12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Low Energy Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions Makoto Sakuda (KEK) in collaboration with C.Walter,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrino Cross Section Calculations (Status Report) Emmanuel A. Paschos University of Dortmund March 21st, 2007.
Advertisements

Neutrino-induced meson production model for neutrino oscillation experiments Satoshi Nakamura Nuclear Theory Group.
Neutrino-induced meson productions Satoshi Nakamura Osaka University, Japan Collaborators : H. Kamano (RCNP, Osaka Univ.), T. Sato (Osaka Univ.) T.-S.H.
Neutrino-interactions in resonance region Satoshi Nakamura Osaka University Collaborators : H. Kamano (RCNP, Osaka Univ.), T. Sato (Osaka Univ.)
Neutrino Interactions with Nucleons and Nuclei Tina Leitner, Ulrich Mosel LAUNCH09 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Degree of polarization of  produced in quasielastic charge current neutrino-nucleus scattering Krzysztof M. Graczyk Jaroslaw Nowak Institute of Theoretical.
Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%) Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%)
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Howard Budd, Univ. of Rochester1 Vector and Axial Form Factors Applied to Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Scattering Howard Budd University of Rochester (in collaboration.
Un-ki Yang, Manchester 1 Nuclear Effects in Electron Scattering Arie Bodek University of Rochester Un-ki Yang University of Manchester NuFact 2008, Valencia,
Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester1 Vector and Axial Form Factors Applied to Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Scattering Howard Budd University of Rochester
Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester Quasielastic Scattering in MINERvA A. Bodek, H. Budd - Rochester will get Steve Manly - Rochester and Tony.
K. Mawatari (Kobe)1 Decay distribution of tau produced by neutrino-nucleon scattering Kentarou Mawatari (Kobe U.) with M. Aoki, K.
Count rate estimates from TDR Assuming beam intenisties from previous slide and acc *rec from SIM LH2 case [counts/24h] p [GeV/c] beam momentum Solid.
NUFACT06, Irvine, CA August 25, 2006 S. Manly, University of Rochester1 Recent Electron Scattering Results from Jefferson Laboratory S. Manly University.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester1 [P13.011] Modeling Neutrino Quasi-elastic Cross Sections Using Up.
Charge-Changing Neutrino Scattering from the Deuteron J. W. Van Orden ODU/Jlab Collaborators: T. W. Donnelly and Oscar Morino MIT W. P. Ford University.
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Sampling Detectors for e Detection and Identification Adam Para, Fermilab NuFact02 Imperial College Interest de jour: what is sin 2 2  13  oscillations.
Tina Leitner, Oliver Buss, Ulrich Mosel, Luis Alvarez-Ruso Neutrino Interactions with Nucleons and Nuclei TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Hadronic Models Problems, Progress and Plans Gunter Folger Geant4 Workshop, Lisbon 2006.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
Study of hadron properties in cold nuclear matter with HADES Pavel Tlustý, Nuclear Physics Institute, Řež, Czech Republic for the HADES Collaboration ,
ニュートリノ原子核反応 佐藤 透 ( 阪大 理 ) JPARC Dec Our previous works on neutrino reaction single pion production(Delta region) nuclear coherent pion production.
Extending the Bertini Cascade Model to Kaons Dennis H. Wright (SLAC) Monte Carlo April 2005.
Neutrino Generators and Electron Data 1)A brief overview of neutrino event generators / neutrino MC physics 2)Calibration of generators using neutrino.
K2K NC  0 production Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for the K2K Collaboration July 28, NuFact04.
Realistic Calculations of Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Cross sections T.S. Kosmas Realistic Calculations of Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Cross sections T.S.
Neutral pion photoproduction and neutron radii Dan Watts, Claire Tarbert University of Edinburgh Crystal Ball and A2 collaboration at MAMI Eurotag Meeting.
Determining Strangeness Quark Spin in Neutrino-Nucleon Scattering at J-PARC T.-A. Shibata (Tokyo Tech) in collaboration with N. Saito (Kyoto Univ) and.
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Dott. Antonio Botrugno Ph.D. course UNIVERSITY OF LECCE (ITALY) DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS.
1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 5. 2 Contents Top quark mass measurements at Tevatron Electroweak Measurements at low energy: –Neutral Currents at low momentum.
1 Mike Kordosky – NuFact 06 - Aug 27, 2006 Neutrino Interactions in the MINOS Near Detector Mike Kordosky University College London on behalf of the MINOS.
Measurements of neutrino charged current scattering in K2K Fine-Grained Detector Introduction Introduction K2K Near Detector K2K Near Detector CC interactions.
Electromagnetic probes MAMI, Jefferson Lab & MAX-Lab Daniel Watts University of Edinburgh.
1 August 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions 数 GeV 領域のニュートリノ原子核反応の測定と 計算の進展 作田 誠 (KEK 、 IPNS) 1 August 東工大 Outline 1. ニュートリノ振動実験 2. ニュートリノ原子核反応の測定データ.
1 Physics Requirements on Reconstruction and Simulation Software Jorge G. Morfín - Fermilab.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
JAROSLAW NOWAK For the MiniBooNE Collaboration LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY Sixth International Workshop on Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions in the Few-GeV.
Low-Energy -Nucleus Scattering Jorge G. Morfín Fermilab WIN’03 8 October 2003.
Neutrino-Nucleus Reactions at Medium and Low Energies [contents] 1. Neutrino and weak interaction 2. Cross section for ν-A and e-A reactions 3. EMC effect.
Preliminary Results for CCQE Scattering with the MINOS Near Detector Mark Dorman, UCL On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration NUINT 09, CC/NC QE Scattering,
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Comparison of quasi-elastic cross sections using spectral functions with (e,e') data from 0.5 GeV to 1.5 GeV Hiroki Nakamura (Waseda U). Makoto Sakuda.
The MINER A Experiment Sacha Kopp, University of Texas at Austin on behalf of the Minerva Collaboration.
Outline: IntroJanet Event Rates Particle IdBill Backgrounds and signal Status of the first MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Analysis Janet Conrad & Bill.
Stephen Wood, Jlab FNAL, March 14, 2003 Neutrino/Electron scattering comparison Similarities and differences between electron on neutrino scattering Comparing.
Neutrino Interaction measurement in K2K experiment (1kton water Cherenkov detector) Jun Kameda(ICRR) for K2K collaboration RCCN international workshop.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
Possible Ambiguities of Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in Quasi-elastic Region K. S. Kim School of Liberal Arts and Science, Korea Aerospace University, Korea.
Axial-vector mass MA and K2K Q2 distribution
Jun Kameda (ICRR) RCCN International workshop at Kashiwa (Dec.10,2004)
Possible Ambiguities of Neutrino-Nucleus
Quasielastic Scattering at MiniBooNE Energies
F.Sánchez for the K2K collaboration UAB/IFAE
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
Neutrino interaction measurements in K2K SciBar
Duality in Pion Electroproduction (E00-108) …
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Presentation transcript:

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Low Energy Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions Makoto Sakuda (KEK) in collaboration with C.Walter, K.McConnel, E. Paschos et al. 10 June NuFact03 Outline 1. Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions 2. Data of low-energy neutrino-nucleus scattering 3. Recent Progress in Calculation (NuInt01/02) Elastic Form Factors Spectral Function = Beyond Fermi Gas Deep Inelastic Scattering Single Pion Production 4. Summary

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions 1. Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions in the Few-GeV Region 1.Oscillation analysis need cross section and spectrum. Y(E )=(Neutrino flux) ·  ( E ) · (Number of target nucleons). Accurate measurements of CC neutrino cross sections exist for E >20 GeV , with accuracy ±3%. nuint02  Measurements of neutrino-nucleus cross sections at E = GeV are still poor. Accuracy is about ±20% and spectrum even worse. Nuclear effects become significant. Neutrino oscillation experiments (K2K , MiniBooNE, MINOS , OPERA, ICARUS, JHF-Kamioka) have to work in this complex energy region. We want to measure  → e oscillations at sin 2 2  13 ~0.01, especially after KamLAND result. Cross section and spectrum at a few % level are needed in the future. 2.Weak nucleon form factor itself is very interesting. We need to update both vector and axial-vector form factors if we want to predict the spectrum better than 10%.

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Sensitivity to M A  (MA)stat. ~.06GeV/c 2.  (MA)sys. ~.15GeV/c 2. d  /dQ 2 (quasi-elastic scattering) BNL Deuterium BC Calculation by Ch.L.Smith et al. M A =1.07±0.05

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions 2. Data of low-energy neutrino-nucleus scattering Overall flux error is about ±10-20% at low energy.  Experiments below 20 GeV were performed with wide-band beams. Many processes contribute equally, with ±20% errors.  Quasi-elastic scattering  Single pion production  Multi-pion production/DIS  Coherent-pion production  NC Nuclear effects can be different for different target.  Fermi-motion and Binding energy  Pauli exclusion effects  Nuclear rescattering  Pion absorption

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Pauli exclusion effect Quasi-elastic  production W/o Pauli effect W/ Pauli effect 10-15% suppression At low Q2 Total 3% reduction E =1.3 GeV , k F =220 MeV/c  PpPp PpPp  q W   npnp PpPp q If P <k F, suppressed. Total 8% Nuclear effects are large in the low Q 2 region, where the cross section is large. d  /dQ

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Charged-Current Quasi-elastic Scattering This is the simplest and the most important reaction. Calculation by Ch.L.Smith et al. with M A =1.0.    n     p)     p     n) 1x  1.0 (cm 2 ) Pauli effect ~8%

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Single Pion Production Cross Section Prediction = Rein-Sehgal M A =1.2 GeV/c 2 1x  1.0 (cm 2 ) 0.0

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Strange particle production and CC/NC Coherent Pion Production  n    K +  Comparison with NUANCE / Neugen

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Total Charged-Current Cross Section Total cross section increases with energy,  =  E . 1.0  x (cm 2 )    / E     / E

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Neutral Current Interactions 1kton Neutral-Current  0 production (P  0 ) Preliminary) P0P (GeV/c) Very few data are available at low energy.  E734  reports  M A = for  p →  p.

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions M A measurements 1.0 M A (GeV/c 2 )

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions d  /dQ 2 (   production) from BNL μ-pπ+ nsμ-pπ+ ns Q 2 (GeV) Rein-Sehgal (M A =1.2 GeV/c 2 ) Normalized by the entries M A (1  ) (Rein-Sehgal model) SKAT89 M A =1.01+/-0.09+/-0.15 CF 3 Br BEBC89 M A =1.01+/-0.10 D 2

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions 3. Recent Progress in Calculation (NuInt01/02) Elastic Form Factors Spectral Function = Beyond Fermi Gas Deep Inelastic Scattering Single Pion Production

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions 3.1) Nucleon Form Factors de p P q ee

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions 3.1) Quasi-elastic interaction   n     p A = Q 2 /4M 2 [(4 + Q 2 /M 2 )|F A | 2 - (4 - Q 2 /M 2 )|F V 1 | 2 + Q 2 /M 2 (1-Q 2 /4M 2 ) |  F V 2 | 2 + 4Q 2 /M 2  ReF V* 1 F V 2 ] B = -Q 2 /M 2 ReF * A (F V 1 +  F V 2 ), C = 1/4(|F A | 2 + |F V 1 | 2 + Q 2 /4M 2 |  F V 2 | 2 ). Vector Form factors G E p =D, G M p =  p D, G M n =  n D, G E n =  n  D, D=1/(1+Q 2 /M V 2 ) 2, M V =0.843 (GeV/c 2 )  p  n  =5.6,  = Q 2 /4M 2 Axial-vector form factor F A F A (Q 2 )= /(1+Q 2 /M A 2 ) 2 d  dQ 2 [A(Q 2 )-B(Q 2 )(s-u)+C(Q 2 )(s-u) 2 ] M 2 G 2 cos 2  c ( 8  E 2 ) = Form Factors F 1 V,F 2 V,and F A and (s-u) =4ME -Q 2 -M  2

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Nucleon Vector Form Factors A simple dipole form D=(1+Q 2 /M V 2 ) -2, M V =0.843 is good to 10-20% level for Vector Form Factors. Fig -- Bosted, PRC51,409,’95 Red=Dipole Curve= (1+a 1 Q+a 2 Q 2 +.+a 5 Q 5 ) -1 G Mn  G Mp,G Ep Cross section shape will change if we use these data. G Mp /  p D G Ep /D GMn/nDGMn/nD (G E n /D ) 2 Q2Q2

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions ratio_JhaKJhaJ_D0DD.pict Effect of New Vector Form Factors G Mn,G Mp,G Ep,G E n

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions ratio_JhaKJhaJ_D0DD.pict Effect of New Vector Form Factors G Mn,G Mp,G Ep,G E n

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions ratio_JhaKJhaJ_D0DD.pict Effect of finite G E n  (with)/  (without)

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions 3.1) Model beyond the Fermi-gas model Spectral Function Calculation or Local Density Approximation Spectral Functions P(p,E) for various nuclei, eg. 16 O, are estimated by Benhar et al. using e-N data. P(p,E) : Probability of removing a nucleon of momentum p from ground state leaving the residual nucleus with excitation energy E P (MeV/c) E (MeV) Fermi momemtum Fermi Gas model p

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Lepton energy in quasi-elastic -N interaction - Comparison of Fermi Gas model and Spectral Function Calculation- Large E and Large p tail exist in data. Shift at a level of 10 MeV may exist. =25 MeV (Fermi-Gas) LDA =40 MeV

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Test of neutrino models using (e,e’) Data (). The energy transfer (  =Ee-Ee ’ ) at the fixed scattering angle. Oxygen Carbon Oxygen Carbon Oxygen Spectral function calculation agrees with data. Thus, the lepton energy kinematics can be checked within a few MeV. For example, accuracy of <10 MeV is needed in E reconstruction in the future while the present accuracy is about MeV due to the energy calibration and nuclear effects. , q e Ee’Ee’ np 

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions 3.3) N   transition form factors

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Schreiner-von Hippel(’73)/Adler (‘68) model Form factors C i V,A (i=1,6) for N     Vector form factors C 3 V (Q 2 ) = 2.05/ (1+Q 2 /M v 2 ) 2, M v 2 =0.54 ( GeV) 2 C 4 V (Q 2 )=-M/M  C 3 V (Q 2 ), C 5 V (Q 2 )=0. C 6 V (Q 2 )=0. (CVC) Axial form factors C i A (Q 2 ) = C i A (0) /(1+ Q 2 /M A 2 ) 2, (i=3,4,5) C 6 A (Q 2 )= C 5 A (Q 2 ) M 2 /(m  2 +Q 2 ) [PCAC] C 3 A (0)= 0. C 4 A (0)=-0.3, C 5 A (0)=1.2

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions SLAC/Jlab resonance data (not used in the fit) 3.3) DIS (Bodek-Yang at NuInt01/02) Dashed: GRV94 Red:Bodek-Yang This correction is significant at low Q2 region. NB. Three resonances are evident.

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Nuclear PDF and its effect on the DIS cross section

12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions The accuracy of Neutrino-Nucleus ( -N) interactions at E = GeV is about +-10% or more. We will combine both e-N data and -N data to understand -N interactions better. It is very important for the running and the future neutrino oscillation experiments. A strong community of nuclear and high-energy physicists has been formed at NuInt01/02 Workshop. Some JLAB people not only collaborate on the analysis of form factors and nuclear effects, but also ask proposals for measurements at JLAB usuful for neutrino physics. K2K near detectors (1kton/SciFi) : producing new data. BooNE : soon. K2K upgraded detector (SciBar) will be complete this summer. MINOS near detector and ICARUS will come in Joint nuclear/high-energy physics proposals at NuMI for dedicated measurement of neutrino-nucleus interactions are being discussed. Measurement of strange spin by NC/CC is proposed. Re-analysis of old data (BNL,ANL) using current formalism is still valuable. Open Neutrino Generators are available: Nuance and Fluka. 5. Summary