Practical suggestions to increase the response rate when gathering post-school outcomes data. OSEP Approved January 2007 On the web at:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GSEG Project Project Update. Topics n Data Requirements and Recommendations n Assessment of Local Data Quality.
Advertisements

Collecting and Using Post-School Outcome Data New Mexico Cadre Summer Camp June 11-12, 2007.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator #14 Post School Outcomes Study Cohort III: Exiters Technical Assistance Session #2 Presented by The New.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Amy Jenks, Grant Coordinator NH RESPONDS Grant (SPDG) (603) 1 New Hampshire’s Advisory Board for SPDG.
Sharp Healthcare Interpreting Program. agenda 2 » Overview » SIGNS » Education » Web Site.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Using and Understanding Post School Outcome Data Collection Presented by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Beth Miller Harrison, Ph.D. Tony LoBianco,
Charlotte Y. Alverson, Ed. S. Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May 8, 2008 Blueprint for Success: Helpful Hints for Writing.
Hard to Find. Purpose of IDEA To ensure that all children with prepare them for further education, employment disabilities have available to them a free.
Learn How States Are Finding “Hard-to-reach” Students for Post-school Outcome Data Collection! How the Heck Do We Contact Some of Our Former Students?
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound check.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
107 Findings and Follow-up Referral ** Initial Contact **
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
OAVSNP 2014 Charlotte Alverson, NPSO Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE 1.
Your Students, Your Outcomes: Using Your PSO Reports Sally Simich, ODE Pattie Johnson, TRI Charlotte Alverson, NPSO 1.
Title I-D, Subpart 2 Neglected, Delinquent, and At- Risk Youth Program ESEA Odyssey Summer 2013 Russ Sweet Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
Summary of Performance (SOP) Content from November 18, 2013 presentation by Dr. Valerie L. Mazzotti National Post-School Outcomes Center University of.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Kentucky Post School Outcome Study Human Development Institute University of Kentucky
Effective Partnerships in Providing Education to Youth in Detention Centers Sheril R. Smith, Ph.D., Director Office of Dropout Prevention Mississippi Department.
Do We Have all the Workers? Strategies for Gaining Representativeness Loujeania W. Bost, Ph.D. NDPC-SD & Deanne Unruh, Ph.D. NPSO State Planning Institute.
2. NLTS2 Study Overview. 1 Prerequisites Recommended module to complete before viewing this module  1. Introduction to the NLTS2 Training Modules.
TRANSITION PLANNING An Overview High Road Academy.
1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
1 Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008 Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
LEP SYSTEM REQUIRED ANNUAL DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR SD/CS/AVTS/CTC Presenter: Barbara Mowrey ESL/Bilingual Education Advisor Pennsylvania.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Division of Risk Management State of Florida Loss Prevention Program.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
ESC Region XI Texas Effectiveness Study PROGRAM UPDATE 2005 Deborah Norris, Project Coordinator Education Service Center Region XI Fort Worth, Texas.
Eastside Elementary School Parental Involvement Policy and Plan for Shared Student Success School Year Eastside Elementary School Shelia Cain,
Texas Effectiveness Study Mini-Grant Program for LEA Follow-up.
The Federal Telework Program U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Transforming the Future with PSO Data.  Understand why collecting PSO data is so important for district decisions on how to best serve students  Learn.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
What is it? This is a plan that describes how Rosemont Elementary School (RES) will provide opportunities to improve parent engagement to support student.
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Parental Involvement Policy
2017.
The SARB Process Tulare Joint Union High School District Presented By
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008
Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Parental Involvement Policy
2016.
Parental Involvement Policy
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
2015.
5th Annual Central California Truancy Summit
Using the AIM Alternative Testing Module (for Instructors)
Parent & Family Engagement Policy & Plan for Shared Student Success
Presentation transcript:

Practical suggestions to increase the response rate when gathering post-school outcomes data. OSEP Approved January 2007 On the web at: NPSO Tools & Products: Data Collection

National Post-School Outcomes Center National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities 2 Collaborative Product

NPSO Resources NPSO Resources Tools & Products

From the Introduction...  Intended for state and local education agency personnel charged with designing systems to collect post-school outcome data for students with disabilities  Overview of requirements and challenges in data collection  Recommendations and strategies to secure sufficient response rates, especially from youth who drop out of school

Strategies for Survey Design Tailor survey to the intended audience. Make survey user-friendly. Appearance matters! Focus on essential questions.

Strategies for Survey Administration: Ensure Confidentiality Personalize Notification Provide pre-notification Consider alternate means of distribution and collection Express commitment: The respondent should feel as though the survey is valuable and that their responses are valuable. Use incentives Conduct follow-up. Letters, cards, s all increase the likelihood of a response

Strategies for Locating Youth: Before Exiting Keep students’ files current and accurate prior to exiting. Have students complete an exit survey prior to leaving school. Discuss the importance of transition planning and inform students and families that they may be contacted after leaving school. Encourage LEAs to maintain current contact information. Encourage LEAs to recheck fall enrollments annually for students who may have (may not have) returned. Locate and contact LEAs with high response rates to share what they are doing. Prior to exit, ask students: Specifically, what would keep them in touch?

Strategies for Locating Youth: Before Exiting continued Have students develop a resume, providing personal and professional references. At the beginning of each semester provide all students, especially those students at risk for dropping out, with a “pre-correct” message regarding staying in school. Establish district-wide, standardized practices for monitoring and responding to student attendance issues. Improve the quality of exit interviews. During transition planning and exit interviews, ask students about their future plans. Prior to students exiting, verify and update contact information.

Strategies for Locating Youth: After Exiting Keep local data systems current. Send “heads up” letter to youth and families. Attempt to locate students via the Department of Motor Vehicles. Schools may consider hiring police officer liaisons. “Google” students. Go where students are; locate them at their favorite places. Pay students to keep in touch.

Strategies for Locating Youth: After Exiting continued Locate and contact LEAs with high response rates. After students leave school, send written correspondences or correspondences through Telephone and send written correspondences Send postcard with forward service or change of address request. Contact the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation. Consider Aristotle’s Nationwide Voter File.

Other products to help increase Response Rate Student/Parent Flyers  Information on survey process  Available in English & Spanish  Personalize to your district Coming Soon: “Youtube” video for parents/students on PSO Survey coming their way 11

NPSO Resources NPSO Resources Tools & Products