Margin Management. PAGE 2 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Late 1990’s – numerous “surprise” long-term plant shutdowns 2.Shutdowns resulted when a.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cycle of Performance Getting Back on the Path to Excellence Warning Flags/Precursors Palo Verde: A Case Study Frederic Lake Corrective Action Program.
Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
INPO Update CMBG Meeting June 2013
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
1 CMBG 2009 Copyright 2009 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Configuration Management Activities, Including Margin Management David Hembree INPO June.
Smart Grid - Cyber Security Small Rural Electric George Gamble Black & Veatch
January 24, SA12-PE-04 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this self assessment is to conduct a multi-discipline team review (deep dive) of the Feedwater.
ISO General Awareness Training
Stephen S. Yau CSE , Fall Security Strategies.
Purpose of the Standards
RC14001 ® Update GPCA Responsible Care Committee September 23, 2013.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
Welcome ISO9001:2000 Foundation Workshop.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Risk Assessment – An Essential Standard
Key changes and transition process
Key changes from OHSAS 18001:1999
Industry Nuclear Safety Culture* Process Thomas C. Houghton Director, Safety Focused Regulation Nuclear Energy Institute March 12, 2009 *Nuclear Safety.
S/W Project Management
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Deployment of a Margin Model at Comanche Peak Presented.
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
Software Quality Assurance Lecture 4. Lecture Outline ISO ISO 9000 Series of Standards ISO 9001: 2000 Overview ISO 9001: 2008 ISO 9003: 2004 Overview.
Page 1 Evaluation Improvement Initiative A New Evaluation Approach 0616 CMBG Discussion on Revised Evaluation Approach.PPT Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
IRSN STRATEGY TO ASSESS A NEW MAINTENANCE POLICY / Nesebar, Bulgaria Presented by Naoëlle MATAHRI, IRSN.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
Page 1 Evaluation Improvement Initiative A New Evaluation Approach 0616 CMBG Discussion on Revised Evaluation Approach.PPT Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.
Quality Management.  Quality management is becoming increasingly important to the leadership and management of all organisations. I  t is necessary.
2007 CMBG Conference David Hembree Institute of Nuclear Power Operations June 20, 2007 Charleston, SC INPO Perspective on Configuration Management.
Software Engineering Lecture # 17
Service Transition & Planning Service Validation & Testing
1 Human Performance in Reactor Safety George E. Apostolakis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Presented at the Quality Colloquium,
ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Summary of Changes
Glen Fields - Final Project Presentation. What Sets CSI Apart... GBA 573 Consultants Company Background Located in San Diego, CA 5 Engineering Consultants.
ISM Annual Review and Declaration Lessons Learned CH2M HILL Hanford Group John McDonald.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
A Guide for Management. Overview Benefits of entity-level controls Nature of entity-level controls Types of entity-level controls, control objectives,
2006 CMBG Conference Keith A. Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna 2006 CMBG Conference June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA Configuration Management Awareness Training.
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 20 th, 2015 | New Orleans, LA API RP 1175 Pipeline Leak Detection Program Management – New RP Highlights.
ITPD ISSUE MANAGEMENT PROCESS SEPTEMBER 5, 2008
The common structure and ISO 9001:2015 additions
Evaluating Configuration Management
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
Business Continuity Disaster Planning
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Implementing Program Management Standards at Duke Energy.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Maintenance Rule Program Workshop Information IAEA Workshop.
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Standard Design Process Overview
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
International Safety Rating System
UNDERSTANDING ISO 9001:2008.
NIEP Evaluation PO&A “How-to” Guide and Issue Classification
Conduct of the Review May 2005 Revision
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
NRC CM Pilot Inspections Methodology and Results
Vision Facilitation Template
Results of Design Reviews
Margin Management Configuration Management Benchmarking Group
Vendor Technical Information
Presentation transcript:

Margin Management

PAGE 2 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Late 1990’s – numerous “surprise” long-term plant shutdowns 2.Shutdowns resulted when a history of events (equipment failures / complicated transients) lowered confidence in plant and raised scrutiny by external organizations 3.General lack of “rigor” in evaluating and correcting problems

PAGE 3 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Design issues evident shortly before or after shutdown 2.Resolution and extent of condition extended shutdown considerably 3.Key issues included Accident analysis – translation into operation Operating margin Physical condition of plant not in conformance

PAGE 4 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns Similar issues and causes and contributors are evident in plants today Palo Verde Kewaunee Point Beach Others?

PAGE 5 Margin Management Basic Approach 1.INPO does: Encourage more systematic consideration Look for margin contributors to performance Promote identification and resolution of “latent problems: Promote site-wide approach to MM 2.INPO does not: Dictate how much margin was acceptable Prescribe how to manage Push plants to build another complicated infrastructure Push utilities to quantify unknown margins unless there was a risk / need.

PAGE 6 Margin Management Status Today 1.Higher awareness and consideration of margins 2.Margin preservation and improvement is more explicitly considered during Prioritization of equipment improvements Design change options Reconstitution of design basis, calculations, etc.

PAGE 7 Margin Management Gaps Today 1.No industry consensus on: Attributes/principles of margin management Which margins are of most concern (i.e. critical equipment functions) 2.Some stations elected not to establish a “program” but normal processes don't have explicit standards and expectations 3.Most “programs” focus on identification & prioritization – little guidance that describes the desired site-wide management and organizational behaviors 4.At some stations – MM still viewed as an engineering activity – not embraced by the full management team 5.May not be rigorous if BOP

PAGE 8 Margin Management CM & EN Evaluation Results Data Through 3/31/2008

PAGE 9 Margin Management Guidance Document Development 1.Industry working group meeting at INPO April attendees 2.Current schedule to publish the document is end of NX-1068 Exelon Margin Management

PAGE 10 Margin Management Key Elements 1.Understanding margin 2.Identifying margin concerns 3.Evaluating margin concerns 4.Prioritizing margin issues 5.Resolving margin issues 6.Roles and responsibilities 7.Process considerations 8.Periodic assessment and communications

PAGE 11 Margin Management Understanding margin 1.Objective The concept of design and operating margin are defined, communicated, and understood by station personnel 2.Attributes The definition of various margins is provided to plant personnel Concepts understood by appropriate personnel Location of limits and their bases are communicated to plant personnel Training tools developed at plants

PAGE 12 Margin Management Identifying margin concerns 1.Objective Margin concerns are identified and documented by station personnel 2.Attributes Scope of SSCs covered by program defined Cross disciplinary input used Existing processes identify margin concerns Corrective Action Program Self Assessments Latent Issues Review System Health Reports Margins are identified when new plant configurations are implemented

PAGE 13 Margin Management Evaluating Margin Concerns 1.Objective Margin concerns are sufficiently understood to allow for proper prioritization 2.Attributes Operating and design requirements are known SSC capability is known The resulting margin is assessed The aggregate impact of margin issues is evaluated, as required The associated risk to plant safety and reliability is established

PAGE 14 Margin Management Prioritizing margin issues 1.Objective Conditions that result in unacceptable design and operating margins are prioritized commensurate with the associated risk to plant safety and reliability 2.Attributes Prioritization based on safety and reliability Cross-disciplinary reviews determine priority The prioritization scheme correlates to site prioritization Management reviews, validates priority, and provides sponsorship

PAGE 15 Margin Management Resolving Margin Issues 1.Objective Plans are comprehensive and address interim compensatory measures and contingencies 2.Attributes Plans developed Associated actions are captured and tracked in the appropriate station work process Interim actions and contingencies developed as req’d

PAGE 16 Margin Management Roles and Responsibilities 1.Objective Roles and responsibilities for monitoring, protecting, and resolving operating and design margins are defined and understood by plant personnel 2.Attributes Site management sponsors the disposition of margin concerns and provides effective oversight of margin management implementation Engineering is the champion of margin management and owns design margins Operations owns operating margin Maintenance ensures equipment maintained and tested to ensure performance requirement are met

PAGE 17 Margin Management

PAGE 18 Margin Management

PAGE 19 Margin Management Process Considerations 1.Objective Sufficient station processes exist to allow margin concerns to be identified, prioritized and dispositioned 2.Attributes Station personnel are aware and consistently apply the process(es) designated to identify, prioritize and disposition margin issue Processes revised to drive consideration (institutionalized)

PAGE 20 Margin Management Periodic assessment and communications 1.Objective The effectiveness of margin management decisions is periodically evaluated and communications reinforce the importance of effective margin management 2.Attributes Periodic oversight reviews by station leadership Periodic communications reinforce the importance of effective margin management

PAGE 21 Margin Management Examples of Margin Areas for Improvement 1.Weaknesses in identifying and resolving low operating and design margin issues are affecting equipment that is important to safety. 2.Compensatory measures for low operating and design margins are affecting plant operations. 3.Power uprates reducing BWR power-to-flow map operating region and operation outside the design basis 4.Excessive cooler flows erode coils and cause unplanned LCOs 5.EDG loading margin and voltage response

PAGE 22 Margin Management Examples of Margin Assistance Recommendations 1.Improve awareness of margin shortfalls during high-risk and emergent events. 2.Improve communications and understanding of margin issues. 3.Improve pathways of highlighting margin issues in existing plant processes. 4.Develop clear margin issues and follow a systematic process to resolve shortfalls.