Ken Bell – Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TYPE TEXT HERE On July 4, 2012, scientists at CERN announced the discovery of an essential part of the Standard Model of particle physics: the Higgs.
Advertisements

Tau leptons as an exciting probe for New Physics in ATLAS
F.Pastore II Workshop sulla fisica di ATLAS e CMS Oct Trigger di primo livello per gli esperimenti ATLAS & CMS ad LHC F.Pastore INFN Sezione.
D u +-Strom I wk + u d --Strom I wk - d(u) u(d) 3-Strom I wk 3 W-W- W+W+ W3W3 n p +-Strom + p n --Strom - n(p) p(n) 3-Strom Parallele starker-schwacher.
Discovery of a standard model Higgs boson using vector boson fusion at the LHC Craig Buttar University of Sheffield Collaborators: G.Azuelos, V.Cavasinni,
PPD/Southampton seminarB W Kennedy, RAL PPD23 Nov 2001 Survey of Higgs searches at CMS B W Kennedy, RAL/PPD 23 November 2001.
Bruce Kennedy, RAL PPD Particle Physics 2 Bruce Kennedy RAL PPD.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Vacuum Phototriodes for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Endcap
Recent studies on sparticles and MSSM Higgses at CMS Massimiliano Chiorboli University and INFN Catania.
Open beauty production in pp collisions at 7 TeV with CMS Kajari Mazumdar Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India. on behalf of CMS Collaboration,
Higgs at the Tevatron and LHC Rick St. Denis – Glasgow University.
Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.
26th Rencontres de Blois, Particle Physics and Cosmology, 2014 BSM Higgs Searches at the LHC C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous PPD, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Charged Higgs – Uppsala 2006 C.H. Shepherd-Themistocleous- RAL 1 C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Identification of tau.
Sayfa 1 Introduction to B Physics in ATLAS Detector at LHC Ahmet BİNGÜL Department of Engineering Physics University of Gaziantep Feb 2010.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
17th Sep JapanTau04 - International workshop on Tau Lepton Physics1 Discovery Potential of the SM Higgs at the LHC Junichi Tanaka ICEPP, University.
LC Workshop April 2002 ATLAS & CMS prospects Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 ATLAS and CMS activities Albert De Roeck CERN ECFA/DESY meeting St Malo April.
J. Nielsen1 The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Jason Nielsen UC Santa Cruz VERTEX 2004 July 28, 2010.
The High-Energy Frontier Meenakshi Narain For the BU High Energy Experimental Groups: g-2 Super-K Dzero Atlas CMS.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
The CMS Muon Detector Thomas Hebbeker Aachen July 2001 Searching for New Physics with High Energy Muons.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
FNAL Academic Lectures – May, –Tevatron -> LHC Physics 3 –Tevatron -> LHC Physics 3.1 QCD - Jets and Di - jets 3.2 Di - Photons 3.3 b Pair Production.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Discovery potential for H + decaying to SUSY particles 30 March 2005, ATLAS Higgs Working Group Meeting, CERN Christian Hansen Uppsala University Nils.
Higgs Properties Measurement based on HZZ*4l with ATLAS
17 April. 2005,APS meeting, Tampa,FloridaS. Bhattacharya 1 Satyaki Bhattacharya Beyond Standard Model Higgs Search at LHC.
Introduction to CERN David Barney, CERN Introduction to CERN Activities Intro to particle physics Accelerators – the LHC Detectors - CMS.
Search for a Z′ boson in the dimuon channel in p-p collisions at √s = 7TeV with CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Search for a Z′ boson in the.
Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
7 July 2009Neil Collins : University of Birmingham1 MINERVA (Workshop)
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
Introduction to CERN Activities
INCLUSIVE STANDARD MODEL HIGGS SEARCHES HIGGS SEARCHES WITH ATLAS Francesco Polci LAL Orsay On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. SUSY08 – Seoul (Korea)
Search for a Z′ boson in the dimuon channel in p-p collisions at √s = 7TeV with CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Search for a Z′ boson in the.
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
A/H  and A/H  decays at the LHC Outline of the talk: The LHC and ATLAS,CMS MSSM A/H Higgs production A/H  A/H  Conclusions HEP2003 Europhysics.
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
CMS History Compact Muon Solinoid Compact Relative to ATLAS, which is ~1.5x the diameter of CMS and 2x as long (but ATLAS is half the weight of CMS!).
ITEP Physics Winter School, Moscow, 13-20/02/ D. Froidevaux, CERN Honorabilis et amplissimus rector, laudati conlegae Experimental prospects at the.
12 March 2006, LCWS06, BangaloreS. Bhattacharya 1 Satyaki Bhattacharya The Standard Model Higgs Search at the LHC University of Delhi.
Particle Physics II Chris Parkes Top Quark Discovery Decay Higgs Searches Indirect mW and mt Direct LEP & LHC searches 2 nd Handout.
HEP Conference 1 NMSSM Higgs Search Search for neutral NMSSM Higgs Studies at 10 TeV, and with the TeV Jehad Mousa University of.
Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool For the CDF collaboration EPS 2003, Aachen, Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Photonic Final.
Trilepton+top signal from chargino-neutralino decays of MSSM charged Higgs bosons 17 June 2004, 9 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop, Copenhagen Christian.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Higgs Properties Measurement based on H  ZZ*  4 with ATLAS 杨海军 (上海交通大学) 中国物理学会高能物理分会 第九届会员代表大会暨学术年会 华中师范大学,武汉 2014 年 4 月 日 1.
Marcel Vreeswijk (Nikhef/UvA-IoP) First Results of ATLAS at the LHC -- The rediscovery of the Standard Model-- Contents: Intro: The Standard Model Elementairy.
LHC Prospects on Standard Model Higgs Riccardo Ranieri INFN and Università degli Studi di Firenze on behalf of ATLAS and CMS Collaborations ICHEP’04 32.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Introduction to CERN Activities
ATLAS Upgrade Program Sarah Demers, US ATLAS Fellow with BNL
Introduction to CERN Activities
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Low Mass LHC Why low mass
The Top Quark Search Joey Foley.
Presentation transcript:

Ken Bell – Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Compact Muon Solenoid Extended Introduction to CMS Magnet Tracking System Electromagnetic Calorimeter Hadronic Calorimeter Muon System Trigger & Data Acquisition Summary Ken Bell – Rutherford Appleton Laboratory CMS Ken Bell 1

Physics Goals (as of 1994) General Purpose Detector at LHC: 14TeV pp, 40MHz Standard Model Higgs Boson 85 – 160 GeV: Two photon channel 130 – 700 GeV: Four lepton channel 700 GeV – 1 TeV: ljj and lljj channels 5σ discovery possible from LEP2 limit to 1 TeV (105pb-1) SUSY MSSM Higgs: Two photon and four lepton channels Tau and b tagging also important Model-independent searches: high Et Jets and missing Et Heavy Ion Physics SM Higgs Boson used as performance benchmark CMS Ken Bell 2

Design Drivers Efficient, hermetic muon triggering and identification Low contamination & good momentum resolution over || < 2.5 Di-muon mass resolution <1% at 100 GeV/c2 Charge determination for muons with momentum ~1 TeV/c ΔpT/pT ~5% High-granularity, hermetic electromagnetic calorimetry Coverage over || < 3.0 Good energy resolution, ~0.5% at ET ~50 GeV Di-photon mass resolution <1% at 100 GeV/c2 Powerful central tracking system Good charged particle momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency Good reconstruction of secondary vertices (for  and b-jets) Hermetic combined calorimetry system Coverage over || < 5.0 Good resolution for detecting and measuring “missing” ET and for reconstructing the mass of jet-pairs Criterion 1 drives overall physical design of the detector through magnet design Criteria 2&3 need special technologies to cope with challenging LHC environment CMS Ken Bell 3

Engineering Solutions Single high field (4T) solenoid Largest practicably constructible Compact design, but large enough BL2 Contains all barrel tracking and calorimetry Therefore solenoid can be thick Flux return yoke accurately constructed and instrumented for muon detection with redundant measuring systems 4 stations 32 r- measurements (barrel DT) & 24 r-z measurements (endcap CSC) Additional trigger from RPC layers Sophisticated alignment system High-granularity electromagnetic calorimeter containing ~75k PbWO4 crystals >22X0 in depth Tracking using 3-layer Si-pixel (66M channel) surrounded by 10-layer Si-strip (10M chans.) (210m2 silicon: ~tennis court) Hermetic hadron calorimeter Sampling type, brass/scintillator layers CMS Ken Bell 4

Assembly Concept Modular 5 Barrel “Wheels” 3+3 Endcap “Disks” Ease of surface pre-assembly Lower as 15 large pieces Rapid access for maintenance 5 Barrel “Wheels” 3+3 Endcap “Disks” Surface (2000-2007) Assemble Barrel & Endcap yokes Assemble & insert Coil Assemble & install HCAL Install Muon chambers (Pre-)cable detectors Start commissioning Test of coil & “-slice” of CMS Underground (2006-2008) Install ECAL Barrel & Endcaps (preshower 2009) Install Tracker and Beam-Pipe Complete cabling Close detector and finish commissioning CMS Ken Bell 5

Performance Overview Tracking HCAL CMS Ken Bell 6

CMS Timeline Lausanne: Workshop on installing Large Hadron Collider in LEP tunnel CERN’s long-range planning committee recommends Large Hadron Collider as right choice for CERN’s future LEP Collider starts operation Aachen: ECFA LHC Workshop Evian les Bains: General Meeting on LHC Physics and Detectors Letters of Intent for LHC detectors submitted LHC approved CMS Technical Proposal approved LHC Construction begins CMS assembly begins on the surface; LEP Collider closes CMS experimental cavern completed 10-Sep: First circulating beams Oct/Nov: CMS: 4-week, 300M cosmic-ray, data-taking at 3.8T:“CRAFT” First proton-proton Collisions Reach design luminosity ?? Upgrade LHC Phase 1: increase design luminosity by factor 2-4 ?? Upgrade LHC Phase 2: increase design luminosity by factor ~10 CMS Ken Bell 7

Nr Scientists & Engineers CMS Collaboration 59 49 175 Member States Total USA 67 Non-Member States Number of Laboratories Belgium Bulgaria Austria Finland USA CERN France Germany Greece Russia Hungary 1084 503 723 2310 Member States Non-Member States Total USA Nr Scientists & Engineers Uzbekistan Italy Ukraine Georgia Belarus UK Poland Armenia Portugal Turkey Brazil Serbia China,PR Spain Pakistan China(Taiwan) Switzerland Lithuania New-Zealand Mexico Iran Colombia 38 Countries 175 Institutions 2310 Scientists and Engineers Korea Croatia Ireland India Cyprus Estonia CMS Ken Bell 8

UK groups in CMS Detector UK is ~5% of CMS Collaboration Bristol University ECAL & Global Calorimeter Trigger (GCT) Brunel University Strip Tracker & ECAL Imperial College Strip Tracker, ECAL & GCT CMS Spokesperson (T.S.Virdee) Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Electronic & Mechanical Engineering Support Principal UK Strip Tracker involvement: Electronics & DAQ Principal UK ECAL involvement: Endcaps CMS Ken Bell 9

Detector Components CMS Ken Bell 10

Magnet Strong field (4T) with very large BL2 Central tracking and calorimetry inside solenoid World’s largest SC solenoid 12.5m long, 6.3m diameter Many novel engineering aspects NbTi conductor embedded in pure Al Cold mass: 220 t Nominal current: 19.5 kA Stored energy at full field: 2.6 GJ Yoke 22m long, 15m diameter, 10000 t of iron 5 Barrel “wheels”, 3+3 Endcap “disks” Operate at B=3.8T CMS Ken Bell 11

Field Mapping inside solenoid Map on Surface, before TK & ECAL installed Rotary arm field-mapper: precision ~7 x 10-4 Raw magnetic flux density measurements: 1st parameterisation: Field/T 12-fold symmetric model Z/m f/deg Map good to 20G inside Tracking volume CMS Ken Bell 12

Measured Endcap Deformation at 3.8T [mm] SLM 1 SLM 2 SLM 3 3 Straight Line Monitor (SLM) Laser Lines per Muon Endcap Station Radial distance along SLM [mm] 10 optical CCD sensors per SLM Measured ~15mm deformation agrees well with FEA prediction CMS Ken Bell 13

All-Silicon Tracker: Pixels & Strips TEC - Tracker EndCaps 2x9 disks, 6400 modules TID - Tracker Inner Disks 2x3 disks, 816 modules TOB - Tracker Outer Barrel 6 layers, 5208 modules TIB - Tracker Inner Barrel 4 layers, 2724 modules FPix - Forward Pixels 2x2 disks, 192 panels, 18Mpix BPix - Barrel Pixels 3 layers, 768 modules, 48 Mpix CMS Ken Bell 14

Pixel Tracker Barrel Pixels 3 barrel layers at r of 4.3, 7.3, 10.4cm 672 modules & 96 half modules 11520 ROCs (48 million pixels) Forward Pixels 2x2 disks at z = ±34.5 & ±46.5cm Extend from 6-15 cm in radius 20º turbine geometry 672 modules in 96 blades 4320 ROCs (18 million pixels) Design allows for three high precision tracking points up to || of ~2.5 Active area: 0.78m2 (BPIX), 0.28m2 (FPIX) Pixels 150m x 100m. Hit resolution of 10m (r-) & 20m (z) expected due to charge sharing & B=4T 66M readout channels CMS Ken Bell 15

Silicon Strip Tracker TIB 4 layers at r of 25-50cm. Pitch 81/118m Hit resolution 23-34m in r- TOB 6 layers at r of 50-110cm. Pitch 118/183m Hit resolution 35-52m in r- 1st 2 layers of TIB/TOB: 100mrad stereo angle TID 2x3 disks at |z| of 70-115cm Pitch 97/128/143m TEC 2x9 disks at |z| of 120-280cm Pitch 96/126/128/143/158/183m 1st 2 rings of TID, Rings 1,2,5 of TEC: stereo 10 layer coverage in || to ~2.4 Active area: ~210 m2 Silicon 75k APV front-end chips 9.6M readout channels 2.4m 5.4m CMS Ken Bell 16

Strip Tracker insertion CMS Ken Bell 17

Pixel commissioning in CRAFT Z [cm] r [cm] Barrel aligned at module level (200-300 hits, 89% aligned) Pixel occupancy map CMS Ken Bell 18

SST commissioning in CRAFT TOB thick sensors : S/N = 32 TIB/TID thin sensors : S/N = 27/25 TEC (mixed thickness) : S/N = 30 Conclude: Signal/Noise as expected TIB aligned: rms= 26-40m TOB aligned: rms= 24-28m CMS Ken Bell 19

ECAL Hermetic, homogeneous PbWO4 calorimeter Good energy resolution Why use PbWO4 scintillating crystals? Short radiation (X0 = 0.89cm) & Moliere (2.2cm) length Compact, fine granularity Fast and radiation hard Low light yield: compensate with high gain photodetectors which work in magnetic field Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs) in barrel Vacuum Phototriodes (VPTs) in endcaps Extensive R&D needed: ~84 t of PbWO4 (& APDs, VPTs) [cf ~tens of g of PbWO4 before CMS] CMS Ken Bell 20

ECAL Barrel Barrel: 61200 crystals 0 < || < 1.479, inner radius 129cm 36 identical “supermodules” Crystal covers 1º in  &  Front face 22x22mm2, length = 230mm  25.8 X0 Quasi-projective geometry All channels pre-calibrated to 1.5% (cosmic rays) σ(E)/E = 0.42±0.01% CMS Ken Bell 21

ECAL Endcaps Endcaps: 2 x 7324 crystals 1.479 < || < 3.0, |z| ~314cm 2 “Dees” per endcap Crystals arranged in xy grid Front face 28.6x28.6mm2 Length = 220mm  24.7 X0 Quasi-projective geometry CMS Ken Bell 22

installed & checked-out ECAL Endcap Preshower 4300 sensor modules 20m2 Silicon 138k channels Final plane complete this month Both endcaps installed & checked-out by Easter 2009 1.9 X0 0.9 X0 Pb ECAL crystals Identifies 0 over 1.653 < || < 2.6 Improves purity of electron ID High granularity  improved electron &  position determination CMS Ken Bell 23

ECAL Energy in Beam Splash Events Energy Maps shown. Beam splash events also used to determine channel timings White areas to be recovered in 2008/09 shutdown Calibrations not yet applied in Endcaps (lower response VPTs nearer beam pipe) CMS Ken Bell 24

ECAL Stopping Power (CRAFT cosmics) Stopping power of cosmic rays traversing ECAL, as function of measured momentum (Tracker) Dashed lines: contributions from collision loss (red) and bremsstrahlung (blue) Errors: bin-width (x) & statistical (y) Shows correctness of Tracker momentum scale & ECAL calibration from test beams CMS Ken Bell 25

HCAL Hermetic hadron calorimeter Sampling type, brass/scintillator layers (HB, HO, HE). Hybrid Photo-Diodes Barrel: || < 1.4, inside solenoid, single longitudinal sampling Outer: barrel tail-catcher for || < 1.26  >11int in depth Endcap: 1.3 < || < 3.0 Forward: 3.0 < || < 5.0: Iron/quartz-fibre σ/E (test beam): ~97%/√E  8% CMS Ken Bell 26

HCAL & ECAL in Beam Splash Events ECAL & HCAL energy deposits highly correlated CMS Ken Bell 27

HCAL commissioning in CRAFT Event selection: Muon track matching in DT and Tracker 20 GeV/c < Pµ < 1000 GeV/c CRAFT: 200 k events MC: 15 k events CRAFT data HB energy: signal from HB towers corrected for muon path length in HB Test Beam 2006 Pµ = 150 GeV/c Mean signal = 2.8 GeV CMS Ken Bell 28

Resistive Plate Chambers Muon System Cathode Strip Chambers & Resistive Plate Chambers Drift Tubes & Resistive Plate Chambers Wires = anodes Strips = cathodes Endcap Barrel Endcap +ve anode Resistive Plate Chambers -ve cathode CMS Ken Bell 29

Muon System Drift Tube Chambers (Barrel) Two independent & complementary systems At least 4 layers Drift Tube Chambers (Barrel) 250 chambers, 180k channels Good muon resolution: r- ~100m, Z~150m, angle ~1mrad Slower response (up to 400 ns) Economical for use in low rate region Resistive Plate Chambers (Barrel & Endcap) 1020 chambers Muon spatial resolution: r- ~1.5 cm Fast response, <3ns timing resolution Relatively inexpensive Dedicated to first level trigger Cathode Strip Chambers (Endcaps) 468 chambers, 450k channels Good muon spatial resolution: r- ~75–150m, <2mm at trigger level Close wire spacing  fast response 4ns timing resolution Good for high rates CMS Ken Bell 30

Beam Halo Hit Distribution in CSCs ME4 ME3 ME2 ME1 ME+1 ME+2 ME+3 ME+4 Arrow indicates sequence beam traversed endcap disks: Iron progressively absorbs halo muons… CMS Ken Bell 31

Beam Halo Muons Reconstructed in CSCs CMS Ken Bell 32

DTs, HCAL & ECAL in Beam Splash Events ~2x109 protons on collimator ~150m upstream of CMS HCAL energy ECAL energy Debris DT muon chamber hits Inner tracking systems kept OFF CMS Ken Bell 33

Muon DTs at CRAFT Chamber residuals: Data MC MB4 MB3 MB2 MB1 Chamber residuals: Reasonable agreement between data & MC after fitting arrival time of cosmic muon Sigma ~200-260m Sector 4 of wheel -2 shown here B-field degrades MB1 resolution in wheels +/-2 CMS Ken Bell 34

DT Drift Velocity Along Z, Field On/Off Already have Drift Velocity determination from CRAFT data Innermost stations on outer wheels have largest radial field (eg Wh-2 MB1) Highly suppressed zero on Y-axis: maximum difference in Drift Velocity is 3% CMS Ken Bell 35

CRAFT: TK, ECAL, HCAL, Muon Green: Tracker and Muon hits Magenta: ECAL Blue: HCAL CMS Ken Bell 36

Trigger challenges at LHC Enormous data rate: 109 Hz of collisions More than 1TByte/s Minimum bias in-time pile-up 22 events per bunch crossing Out-of-time pile-up Events from different bunch crossings overlaid Tiny cross sections for Higgs and new physics Selection 1:1011 All online Can’t go back and fix it. Events are lost forever! Level-1 (hardware): 40MHz 100kHz Level-2 (software): 100kHz ~100Hz CMS Ken Bell 37

CMS Level-1 Trigger CMS Ken Bell 38

CMS Level-2 Trigger High Level Trigger (HLT) Bandwidth/Timing constraints: Each HLT trigger path is a sequence of filters Progress from low- (Calo, Muon) to high- (Pixel, Strip) time-consuming algorithms All algorithms regional (except jets) Seeded by previous levels Reco time is significantly improved by applying: Regional data-unpacking Local reconstruction (using one subdetector only) Runs on ~1000 Dual QuadCore CPUs at 2.6 GHz Major exercise in 2007 showed time/event OK CMS Ken Bell 39

Data Acquisition Architecture CMS Ken Bell 40

Underground Commissioning Progress Sub-Detector + Trigger Pixels and EE added 100% Reached scale of 2006 Magnet Test & Cosmic Challenge Muon Tracks in Si-Strip Tracker Final DAQ hardware, final services First  coincidence of 2 subsystems Upgrade to final DAQ software architecture First cosmic muon triggers underground May07 Sep08 CMS Ken Bell 41

Winter 2008/2009 Shutdown Install and commission preshower detector Tackle infant mortality in detectors installed prior to 2008 Finalise commissioning of detectors installed in 2008 Address issues arising from CRAFT running Schedule for restart in 2009: Resume cosmic-ray data-taking at B=0T in April Close detector by end of May Extended CRAFT Run before 2009 LHC beams CMS Ken Bell 42

Summary Construction of the CMS experiment is almost completed Commissioning work already carried out gives confidence that CMS detectors will operate with expected performance Integrated operation of subdetectors & central systems using cosmic-ray triggers is now routine, with near-final complexity and functionality Challenges conducted around the clock at 100% of 2008 load show that Computing, Software & Analysis tools are ready for early data Have already taken and analysed first beam-related data Preparations for rapid extraction of physics are well advanced Eagerly awaiting first LHC Physics during 2009 CMS Ken Bell 43

Back-Up Back-Up CMS Ken Bell 44

Cosmic Run at Four Tesla (CRAFT) Aims: Run CMS for 4 weeks continuously to gain further operational experience this year Study effects of B field on detector components (since MTCC) Collect 300M cosmic events with tracking detectors and field Aim for 70% efficiency Facts: Ran 4 weeks continuously from 13-Oct to 11-Nov 19 days with B=3.8T 370M cosmic events collected in total 290M with B=3.8T and with strip tracker and DT in readout 194M with all components in 4 runs exceed 15h Oct.21 VIP visit CMS Ken Bell 45