Space Research Centre EDDICAM Interests in EDDINGTON Professor Alan Wells and Dr Matthew Burleigh Space Research Centre, University of Leicester.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HEAT TRACING SPECIALIST
Advertisements

Leicester SRC, 3-5 Dec 2007 Systems engineering at detector level Tim Stevenson.
Fawzy Al-Alami G Term Paper.  Introduction.  Effect of Teamwork in Design-Build. Construction Contract.  Factors Can Enhance Design-Build.
Flex Circuit Design for CCD Application ECEN 5004 Jon Mah.
X-ray Imaging Spectrometers (XIS) of Astro-E2 Hironori Matsumoto (Kyoto University) and the XIS team 1. Overview Astro-E2 is the fifth Japanese X-ray Astronomy.
The Mercury Imaging X-ray Spectrometer (MIXS): Lessons learned for the ATHENA Wide Field Imager (WFI) GW Fraser, A Martindale and C Thomas Space Research.
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
Armin Karcher, LBNL IEEE/NSS 2001 Proton Radiation Damage in P-Channel CCDs Fabricated on High-Resistivity Silicon. C. Bebek, D. Groom, S. Holland, A.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Procurement Methodology David Dale NLSL II Procurement Manager.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
LXO/MagEX Meeting Greenbelt, 24/10/07 Telescope Baseline Configuration: Imaging Capability (Micropore Optic) Telescope Field of View ~ 30° x 30° Angular.
EPIC MOS Life Test Facility The centre of the central CCD in the MOS cameras is showing damage – Andy Read et al. This damage causes low energy redistribution.
EDGE™ Final Project Plan P09701 – Corning Tropel LightGage™ Metrology System Matthew Bradley (ME) Images Courtesy of Corning Tropel.
1 Aurélien Barrau LPSC-Grenoble (CNRS / UJF) A few words on the LPSC The LPSC in few words: The scientific environment : Grenoble 4 Universities.
SDW2005, juin, Taormina The Corot Space instrument.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Optical Design for an Infrared Multi-Object Spectrometer R. Winsor, J.W. MacKenty, M. Stiavelli Space Telescope Science Institute M. Greenhouse, E. Mentzell,
A Finmeccanica Company 04/2000/1 EUSO Development Philosophy EUSO General Meeting Max Planck Institute for Physics Munich, November the 20th 2003.
Eddington Kick-Off. Vienna, September 17th, 2001 T.Muñoz/C.Laviada (INTA) 1 EddiCam: The Eddington Photometric Camera Preliminary Design Layout.
Final Version Wes Ousley Dan Nguyen May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Thermal.
1st Eddington Workshop. Córdoba, June 14th, 2001 J. Miguel Mas-Hesse 1 EddiCam: The Eddington Photometric Camera Preliminary design.
IMPRS June Organigram of ESA, in the late 1980s
Advanced Concepts & Science Payloads Office Eddicam/EST MeetingPage 1 CCD Procurement Schedule driven Review off-the shelf availability Specific mode of.
From Research Prototype to Production
Presentation EddiCam consortium, FF, Madrid 13/06/2002 Eddington programmatic status Fully approved by SPC as part of ESA’s science program as project.
Edimburg June 2006 Fast detectors 1 Fast detectors (for E-ELT AO) Philippe Feautrier INSU/CNRS-LAOG.
THEMIS Instrument CDR(1) UCB, April 19 & 20, 2004 Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California - Berkeley.
FIRST/Planck 12 December 2000PT The FIRST Mission Implementation Status and Schedule T. Passvogel The Promise of FIRST.
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 Roger Hunter (Ames Research Center) & Kepler Team March 26, 2010.
Description of Work Objectives WP 8 serves to define the technical content of the VI for contact thermometry. It will contain a selection of guides to.
Science - Coronal heating - Coronal structure / dynamics - Elementary processes in Magnetic Reconnection Mission instruments - Optical Telescope / Vector.
Plato meeting MSSL Wed+Thur 15+16/Oct/08 UK interests/activities Alan Smith and Dave Walton UCL/MSSL.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
A Silicon vertex tracker prototype for CBM Material for the FP6 Design application.
PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 PACS PI Summary1 Where we are and where to go… A. Poglitsch MPE.
AMS-RICH Detector. J. Berdugo – CIEMAT (Madrid, Spain) 1 AMS-02 Phase II Flight Safety Review AMS Ring Imaging CHerenkov PURPOSE: 1.Precise measurement.
1 Stepping in everyone’s toes ( but for a good cause….) Eduardo do Couto e Silva Software Meeting – January 2001.
CCD Camera Realignment 1. Northrop Grumman  Northrop Grumman is a global defense and technology company  Company does business around the world  Contracted.
Dept. Physics & Astronomy Space Research Group Nick Nelms Space Research Group Dept. Physics & Astronomy University of Leicester UK GERB International.
FourStar Status Eric Persson (OCIW) Presented By.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Page 1HMI/AIA Science Meeting – February 13, 2006 HMI Instrument Status HM/AIA Science Meeting February 13, 2006 Barbara Fischer HMI Deputy Program Manager.
Extended Detector Cutoff Considerations WFIRST Project Office May
Unit – I Presentation. Unit – 1 (Introduction to Software Project management) Definition:-  Software project management is the art and science of planning.
ROCSAT-2 Current Status of ISUAL Project Jyh-Long Chern of NCKU Yukihiro Takahashi of Tohoku University Henry Heetderks of UCB February 28, 2002.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
DES Review CCD Focal Plane and Camera Roger Smith George Ricker.
NASA Ames Instrumentation Workshop May 13, 2010 Technology / Application Images go here Title of Presentation goes here Description goes here Format. Please.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
HST Cal Conf -- Oct 27, Calibration Status and Results for Wide Field Camera 3 – R. Kimble/GSFC, Calibration Status and Results.
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
NIRSpec - the JWST Multi-Object Spectrograph P. Ferruit (ESA), S. Arribas (CSIS), S. Birkmann (ESA), T. Böker (ESA), A. Bunker (Oxford), S. Charlot (IAP),
Report on Payload and Calibration splinter meeting B. Maffei M. Bersanelli 1CERN May 2016.
MAVEN-SWEA Assembly, Integration & Test (AIT) Contents AIT: CESR Team Facilities Main subcontractors Applicable documents AIT documentation Cleanliness.
Date : 2015/04/14 THERMAL ANALYSIS OF ALUMINUM-ACETONE FLAT PLATE HEAT PIPE APPLICATION IN HEAT DISSIPATION OF HIGH POWER LEDS Wu-Man Liu David T.W.
ESA research and development plans
WBS 1.03 Readout Systems Scope, Cost and Schedule
Micro-channel Cooling
The European Contribution to eXTP
UK RFD Pre-Series cryomodule
ISAS Solar Physics Yohkoh (1991- ) Hionotori ( )
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
LSST Camera Detector Status
Systems Engineering Management
Lessons Learned and Earned Value Management System Assessment
Karen Meech Institute for Astronomy TOPS 2003
Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR)
Instrument Overview Larry Springer HMI Program Manager
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

Space Research Centre EDDICAM Interests in EDDINGTON Professor Alan Wells and Dr Matthew Burleigh Space Research Centre, University of Leicester.

Space Research Centre EDDICAM Possible Contributions to EDDICAM from University of Leicester. 1. Planet Search Science- Dr Matthew Burleigh. 2.CCD and Focal Plane Expertise 3. Close R & D relationship with UK CCD supplier (Marconi Applied Technologies-UK) 4.Radiation effects System, mission and sensor implications. Screening design and verification. 5.FPC development. Planning, procurement or build in-house, calibration, integration and test.

Space Research Centre Relevance of our CCD Capabilities to EDDICAM 1. Flight packaging of CCD’s into mosaic arrays Each Device pre-selected and calibrated Whole array calibration Flat field, QE, CTE. 2. Thermal Control to <1C. Passive Control with Thermal Radiator (EPIC) Active Control with TEC, Heat Pipe and Radiator (SWIFT) 3. CCD Radiation Response. Radiation shielding design tools. Evaluation of CCD radiation tolerance. Evaluation of charged particle background effects on imaging response. Application-specific CCD development with MAT for radiation tolerance.

Space Research Centre CCD Package and Camera Assembly NASA SWIFT XRT CCD batch procured from MAT. Selection and qualification performed in-house. CCD bonded to 5-stage thermo-electric cooler provides CCD operating temperature =-105C Active cooling of TEC hot junction coupled to space radiator by heat-pipe. CCD/TEC unit space qualified for SWIFT Focal plane camera assembly incorporates fixed light filter and radiation shielding. Storage and launch under vacuum for launch safety and contamination control. Hardware built through sub-contracts. Assembly, test, calibration and qualification in- house. Drive electronics built by US partner, to our system specification Protoflight model space qualified for SWIFT.

Space Research Centre CCD Package and Camera Assembly XMM-NEWTON EPIC Camera Array of 7, 2.5*2.5 cm 2, 600* 600 pixel CCD  pixels. CCD designed by MAT to UL requirements CCDs procured from MAT, screened, tested and calibrated in-house. 4 FM and 2 DM EPIC focal plane cameras built in-house. Radiation screening incorporated. Passive radiator cooling system (-100C CCD operation). Electronics built by space industry to our detailed specification based on in-house prototype heritage.

Space Research Centre CCD Package and Camera Assembly Muon Neutrino Mass Experiment 6cm * 6cm array planar array of CCD’s. CCD Camera for Pion Beam Experiments at Paul Scherrer Institute. Drive electronics built under contract by SME to in-house design specifications.

Space Research Centre Radiation Effects Radiation dose: Degrades CTI; which affects centroiding accuracy. Affects Read-Noise Background events affect centroiding.

Space Research Centre Cosmic Background Events in CCD image Distort Telescope Source Locations Evaluation of effects needed for EDDICAM.

Space Research Centre EDDICAM Development Plan Involving Industry Advantages Fabrication of 4 identical flight cameras better suited to an industrial procurement. (High repetitive workload can overload institute resources-EPIC experience). Reproducibility of multiple cameras should be achievable with industry QA and configuration control. Schedule risks accordingly reduced. ESA might be expected to pay for industry procurement for EDDICAM or major sub- systems. Disadvantages Efficient industry development would require a comprehensive & detailed specification. Changes to requirements or recovery from problems are expensive and a serious source of schedule risk. Industry unlikely to have all necessary scientific and technological skills to undertake all required development tasks. Software developments are especially high risk. Need major management inputs from ESA and the EDDICAM system team.

Space Research Centre Development Plan Institute Consortium Development Need to set up a well structured EDDICAM Science system Team (could be drawn from several institutes). Advantages Design under control of science system team. Immediate access to highly relevant in-house expertise. Track record important. Access to already-available calibration facilities. Ability to respond quickly to evolving requirements or for problem solving. Close coupling between hardware and software development tasks. Dedicated experimental teams in institutes with proven track record in space instrumentation programmes. Disadvantages High work-load to produce multiple cameras. (serial production is the norm). Multi-institute collaborations carry a high cost and time overhead. Project schedule determined by weakest partner. Complex management arrangements. Dependence on national funding.

Space Research Centre A Possible Approach, The EXOSAT MEDA Model. Science team (UL & MPE) provided and controlled all system requirements, developed procurement specifications and were responsible for calibration and verification. Prototypes were built in-house supported by institute contracts to industrial partners. Prototype test data used to define and refine industrial procurement specifications for flight models. Flight hardware built under by an industrial instrument prime contractor (who also managed sub-contractors). Multiple detectors built under this scheme. Science system team supported the industrial contractor with off-line testing, problem solving, technical and management support and feedback of test results into the industrial procurement. Science system team led the calibration of the flight hardware and all software developments. ESA paid for the industrial contracts. National agencies paid for the science support in the institutes and for the off-line R & D. Would this model offer some possibilities for EDDICAM?

Space Research Centre Work Packages Declaration of Interest. Priority Areas 1. CCD procurement and selection. Management of CCD procurement from MAT. Over- seeing device selection via in-house test programme. 2. CCD focal plane packaging. Transfer of expertise. Radiation shielding analysis. Assessment of thermal design requirements and support with thermal analysis. Support of industrial activities, as appropriate. Acceptance testing. 3. Calibration support. Preferably in collaboration with a partner with facilities/experience in photometric calibration. 4. Science system support and software development for planet search imaging and background subtraction. 5. Design support and fabrication of prototype focal plane camera. Additional areas if required: 6. Support for front end electronics design, specification and fabrication. 7. System support for industrial contractor for flight model cameras. 8. System support for flight model CCD drive electronics.