4 th September 2006 UK Neutrino Factory C.R. Prior CCLRC-ASTeC and Trinity College Oxford On behalf of the UK Neutrino Factory Collaboration CCLRC Adams.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Imperial College 1 Progress at the RAL Front End Test Stand J. Pozimski Talk outline : Overview Ion source development LEBT RFQ Beam Chopper MEBT.
Advertisements

ISIS Accelerator Division
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Participants WP3total Imperial College CERN STFC University Warwick CRNS University Oxford6 6 Total Euro  - WP3.
Solid Targets for the Neutrino Factory J R J Bennett Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK
Studies of solid high-power targets Goran Skoro University of Sheffield HPT Meeting May 01 – 02, 2008 Oxford, UK.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
ISIS, FETS and ASTeC David Findlay Head, Accelerator Division ISIS Department Rutherford Appleton Laboratory / STFC ASTeC 10 Years On, Thursday 13 October.
Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London. Neil Bliss, Norbert Collomb, Alan Grant, STFC/DL, Daresbury. Costing Methodology and Status of the Neutrino Factory.
Front End Test Stand Klystron Commissioning Alan Letchford UKNF Plenary Meeting 22 nd April 2009.
UKNF OsC RAL – 21 & 22 June 2010 UKNF achievements & milestones J. Pozimski.
Solid Target R&D Programme Colliding the proton beam with a dense target is currently the only known way to produce enough muons for the neutrino factory.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
Initiatives in the Target Sector J. R. J. Bennett CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon. OX11 0QX, UK.
Proton driver front end test stand Plans and organisation for 2004–05 David Findlay ISIS Accelerator Division STVLTVS EST QVI ACCELERATORIBVS CVRANDIS.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
The RAL Front End Test Stand Alan Letchford CCLRC RAL ISIS Injector Group Joint Accelerator Workshop 28–29 March 2006.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
Related poster [1] TPAG022: Slow Wave Electrode Structures for the ESS 2.5 MeV Chopper – Michael A. Clarke-Gayther Status Funding bids have been prepared.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
NuFACT06, Irvine 27. August 2006 The Front End Test Stand (FETS) is a collaborative project, between CCLRC (ISIS & ASTeC) and UK universities (Imperial.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
J. Pozimski UKNF WP1 meeting 10 March 2010 UKNF WP1 milestone table status.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
Initiative in the Target Sector J. R. J. Bennett CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK.
UKNF OsC RAL – 31 st January 2011 UKNF - Status, high lights, plans J. Pozimski.
June 23, 2005R. Garoby Introduction SPL+PDAC example Elements of comparison Linacs / Synchrotrons LINAC-BASED PROTON DRIVER.
1 of 12 Stephen Brooks JAI Advisory Board, February 2006  Neutrino Factory Muon Beam Production Studies.
Status of the Front End Test Stand April Infrastructure R8 refurbished Laser lab under construction Vacuum system for first section delivered Stands.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
John Womersley Welcome Director of Particle Physics, CCLRC International Scoping Study Meeting, RAL April 2006.
Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE) Sergei Nagaitsev Dec 19, 2011.
NEUTRINO DETECTORS Cutting-Edge Accelerator Research for a Neutrino Factory and Other Applications Ajit Kurup for the FETS and UKNF Collaborations Cutting-Edge.
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory in the 5 Year Plan A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009.
Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.
Introduction to the Non-Scaling Electron Model Rob Edgecock CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory For the EMMA Collaboration Motivation Basic EMMA parameters.
Parameters of the NF Target Proton Beam pulsed10-50 Hz pulse length1-2  s energy 2-30 GeV average power ~4 MW Target (not a stopping target) mean power.
Shock Tests on Tantalum and Tungsten J. R. J. Bennett, S. Brooks, R. Brownsword, C. Densham, R. Edgecock, S. Gray, A. McFarland, G. Skoro and D. Wilkins.
THE DESIGN OF THE AGS-BASED PROTON DRIVER FOR NEUTRINO FACTORY W.T. WENG, BNL FFAG WORKSHOP JULY 7-11, 2003 KEK, JAPAN.
Proton Driver / Project X Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab August 30, 2012.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
H. Haseroth Friday, August 31, 2001 MUG Meeting 1 Overview of the CERN Neutrino Factory Machine Studies H. Haseroth for the Neutrino Factory Working Group.
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
The RAL Front End Test Stand David Findlay for Alan Letchford Accelerator Division, ISIS Department Rutherford Appleton Laboratory HIPPI-05, Cosener’s.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Summary of WP3 J. Pozimski.
1May, IPPP- Imperial College, London1 NF activities at IC (part II) m. apollonio.
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
The RAL Front End Test Stand
Towards a Common Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
The Accelerator Complex from the International Design Study
Status of the Front End Test Stand April 2007.
Outline: Why now ? What ? How ?
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
Meson Production Efficiencies
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
Introduction to the Non-Scaling Electron Model
General Issues for a Multi-MW driver
Presentation transcript:

4 th September 2006 UK Neutrino Factory C.R. Prior CCLRC-ASTeC and Trinity College Oxford On behalf of the UK Neutrino Factory Collaboration CCLRC Adams Institute Cockcroft Institute High Power RF Faraday Partnership Imperial College London Brunel University University of Durham University of Glasgow University of Lancaster University of Liverpool University of Oxford University of Sheffield University of Southampton University of Warwick

Neutrino Factory NF covers every aspect of advanced accelerator study Aim is neutrinos per year Intense proton beams with very short bunch length (~1ns) Secondary pion beam Low production rate Targets capable of handling multi- MW of beam power Tertiary muon beams (lifetime 2.2 μs at rest) Fast acceleration Decay rings handling large muon beam power Neutrinos are a quarternary beam New concepts Ionization cooling FFAG accelerators (large acceptance, rapid acceleration)

Time Line 1999 Inauguration of series of annual Neutrino Factory Workshops. Basic parameters set RAL collaboration with CERN UK design of synchrotron proton drivers PPARC funded UKNF study International Scoping Study (ISS) UK scientists playing a major role Identification of a self-consistent NF scenario Baseline design established The future Further UKNF study International Design Study, probably UK led.

UKNF WP1 Conceptual Design Study Designs for whole accelerating structure identified WP2 Proton Driver Front End Test Stand Fundamental proton driver R&D WP3 Target R&D WP4 Preparation for International Design Study Several new young enthusiastic recruits to Accelerator Physics. Much progress has been made in all areas. The UK is at the forefront of NF studies and in a position to lead and direct NF research.

UKNF WP1 Conceptual Design Study Detailed analysis of integrated accelerator facility in accordance with ISS recommendations WP2 Proton Driver Front End Test Stand Through to completion WP3 Target R&D Establish viability of a solid target solution WP4 Development of High Gradient RF Cavities WP5 Survey and Geological Investigation Explore feasibility of RAL as a site for a Neutrino Factory WP6 International Design Study IDR 2010, CDR 2012

WP1 Conceptual Design Study Proton driver UK designs at 5 GeV, 8 GeV, 10 Gev, 15 GeV, 30 GeV Pion decay/muon capture Optimised solenoid scheme Recent new ideas for phase rotation to capture both µ + and µ - Cooling Cooling ring designed New modelling code under development Novel cooling schemes under investigation Muon Acceleration New codes developed Investigation of J-PARC scheme (in collaboration) UK lattices for first-ever isochronous FFAGs Muon storage and neutrino production UK designs for triangular and bow-tie rings Suitable detector sites identified for a facility based at RAL

Proton Drivers ISS baseline: 4 MW beam power 50 Hz repetition rate Energy 5-15 GeV 1-5 bunches per pulse, each compressed to 1-2 ns rms 20 μs delay between output of bunches to target UKNF 10 GeV design meets all requirements 180 MeV H - linac 3 GeV RCS Booster Radius=63.788m 10 GeV FFAG Radius=127.6m 3 or 5 proton bunches 221 m 218 m

Proton Drivers In-depth analysis required Potential difficulties Beam chopping Beam injection into booster synchrotron Bunch compression to ~1 ns rms FFAG itself Develop 3D modelling codes (including space charge) for synchrotrons and for FFAGs R&D: design and build an electron model of a non-scaling proton FFAG Funding being sought elsewhere 180 MeV H - linac 3 GeV RCS Booster 10 GeV FFAG 3 or 5 proton bunches 221 m 218 m

Pion Decay/Muon Capture Distributed code for optimisation of solenoid capture channel Choice of Proton Driver Energy New scheme to capture equal quantities of both sign muons Optimise for 0.2 muons/proton through capture channel. Phase rotation and bunching systems prior to cooling.

Muon Acceleration Initial stages of muon acceleration in linac and RLA (dogbone) One or more FFAGs to reach final energy (20-40 GeV) Both μ – and μ + accelerated Muon beam has very large emittance (~30,000 π mm.mrad) Beam trajectories in triplet FFAG Schematic of ISS baseline for muon acceleration. Other layouts are under consideration.

New Modelling Code: end-end simulation Transverse emittance = 1 π mm.mrad RF phase/2π Kinetic energy [GeV] Transverse emittance = 30,000 π mm.mrad Linac RLA FFAG Linac RLA FFAG

Electron FFAG test model EMMA EMMA fed by ERLP injector at Daresbury Laboratory Essential R&D of a non-scaling FFAG MeV electron model to test theory and demonstrate beam transport Beam dynamics and simulation carried out under UKNF WP1 Bid for money for construction submitted to Basic Technology Fund.

Muon Decay Rings Triangular design Bow-tie design Injection ν ν 425 m production straights Advantages of Bow-tie design smaller depth (300 m compared with 435 m). higher efficiency (52.6 % compared with 49.6%). greater choice of the opening angle around 50°. But needs a scheme to remove the beam polarization. ν ν Circumference for both rings = 1608 m 53° Two parallel rings, one for each muon sign, in each tunnel, with μ ± bunches interleaved in time.

Detector Sites for NF at RAL Site 1BaselineSite 2BaselineAngle WIPP, Carlsbad, NM 7513 km Arlit mine, Niger 3678 km67° INO, Pykara, India 7630 kmNorsaq2805 km 60° WIPP, Carlsbad, 7513 km SAGE, Baksan 3375 km 60° WIPP, Carlsbad 7513 kmCyprus3251 km52° New Work Package WP5 to explore geology and sites for decay rings

RFQ, 324 MHz, 3 MeV MEBT, chopper Ion source 70 mA, 2 ms, 10 % dc 3 Solenoid LEBT WP2 Proton Driver R&D: The Front End Test Stand Creating gaps in H - micro-pulse train (chopping) is essential for low-loss, high intensity, beam accumulation

Front-end Test Stand 2 copper “quadrants” of the RFQ cold model waiting for brazing ASTeC and EU FP6/HIPPI funded H - ion source: development goals: Double output current 35mA →70mA Increase pulse length 200µs → 2ms Improve emittance Maximise lifetime Design of Solenoid-based LEBT completed Production of 324 MHz RFQ Cold model almost finished Preparing a computer controlled bead pull system for field measurement Fast beam chopper Electronics ready Alternative beamline optics under study Diagnostics Laser-wire system for profile measurement from different angles ISIS ion source at RAL A generic project – could be used for any proton driver

Radio Frequency Quadrupole Linac A 324 MHz klystron has been ordered from Toshiba for delivery towards the end of A cold model RFQ is under construction. 0.5 m long, it models all significant features of the full 4 m design Aluminium machining model Design of the 4 vane RFQ cold model

A novel tandem chopper technique has been developed at RAL to overcome the conflicting requirements of fast rise time (< 2ns) and long flat-top (up to 100  s). FETS Fast Beam Chopper A ‘fast’ chopper, with short rise time but limited flat-top, removes 2-3 microbunches. In the gap created, a ‘slow’ chopper is switched on, with longer rise time and flat-top, able to remove a succession of micropulses (typically ~100). The gap in the bunch train is needed for low-loss injection and extraction in the accumulator rings. Chopper 1 (fast transition) Chopper 2 / Beam dump (slower transition) BEAM Fast and slow chopper modules

WP3 Target Studies Potential Neutrino Factory show-stopper Target station  small nuclear power station, need to be in secure nuclear site Radiation safety very important Target feasibility not yet demonstrated UKNF focus on solid targets Radiation safety “easier” + more World experience exists Issues: Shock – simulations suggest could break target in 1 pulse Temperature rise – would melt target in < 50 pulses Radiation damage – could break target in many pulses Shock Studies UKNF has developed world-leading expertise A shock test facility has been built without a 4 MW proton driver! A much better understanding of shock has been acquired UK solid target work is based on a moving target – each “rod” is exposed to the proton beam only once every 3 sec

50kV, 8kA pulsed p/s for ISIS kicker magnets Pulse: rise time ~100ns, 800ns flat top Tested 0.5mm Ta & W wires Ta at 2000K W after testing at 5 MW. Breaks caused by removal, not testing

Some Results of 0.5 mm diameter wires MaterialLngth cm Pulse Current A Pulse Temp. K Max. Temp K Rep Rate Hz No. of pulses to failure Beam Power MW Target dia cm Tantalum x10 6 Tantalum is not a very good material – too weak at high temperatures. Tungsten Broke when increased to 7200A (2200K) >3.4x Stuck to top Cu connector >1.6x Not broken; still pulsing >4.2x10 6 +PLUS+ >9x “Equivalent Target”: This shows the equivalent beam power (MW) and target radius (cm) in a real target for the same stress in the test wire. Assumes a parabolic beam distribution and 4 micro-pulses per macro-pulse, spaced at 30  s. Equivalent Target

Target Studies: simulation Code LSDyna Benchmarked against existing beam data Used to: understand shock relate wires to NF targets study shock reduction determine size of effects study failure mechanisms Codes MARS and GEANT4 Used to: predict energy deposition in target study radiation damage monitor pion production(cf HARP data) Comparison with tests at ISOLDE

Target Plans Results for shock and radiation damage in W look very promising – contrary to widely held belief. Continue shock measurements and supporting simulations find limits ■ show reproducibility ■ test different solids test expected shock dependence ■ temperature dependence Strengthen case for solid targets – also important for other projects Engineer realistic mechanism for changing target at 50Hz including building a model Study the effect of the 20T capture solenoid field Engineer a target station around the target: simulations required of activation, heating, etc incorporate a beam dump Considerable expertise with W being developed by ISIS Maintain ability to contribute to liquid target work (MERIT) Main deliverable: realistic and defendable solid target solution for a Neutrino Factory

WP4 High Gradient RF Cavities Experimental and theoretical studies Achievable accelerating gradient under a few Tesla magnetic fields Ascertain what can be manufactured with repeatable specifications Investigate surface factors that limit accelerating gradient Electro-polishing Chemical mechanical polishing Abrasive flow machining Fabrication: Examine surface topology and chemical composition Evaluate effects of fabrication on these properties High power testing Collaboration with overseas laboratories (FNAL, LBNL, J-Lab) and industry (Shakespeare Engineering, North Eastern Metal Spinners, e2v, High Power RF Faraday Partnership)

Cavity Fabrication Process Cavity body Ceramic RF window Water cooling line RF Power Two couplers Load RF coupler conditioning at SNS in ORNL

Summary Aim to complete conceptual NF design in framework of ISS recommendations and in collaboration with IDS, working towards the full (international) conceptual design report in Complete proton driver front-end test stand and demonstrate fast, clean, beam chopping. Important for many applications besides NF. Further studies of solid targets to find a feasible solution for NF. Again, other applications. Develop techniques for production of reliable high-gradient RF cavities. Generic. Undertake geological study of suitable site for a Neutrino Factory. Play a leading role in the International Design Study.

Organisation and summary Management of UKNF programme Summary of request

Project management: UKNF Steering Group Conceptual design C. Prior Target studies R. Edgecock Front-end test stand A. Letchford High-gradient cavity development R. Seviour Site survey & geological studies M. Warner International Design Study R. Edgecock MICE-UK KL

WP1: NF Conceptual design Principal deliverable: Interim design report (IDR) In context of the International Design Study (IDS) Resources for the UK contributions to the IDS Underpins: UK leadership position Eventual development of bid to host or to make substantial contributions

WP2: Proton driver f/e test stand Principal deliverable: Front-end test stand: LEBT, RFQ, Chopper, and diagnostics High-quality chopped beams critical for development of high-power proton driver for the Neutrino Factory Complementarity: EU FP6 HIPPI Future high-power proton facilities (e.g. ISIS upgrade, ESS, …)

WP3: Target studies Principal deliverable Conceptual design for NF target station for inclusion in IDR High-power target key engineering challenge Require to: Complete solid-target material studies; Develop engineering concept of target station

WP4: Development of high-gradient cavities Principal deliverable: Robust, reproducible manufacturing process Completion of IDR requires specification of accelerating gradients in acceleration systems: Challenge: high-gradient in magnetic field Requirement: to build many cavities to spec. To define manufacturing process require: To understand of effect steps in manufacture have on achievable gradient To devise cost optimised manufacturing process

WP5: Site survey and geological studies Site survey: Essential pre-requisite to preparation of bid to host Geological studies: Performance optimum for given cost requires understanding cost of reducing matter density uncertainty

WP6: International Design Study UK demonstrated international leadership by initiating the ISS Essential to maintain and enhance this position by Resources required to: Allow UK personnel to play key leadership roles in the negotiations leading to the formation of the International Design Study collaboration Allow UK personnel to play leading roles in the preparation of a successful bid to EU Framework Programme 7

Summary Resources will allow UKNF to: Deliver IDR for the Neutrino Factory by 2010 As a leading member of the IDS collaboration As a step on the way to producing the NF CDR by 2012 Carry out a targeted programme of hardware R&D that will: Establish UK competence in key systems and technologies Engage appropriately with industry to ensure cost models for CDR are accurate