Session Three Data Overview sharing Looking at Student Work (Step 4 Digging into Data) Looking at Teaching Practice (Step 5 Examining Instruction)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
Advertisements

School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Using Data to guide School and Classroom Level Practices Presented by: Dr. Sean Impeartrice and Emily Vaughn.
Getting to Common Formative Assessments NMUSD Adult School We share to impart, impact, improve and empower.
Creating District C.I.P. And Building S.I.P. Making Sure The Canaries Don’t Die While You Are Data Mining.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Pioneer High School Our Journey: Becoming and Sustaining a Professional Learning Community.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Act and Assess Part I Feb. 6, Plan for Today 4:10-4:20 Welcome Back and Overview 4:20-4:50 Bridging the Gap: Teaching and Learning 4:50-5:40 “Student.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Data Informed Decision Making IV: Monitoring and Assessing Progress.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal(s) Objectives & Actions.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources: 1.Print copies for each person of the following from the Resource Tab: a)Grain Size Visual.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Timberlane Regional School District
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
Summer Institute Overview Part II: ACT Michelle Beavers, PhD Virginia State University.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
When dealing with colleagues in PLC’s…. Welcome Professional Learning Communities Presenters: Pam Hughes & Kristin Magee
Data Wise A process for working with data to improve teaching and learning.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results. A Culture of Collaboration - PLC Norms - Systems Support A Focus on Results -Pre-assessments -Common Formative.
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
RTI, The Colorado Growth Model, and the Council for Exceptional Children.
U SING D ATA TO ASSESS AND INFORM SCHOOL CHANGE Data for change Presenter: Judith Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Creating Student Success through the Data Team Process Mason City Community School District Kathryn Schladweiler TJ.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Professional Learning Communities
Step 0: Common Assessments
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Session Three Data Overview sharing Looking at Student Work (Step 4 Digging into Data) Looking at Teaching Practice (Step 5 Examining Instruction)

Looking at Student Work Group Practice What do you see? Can you identify a Learner-Centered Problem? What other information do you need?

Observation Rubrics Walk-throughs Extended observations Performance indicators Evidence collections: Portfolios, etc.

Data Wise Section III: Act Step Six: Developing an Action Plan Step Seven: Planning to Assess Progress Step Eight: Acting and Assessing

Step Six Develop an Action Plan Creating a plan of action is a way to translate what you have learned through analyzing a broad swath of data into concrete strategies for improving teaching and learning.

Step Six Developing an Action Plan Decide on an instructional strategy or strategies. Agree on what your plan will look like in classrooms. Put the plan down on paper. Plan how you will know if the plan is working.

Decide on an instructional strategy or strategies. Clarify the scope of the plan. Who, what, when, where, and how. Broad enough, but specific enough. Present a coordinated effort.

Cautions Be judicious with outside interventions. Be prepared for push-back. Check your compass Where are we? Where will this take us?

Agree on what your plan will look like in classrooms. Develop a common vision for implementation Create shared understanding by using indicators or “look-fors” Differentiate for curriculum, teaching variables, and student need

Example: Pg. 125 What could make this example stronger, clearer, or better?

Put the plan down on paper What are the tasks? Who is going to do them? When will they be done? How will we assess? When will they be assessed?

Compare/Contrast Look at the charts on 131 and 133. Compare the examples you see. Benefits/Issues What could make these examples stronger, clearer, or better?

Step Seven: Planning to Assess Progress What assessments will be used to measure progress? When will each type of assessment data be collected? Who is responsible for collecting and keeping track of the data? How will the data be shared among stakeholders? What are the goals for student improvement and proficiency?

Data Source Time Frame Short-term data Daily or weekly from student work or interactions Medium-term data Periodic intervals from grade, department, or school community Long-term data Annually from summative assessments

Examples Pg. 142 Pg. 146 Benefits/Issues

SMART Goals Establishes a culture of internal accountability Recursive

SMART Goals Improvement goals Growth Proficiency goals Competence Proficiency takes time, but continuous growth is expected.

Step Eight: Acting and Assessing Are we all on the same page? Are we doing what we said we’d do? Are our students learning more? Where do we go from here?

Are we all on the same page? Use teams for support and internal accountability

Are we doing what we said we’d do? Promote consistency rather than conformity

Are our students learning more? Frequently gather data to observe progress trends. Be prepared to change course if data shows corrections need to be made.

Where do we go from here? Celebrate successes Identify needs Build on the work we have done

The Data Wise Improvement Process

Points to Remember The process of using data to improve learning and teaching should be focused, malleable, and manageable. Every stakeholder should have an informed voice in the discussion. Higher scores will come when we improve teaching and learning experiences. Effective change needs time and active engagement with the change process.

Practical Application Build a solid foundation of teams and communication Start small, big success Be faithful to the process Be open and responsive to concerns, needs, and ideas Monitor, but allow for leadership in-house Stay positive