1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Advertisements

Agenda For Today! Welcome/Housekeeping
I MPLEMENTATION. How does this relate to your work?
Jessamine County Schools Pyramid of Interventions Update 2009.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
- McKinsey & Co. Report Thought to ponder… “It’s a system thing, not a single thing.” -McKinsey & Co. Report.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Differentiated Supervision
Bluebonnet Elementary School Celebrations and Recommendations for Continuous School Improvement Round Rock Independent School District Module 7 Assignment.
We have the goals and the plans. The challenge is… closing the IMPLEMENTATION gap. -Douglas Reeves.
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance Phase III: Design AEA 267 SINA Process Se.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
SINA COLLABORATIVE LEARNING WEBINAR FOR S PECIAL EDUCATION T EAM REPRESENTATIVES AND EDUCATIONAL S ERVICES C ONSULTANTS You should be hearing music at.
SINA COLLABORATIVE LEARNING WEBINAR : S PECIAL EDUCATION T EAM REPRESENTATIVES AND EDUCATIONAL S ERVICES C ONSULTANTS You should be hearing music at this.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Texas Education Agency Updated F-2 FOUNDATION.
Implementation Phase Great Prairie AEA - December 2012 Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance TODAY’S AGENDA Event versus Process Monitoring.
RTI at the High School Level JoAnne Malloy, MSW Project Director Institute on Disability/UCED University of New Hampshire Maria Agorastou, MSW Research.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Establishing Training Capacity for Classroom Management Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Kim Herrmann, S.S.P. University of South Florida Marla Dewhirst Illinois.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Timberlane Regional School District
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Open Court Reading Tools for Schools June 9, 2008.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance Phase II: Diagnosis AEA 267 September 2011.
Presented to the ASD Board of Education Appoquinimink's Race to the Top Plan January 17, 2012.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
SPECIAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES “Establishing a Culture of Professional Collaboration that Results in Increased Student Academic Success”
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
AEA 267 Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance The KASAB June, 2011 KASAB: Knowledge Attitude Skills Aspiration Behavior.
1 BLTs, ARODs, and IPDMs Tales from SWRT (Teacher Implementation Focus) Donna Wood, AEA 9.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Illinois Evaluation Tools SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting Kansas City, MO October 5 & 6, 2009 Kathryn Cox Illinois State Board of Education
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning DeeDee Washington, Associate Superintendent of Academics Elementary.
Welcome Back to Day Two Q and A Professional Learning Communities SMART Goals Mission Statement for improving parent-school relations Book Study “ The.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Presentation transcript:

1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher Behavior Determine impact on… 4 Key Components 1)Administrators are supportive and actively involved 2)Adequate time provided 3)Teachers given frequent opportunities to collaborate 4)Adequate resources allocated How will data be collected? Who will collect these data and when? How will data be shared and with whom? How will the data be analyzed? How often and how will implementation data be compared with formative student achievement data? IPDM Monitor Student Achievement Monitor Teacher Behavior Structure for Teacher Collaboration Adjust Training and Supports What are students/teachers experiencing? Are students showing learning gains? Should we increase/decrease our use of certain strategies? What tools are needed to monitor progress? 2011 AEA 267

Professional Development to Support Student Achievement “When schools become places for teachers to learn, they also become schools on the way to improvement.” - Gentile, AEA 267

Why Monitor Implementation of Professional Development? TO GATHER AND USE DATA To monitor the implementation of professional development content IMPACT To monitor IMPACT on student learning and teacher behavior To adjust the professional development plan Source: Iowa Professional Development Model – Tool2(cycle)4 Tool can be found on page 56 of the Implementation Section 2011 AEA 267

Collaboration/ Implementation Two consistent findings in research:  Much of the content of training is never implemented in classrooms - 12% with fidelity power of collaborative work  Successful implementation of professional development uses the power of collaborative work of teachers to solve problems and change practice Two consistent findings in research:  Much of the content of training is never implemented in classrooms - 12% with fidelity power of collaborative work  Successful implementation of professional development uses the power of collaborative work of teachers to solve problems and change practice 2011 AEA 267

5

Collaboration/ Implementation The Iowa Professional Development Model provides structure for teacher collaboration. Examples include: – rehearsing lessons – planning lesson together – observing each other – studying data – solving problems related to using new strategy The Iowa Professional Development Model provides structure for teacher collaboration. Examples include: – rehearsing lessons – planning lesson together – observing each other – studying data – solving problems related to using new strategy 2011 AEA 267

Tools to Monitor PD Implementation  Reading Comprehension Pocket Guide  Math Checklist  Implementation Log Example  Observation Walk-through o Middle School o Elementary

Helpful Hints to avoid the Pitfalls of Monitoring Implementation of Professional Development Consistently looking and analyzing data Frequent productive meetings Not expecting miracles 2011 AEA 267

Collaboration/ Implementation Monitor the IMPACT of professional development on student success and teacher behavior: – What are students/teachers experiencing? – Are students showing gains? – Should we increase/decrease our use of certain strategies? Data help teams to make decisions about how to adjust the training and the supports provided to teachers Monitor the IMPACT of professional development on student success and teacher behavior: – What are students/teachers experiencing? – Are students showing gains? – Should we increase/decrease our use of certain strategies? Data help teams to make decisions about how to adjust the training and the supports provided to teachers 2011 AEA 267

The Myth of Linearity…NOT SO! 2011 AEA 267

11 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher Behavior Determine impact on… 4 Key Components 1)Administrators are supportive and actively involved 2)Adequate time provided 3)Teachers given frequent opportunities to collaborate 4)Adequate resources allocated How will data be collected? Who will collect these data and when? How will data be shared and with whom? How will the data be analyzed? How often and how will implementation data be compared with formative student achievement data? IPDM Monitor Student Achievement Monitor Teacher Behavior Structure for Teacher Collaboration Adjust Training and Supports What are students/teachers experiencing? Are students showing learning gains? Should we increase/decrease our use of certain strategies? What tools are needed to monitor progress? 2011 AEA 267

Worksheet: Implementation/ Formative Data StakeholdersChanges in Stakeholders Formative Evaluation Questions Evidence Collected Summary of Evidence AND Next Steps Teachers Students Administrators 2011 AEA 267

REMEMBER… Key “Jobs” as you implement your plan Meet regularly to monitor progress Have a focused review process Maintain the focus and endurance of the plan Lead and include other staff members Communicate and celebrate the progress 2011 AEA