Sridhar Ramachandran Chief Technology Officer Core Session Controller.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Company Overview Beox Communications is a global communications service provider founded in Based in USA with branches in UK and Turkey. Beox Communications.
Advertisements

BAI613 Module 2 - Voice over IP Technology. Module Objectives 1. Describe the benefits of IP Telephony/Packet Telephony/VoIP over traditional telephone.
SIP & SS7 (SIP-02) Monday - 09/10/07, 10:00-10:45am.
Building Applications with SIP Conferencing / Collaboration Alan D. Percy Director, Market Development AudioCodes.
VoIP/SIP Trunking Wholesale/Enterprise.
Presents H.323 Forum ETSI TIPHON Presented by: Richard Brennan - Telxxis LLC Vice-Chair ETSI-TIPHON.
Why Converged Networks Make Sense: VoIP a First Step July 26, 2006.
 3G is the third generation of tele standards and technology for mobile networking, superseding 2.5G. It is based on the International Telecommunication.
John Bean Director, Europe, Middle East and Africa 4 August 2015 CONFIDENTIAL © 2010, Peering Partner's. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 15 & 16 Service Provider VoIP Applications and Services Advanced Enterprise Applications.
VoIP: From Disruptive Innovation to Mainstream Opportunity
Colombo, Sri Lanka, 7-10 April 2009 Multimedia Service Delivery on Next Generation Networks Pradeep De Almeida, Group Chief Technology Officer Dialog Telekom.
IT Expo SECURITY Scott Beer Director, Product Support Ingate
IETF 63 - Paris VOIPPEER BoF A Broadband Service Provider’s Perspective on VoIP Peering August 5, 2005 Presented by Jason Livingood.
6. Next Generation Networks A. Transition to NGN B
Polycom Conference Firewall Solutions. 2 The use of Video Conferencing Is Rapidly Growing More and More people are adopting IP conferencing Audio and.
January 23-26, 2007 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Integrating Your IP PBX with an ITSP Leveraging SIP Trunking for Broadband Services John Blasko Vice President.
Is VoIP Dead? Where Does it Stand? James Rafferty Product Line Director, Dialogic September 3, 2009.
1 Leveraging SS7 to Deliver IP Services Carl Bergstrom Director – IN & IP Services VeriSign Telecommunication Services Internet Telephony Conference, February.
Ingate & Dialogic Technical Presentation SIP Trunking Focused.
PART 2: Product Line. Tenor Switches & Gateways Tenor AX Series Solution For Medium to Large Enterprises  Available in 8, 16, 24 and 48 port Available.
VoIP security : Not an Afterthought. OVERVIEW What is VoIP? Difference between PSTN and VoIP. Why VoIP? VoIP Security threats Security concerns Design.
Fall VON - September 28, 1999 C O N N E C T I N G T H E W O R L D W I T H A P P L I C A T I O N S SIP - Ready to Deploy Jim Nelson,
RIPE64 Enum Working Group DE-CIX NGN Services.
CHAPTER 14 PSTN and VoIP Interworking. Cisco Packet Telephony: Connection Control Call Control Services.
National Institute of Science & Technology Voice Over Digital Subscriber Line (VoDSL) Vinay TibrewalEE [1] VoDSL: Next Generation Voice Solution.
1 © 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. H.323 Voice Market H.323-Forum, November 2002, New York, USA H.323 Voice Market Haluk Keskiner Cisco.
MATERI KULIAH 6 SP 2005 PENJASTEL. Next Generation Networks ( NGN ) Adapted from PT. INTI internal documents for teaching purposes.
June 2006 Roles of Session Border Controllers in IMS Networks CANTO - June 2006.
Peering & Routing Designs Using Session Controllers & Media Gateways James Rafferty Voice Peering Forum March 8, 2007.
Session border controllers
Applied Communications Technology Voice Over IP (VOIP) nas1, April 2012 How does VOIP work? Why are we interested? What components does it have? What standards.
B2BUA – A New Type of SIP Server Name: Stephen Cipolli Title: System Architect Date: Feb. 12, 2004.
© Copyright 2007 Arbinet-thexchange, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Voice Peering Steve Heap Chief Technology Officer.
Quintum Confidential and Proprietary 1 Quintum Technologies, Inc. Session Border Controller and VoIP Devices Behind Firewalls Tim Thornton, CTO.
Introduction to SIP Based ENUM IP Telephony Infrastructure 資策會 網路及通訊實驗室 Conference over IP Team 楊政遠 博士
© Copyright 2007 Arbinet-thexchange, Inc. All Rights Reserved. VoIP Peering Pilot Using the Internet2 Backbone.
1 © 2008 Avaya Inc. All rights reserved. Enterprise Infrastructure Anne L Coulombe Global Unified Communications Solutions September.
IP Network Clearinghouse Solutions ENUM IP-Enabling The Global Telephone Directory Frank Estes Vice President , ext 224
2004 APPA Community Broadband Conference Emerging Technologies: Voice Over IP October 11, 2004 Tim Hoolihan V.P. Marketing and Product Management (949)
ﺑﺴﻢﺍﷲﺍﻠﺭﺣﻣﻥﺍﻠﺭﺣﻳﻡ. Group Members Nadia Malik01 Malik Fawad03.
1 Presentation_ID © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco All-IP Mobile Wireless Network Reference Model Presentation_ID.
The State of VoIP Peering Charles Studt Director of Product Management, VoEX.
October 10-13, 2006 San Diego Convention Center, San Diego California SIP Trunking… Why is it so important?
PTCL Training & Development
 Introduction – Consumer Market  Benefits – Operational Cost & Flexibility  Challenges – Quality of Service & Securing VOIP  Legal Issuers  Risk.
Adoption of IP in the Next Generation Contact Center Rupesh ChokshiGautham NatarajanDirector, AT&T.
Intelligent Interconnects in the VoIP Peering Environment
Softswitch SIP Proxy Server Call Manager IP Telephony Router Tablet PC IP PBX Class 5 Switch Class 4 Switch PBX Access Gateway Broadband Router Voice Gateway.
Colombo, Sri Lanka, 7-10 April 2009 FORUM ON NEXT GENERATION STANDARDIZATION (Colombo, Sri Lanka, 7-10 April 2009) Session Moderator Ghassem Koleyni An.
To Rent or Buy the IP PBX? Maybe it’s Both…. Building a VoIP Solution That Enables Both.
Richard Gurdak International Development Blue Ridge Networks Service Providers and Lawful Intercept.
© 2007 Level 3 Communications, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 1 Beyond SIP Trunking What’s Next ? September 11, 2007 Michael Remacle.
Next Generation Switching Solutions Explored
Delivering high-quality SIP applications and services Jim Hourihan VP Marketing & Product Management.
Session border control: CONTROL for service providers to make money from IP IC services Kevin Klett VP, Product Management.
Intelligent Interconnects in the VoIP Peering Environment John Longo VP Product Marketing & Management, NextPoint.
1 Session Controllers Micaela Giuhat AVP Product Management Netrake
Improving Enterprise Service Solutions with IMS Architectures Ray Adensamer Senior Manager, Product Marketing RadiSys Session IMS-03: IMS in the Enterprise.
SIP & How It Relates To YOUR Business. Jeff S. Olson Director of Marco Carrier Services David Bailey-Aldrich Technology.
© ITT Educational Services, Inc. All rights reserved. IS3120 Network Communications Infrastructure Unit 7 Layer 3 Networking, Campus Backbones, WANs, and.
Rohde & Schwarz Topex TOPEX SoftSwitch July 2011.
سمینار تخصصی What is PSTN ? (public switched telephone network) تیرماه 1395.
1Security for Service Providers – Dave Gladwin – Newport Networks – SIP ’04 – 22-Jan-04 Security for Service Providers Protecting Service Infrastructure.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CISCO CONFIDENTIAL Cisco SP Voice solutions Review Ching-Ying Tong
IP Telephony (VoIP).
Class 4 & Class 5 Softswitch
Level 3 Voice Services Network Architecture June 15, 2004
Don Troshynski Technical Director
August 5, 2005 Presented by Jason Livingood
Presentation transcript:

Sridhar Ramachandran Chief Technology Officer Core Session Controller

NexTone Customers NexTone’s Session Controllers are deployed in over 100 carrier and service provider networks for a total capacity of over 2 BILLION minutes a month

What is a Session Controller? Point of control for multimedia signaling and media − Service protection − Network isolation and insulation Other names − IP-IP Gateway − Back to back gateway − Session Border Control − Border Session Control Point of control for multimedia signaling and media − Service protection − Network isolation and insulation Other names − IP-IP Gateway − Back to back gateway − Session Border Control − Border Session Control

Problems where VoIP has proven effective Transport Switching Interconnect − Carrier – Carrier − Enterprise – Carrier Applications Transport Switching Interconnect − Carrier – Carrier − Enterprise – Carrier Applications Top and bottom line enhancing Flexibility and enforceability are key Control points

Growth in VoIP Peering ITXC Carries Record Voice Call Volumes for Holidays “In past years, our carrier customers used ITXC to complete their subscribers’ calls because our VoIP technology allowed us to provide them high quality at low prices. Usually, the only VoIP involved was within our network. Now carriers also choose ITXC for interconnection because they themselves are deploying VoIP equipment in their own networks or even at their subscribers’ premises. Our technology allows these carriers to connect their VoIP networks to ours at much less cost than a legacy PSTN interconnect and with much greater flexibility.” In the fourth quarter of 2003, over one third of ITXC's traffic was originated or terminated through a direct VoIP interconnect between ITXC.net® and the network of another carrier. ITXC has VoIP interconnects with over 140 carriers or service providers in 60 countries and supports VoIP traffic exchange with a wide variety of network equipment vendor platforms based on either Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) or H.323 call control protocol. iBasis Posts Record VoIP Call Volume During New Year's Day "In addition to setting an overall record for traffic, we are experiencing a record volume of traffic that enters or exits the iBasis Network as IP traffic," said Ofer Gneezy, president and CEO of iBasis. "Major carriers have been deploying VoIP infrastructure to support both retail services and direct VoIP carrier interconnects. At the same time, new service providers are delivering VoIP services directly to residential and business consumers. Both can realize significant cost efficiencies by establishing direct VoIP interconnections with our proven global VoIP infrastructure. "More than 70% of iBasis traffic either originates or terminates through our direct VoIP interconnects with service providers. Direct VoIP interconnects require significantly less capital expense in the iBasis network than legacy TDM interconnects. In addition, we are enabling our customers to more fully benefit from the efficiencies of VoIP and the public Internet for global telecommunications."

VoIP Peering Requirements − Flexibility Media and Signaling Routing based on trust boundaries “Any-to-any” interworking – SIP, H.323, multiple vendor interoperability High Performance and Scale “On-demand” Media Processing − Leverage and enforce existing peering agreements Call Admission Control  Prevent Denial of Service attacks and service abuse/theft Call accounting  Call Detail Record (CDR) generation and reporting Topology Hiding  Go across address boundaries − Control Points Segmentation/classification of traffic

What are Carriers’ session control needs? Call routing with multiple business models: − Wholesale − Transit − Pre-paid − Post-paid/retail Service brokerage Special applications − Permissive dialing Call routing with multiple business models: − Wholesale − Transit − Pre-paid − Post-paid/retail Service brokerage Special applications − Permissive dialing

Edge SC Session Controller Placement SIP Network Enterprise Peering PSTN Broadband H.323 Network Carrier Peering Broadband NAT Traversal PSTN Orig/Term Edge SC Softswitch Core SC Edge SC

Aggregation Multiple interconnects between same carriers Multi-stage and hierarchical call admission control Core SC maintains notion of aggregate capacity Multiple interconnects between same carriers Multi-stage and hierarchical call admission control Core SC maintains notion of aggregate capacity Partner Carrier IP Network Carrier IP Network Edge SC Core SC Edge SC

Merits of this Approach No “control” protocol Call admission control based on network egress policies Ability to add other service selection logic − Applications − Quality of Service demanded or provisioned Call routing with mixed business models − Wholesale − Pre-paid or post-paid − Transit Normalized and vendor independent call routing − SIP only No “control” protocol Call admission control based on network egress policies Ability to add other service selection logic − Applications − Quality of Service demanded or provisioned Call routing with mixed business models − Wholesale − Pre-paid or post-paid − Transit Normalized and vendor independent call routing − SIP only

Other Advantages Implementation flexibility − Redirect server − Stateful SIP proxy − B2BUA Core SC function can be integrated into Edge SC Leverage TRIP (rfc 3219) and TGREP View Edge SCs and Gateways as originators and terminators of sessions Implementation flexibility − Redirect server − Stateful SIP proxy − B2BUA Core SC function can be integrated into Edge SC Leverage TRIP (rfc 3219) and TGREP View Edge SCs and Gateways as originators and terminators of sessions

What about the “Softswitch”? “Control” paradigm has limited effectiveness − Gateway control − Call control Softswitch designed for a “closed” network − MGCP/MEGACO to provide total control of internal network How does one build a fabric of softswitches? “Control” paradigm has limited effectiveness − Gateway control − Call control Softswitch designed for a “closed” network − MGCP/MEGACO to provide total control of internal network How does one build a fabric of softswitches?

Summary Session Controllers are essential for VoIP peering Core Session Controllers provide higher level functionality, based on SIP signaling Session Controllers are essential for VoIP peering Core Session Controllers provide higher level functionality, based on SIP signaling

Thank You. ;

What about the “Softswitch”? “Control” paradigm has not proven effective Softswitch designed for a “closed” network − MGCP/MEGACO to provide total control of internal network VoIP interconnects challenge the Softswitch “control” paradigm − Interconnects = carrier peering, and MGCP/MEGACO “control” of 3 rd party networks not viable − SIP/H323 typically added as after-thought to interwork trusted devices Softswitch domains (and VoIP interconnects should never be trusted) VoIP Interconnect Solution: − Keep SS7 and MGs at the edge of the VoIP network, Softswitch as “cluster controller” to help handle SS7/C7 − Introduce Session Controllers to manage VoIP peering and interconnects between carriers and enterprises − Overcome lower layer (Layer 2/3) IP issues call-by-call – NAT/PAT, security, VLANs etc “Control” paradigm has not proven effective Softswitch designed for a “closed” network − MGCP/MEGACO to provide total control of internal network VoIP interconnects challenge the Softswitch “control” paradigm − Interconnects = carrier peering, and MGCP/MEGACO “control” of 3 rd party networks not viable − SIP/H323 typically added as after-thought to interwork trusted devices Softswitch domains (and VoIP interconnects should never be trusted) VoIP Interconnect Solution: − Keep SS7 and MGs at the edge of the VoIP network, Softswitch as “cluster controller” to help handle SS7/C7 − Introduce Session Controllers to manage VoIP peering and interconnects between carriers and enterprises − Overcome lower layer (Layer 2/3) IP issues call-by-call – NAT/PAT, security, VLANs etc

Core Session Controller Introduction What is a session controller? Growth in VoIP peering Need for more control at the core View of softswitch Core session controller fabric Introduction What is a session controller? Growth in VoIP peering Need for more control at the core View of softswitch Core session controller fabric