delivery options for meeting needs and achieving the defined outcomes? 2.

How would you translate your requirements into effective working relationships with a delivery partner or range of delivery partners? 3.

What are you doing now to position yourself as a delivery partner in other commissioning processes going on around you? For example, health, older people, children & young people? 4.