Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
#2. Implementing RTI, in Six Easy Steps
Advertisements

RTI RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION Creating Tier I/PIPs Cleaning the Windshield.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Inquiry Team Eydie Wilson, Ph.D. Math Coach November 3, 2009.
Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Multi-tiered Systems of Support Improving Outcomes for All Office of Special Programs.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development October 9, 2009.
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
Response to Instruction (RtI) Calhoun County Schools Calhoun County Schools Mission It is the mission of the Calhoun County School System to reach and.
Multidisciplinary Teams
Understanding Response to Intervention (RtI) : What it Is & How it Works in Midway ISD.
Single Plans for Student Achievement Cambrian School District May 2012.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Eagle Ridge Elementary Data Presentation. Eagle Ridge: CRCT Data Review (3-5) Subject Gains/Losses Reading86%87%+1 Language Arts86%82%-4 Math81%69%-12.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
COTTON INDIAN ELEMENTARY LEADER IN ME WHAT IS A TITLE 1 SCHOOL? Each year the Federal Government provides funding to schools that qualify based.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
HILLPOINT ELEMENTARY Dr. Ron M. Leigh Principal “Every Child, Every Chance, Every Day” 2.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 2 of 8 1.
Governing Board Meeting September 29, 2011 Annual State of the School Address Mr. R. Hackler, Principal.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
November 1, 2012 Cambrian School District. School Plan (SPSA) process review Site SPSA updates Moving Forward Overview.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Problem Solving Process ELA CST 2012 % Increase Proficiency Rate Panorama High School Sandra Huerta, Instructional Coach.
A Mission of Restoration
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
Background In , City Year Greater Philadelphia (CYGP) provided academic and behavioral supports for students in grades 6-9. Supports include one-on-one.
Harvie Elementary School Improvement Plan By: Kristine Lara, Christopher Martinez, Amy Peterman, and Melinda Hammond.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
The Learning Journey Christie Kay, Teacher, Solana Pacific School Lisa Denham, Principal, Skyline School Leslie Fausset, Superintendent.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Fulton City School District CDEP Plan Implementation Update Fulton Board of Education October 27, 2015.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
J. Hoar, Principal. READING In % of Grade 3 – 8 students were proficient in Reading (up from 67% in 2011) HOWEVER: The target Annual Measureable.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Morgan County Schools Response to Instruction
Summer Leadership August 7-9, 2017
Administrative Conference, September 2013
Ahoskie Elementary School
ESE Blended Cafe Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) A Parent Guide
Welcome to John Will Elementary School!
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Response to Intervention = RTI
Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process
NOTES FOR PRESENTERS VIEW
Beecher Hills Elementary School (Mays Cluster)
Ahoskie Elementary School
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Media Briefing School Progress 2012 Results Mary L. Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy July 10, 2012 Meeting the requirements.
DFB CAASP Review & Plan for Student Achievement
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
Old Shell Road School of Creative and Performing Arts
Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

How does Response to Instruction relate to Plan 2020? Plan 2020 focuses on the following data elements: ▫Achievement ▫Gap ▫Graduation Rate ▫Attendance

Achievement Achievement is based upon the percentage of proficient students meeting the Annual Measureable Objective (AMO) in the areas of reading/language and mathematics. The AMO’s will be identified by the school.

Gaps The Gaps will be identified using non proficiencies in reading, language arts, math and the graduation rate. The Gap group will consist of students identified in the following subgroups: ▫Black ▫Hispanic ▫English Learners ▫Poverty (free and reduced lunch) ▫Special Education

Graduation Rate The graduation rates will be calculated using both four-year and five-year cohort rates.

Annual Measureable Objectives AMO’s will be set in equal increments with the goal of reducing half of the percentage of students in the “all student” group and each subgroup who are not proficient within six years.

Attendance The goal for the attendance rate is 95% or higher.

How will team members know RtI is being implemented in the schools? Academic Look Fors ▫Universal screening data  STAR Reading STAR Reading  Global Scholar Global Scholar ▫DIBELSDIBELS  Progress Monitoring Progress Monitoring ▫AR Data ▫Progress monitoring tools (Tiers 2 and 3) ▫End of Course Assessment ▫Current level of performance ▫Extended Day data ▫Local school dataLocal school data ▫Gizmo ReportsGizmo Reports Behavior Look Fors ▫School wide discipline plan ▫Review 360 ▫Behavior Plan ▫Suspension DataSuspension Data ▫Retract/Detention/ Saturday SchoolRetract

How will the team know that the RtI process is being implemented? PST Meetings ▫Schedules of how often meetings are taking place (Every 3-6 weeks) ▫Sign in sheets of who attends the meetings. Principals and or assistant principals, general education teachers, counselors and other specialists as needed. (Coaches, Speech Pathologists, EL Teachers, Intervention Teachers) ▫Use of PST Student Intervention form ( PST Manual, p )

What should team members see while observing? Use of flexible grouping of students Evidence of varied levels of support Implementation of researched based intervention strategies Provision of additional support and resources (peer tutors, one on one instruction, second delivery)

What kinds of questions should team members ask? When and where will additional support be provided? Who will provide support to struggling students? Does the schedule allow time to implement the intervention plan consistently? What types of data did you use to identify students? How often are students being monitored for progress and what are you using? How will the school know when the student is ready to exit PST?

How will team members know if interventions are working? Reduced course failures Academic Improvement/Progress Monitoring using grades and programs Improvement of skill deficit areas through progress monitoring Behavior improvement Reduction in suspensions Reduced numbers in Retract/Detention/Saturday School/Extended Day