Equivalence principle, antigravity of antimatter and all that Savely G Karshenboim D.I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology (St. Petersburg) and Max-Planck-Institut.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ON TIME An Introduction into the theory behind Albert Einsteins Special Relativity.
Advertisements

Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom
Throw a monkey wrench into quantum mechanics Presenter: Rob Vucic STAO 2010.
"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." Robert Oppenheimer after the first test of the atomic bomb.
The Lamb shift in hydrogen and muonic hydrogen and the proton charge radius Savely Karshenboim Pulkovo Observatory (ГАО РАН) (St. Petersburg) & Max-Planck-Institut.
1 Test of fundamental symmetries Sumerian, 2600 B.C. (British Museum) With thanks to Antoine Weis from an atomic physics perspective Mike Tarbutt.
Phy107 Fall 2006 From last time… Einstein’s Relativity ◦ All laws of physics identical in inertial ref. frames ◦ Speed of light=c in all inertial ref.
Q44.1 The strong nuclear force has a short range compared to the electromagnetic force. Why is this? 1. the particles that mediate the strong force are.
A Brief Tour of the Universe Don’t Panic The Sun in UV.
Cosmology The Origin and Future of the Universe Part 2 From the Big Bang to Today.
AAAS 2001 San Francisco1 Supersymmetry The Coming Revolutions in Particle Physics Hitoshi Murayama (UC Berkeley)
The Uncertain Nature of Gravity An Illustration of Science as a Process of Investigating Nature.
ISP Astronomy Gary D. Westfall1Lecture 6 The Nature of Light Light and other forms of radiation carry information to us from distance astronomical.
Homework # (20 points) 8-25 (20 points) 8-32 (30 points)
Gravitation Learn the nature of gravitational force. Solve problems using Newton’s law of gravitation. Learn about the two kinds of mass. Chapter 7 In.
Gravitation Applications Lecturer: Professor Stephen T. Thornton
Chapter 12 Gravitation. Theories of Gravity Newton’s Einstein’s.
SPACE NOTES Grade 9 science. OUR UNIVERSE describe theories on the formation of the solar system describe theories on the origin and evolution.
FREE ENERGY & Antigravity By William S. Alek INTALEK, INC. June 25, 2005.
Making Light How do we make light?. Making Light How do we make light? –Heat and Light: Incandescent Lighting (3-5% efficient) –Atoms and Light: Fluorescent.
General Theory of Relativity Secs Professor Ken Wester.
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 12; May
Particles & Antiparticles
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 29 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker.
Chapter 26 Relativity. General Physics Relativity II Sections 5–7.
Particles (matter) behave as waves and the Schrödinger Equation 1. Comments on quiz 9.11 and Topics in particles behave as waves:  The (most.
The Theory of Relativity. What is it? Why do we need it? In science, when a good theory becomes inadequate to describe certain situations, it is replaced.
1 Martin L. Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology at Stanford.
 The Bohr model describes definite electron energy levels within atoms  Bohr’s model only applied to hydrogen – it has been replaced by more sophisticated.
Antigravity and Equivalence principle Savely G Karshenboim Pulkovo observatory (ГАО) (St. Petersburg) and Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik (Garching)
Physics - Coulomb's Law. We’ve learned that electrons have a minus one charge and protons have a positive one charge. This plus and minus one business.
Light and Matter Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 6.
Relatively Einstein 2005 has been chosen as the World Year of Physics to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Einstein’s Miraculous Year. In this presentation,
General Relativity and the Expanding Universe Allan Johnston 4/4/06.
Jeopardy Jeopardy PHY101 Chapter 12 Review Study of Special Relativity Cheryl Dellai.
Fundamental Principles of General Relativity  general principle: laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not)  general covariance:
1 Antimatter 1Antimatter and the Universe 2Antimatter in the Laboratory 3Antimatter in Daily Life.
Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2 Chapter 2 Spectroscopy / Review.
Lecture 3 16/9/2003 Recall Penning Trap orbits cylindrical coordinates: ( , ,z); B = constant along z radial (  ) and axial (z) electric.
Precision tests of bound-state QED: Muonium HFS etc Savely G Karshenboim D.I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology (St. Petersburg) and Max-Planck-Institut.
Precision test of bound-state QED and the fine structure constant  Savely G Karshenboim D.I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology (St. Petersburg) and Max-Planck-Institut.
Homework 4 Unit 21 Problem 17, 18, 19 Unit 23 Problem 9, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20.
Astronomy 1143 – Spring 2014 Lecture 18: Special Relativity.
The Big Bang Theory (Part I) How the Universe began. Mike Stuckey Warren East High School.
Light and Matter Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 6.
The Higgs Boson Observation (probably) Not just another fundamental particle… July 27, 2012Purdue QuarkNet Summer Workshop1 Matthew Jones Purdue University.
Physics 55 Monday, December 5, Course evaluations. 2.General relativity with applications to black holes, dark matter, and cosmology. 3.Hubble’s.
Motions of Self-Gravitating bodies to the Second Post- Newtonian Order of General Relativity.
Unit 13 Relativity.
Mathematical Descriptions of Axially Varying Penning Traps Stephanie Brown.
Goal: To understand the history of the universe especially the beginning Objectives: 1)To learn about the beginning of the Big bang! 2)To explore the Big.
The Uncertain Nature of Gravity An Illustration of Science as a Process of Investigating Nature  Using observed motions of objects to infer physics.
By Davion.  In particle physics, antimatter is the extension of the concept of the antiparticle to matter, where antimatter is composed of antiparticles.
Chapter 10 Our Star.
A recap of the main points so far… Observers moving uniformly with respect to each other do not agree on time intervals or distance intervals do not agree.
QED, Lamb shift, `proton charge radius puzzle' etc. Savely Karshenboim Pulkovo Observatory (ГАО РАН) (St. Petersburg) & Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik.
ANTIMATTER Didsbury Scibar May 25 th 2009 Roger Barlow.
Black Holes A stellar mass black hole accreting material from a companion star 1.
Lecture 5. Particle Properties of Waves (cont’d)
7/3/2016Milano Consiglio di Sezione AEGIS: a moirè deflectometer for antimatter Marco G. Giammarchi Istituto Nazionale Fisica Nucleare - Milano A E g I.
qBOUNCE: a quantum bouncing ball gravity spectrometer
Cold Antimatter at CERN
Lecture 10 Gravitational force (chap 7, 9.6)
General Theory of Relativity
GENERAL RELATIVITY General relativity describes the effect of gravitational fields on space and time.
Exam 3 average: 65%. You will have all of class time on Thursday to do the group review. The response “Exams” will be on Learning Suite by Wed noon. They.
GENERAL RELATIVITY General relativity describes the effect of gravitational fields on space and time.
Special Relativity Chapter 1-Class2
Summer Student Sessions
Presentation transcript:

Equivalence principle, antigravity of antimatter and all that Savely G Karshenboim D.I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology (St. Petersburg) and Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik (Garching)

Antigravity and equivalence principle for antimatter (i) Antigravity of antimatter: Precision spectroscopy of fundamental atoms, containing antiparticles, in the presence of galactic and Solar gravity Precision spectroscopy of fundamental atoms, containing antiparticles, in the presence of galactic and Solar gravity

Equivalence principle and antigravity  Equivalence principle:  Equivalence principle: in free fall we could not recognize gravitation (if neglecting the gradients)  Antigravity: no equivalence principle  while the matter is falling free  the antimatter is rising free

Red shift = {(E=mc 2 ) + (m i =m g ) + Newtonian gravity} All clocks upstairs are blue shifted, photon frequencies are not shifted. When photon is going up it disagrees with the clock by / = (gh/c 2 ). E = m 0 c 2 + m 0 gh E = m 0 c 2 h E = (m 0 +  m) (c 2 + gh) E = (m 0 +  m)c 2 h 0 =  mc 2 h h =  m(c 2 +gh) ground state excited statetransition frequency

Gravitational and motional effects  I will discuss gravitational effects and ignore motional effects.  That is possible because I am interested in differential effects.  Motional effects are closely related to gravitational and often cancel them.  However, differential motional effects such as Doppler effect are equal to zero.

Red shift = {(E=mc 2 ) + (m i =m g ) + Newtonian gravity} E = m 0 c 2 + m 0 gh E = m 0 c 2 h E = (m 0 +  m) (c 2 + gh) E = (m 0 +  m)c 2 h 0 =  mc 2 h h =  m(c 2 +gh) ground state excited statetransition frequency All clocks upstairs are blue shifted, photon frequencies are not shifted. When photon is going up it disagrees with the clock by / = (gh/c 2 ).

Red shift = {(E=mc 2 ) + (m i =m g ) + Newtonian gravity} E = m 0 c 2 + m 0 gh E = m 0 c 2 h E = (m 0 +  m) (c 2 + gh) E = (m 0 +  m)c 2 h 0 =  mc 2 h h =  m(c 2 +gh) ground state excited statetransition frequency All clocks upstairs are blue shifted, photon frequencies are not shifted. When photon is going up it disagrees with the clock by / = (gh/c 2 ). The shift is universal for all clocks once the gravity is proportional to their inertial mass and thus the shift by itself cannot be detected.

Red shift = {(E=mc 2 ) + (m i =m g ) + Newtonian gravity} E = m 0 c 2 + m 0 gh E = m 0 c 2 h E = (m 0 +  m) (c 2 + gh) E = (m 0 +  m)c 2 h 0 =  mc 2 h h =  m(c 2 +gh) ground state excited statetransition frequency All clocks upstairs are blue shifted, photon frequencies are not shifted. When photon is going up it disagrees with the clock by / = (gh/c 2 ). The shift is universal for all clocks once the gravity is proportional to their inertial mass and thus the shift by itself cannot be detected. That is correct for all clocks of matter. Once we suggest antigravity for antimatter – that is not correct for antimatter anymore!

Red shift = {(E=mc 2 ) + (m i =m g ) + Newtonian gravity} E = m 0 c 2 + m 0 gh E = m 0 c 2 h E = (m 0 +  m) (c 2 + gh) E = (m 0 +  m)c 2 h 0 =  mc 2 h h =  m(c 2 +gh) ground state excited statetransition frequency All clocks upstairs are blue shifted, photon frequencies are not shifted. When photon is going up it disagrees with the clock by / = (gh/c 2 ). The shift is universal for all clocks once the gravity is proportional to their inertial mass and thus cannot be detected. That is correct for all clocks of matter. Once we suggest antigravity for antimatter – that is not correct for antimatter anymore! Gravitational red shift is a generic property of any relativistic theory of gravitation.

Can we measure the absolute red shift (in respect to zero gravity r=∞) ? Hydrogen:  Gravity m g = m i m g = m i  Spectroscopy 1s-2s Other transitions  Theory calculable frequency in terms of m e and  Ry Antihydrogen:  [Anti]gravity m g = – m i m g = – m i  Spectroscopy 1s-2s ? HFS ?  Theory needs m e+ & m p- otherwise: all is the same as for H

Can we measure the absolute red shift (in respect to zero gravity r=∞) ? Hydrogen:  Gravity m g = m i m g = m i  Spectroscopy 1s-2s Other transitions  Theory calculable frequency in terms of m e and  Ry Antihydrogen:  [Anti]gravity m g = – m i m g = – m i  Spectroscopy 1s-2s ? HFS ?  Theory needs m e+ & m p- otherwise: all is the same as for H To be blue shifted (∞).To be red shifted (∞).

Can we measure the absolute red shift (in respect to zero gravity r=∞) ? Hydrogen:  Gravity m g = m i m g = m i  Spectroscopy 1s-2s Other transitions  Theory calculable frequency in terms of m e and  Ry Positronium:  [Anti]gravity m g = 0 m g = 0  Spectroscopy 1s-2s HFS  Theory needs m e+ & m e- calculable frequency in terms of m e and  Antihydrogen:  [Anti]gravity m g = – m i m g = – m i  Spectroscopy 1s-2s ? HFS ?  Theory needs m e+ & m p- otherwise: all is the same as for H To be blue shifted (∞).To be red shifted (∞).To be not shifted.

Can we measure the absolute red shift (in respect to zero gravity r=∞) ?  Hydrogen 1s-2s  Equivalence for H m g = m i  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and   Positronium 1s-2s  Antigravity: m g = 0  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and 

Can we measure the absolute red shift (in respect to zero gravity r=∞) ?  Hydrogen 1s-2s  Equivalence for H m g = m i  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and   Positronium 1s-2s  Antigravity: m g = 0  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and  while neglecting gravity

Can we measure the absolute red shift (in respect to zero gravity r=∞) ?  Hydrogen 1s-2s  Equivalence for H m g = m i  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and   Positronium 1s-2s  Antigravity: m g = 0  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and  Comparison of theory against experiment for Ps is the same as comparison of H and Ps, because theory of Ps speaks in terms of Ry from H

Can we measure the absolute red shift (in respect to zero gravity r=∞) ?  Hydrogen 1s-2s  Equivalence for H m g = m i  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and   Positronium 1s-2s  Antigravity: m g = 0  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and  Comparison of theory against experiment for Ps is the same as comparison of H and Ps, because theory of Ps speaks in terms of Ry from H

Can we measure the absolute red shift (in respect to zero gravity r=∞) ?  Hydrogen 1s-2s  Equivalence for H m g = m i  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and   Positronium 1s-2s  Antigravity: m g = 0  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and  Comparison of theory against experiment for Ps is the same as comparison of H and Ps, because theory of Ps speaks in terms of Ry from H The results are consistent at level of about few parts in 10 9.

Can we measure the absolute red shift (in respect to zero gravity r=∞) ?  Hydrogen 1s-2s  Equivalence for H m g = m i  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and   Positronium 1s-2s  Antigravity: m g = 0  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and  Comparison of theory against experiment for Ps is the same as comparison of H and Ps, because theory of Ps speaks in terms of Ry from H The results are consistent at level of about few parts in 10 9 suggesting no gravitational effects.

How large is absolute red shift?  Motion around center of galaxy:  v = c  / =  Motion around Sun  v =10 -4 c  /=10 -8 Basic equations: a = v 2 /R a = U/R  U = a · R  / =  U/c  = v 2 /c 2 It is huge! v a R

Can we measure the absolute red shift?  Hydrogen 1s-2s  Equivalence for H m g = m i  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and   Positronium 1s-2s  Antigravity: m g = 0  Frequency is calculable in terms of m e and  10 9 The results are consistent at level of about few parts in Should be red shifted (∞). Should be immune.

Theory again?  Universality of the red shift for matter sources:  Universality of free fall for matter:  Applicability of the Dirac equation for an electron and CPT (m e+ = m e- ): Proved experimentally! Proved experimentally! Proved experimentally in g-2 experiment! Proved experimentally in g-2 experiment!

Theory again?  Applicability of bound state QED:  We do not know the field of our galaxy:  We do not know about the Sun: Proved experimentally in H etc. spectroscopy! Proved experimentally in H etc. spectroscopy! The Sun gravitation is enough! The Sun gravitation is enough! Not less than about the Earth! Not less than about the Earth! Besides: antiprotonic helium and muonium point in the same direction!

Theory again? OK: no galaxy, no CPT, no QED aphelion: Gm perihelion: Gm U/c 2 = 3 × – quite a large `small’ effect for spectroscopy

Theory again? OK: no galaxy, no CPT, no QED aphelion: Gm perihelion: Gm U/c 2 = 3 × – quite a large `small’ effect for spectroscopy We consider differential effects and do not care about Doppler effect etc.

Theory again? OK: no galaxy, no CPT, no QED aphelion: Gm perihelion: Gm U/c 2 = 3 × – quite a large `small’ effect for spectroscopy might be done for positronium, antiprotonic helium muonium, antiprotonic helium and antihydrogen

Atoms with antiparticles: just to remind positronium: muonium: antimuon + electron antiprotonic helium:  -particle + antiproton antihydrogen:  truly neutral in any sense  mass of the antiparticle >> mass of the particle (m  =207m e )  mass of the antiparticle = ¼ of mass of the particle  there is a small disturbing electron…  I hope you already know what it is: a truly antiatom  not yet cold enough, but hopefully will be (winter is coming)

Atoms with antiparticles: just to remind positronium: muonium: antimuon + electron antiprotonic helium:  -particle + antiproton antihydrogen:  truly neutral in any sense  mass of the antiparticle >> mass of the particle (m  =207m e )  mass of the antiparticle = ¼ of mass of the particle  there is a small perturbing electron (let be neglected)  I hope you already know what it is: a truly antiatom  not yet cold enough, but hopefully will be (winter is coming)

Effects, uncertainties, sensitivities Gravitation effect  U/c 2 Uncertainty/Sensitivity Solar gravity (∞) Galactic gravity (∞) Solar gravity (perihelion-aphelion) Moon gravity (day-night) Earth gravity (100 m) Ps 1s-2s (th+exp) Mu 1s-2s (th+exp) H 1s-2s (exp) H HFS 1s (th + exp) Anti-p helium g-2 (Dirac eq) Solar gravity (day-night) Earth gravity (1 m) best clocks

small No room for antigravity, but a small room for `non-universality’  antigravity: inertial mass of particles and antiparticles is [about] the same gravitational mass = + inertial mass (matter) = – inertial mass (antimatter) = [almost] 0 (truly neutrals)  no chance ! Still possible: small  a small violation of equivalence principle small  a small difference in gravitation for a particle and antiparticle of a certain kind