1 101 on NIH Grants Understanding the Roles of VMRF and the Principal Investigator When Administering NIH Grants Last updated: December 2006 Veterans Medical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT OF HRSA GRANTS
Advertisements

KSU Sponsored Projects Overview Sponsored Research Network for Department Administrative Staff May 21, 2013.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Just-in-Time JIT features and UMass approaches. JIT purpose In an effort to focus the NIH review on the science and to save the applicant time and effort,
NIH Changes …grants.gov. NOT-OD files/NOT-OD htmlhttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice- files/NOT-OD html.
Preparing and Submitting Reports Della Brown White, Ph.D. Program Officer, Office of Health Equity Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health.
Grant Financial Management Post Award Sponsored Projects Training Program1.
BUDGET BASICS FOR ADMINISTRATORS TIJUANNA DECOSTER, PH.D., MPA CHIEF GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE.
Oregon Health & Science University Sponsored Projects Administration Closeouts John Caruso, Education Coordinator Sponsored Projects Administration.
Post Award MUHAS, Dartmouth, UCSF Financial Reporting & Closeouts Tuesday October 21, 2014.
Grants Management Overview 2013 Minority Fellowship Program Grantee Meeting April 23-24, 2013 Salvador Ortiz; Maria Martinez;
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
MANAGING THE SUBMISSION AND AWARD PROCESS Office of Sponsored Projects Main Campus and Branches.
Foundation Financial Services Post Award Nancy Gomez Post Award Analyst.
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GRANTS AND CONTRACTS Effort Reporting System Departmental Coordinator Training Updated 01/11/2012.
CSBS Fourth Friday Faculty Workshop 1: Grant Management CSBS: Frances Solano ORSP: Stefanie Friesen TUC: Stacey Lord / Maryann Camarillo 1/23/
The proper protocol for grant approval at LCSC GRANT-WRITING 101: INTERNAL PROCEDURES.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Policy Update Michelle G. Bulls Chief Grants Management Officer Grants Policy.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
GRANT POLICIES: “Do’s and Don’ts” Rebecca Bound, Research Administrator, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison Cheryl.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Got the Grant What’s next??????????? Joy R. Knipple Team Leader, National Institute of Mental Health July 26, 2006.
POST-AWARD GRANT MANAGEMENT June 23, 2014 Presented by Arina V. Kramer Grants Management Specialist Office of Grants Administration, NCI.
FEBRUARY 26, 2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SESSION 2 OF SERIES III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON.
WORKING WITH SPO AND IAO Lynne HollyerNoam Pines Associate Director Research Administrator Industry Alliances OfficeSponsored Projects Office
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
AFTER THE AWARD IS MADE…THEN WHAT? Sean Hine Branch Chief Office of Grants Administration National Cancer Institute Date: 03/18/2015.
10/16/2015 Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators/ Program Directors/ Project Directors.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Close-Outs Presented by Stacy Tedder NOAA Grants Management Division January 31,
NIH NRSA CLOSEOUTS Office of Research Services ORS Brown Bag January 24, 2007.
NIH eRA COMMONS Principal Investigator Lab Regional Seminar Albuquerque April 2005.
Award Transfers Office of Research Services ORS Brown Bag November 20, 2006.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN SUBCONTRACTS/SUBAWARDS CITI Training.
Rebecca Nickleson, MS, CRA Assistant Director Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
1 RA Forum July American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
Modular Applications and Awards. FY Modular Grants n Modular Research Grants –Goal of initiative is to redefine the Research Project Grant as an.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
1. 2 Department of Education Public Charter School Program  PURPOSE: To expand the number of high- quality charter schools by providing financial assistance.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
1 WUSM RA Forum September 2007 Grants & Contracts.
University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review.
Office of Sponsored Projects The Funding Life Cycle.
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
BUDGET BASICS FOR ADMINISTRATORS TIJUANNA DECOSTER, PH.D., MPA CHIEF GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE.
1 FIRST UIC ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE Striving for Excellence March 8 th & 9 th, 2007 Workshop Session: 3 D Best Practices for Sponsored.
Research Protections Office University of Vermont Change to Procedures for Committee Review of Resubmissions of Grant Applications.
MICHELLE BULLS DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF POLICY FOR EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
An Overview of the Pre-Award Grant Process
Overview of Proposal and Award Process at UCLA A short “ How-to-Do ”
Office of Sponsored Projects The Funding Life Cycle.
Lifecycle of an Award Reporting, Close-outs and Audits Michelle Vazin, Vanderbilt University Michele Codd, George Washington University.
1 Mission Impossible: Understanding the Pre-Award Grant Process Monique Foxx, MHSA Manager, Office of Sponsored Programs Stephanie Bair, MS Grants Management.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
COBRE Post Award Management Christy Leake Grants Administration Branch National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH.
Post-Award Grant Administration Presented by: Sponsored Program Accounting Updated: Fiscal Year 2014.
Tijuanna DeCoster, Ph.D. Chief, Grants Management Officer
“SPEAR” Workshop May 18, 2017 Julie Wammack
Subaward Life Cycle 10/24/17.
Post-Award Grant Administration
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Post-Award Grant Administration
University of Pittsburgh
Office of Grants and Contracts Presenter: Stephanie Chandler-Thompson
Presentation transcript:

1 101 on NIH Grants Understanding the Roles of VMRF and the Principal Investigator When Administering NIH Grants Last updated: December 2006 Veterans Medical Research Foundation

2 Objective of this presentation: Provide a clear delineation of the roles and responsibilities of the Principal Investigator and the Veterans Medical Research Foundation in the administering of NIH grants; Offer the key tools to ensure compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and policies; and Create an awareness of how VMRF can be of assistance to PIs and their staffs.

3 Overview NIH Grant Management Tools NIH Grant Management Tools Pre-award: preparation and submission of Proposal Pre-award: preparation and submission of Proposal Post Award Administration: what should be done once the grant has been awarded Post Award Administration: what should be done once the grant has been awarded Close-Out Procedure Close-Out Procedure Record Retention Record Retention VMRF Reporting Requirements VMRF Reporting Requirements

4 Grant Management Tools VMRF Website provides links to resource information, such as institutional requirements, policies and procedures, subject matter experts (i.e. Contracts & Grants Administrator), and other contact information. VMRF Website provides links to resource information, such as institutional requirements, policies and procedures, subject matter experts (i.e. Contracts & Grants Administrator), and other contact information.  Information NIH website links: m m

5 Overview of the Grant Cycle Congress Authorizes Program President Requests Funds Congress Appropriates Funds Federal Agency may develop program regulations to guide program implementation Agency usually advertises availability of funds - Several months before posted deadline - VMRF applies for assistance. Principal Investigator signs as PI. - From the time decision is made to apply to deadline (1 – x months) - Program Authorization / Appropriation Applications Solicited / Funded Agency reviews applications and selects proposals for funding. - Typically 8-9 month review period - VMRF / PI conduct approved project; Agency monitors award. - Approval approx. 10 months after deadline; Project period per New Grant Award - VMRF / PI close out award at the end of the project period. - Close-out documentation due within 90 days after project complete - Grant Administration Grant Close-Out Beginning of VMRF’s activities in support of applying for and managing grant funds

6 Pre-Award: Preparation and Submission of Proposal Who is responsible for what? Who is responsible for what?  Role of the Principal Investigator (PI)  Role of VMRF Proposal Timeline Proposal Timeline Transitioning from Pre- to Post Award Transitioning from Pre- to Post Award

7 Role of the Principal Investigator 1. Idea 2. Identifies location of research administration  Based on VMRF/UCSD Agreement, 50% or more of study must occur in VA/VMRF space for a project to be administered by VMRF 3. Identifies Key Personnel & other personnel (supplies and other expenses, as needed) for project 4. Prepares application (application guidelines posted at (a) Abstract (b) Budget justification, including budget detail (c) Bio sketches for Key Personnel (d) Resources page (e) Research plan

8 The VMRF Contracts and Grants Administrators ( x 7606) will support PIs and their staff to prepare the proposal submission to the NIH  Confirms PI eligibility / gets PI registered on eRA Commons if needed  Requests budget information from PI  Prepares the following: NIH requirements (a) PHS SF424 Application administrative sections (b) PHS SF424 Budget section for year 1 (c) PHS SF424 Budget section for entire project period (d) PHS SF424 NIH checklist; VMRF requirements (e) Conflict of Interest (Form 2000) for PI and Key Personnel (f) VMRF Checklist for PI and VASDHS Service Chief signature (g) Signed PI Assurance Form Role of VMRF C&G Administrators

9  Compiles and submits proposal to appropriate agency  Assures compliance: If Human Subject and/or Animal Subject approval is not obtained prior to grant submission, VMRF Contracts & Grants Administrator follows up with investigator, as necessary, to ensure appropriate paperwork has been submitted to appropriate committee (IRB or IACUC), as these approvals must be received before NIH will release award. Grant proposal also submitted to IRC and R&D committees for approval. Role of VMRF C&G Administrators CONTINUED

10 The Proposal Timeline Definitions: Budget Period: An interval of time (usually 12 months each) into which a project period is divided for budgetary and funding purposes. Project Period: The total time for which support of a project has been programmatically approved. The total project period comprises the initial competitive segment, any subsequent competitive segments resulting from a competing continuation award, and non- competing extensions. Modular Budget Grant: As part of NIH’s streamlining and reinvention initiatives, a simplified budget reporting feature is used allowing grantees to request total direct costs not exceeding $250,000 per year for the entire project period rather than requesting funds each budget period. (Use Modular Budget Component in PHS SF424)

11 The Proposal Timeline CONTINUED For the NIH standard Schedule of Postmarked Receipt Dates, Review and Award Cycles visit For the NIH standard Schedule of Postmarked Receipt Dates, Review and Award Cycles visit  nschedule.htm nschedule.htm nschedule.htm  All SF424 applications must be in response to a FOA, including the R01.

12 The Proposal Timeline CONTINUED Responsible Party ActionTIMELINE (1) Principal Investigator (PI) Contact VMRF (Contracts & Grants Administrator) regarding submission As early as possible, but preferably 1 month prior to grant deadline (2)VMRF (Contracts & Grants Administrator) Confirm PI and institution eligibility; identify grant deadline and applicable grant policies Immediately (3)PI GENERATE final grant proposal: Abstract Abstract Budget Justification Budget Justification Biosketches for Key Personnel Biosketches for Key Personnel Resources page Resources page Research Plan Research Plan 2 weeks prior to due date

13 The Proposal Timeline CONTINUED Responsible Party ActionTIMELINE (5)VMRF (Contracts & Grants Administrator) INPUT information into internal database and prepare the following: NIH PHS SF424 Application Cover and Admin sections Cover and Admin sections Budget sections Budget sections Detailed budget section Detailed budget section (Even if not required by NIH) (Even if not required by NIH) NIH checklist component NIH checklist component VMRF documents (to be pre-filled as much as possible by VMRF staff, but completed by PI) VMRF Checklist VMRF Checklist Conflict of Interest Form 2000 Conflict of Interest Form 2000 PI Assurance Form PI Assurance Form Upon receipt of first draft of grant proposal

14 The Proposal Timeline CONTINUED Responsible Party ActionTIMELINE (6)VMRF (Contracts & Grants Office) REVIEW PI’s grant proposal Budget – Correct calculations, if necessary Budget – Correct calculations, if necessary Forms – Correct and complete Forms – Correct and complete forms being used, if necessary Formatting requirements for PHS SF424: Grant cover component –addresses and data must be correct Grant cover component –addresses and data must be correct Resources page – ensure Federal (i.e. VA) resources will be utilized and are listed on this page Resources page – ensure Federal (i.e. VA) resources will be utilized and are listed on this page NIH checklist – Ensure correct base & current VMRF IDC rate are listed NIH checklist – Ensure correct base & current VMRF IDC rate are listed Animal and/or Human Subject data addressed (if applicable) in appropriate sections, as well as in the research plan Animal and/or Human Subject data addressed (if applicable) in appropriate sections, as well as in the research plan 1-2 weeks prior to deadline

15 The Proposal Timeline CONTINUED Responsible Party ActionTIMELINE (7)VMRF (Contracts & Grants Administrator) Compile and submit to grants.gov 5 days prior to deadline (8)VMRF (Contracts & Grants Administrator) Grants.gov & eRA Commons Confirmation of receipt to PI Coordinate w/PI handling any changes within 2-day period Re-submit as necessary Obtain hard copy from PI via eRA commons- make internal copies SUBMISSION COMPLETE

16 What Can Go Wrong? TRANSITIONING FROM PRE- TO POST- AWARD COMPLIANCE: Approval is not received for Human Subject and/or Animal use from appropriate committee by just-in-time deadline. This may delay review or award of grant. COMPLIANCE: Approval is not received for Human Subject and/or Animal use from appropriate committee by just-in-time deadline. This may delay review or award of grant.  NIH uses “just-in-time” procedures to allow an applicant to submit a proposal without certification of IRB approval of proposed use of human subjects, verification of IACUC approval of the project’s proposed use of live vertebrate animals or evidence of compliance with the education in the protection of human research participants. These approvals are necessary in order for the project to be reviewed and/or awarded, depending on human or animal use and agency.

17 What Can Go Wrong? TRANSITIONING FROM PRE- TO POST-AWARD Notice of Grant Award (NGA) from NIH may not be on time or is reflective of back-dated start date when received. Notice of Grant Award (NGA) from NIH may not be on time or is reflective of back-dated start date when received.  Until VMRF receives an NGA for the initial award no costs can be incurred by the applicant for the project, including the hiring of personnel, if applicant has no other funds with VMRF.  In some instances, however, exceptions may apply. NIH has waived cost-related and other prior-approval requirements for many activities and expenditures, and provided authority for these activities and expenditures to a grantee. These operating authorities are termed “expanded authorities,” which entitles VMRF to administer some Federal funds without prior permission from the awarding agency in terms of approvals/disapprovals of budgetary issues.

18 What is VMRF permitted under “Expanded Authority?” Under Expanded Authorities, VMRF can do the following: Approve pre-award spending 90 days before NGA is issued if indication has been given that the grant will be funded. Approve pre-award spending 90 days before NGA is issued if indication has been given that the grant will be funded. Allow carryover of un-obligated balances from one budget period to the next. Allow carryover of un-obligated balances from one budget period to the next. Allow a no cost extension (extension of final budget period up to a year without additional NIH funds). Allow a no cost extension (extension of final budget period up to a year without additional NIH funds). Transfer performance of substantive programmatic work to a third party (by consortium agreement). Transfer performance of substantive programmatic work to a third party (by consortium agreement). VMRF must exercise proper stewardship, as the NIH may disallow the costs if it determines through audit or otherwise, that the costs do not meet the parameters of allowability, allocability, reasonableness, necessity and consistency.

19 Post Award Administration Now that the grant is awarded... What does NIH require for compliance? VMRF? What is the PI’s role? What are non-competitive continuations?  What is SNAP? What are competitive continuations?

20 Post Award Administration What happens when a grant is awarded? 1. Notice of Grant Award (NGA) received by VMRF. 2. VMRF reviews and compares NGA with submitted proposal - budget period, project period, award amounts, reporting and contact information. 3. VMRF assigns fund number and verifies full compliance (e.g. receipt of VA committee approvals).* 4. When VMRF notifies PI of award, spending may begin. 5. VMRF sets up monthly expenditure reports for PI to monitor spending VMRF is governed by the Cost Principals for Non-Profit Institutions as identified within OMB Circular A-122 ( b/circulars/a122/text/a122.html ) *For more information on Compliance, please visit Emp.html on the right hand side of the pagehttp:// Emp.html

21 Post Award Administration What does VMRF monitor on awarded funds? VMRF Contracts and Grants Administrators monitor personnel expenses allocated to grant funds. VMRF Contracts and Grants Administrators monitor personnel expenses allocated to grant funds. VMRF Contracts and Grants Administrators prepare and route Personnel Agreements (if required). VMRF Contracts and Grants Administrators prepare and route Personnel Agreements (if required).  Definition: an agreement between UCSD, a UCSD employee and VMRF established for long-term UCSD employees to have continuity of their UCSD benefits for the employee while working on a VMRF project. VMRF notifies PIs monthly of grant expenditures and potential budget concerns. VMRF notifies PIs monthly of grant expenditures and potential budget concerns. VMRF monitors and communicates financial forecasting for budget/project period. VMRF monitors and communicates financial forecasting for budget/project period.

22 Post Award Administration What are non-competitive continuations? Non-Competitive Continuation defined: Projects lasting more than 12 months must provide annual progress reports to NIH to ensure the project is progressing as appropriate before the funds for the subsequent budget year can be released. This process is “noncompetitive,” in that the Principal Investigator only needs to inform the NIH of the progress a project has made over the previous budget year(s) and is not competing for funding that is incorporated into the current project period. The "Grant Progress Report" (PHS 2590) is submitted to and approved by NIH to noncompetitively fund each additional budget period within a previously approved project period. (

23 Post Award Administration Noncompetitive Continuation process: 1. VMRF Contracts & Grants Administrator notifies PI of when the Progress Report is due to VMRF for NIH submission (annual progress reports are due to NIH two (2) months prior to the start of a new budget period). 2. VMRF Contracts & Grants Administrator generates: (a) NIH Face page (PHS 2590), Project Report Summary (page 2, which includes the SNAP questions) and Key Personnel listing (b) VMRF Checklist and Conflict of Interest (must be updated annually). 3. PI responds to SNAP questions, completes progress report and provides all necessary documentation to VMRF.

24 What is SNAP? Streamlined Non-Competing Award Process; Annual progress report; Under SNAP, the NIH Grants Management Officer negotiates the direct costs for the entire project period, eliminates the need for annual budget submissions and any negotiations, and reduces the information NIH requires to review and approve non-competing continuation awards and to monitor these awards. SNAP provides PIs with a mechanism of support that facilitates science while simplifying administration during the project period while keeping NIH updated on progress.

25 What is SNAP? CONTINUED As part of the progress report, the must address the following questions: As part of the progress report, the PI must address the following questions: Has there been a change in the other support of key personnel since the last reporting period? Has there been a change in the other support of key personnel since the last reporting period?  If yes, Other Support pages are required for those key personnel. Will there be, in the next budget period, a significant change in the level of effort for key personnel from what was approved? Will there be, in the next budget period, a significant change in the level of effort for key personnel from what was approved?  If yes, reasons must be stated and Other Support pages must be included. Is it anticipated that an estimated unobligated balance (including prior year carryover) will be greater than 25 percent of the current year’s total budget? Is it anticipated that an estimated unobligated balance (including prior year carryover) will be greater than 25 percent of the current year’s total budget?  If yes, justifiable reasons are required, along with how this will be avoided in the future.

26 Post Award Administration WHAT ARE NON-COMPETITIVE CONTINUATIONS? 4.VMRF Contracts & Grants Administrator submits Grant Progress Report to agency identified within Notice of Grant Award (NGA) 5.VMRF receives and verifies annual NGA 6.VMRF renews personnel agreements (if applicable)

27 Competitive Continuation defined: A request for funding to renew a project period that would otherwise expire. The request is considered a new grant, but allows the PI to continue and/or build upon the research to date. Competitive continuations are reviewed on a different cycle than “new” grants. Typically, the review is more expeditious due to receipt of previous project funding. Post Award Administration WHAT ARE COMPETITIVE CONTINUATIONS?

28 The competitive continuation should include information on progress made with previously (or currently) funded project as an introduction to the new research plan. The competitive continuation should include information on progress made with previously (or currently) funded project as an introduction to the new research plan. PHS SF424 Electronic Application is used. PHS SF424 Electronic Application is used. (see Post Award Administration WHAT ARE COMPETITIVE CONTINUATIONS? ( CONTINUED) POST- AWARD COMPLETE

29 Close-Out Procedure When should close-out begin? When should close-out begin? What are the steps to close-out the grant? For NIH? For VMRF? For Principal Investigator? What are the steps to close-out the grant? For NIH? For VMRF? For Principal Investigator? When is the grant considered completely closed? When is the grant considered completely closed?

30 Close-Out Procedure days before a project period ends, VMRF internally increases monitoring of grant fund spending, as well as notifies the Human Resources department that alternative funding sources will be required for personnel expenses.  If no other sources are available, identified personnel will be terminated from their VMRF employment. 2. When project ends, VMRF Contracts & Grants Administrator notifies PI of upcoming Final Progress Report and Final Invention Statement (Form HHS 568) for NIH. Forms are due within 90 days after end date or in accordance with NGA. The PI is responsible for completion of aforementioned; once completed documents are received by VMRF, final documentation is submitted to the appropriate agency.

31 Close-Out Procedure CONTINUED 3.VMRF completes and submits the FSR-269, which is the final financial status report for the entire project period. 4.VMRF reviews internal administrative file for completeness. If complete, file is closed. HR and Accounting departments ensure appropriate measures are taken so that no further expenses will hit the fund.

32 Record Retention NIH Requirement: Grantees generally must retain financial and programmatic records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other records that are required by the terms of a grant for 3 years from the date the annual FSR is submitted. VMRF Procedure: Internally, once the grant is closed, records are kept on-site for 18 months. After this time, records are transported to storage for a period of 3 to 7 years, depending on the nature of the records.

33 QUESTIONS? Additional information can be easily accessed via the following: VMRF Website: VMRF Main Line: x7606 UCSD IRB: NIH: