Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *systematically assessing.
Data Based Decision Making
1 Progress Monitoring Content developed by Wayne Callender and Jeanie Mercier Smith The Link Between Instruction and Reading Proficiency.
DIBELS Part I SEDL 368. To access the materials, you will need to go to Download.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
DIBELS – Part II SED 368 Fall Review DIBELS Benchmarks – 3 times/year – At grade-level learners may need only benchmarks – Can be used as a screener.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
The RtI Referral Process Brenda Harrell Becky Ryan.
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
What help does each student need?. Assess to find out specifically where a child is having problems.
Cohort A Project-wide Data “Our goals can only be reached through a vehicle of a plan, in which we must fervently believe, and upon which we must vigorously.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Malissa Patrick and Kim Thorndycraft February 25, 2010.
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Reading Maze General Outcome Measurement TES Data Meeting April, rd and 4 th Grades Cynthia Martin, ARI Reading Coach.
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Assessment: Universal Screening Cadre 7 Initial Training September 29, 2011.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf
DATA BASED DECISION MAKING IN THE RTI PROCESS: WEBINAR #2 SETTING GOALS & INSTRUCTION FOR THE GRADE Edward S. Shapiro, Ph.D. Director, Center for Promoting.
Systems Requirements for RTI The nuts and bolts that hold it all together!
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Progress Monitoring for students in Strategic or Intensive intervention levels Based on the work of Roland Good and Ruth Kaminski.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING: THE HOW TO’S….. BEAVERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Dean Richards, Lisa Bates, Jon Potter.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charlie Eccleston, MTSS Trainer.
What Do I Do With My DIBELS Data? Aligning Student Needs and Instruction source: Tracy Cormane:
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance Kira Florence Jonathan Potter University of Oregon.
Universal Screening Cadre 6 Training October 12, 2010.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED RESPONSE to Instruction & Intervention.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
STAR Reading. Purpose Periodic progress monitoring assessment Quick and accurate estimates of reading comprehension Assessment of reading relative to.
Nuts and Bolts of Progress Monitoring Response to Instruction and Intervention RtII.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Data-Based Leadership
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Improved Outcomes For All Children Progress Universal Monitoring
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring

Purposes Evaluate overall effectiveness of program Select students who need additional support Monitor progress of students A universal screener should over-identify students who might need something more!

Evaluate Overall Effectiveness of Program Are 80% of students reaching benchmarks and “on track” for next goal? Does the core curriculum need to be addressed: Intensity Fidelity Targeted Group size Instructional skills

Select Students who are in Need of Additional Support Strategic support: Students are placed in a program that provides moderate intervention and progress monitored monthly or bi-monthly Intensive support: Students are placed in an intervention that is intense and progress monitored weekly or bi-weekly

Why use a Screener to Track Progress? Reading trajectories are established early. Readers on a low trajectory tend to stay on that trajectory. Students on a low trajectory tend to fall further and further behind. Early identification leads to early intervention. The later children are identified as needing support, the more difficult it is to catch up!

Monitor Progress of Students Ensure students who appear to be on track stay that way (3X yearly) Ensure students who are not on track get on track Inform professionals about “what it takes” for an individual student

Students Achieve the Most When: Progress is monitored twice per week Ambitious goals are set Progress data are displayed on graphs Teams use rules to analyze data (Fuchs,1986) So, which kids get the most of this kind of monitoring?

Progress Monitoring is NOT Intended to… Diagnose Evaluate teachers Use to grade students Select specific instructional goals

Model of Big Ideas, Indicators, and Timeline Adapted from Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5,

Box Plot of End of Year Grade 2 ORF Results Progressive ORF Goals A box plot illustrates an entire grade’s distribution of scores in relation to the goal Harn (2005)

What Screening Data Should We Use? K? 1? 2? 3? 4? 5? In October? In January? In April?

Sorting Students into Interventions Review the DIBELS and OAKS data for one grade level: Are 80% of students at each grade level meeting expectations? (should “benchmark” be the OAKS expectation?) If not, make a plan about what to do about it. Use your DIBELS data and OAKS data for one grade level to create a “lowest 20%” group Use the form on Page 4 Design research-based interventions for the students in that group. Describe the plan for progress monitoring that student.

Make a Plan Who will conduct Universal Screening? Who will train the screeners? Who will prepare materials? Who will organize at the school? Where will the data go? Who will organize the data and present it to teaching teams? Who will keep track of which students are in interventions?

Progress Monitoring Accountability for Individual Students

Progress Monitoring Key features of effective formative evaluation systems Student performance is measured frequently (e.g., once or twice/week) and results in quantitative data Progress is monitored toward an observable, measurable, and ambitious goal Progress is graphed and viewed regularly Data decision rules are used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and determine when modifications to interventions are needed

Brandon, Kindergarten/Identify Goal and Draw Aimline The aimline connects where you are to where you want to get to, and shows the rate of progress needed to get there. Aimline Correct Phonemes per Minute

Whoops! Time to make a change! Correct Phonemes Aimline

TTSD EBIS DECISION RULES - Grades 1-5

Trendline Analysis Using a minimum of 8 student progress data points, determine the students actual rate of progress in order to compare to the aimline Several methods, including: Tukey Method Regression Analysis

Tukey Method Trendline Analysis 1.Divide data points into (approximately) three equal sections using vertical lines. 2.In the first and third sections, calculate the mid-date & mid-rate. Mark the points on the graph where the two values intersect. 3.Connect the points to draw the trendline.

Trendline Example: Tukey Method Correct Phonemes Aimline

Evaluating Responsiveness to Intervention Words Read Correct Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 1

Practice: Plot data for a 2 nd grader and 5 th grader. As you plot the data, use decision rules. If you change an intervention, be sure to draw a vertical line. Compare your chart with another person or table group.

Make a Plan Who will conduct probes? Who will graph the information? Who will draw trendlines? Who will decide whether and instructional decision needs to be made? Do you like the decision rules? What will happen when it is time to make a special education referral?