SESSION 2: ESIF Simplification Workshop – Update on Simplified Cost Options (SCOs) Nicola Lavin, NW Growth Delivery Team Arpley House Warrington

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© IMEC SIMPLIFYING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESEARCH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMMES EPP HEARING - EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT BRUSSELS, 1 SEPTEMBER 2010 Ingrid Reynaert.
Advertisements

European Union Cohesion Policy
© Shutterstock - olly Simplification Cost Options Expert Group on delegated and implementing acts 3 July 2013.
European Territorial Co-operation Eligibility of expenditure for co-operation programmes Art. 17(1) ETC Regulation 16th meeting of the Expert Group on.
INTERREG and Tacis budgets Main differences: No breakdown of the Tacis budget between the partners is required; No strict limits for the project management.
Key points for the future guidance on direct costing for large infrastructures in Horizon 2020 Brussels, 08 April 2013 Vittorio Morelli RTD.M.1.
Communication campaign r. 2 Third parties & other sensitive relations Link with the projectLegal situations Carry out the projects (core tasks) 1. Beneficiary.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: Personnel costs & Other direct costs Antonio Requena Fernández FCH JU Financial Officer.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: - 3rd Parties - Indirect Costs - Indirect Costs Thanos BATSILAS FCH JU Financial Officer.
Communication Campaign 1 Elisabeth Robino Head of Finance & Administration Nicolas Brahy Legal Adviser.
1 Financial Procedures in FP7 Projects Reporting and Audits Karolina Lis Research Assistant DCU, Finance Office
Financial reporting Oskar Otsus January 2013 Moldova.
DG Research and Innovation
Training Module: The MED-Dialogue project (611433) is co-funded by the European Community's ICT Programme under FP7 6 - Resource Allocation and Budgeting.
Funding Schemes. Legal and Financial Rules in the 7th Framework Programme PHOENIX Training Laulasmaa, 1 Sept 2007.
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplification Cost Options Current use and perspectives June 2014.
ESIF Business Process and Simplification Nic Suggit Department of Communities and Local Government 24 April 2014.
EHEROES EC Grant Agreement Negotiations June 1, 2011 K.U.Leuven Research & Development Myriam Witvrouw.
Eligibility Rules Stefan Nyström, MA Per Dahlström, MA Lead Partner Seminar 24th- 25th March, 2015, Svolvaer, Norway.
ACCEPT project Grant Agreement FP7-SSH-2009-A.
Contracts & Finance. A) Grant Agreement / between EC and VITO / relevant for all partners B) Consortium Agreement / between partners / relevant for EC.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
1 Eligibility: Simplified costs Lump sums grants Mathieu LEFEBVRE, Laurent SENS, ESF Coordination Unit DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
Financial and legal aspect in the context of proposal preparation Marija Šola, MSc. Project manager University of Belgrade School of Electrical Engineering.
WE-Mentor Enterprising women in European Research mentoring India/Israel/Romania/Turkey Financial and administrative aspects in FP7.
Training Seminar on an Information Point for FP7 in Palestine Witkowski Jacob, BA,CPA, CIA Nicosia, Cyprus November 2008.
Unit costs for reimbursement of clinical studies HORIZON 2020.
Katarina Lenova, 4 February 2014 H RULES FOR PARTICIPATION AND FINANCIAL RULES.
Basic principles of FP7 Grant Agreement Financial management and reporting.
1 Commission's proposal for HORIZON 2020 Rules for Participation Brussels, 12 December 2011 DG Research & Innovation.
6 September 2012 GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS CORE 2012 CALL – ELIGIBLE COSTS AND FINANCIAL ISSUES ANNA FASTYN CHIEF EXPERT SECTION FOR BILATERAL PROGRAMMES AND.
Louis Vervloet, General director, ESF Agency Flanders
1 An introduction to Project Cycle Management PCM DAY 3 Gori, 31/3 – 3/4/2015.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: - Indirect Costs Thanos BATSILAS FCH JU Financial Officer.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the.
1 The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums OPEN DAYS Workshop 06D06 – Simplification of Cohesion.
European Territorial Co-operation Eligibility of expenditure for co-operation programmes (Art. 17(1) ETC Reg. 18th meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated.
Science, research and development European Commission IDARI Project Meeting Tartu, June 2005 Martin Greimel Scientific Officer Directorate-E ‘Biotechnology,
Volvox Understanding the Budget Angela Pettit – Contracts Officer.
Eligibility Rules Ole Damsgaard Lead Partner Seminar 1st October, 2015, Kuopio, Finland.
Global Awareness in Action (GAIA) Financial information Åsa Gonner Financial Officer City of Malmo/Environment Department.
P.Ignatiadis & Prof Vassilios Zacharopoulos ELKE TEI CRETE March 2011 FP7 Training Courses for TEI Crete 1 FP7 - FINANCIAL AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT.
M ERIT Me tabolic R eprogramming by I nduction of T ranscription Overview finances and reporting Lisbon, 08. – MERIT – M 3 1.
VITAL KICK-OFF MEETING Financial aspects 7 th – 8 th April 2008 Veterinary Research Institute Brno, Czech Republic.
Session 4 - Financial Workshop Ani Hovsepian, Samir Nassar, Ingrid Trauner Call deadline 12/05/2016 (Call not related to the 2016 European Week of Sport)
Simplified Cost Options Impatto della semplificazione sulle attività dei controlli Francisco MERCHÁN CANTOS Direttore Audit DG EMPL Firenze, 21 novembre.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs) The audit point of view.
Eligibility Rules Stefan Nyström, Managing Authority June 1, 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs)
Interreg annual meeting 2016 Brussels | 6 June 2016 Simplified cost options in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Luca Ferrarese | Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Joint Secretariat.
Best practices related to procurement within a project (for part of the expenditure) implemented by the beneficiary itself (art. 67, par. 4 of Regulation.
- Special Education Needs (SEN) Network Administrative and Financial Aspects.
EU - China 11 Guidelines for Applicants rules for applications European Union Delegation to China & Mongolia Beijing Information Session 14 th November.
Interreg Atlantic Area Programme Eligibility Rules.
Presentation from the ECA 26 May 2016 Gerhard Ross and Robert Markus European Court of Auditors.
Eligibility Rules Ole Damsgaard, Joint Secretariat April 20th, 2016 – Faroe Islands.
Simplified Cost Options: DG EMPL audit approach
Interreg Atlantic Area Programme Partner Budget & Eligibility Rules
Get ready for EC reporting
Leader ECA audit findings and possible simplification
Communication Campaign
Horizon 2020 – Financial Issues Horizon 2020 Info Days
Eligibility Rules Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat
Use of SCOs in the ESI funds: Survey of OPs 2017
Eligibility Rules Stefan Nyström, Managing Authority
Financial Guidelines for Applicants
Financial and Administrative presentation on PARTICULATES project
Simplified costs Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme.
by the European Union’s 11th EDF
Presentation transcript:

SESSION 2: ESIF Simplification Workshop – Update on Simplified Cost Options (SCOs) Nicola Lavin, NW Growth Delivery Team Arpley House Warrington Tel: XX

Advantages of Simplified Costs Reduces the administration burden to beneficiaries –No more discussion on whether or not costs are linked to the project - reduced time to develop –No more collection and archiving of every (small) cost –No audit of underlying financial documents –Audit only on results achieved and or activities performed audit less time consuming Reduces the administrative burden for the managing authorities –Supports N+3 –Role of the MA changes to one of support –Easier reporting to EC Reduces the risk of error rate –ECA Annual Reports 2012 & 2013 did not detect any costs related to the specific use of SCO Focus on results

The Cost Options ( for grants and repayable assistance ) Costs actually incurred, identifiable and verifiable, recorded in the accounts, etc. A percentage to be calculated on the eligible costs Example: Indirect costs = 15% Direct staff costs A fixed amount per unit determined by the MA Example: person attending a seminar For average personnel cost (based on the usual accounting practices) A global amount to cover one or several cost categories not exceeding EUR 100,000 of public contribution Example: Hosting of a event/production of information videos

MA status Current position Flat rate of 15% to calculate indirect costs –15% of direct eligible staff costs Emerging For research and innovation activity –Making use of Horizon 2020 for similar activity and beneficiaries –Indirect costs can be calculated on the basis of 25% of total direct eligible costs (less subcontracting costs and the resources made available by third parties which are not used on the premises of the beneficiary, as well as financial support to third parties) Future ( New Year) Standardised Unit costs –Define activity –Review data available on cost driver

Direct costs = £113,772 A. Direct staff costs = 1. Personnel cost100,763 60, ,143 = £100, Internal personnel - remuneration60, Int. pers. – transport home/work Internal personnel – travel costs External personnel – remuneration39,143 B. Indirect costs – 15% of direct staff costs 1.5 External personnel – travel costs0 = 100,038 x 15% = £15, Product develop & consumption13,009 C Other direct costs = £13, Non depreciable consumption goods 9, Publicity3, Organisation costs857 TOTAL ELIGIBLE: 2.4 Other costs0 A = B = C = £128,779 Future simplified cost options Indirect costs = 15% of direct staff costs

Next steps Guidance on SCO released in December by EC Confirmation by DCLG of the use of 25% flat rate (of eligible direct costs less sub contracting etc) to fund indirect costs for similar beneficiaries and activity (Research and Innovation) New Year begin in earnest unit costs analysis.