Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) Frank Borman Elementary Denton ISD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Awards for Teacher Excellence (D.A.T.E.) Overview Grant from Texas Education Agency HB 1, Art. IV.
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation and Rewards OECD Mexico Joint Workshop December 1-2, 2009 Susan Sclafani National Center on Education and the Economy.
An Overview of the District Awards and Teacher Excellence (D.A.T.E.) Grant Copperas Cove ISD District Site-Based Decision Making Committee Stakeholder.
Campus Improvement Plans
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
Consolidated Application Budget Detail and Fiscal Issues.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
2015 Information Session. Our Mission 2 Recognizing teachers as professionals Professional learning experiences of your own design Honoring teacher commitment.
District Awards for Teacher Excellence A presentation to the ACISD Board of Trustees 4/17/08.
DATE District Awards for Teacher Excellence
Finley Elementary “Believe, Achieve and Succeed” Governor’s Educator Excellence Award Program Texas Educator Excellence Grant Cycle 2.
Laredo Independent School District District Awards for Teacher Excellence (D.A.T.E) Plan
Presented by: Sandra Jo Nix April 17, 2010 Division of Educator Standards.
HOUSE BILL 5 UPDATE. Curriculum Graduation Plans Endorsement Pathways College Readiness requirements Accountability Community and Student Engagement Student.
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
United South Middle School Texas Educator Grant Presentation “Aim High for Success” in
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Teacher-Designed Incentive Pay in Texas A Presentation to the IES Research Conference by Lori L. Taylor.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
Professional Development Department Kathleen Jimenez / Administrator for Prof. Dev. Julio Cesar Martinez / CPE Specialist Textbook Voting Procedures: Proclamation.
2015 Information Session. Our Mission 2 Recognizing teachers as professionals Professional learning experiences of your own design Honoring teacher commitment.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Bullard Education Foundation Investing in Our Future Grants Fall 2012.
TEXAS LITERACY INITIATIVE.  San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) will partner with an approved service provider to deliver literacy readiness.
The Austin Blueprint After One Year A report to the AISD Board of Trustees The Austin Blueprint Initiative Dr. Darlene Westbrook, Chief Academic Officer.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Klein Independent School District Technology Integration Mentor Program Moving from learning to use technology...to using technology to learn Ann McMullan,
Rewarding Excellence in the Classroom Idaho’s Pay for Performance Plan
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Lovejoy ISD Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) AEIS Summary Public Hearing Dec. 18, 2007.
Title IA Annual Parent Meeting  Date: September 14, 2015  Gainesville ISD  School: Edison Elementary  Time: 6:00 p.m.  I. Discussion of.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Governor’s Educator Excellence Awards Program Plano ISD Mendenhall Elementary.
Distance Education Faculty Technology Workshop TLT Distance Education Incentive Awards Program Overview Sasi K Benzigar Teaching and Learning.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
ExCEL After School Programs Elementary Lead Teacher Orientation
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
March 15, :00pm Daryton A. Ramsey Educator Quality Grant Administrator.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Monetary Award $120,000. Distribution of Funds for Teachers (75%) $90,000  75% of grant money will be distributed equally for teachers that are working.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Created By: Erin McAlister Christiana Elder Sherene Mayner Freddie Martinez.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
Middle School Program Revision Proposal Bristol School Administration October 5, 2011.
Strategic Resource Planning Council June 26, 2013 Merit Policy.
Non-Educator Merit Pay Plan
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Sonoraville Elementary School
Saginaw Elementary TITLE I
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Proposed Plan for Distribution of
Parent Informational Meeting
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Annual Parent Meeting October 10, 2018 Lamar Elementary
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Denton ISD Board Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) Frank Borman Elementary Denton ISD

Purpose of TEEG To achieve higher levels of student academic performance.

The Goals of TEEG To create a financial incentive system for classroom teachers who have demonstrated a positive impact on student academic performance.

Grant Description The grant is designed to award classroom teachers who meet, at a minimum, two required program criteria, or more as identified in their campus incentive plan.

Eligibility This program recognizes and rewards campuses enrolling high percentages of educationally disadvantaged students that received an exemplary or recognized accountability rating or achieved within the top quartile performance for comparable improvement in math, reading/English language arts.

Borman campus award Based on data, Borman has been awarded $90,000 for school year! Gold Performance Award Comparable Improvement in Math!

Grant Distribution The grant is distributed in two parts: Part I ~ Teacher Incentives 75% of the total campus award Tied to student achievement and teacher collaboration Part II ~ Support Staff Incentives 25% of the total campus award Tied to student achievement

Part I ~ Teacher Incentives ($67,500) Criterion 1: Teacher demonstrates improving student performance. Criterion 2: Teacher demonstrates collaboration with faculty and staff that contributes to improving student achievement Criterion 3 (Optional): Teacher demonstrates ongoing initiative, commitment, professionalism, and personalization *Criterion 4 (Optional) Critical Shortage The CLT voted against this section of the grant.

Part II ~ Support Staff Incentive Incentives awarded to staff not eligible for awards under Part I, but that contribute to student performance. _ Certified Personnel (Administrative) –Instructional Paraprofessionals –Non-Instructional Support Staff

Shared Campus Goal To design objectives that involve the entire faculty and staff that improve the academic achievement for all students

Considerations Members of the Campus Leadership Team believe that it is essential for teachers to work together a a team to improve students’ academic success. Therefore, an incentive plan was designed to reward grade level teams for group problem solving and collaboration. In order to do so, it was necessary to design an incentive plan that may result in less than $3000 per teacher.

Part I –Teacher Incentives Criterion 1 ~ $628 Criterion 2 ~ $400 Criterion 3 ~ $350 * A part-time teacher who works 4 hours or more is eligible to receive an incentive. If a part-time teacher qualifies for the incentive program, they would receive half of the amount of a full-time teacher. For example, Criterion 1 ~ $314.

Part 1 ~ Contingency Plan In each criterion, only qualifying teachers receive the designated incentive. Monies not awarded from each criterion will be distributed equally among teachers who qualify for each criterion. This may lead to qualifying teachers receiving more than $1378.

Part II ~ Staff Incentives ($22,500) Certified Personnel (That do not qualify as a classroom teacher): 35% of Part II funds Principals, specialists, counselor, diagnostician, LSSP, Nurse ~ $985 Instructional Paraprofessionals: 35% of Part II funds Paraprofessionals, campus tech, and student facilitators ~ $ Non-Instructional Staff: 30% of Part II Office Staff, Custodial staff, and Food Service Personnel ~ $ Pending Administrative Costs by TEA.

Part II ~ Contingency Plan For Part II, only qualifying staff members receive the designated incentive. Monies not awarded in Part 11 will be distributed equally among Part II staff members who qualified for the incentive.

Grant Timeline February 2007~ CLT met to discuss and vote on grant. April 2007~Initial School Board Presentation. May 2007~Notice of Intent to Apply sent to TEA. June 2007~Attended TETN Sessions. August 2007~thru 31 st ~CLT discussed and created grant stipulations. August 2007 ~ Final Grant Presentation and Vote for Borman Staff. September 2007~Presentation and Vote for District Committee. September 2007~School Board Presentation. September 2007 ~ Grant application due in Austin Documentation Period May 2008 Assess documentation. On or before October 15, 2008 ~ Distribution of grant incentives to qualified staff members