Project #9 Scarlitte Ponce Starlite Ponce Cristina Hernandez

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(CSC 102) Discrete Structures Lecture 5.
Advertisements

Types of Logic Circuits
Boolean Algebra and Logic Gate
Lecture 2 Dr Richard Reilly Dept. of Electronic & Electrical Engineering Room 153, Engineering Building To insert your company logo on this slide From.
Discrete Structures Chapter 1 Part B Fundamentals of Logic Nurul Amelina Nasharuddin Multimedia Department 1.
1 Section 10.1 Boolean Functions. 2 Computers & Boolean Algebra Circuits in computers have inputs whose values are either 0 or 1 Mathematician George.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 2 THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS.
Propositional Calculus Math Foundations of Computer Science.
The Arithmetic of Reasoning: Logic and Boolean Algebra -Jeff Johnson -Mike Grassel.
Discrete Mathematics Carlos Aguilar Jose De Jesus Melendez
The Logic of Compound Statements
A Brief Biography of George Boole
The Laws of Logic: Boolean Algebra A State High Math Club Presentation START==TRUE.
Digital Systems Presented by Prof Tim Johnson
Digital Logic Circuits – Chapter 1 Section 1-3, 1-2.
CHAPTER 2 Boolean Algebra
Course Outline Book: Discrete Mathematics by K. P. Bogart Topics:
Systems Architecture I1 Propositional Calculus Objective: To provide students with the concepts and techniques from propositional calculus so that they.
Introduction to Proofs
Jesus Beltran Vanessa Cervantes GOTTLOB FREGE. Education Works Accomplishments Family Life References TABLE OF CONTENTS.
CSC Intro. to Computing Lecture 5: Boolean Logic, Gates, & Circuits.
Digital Computer Concept and Practice Copyright ©2012 by Jaejin Lee Logic Circuits I.
Boolean Algebra and Computer Logic Mathematical Structures for Computer Science Chapter 7.1 – 7.2 Copyright © 2006 W.H. Freeman & Co.MSCS Slides Boolean.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 3 THE LOGIC OF QUANTIFIED STATEMENTS THE LOGIC OF QUANTIFIED STATEMENTS.
Application: Digital Logic Circuits Lecture 5 Section 1.4 Wed, Jan 24, 2007.
Module Code MA1032N: Logic Lecture for Week Autumn.
A Mathematical Logician By: Hanan Mohammed. Objectives: Who is this guy? Why should we know him? Impact on Mathematical and Logical fields ( )
IT253: Computer Organization Lecture 7: Logic and Gates: Digital Design Tonga Institute of Higher Education.
MATH 224 – Discrete Mathematics
Discrete Mathematics CS 2610 February 12, Agenda Previously Finished functions Began Boolean algebras And now Continue with Boolean algebras.
Discrete Mathematics CS 2610 September Equal Boolean Functions Two Boolean functions F and G of degree n are equal iff for all (x 1,..x n )  B.
Boolean Algebra and Logic Gates CSE-1108 Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology (AUST)
CMPUT Computer Organization and Architecture II1 CMPUT329 - Fall 2002 Topic2: DeMorgan Laws José Nelson Amaral.
Appendix C Basics of Digital Logic Part I. Florida A & M University - Department of Computer and Information Sciences Modern Computer Digital electronics.
R. Johnsonbaugh Discrete Mathematics 5 th edition, 2001 Chapter 9 Boolean Algebras and Combinatorial Circuits.
Symbolic Logic The Following slide were written using materials from the Book: The Following slide were written using materials from the Book: Discrete.
Logic Simplification-Using Boolean Laws Logic Design Laboratory EE 2121 Lectures By Manesh T EE2121-In Charge
Chapter 5 Boolean Algebra and Reduction Techniques 1.
August 2003 CIS102/LECTURE 9/FKS 1 Mathematics for Computing Lecture 9 LOGIC Chapter 3.
Chapter 3 Boolean Algebra and Digital Logic T103: Computer architecture, logic and information processing.
Boolean Algebra and Computer Logic Mathematical Structures for Computer Science Chapter 7 Copyright © 2006 W.H. Freeman & Co.MSCS Slides Boolean Logic.
LOGIC CIRCUITLOGIC CIRCUIT. Goal To understand how digital a computer can work, at the lowest level. To understand what is possible and the limitations.
Module Code MA0003NI: Computing mathematics Lecture for Week Autumn.
Truth Table to Statement Form
ECE 301 – Digital Electronics
Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
Chapter 11 (Part 1): Boolean Algebra
Computer Science 210 Computer Organization
Thinking Mathematically
CHAPTER 2 Boolean Algebra
(CSC 102) Discrete Structures Lecture 2.
CHAPTER 2 Boolean Algebra This chapter in the book includes:
CHAPTER 3 SETS AND BOOLEAN ALGEBRA
Discrete Mathematics Lecture # 2.
Jeremy R. Johnson Wed. Sept. 29, 1999
Computer Science 210 Computer Organization
Jeremy R. Johnson Anatole D. Ruslanov William M. Mongan
Propositional Calculus: Boolean Algebra and Simplification
Propositional Equivalences
Dr. Clincy Professor of CS
Fundamentals of Computer Systems
Boolean Algebra.
ECB2212-Digital Electronics Boolean algebra
Logic Gates By Dr.Mazin Alzewary
Discrete Mathematics Lecture # 3.
Logic Circuits I Lecture 3.
Truth tables Mrs. Palmer.
Introductory Concepts
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
ECE 352 Digital System Fundamentals
Presentation transcript:

Project #9 Scarlitte Ponce Starlite Ponce Cristina Hernandez MATH 170 Project #9 Scarlitte Ponce Starlite Ponce Cristina Hernandez

Section 3.3 #44 The Notation ∃! stands for the words “there exists a unique”. Thus for instance, “∃! x such that x is prime and x is even” means that there is one and only one even prime number. Which of the following statements are true and which are false? Explain. a. ∃! real # x such that ∀ real numbers y. xy=y b. ∃! integer x such that 1/x is an integer c. ∀real numbers x, ∃! real # y such that x+y=0

Notations ( make the question simpler to read) ∃!= “There exists a unique” Example: “∃! x such that x is prime and x is even”= there is one and only one even prime number ∀= “For all” ℝ= Real number, 1 1/2, √3, π ℤ= integers, -3.-1,1,9 ∈= an element of x∈y

Rewrite #44 Easier to read the the question a. ∃! real # x such that ∀ real numbers y. xy=y a rewritten. There exists a unique real number x such that all real numbers y. x time y equals y. a rewitten. ∃! x∈ℝ, ∀ y∈ℝ. xy=y b. ∃! interger x such that 1/x is an integer b rewritten. There exists a unique real integer x such that 1 divided by x is an integer b rewritten. ∃! x∈ℤ, 1/x is an ℤ c. ∀real numbers x, ∃! real # y such that x+y=0 c rewritten. All all x real numbers, There exists y real number, such that x+y=0 c rewritten. ∀ x∈ℝ., ∃! y∈ℝ, x+y+=0

Solve a. ∃! real # x such that ∀ real numbers y. xy=y Hence, y is a real number and xy, (1)y, y=y. The statement is true. Algebra Let x=1 xy=y (1)y=y y=y Explanation x = there exists a unique real number=1 y= all real numbers plug in 1 for x y∈ℝ

Solve b. ∃! integer x such that 1/x is an integer Hence, 1 is an integer. Statement is true. Algebra Let x=1 1/x 1/1 1 Explanation x = there exists a unique real number=1 original problem plug in 1 for x 1∈ℤ

Solve c.∀real numbers x, ∃! real # y such that x+y=0 Hence, x is not equal to y because x is all real number and y is a unique number. Statement is false. Explanation original problem subtract x y and x must be equal Algebra x+y=0 y=-x unique number y= all real numbers negative x

Section 2.4 #23 Design a circuit to take input signals P,Q, and R and output a 1 if, and only if, all three of P,Q, and R have the same value

Explantion = And gate = ^ = Or gate= V = Not gate = ~ We use circuits to draw statements and we use them in daily life

Explantion sum of products: the sum of product is when you're given a table that has 1 and 0 the one 0<1 use products of sum if you have 0>1 us sum of products After you find out what sum to use, in this case we will use sum of products, you create a boolean function and you find P, Q, and R that have the number of 1. then you make P, Q, and R equal 1 in the table so, for example if P is 0, then you write it as ~P instead of P. After that you continue on with Q and R. In this case you end up with P^Q^R. in the next column it is ~P^~Q^~R. To connect this you add an or, so you end up with (P^Q^R)V(~P^~Q^~R) by sum of products.

Design a circuit to take input signals P,Q, and R and output a 1 if, and only if, all three of P,Q, and R have the same value Step 1 ⇔= “if and only if” Biconditional Statement we need to construct a truth table where P,Q, and R have all different values tested. when all P, Q, R are the same, the statement is equal to 1 but the statement is false or 0 when one or more are different among each other. P Q R P⇔Q⇔R 1 1 1 1 (P^Q^R) 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 (P^Q^R)v(~P^ ~Q^ ~R) 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 (~P^ ~Q^ ~R)

Step 2 P Q R 1 Hence done. AND NOT AND

Section 2.4 #25 An alarm system has three different control panel in three different locations to enable the system, switches in at last two of the panels must be in the on position. If fewer than two are in the on position the system is disabled . design a circuit to control the switches.

T T T T P^Q^ R (P^Q^R)V(P^Q^~R)V(P^~Q^R)V(~P^Q^R) T T F T P^Q^~R An alarm system has three different control panel in three different locations to enable the system, switches in at last two of the panels must be in the on position. If fewer than two are in the on position the system is disabled . design a circuit to control the switches. P Q R T T T T P^Q^ R (P^Q^R)V(P^Q^~R)V(P^~Q^R)V(~P^Q^R) T T F T P^Q^~R T F T T P^~Q^R T F F F F T T T ~P^Q^ R F T F F F F T F F F F F

STEP 2 Draw the Circuit (P^Q^R)V(P^Q^~R)V(P^~Q^R)V(~P^Q^R) and and OR and AND

2.4 # 34 Show that the following logical equivalences hold for the pierce arrow, where P Q = ~(PvQ) a) ~P= P P b) PVQ= (P Q) (P Q) c) P^Q= (P P) (Q Q) d) Write P→Q using pierce arrows only e) Write P⇔Q using pierce arrows only

Solve a) ~P= P P ~P= ~(PvP) ~(PvP) De Morgan's laws ~P^~P Idempotent laws =~P b)PVQ= (P Q) (P Q) ~(PVQ) ~(PVQ) ~(~PVQ) V (~PVQ) Double negative (PVQ) V (PVQ) Distribution PV(QVQ) Idempotent =PVQ

Solve c) P^Q= (P P) (Q Q) ~(PVP) ~(QVQ) DeMorgan’s ~P^~P ~Q^~Q Indempotent ~P ~Q Pierce Arrow ~(~Pv~Q) DeMorgan’s P^Q Final Answer. d) Write P→Q using pierce arrows only P→Q= ~PvQ Negate ~P Q=P^~Q let P be ~P ~(~P Q)= Use DeMorgan’s ~PvQ=P→Q Simplifed ~(~P Q) Final Answer

slove e)e) Write P⇔Q using pierce arrows only P→Q Q→P Seperate into 2 ~PvQ ~QvP Negate ~P Q=P^~Q ~Q P=Q^~P Orinal statement with ~P or ~Q ~(~P Q) ~(~Q P) Pierce Arrows ~(~(~PvQ) ~(~(~QvP) DeMorgan’s Law ~(P^~Q) ~(Q^~P) DeMorgan’s Law ~PvQ ~QvP DeMorgan’s Law ~(~P Q) ~(~Q P) Answer

Biography: C. S. Peirce (1839-1914) Two gates that were not previously introduced were the NAND-gate and the NOR-gate. They are used to simplify circiuts. A NAND-gate is used like and AND-gate but is followed by a NOT-gate. A NOR-gate is like an OR-gate but is also followed by a NOT-gate. The notations for these gates are | (for NAND) and ↓ (for NOR). The notations for an NAND-gate, |, is called a Sheffer stroke after H. M. Sheffer and the notation for a NOR-gate, ↓, is called a Peirce arrow after C. S. Peirce. Charles Sanders Peirce was a theorist of logic, language, communication, and the general theory of signs. He was a great mathematical logician and general mathematician. He was born on September 10, 1839 in Cambridge, MA. Over 57 years his published works consisted of 12,000 printed pages and 80,000 known unpublished handwritten pages. His topics had a wide variety ranging from mathematics, to physical science, to economics, to psychology, and different social sciences. HIs father was a math professor at Harvard and contributed greatly to building the math department at that school. Peirce graduated from Harvard in 1859 with a bachelor of science degree in chemistry. For 32 years Peirce was employed by U.S Coast & Geodetic Survey where he mainly surveyed and carried out geodetic investigations. For a period of time Peirce was also working as a logic professor in the math department at JOhn Hopkins University. He was later released from the position due to some issues about his second wife being a gypsy. At an old age Peirce began to study logic more seriously. He first began when he was 12 years of age. He began to think of all issues as problems of logic and went from there. Starting in his freshman year of college when he was 16 years old Peirce began to study philosophy and studied the works of Kant for about three years. He disagreed with Kant and went on to study natural history and philosophy. For the rest of his life his work on logic was extremely varied. He later became one of the greatest logicians who ever lived.

Bibliography Epp, Susanna S. Discrete Mathematics with Applications. 4. Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole, 2011. 1-820. Print. Burch, Robert, "Charles Sanders Peirce", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce/>.