The implication of developmental opportunities and diversity on social perception at CPUT: a case study Petro Coreejes-Brink Debbie Becker 29/9/2010LIASA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Advertisements

Making the Case for Christian Higher Education: New Challenges, New Opportunities Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University CCCU CEO Conference.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Student Satisfaction Geneva College Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI: Noel-Levitz) 1997 to 2013.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey U of M: Overall Results umanitoba.ca.
2014 Employee Engagement Survey Results ILI 33 – Sept 11 & 12, 2014.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.
1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
Stress: employee’s training Contents What is the issue? What is the issue in our organisation? Why should we deal with it? What are.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
RAPA Fall Meeting 2012 October 21-23, WIIFM Reward and Recognition Nicole Hercules Director, Performance Improvement 2012 RAPA Conference.
 1 Professional Development Competency—Teamwork and Inclusion.
Customer Service Excellence Standard – adding value for your students Helen Loughran Libraries and Learning Innovation Leeds Metropolitan University
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Chapter 4 Managing Service Performance Chapter 4 slides for Marketing for Pharmacists, 2nd Edition.
Students’ feedback - Can higher education quality management systems put it to good use? Babes-Bolyai University, 18 September 2009 Monica Zaharie Melinda.
Understanding the postgraduate experience Chris Park Director, Lancaster University Graduate School Senior Associate, Higher Education Academy (HEA)
What is the Focus?  Round 2 Analysis observed trends in student perception after first survey.  Allows us to recognize improvements of lower measures.
IDENTIFICATION OF OPPORTUNITIES AND PREPARATION OF BUSINESS PLAN -N. VINEETH, AMEEN SHARIFF, 103(RM)
SPE Engagement Survey Results Summary Digital Media Group Masek November 2012 Confidential 1.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
1 What Students Need to Know from The National Student Survey 17 June 2010 Sami Benyahia, Director.
Developing and Assisting Members. Career Stages  Establishment Stage (ages 21-26)  Advancement Stage (ages 26-40)  Maintenance Stage (ages 40-60) 
Long-term twinning seconding and young talents’ involvement for the improvement of land administration development projects Fredrik Zetterquist Managing.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Organization Development and Change Thomas G. Cummings Christopher G. Worley Chapter Eighteen: Developing and Assisting Members.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Methods Participants  126 participants  19% Male, 79% Female  12% age 18-20, 67% age 21-23, 21% age 24+  9% worked 0-9 hours per week, 25% 10-19, 21%
2005 Performance Development System Survey Human Resources Staff Meeting March 20, 2006.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
Highlights of the Staff Survey 2011 Cheryl Kershaw Director of Surveys and Research.
UBC Department of Finance Office Staff Survey Forum Presentation March 17, 2004.
WEB CONFERENCE TO SUPPORT BOARD LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Please standby, the web conference will begin shortly! We invite you to use the chat feature.
Blended Learning: Finding the Right Mix Work Expectations Profile  Explores the “psychological contract” of needs and expectations between employees.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
การพัฒนาสมรรถนะ ของสำนักวิทยบริการสู่ การเป็นองค์กรแห่งการ เรียนรู้และ การ บริการที่เป็นเลิศ รองศาสตราจารย์ ดร. ปพฤกษ์ อุตสาหะวาณิชกิจ คณบดีคณะการบัญชีและการจัดการมหาวิทยาลัยมหาสารคาม.
The University of Western Australia working life survey July 2009 high-level results Voice Project Survey Report, (c) Voice Project Pty Ltd, Page 1.
“Employee Survey 2007” Analysis of results and comparison with 2005 survey results May 2007.
Introduction Motivating others in the workplace is being able to identify the reasons which make employees behave a particular way. In most cases this.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
HOW I CAN CONTRIBUTE TO MY DEPARTMENT AND COLLEGE’S MANAGEMENT Mtholeni N. Ngcobo Linguistics 29 May 2009.
1 SUPPORTING PEDAGOGICAL CHANGE IN NMR SCHOOLS PROJECT Briefing of NMR secondary schools 11 February, 2010 Jean Russell, Graeme Jane, Graham Marshall.
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
Community College Faculty & Staff Tell it Like it Is! The El Paso Community College Employee Survey.
Internal Auditing Effectiveness
Introduction to Business Chapter 19 Planning a Career Essential Question: How can I best plan for a career?
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. Supervisory Safety Leadership Best Safety Practice # 2 Top Management Commitment.
ClimateQual Employee Climate Survey Measures staff perceptions Assess the health of a library Comparison to other like libraries Track changes over time.
Background: -Quarterly survey; five rounds sent out thus far; 25% of the Lab polled each time. Consistencies are: -About a 40% response rate -Agree / Strongly.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Survey Summary of Fall 2014 Results Presentation to College Council Executive Cabinet August 5, 2015.
College Student Satisfaction & Assessment By: Laura Heidel Western Kentucky University CNS 610.
D. Randall Brandt, Ph.D. Vice President Customer Experience & Loyalty The Customer Experience Trust Factor Do You Know How Well Your Employees Are Delivering.
September 26, 2006 From Organizational Assessment to Organizational Change: The University of Maryland Library Experience M. Sue Baughman Johnnie Love.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Advancement.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Northumbria conference York
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Unit Four Business Management
Leadership Video Q&A Prompt
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Presentation transcript:

The implication of developmental opportunities and diversity on social perception at CPUT: a case study Petro Coreejes-Brink Debbie Becker 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Contents Background Diversity variables Research findings Our results Conclusion Way forward 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Background Merger Cape Technikon + Peninsula Technikon (2005) 9 campuses; 95 staff Library staff satisfaction survey done to determine effect of merger and staff adjustment Based on the survey done by Elizabeth Jordan at the University of Queensland, Australia 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Survey Important considerations: Responses would be anonymous Answers would be confidential Staff have the option of adding their name if they so wished All questions must be answered Staff have the option of completing the questionnaire over a period of time 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Background Total of 97 questions divided into 19 areas Question 1 – Work area ( BV, CT, Other, Tech/IT/Fin) Question 2 – Staff level ( grouped into 2 – professional and non-professional ) Covers 19 areas of work experience (e.g. teamwork, communication, etc.) 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Background Staff rated each question on a 5-point scale for both importance and performance Each option on the scale was allocated a value ( 5 for high and 1 for low ) The mean for performance was subtracted from that of importance to create a “gap” A gap of 1.34 or more is significant Areas with a high importance and a large gap require attention 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

← Importance → ↑ Important issues that need attentionLess important issues that need attention Gap ↓ Important issues the library is doing wellLess important issues the library is doing well. 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

, , , , 35, 36, 65 84, 70, 81, , , 27, 39 4,7,16,17,2 2,74 18,19, 91, ,34,41,7 632, 33, ,24 20,21,26,9 4, 155,38, 4237,13, ,4490, , ,46, 5850,48, Scatter graph indicating areas of excellence (all staff)

Areas of concern (all staff) Pink area Yellow area I understand what is required of me in my job 3 Library staff are motivated 72 Good customer service is acknowledge and recognized 63 If things go wrong my colleagues focus on the problem (and not the person) 73 The library is a safe and healthy place to work 75 Library security is visible and effective 79 Library staff have a positive attitude 71 The library has the necessary resources with regard to space and facilities 77 The library’s hiring/promotion policies offer equal opportunities to all staff 86 The library provides opportunities for advancement 87 I am able to effectively contribute to the library’s planning processes 83 Staff are kept adequately and promptly informed on issues that impact on them in any way 31 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Variables Work area Staff level ( Professional vs non-professional ) Age Experience Mobility ( Developmental opportunities ) 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010 Age study “ least satisfied group … under 25 years” – Lynch Experience “more years of experience report higher job satisfaction” Mobility Staff “ working in the same library five years … more satisfied than persons with other plans”

Effect of change on branch staff versus other staff 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Staff age and experience at CPUT 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Mobility 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Conclusions Breaking down of work relations and trust Not utilizing existing expertise (lateral moves) Change in procedures Many vacant positions Library strategic direction unclear (3 directors in 3 years) 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Way forward Survey in 2012 Policies and procedures in place Stable top management with clear vision and strategic objectives Culture of interactive professional staff involvement Improve communication 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010

References Becker, D Staff satisfaction survey 2009: Feedback. Presentation to library staff Jordan, E Keeping a finger on the organisational pulse: surveying staff satisfaction in times of change. Library Assessment Conference Seattle Washington August Lynch, B.P. and Verdin, J.A Job satisfaction in libraries: relationships of the work itself, age, sex, occupational group, tenure, supervisory level, career commitment, and library department. Library Quarterly (Oct 1983), pp /9/2010LIASA conference 2010

Questions? Thank you Petro Coreejes-Brink Debbie Becker 29/9/2010LIASA conference 2010