Ponds 6, 7 & 8 Design Update Napa Sonoma Marsh Restoration Group Meeting USGS San Pablo Field Station Office, Building 505, Mare Island April 17, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of Edmonton Water Quality Monitoring Locations.
Advertisements

Flood Profile Modeling with Split Flows and Weirs
Lake Ponchartrain Normal WS EL = 0.0 Normal Operation Before Gates City of New Orleans Storm Water Pumping Station Levee Top of Levee EL = 11.5 Maximum.
 Map the MS4 conveyances  Locate all outfalls  Conduct dry weather screening of outfalls  Develop & enforce an Illicit Discharge Ordinance in the.
Source: C. Benton Monitoring Program Development David Senn, Emily Novick, Anthony Malkassian February 4, Background/assumptions 2.Monitoring Program.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Methods for Determining Maximum Flood Elevations Landward of Failed Levees: An Example from the Great Missouri.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Bathymetric Surveys on Ponds 3, 4, & 5, Napa-Sonoma Marshes U.S. Geological Survey John Y. Takekawa,
Culvert Hydraulics using the Culvert Design Form
. Topographic map of the Refuge marsh (figure provided by Dr. E.A. Meselhe based on USGS topography data). Elevations are in feet, NGVD29.Form USGS data;
CTC 261 Hydraulics Culvert Design Form
Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
HEC-RAS.
SCAMP Fall Velocity – Main Basin April 16-20, 2004.
Task 3 Institutional Incentives for Efficient Water Use.
Professional Engineering Services For Restoration Project John Mitnik, P.E. Engineering & Construction Bureau Chief Operations, Maintenance & Construction.
San Francisco District San Francisco District Coastal Activities Frank Wu CERB Meeting June 4, 2009.
Senior Project 2006 Union College Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The main purpose of this project is to design and implement a system.
Acoustic Tag Monitoring for Napa River Steelhead at the Napa Plant Site Year One Preliminary Results Presented to Napa Sonoma Marsh Restoration Group.
Ponds 6, 7 & 8 Permitting Update Napa Sonoma Marsh Restoration Group Meeting USGS San Pablo Field Station Office Mare Island November 17, 2010 April 17,
Lower Cape Fear River Estuary Model Progress Report Jim Bowen, UNC Charlotte October 11, 2007 Charlotte, NC (via Centra)
Taming the Alabama River Patrick Dobbs & Clay Campbell AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc Alabama Water Resources Conference.
FIGURE 3.1 Values of density  t (curved lines) and the loci of maximum density and freezing point (at atmospheric pressure) for seawater as functions.
GROUND WATER MONITORING TO EVALUATE EFFECTS OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY Mike Trojan Erin Eid Jennifer Maloney Jim Stockinger Minnesota Pollution Control.
James C. Gibeaut Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Presented to: Coastal Engineering Research.
Napa Salt Marsh Restoration Project 2010 Status Update.
1 Overview of Unsteady Flow Modeling With HEC-RAS Gary W. Brunner, P.E.
DSM2 Performance Measures Tara Smith CWEMF Annual Meeting February 26, 2007 Delta Modeling Section Bay Delta Office.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
05C112011B Template Master – Update Tracking Number and Date Information Here Update tracking number and date on this slide Template Master – Update Tracking.
Libby Dam June 2006 Spill: Total Dissolved Gas Monitoring.
CONSTRUCTION UPDATE Napa Plant Site Central Unit.
NAPA PLANT SITE RESTORATION PROJECT SOUTH UNIT BREACH 2010 Water Quality Monitoring.
A. Hangan, L. Vacariu, O. Cret, H. Hedesiu Technical University of Cluj-Napoca A Prototype for the Remote Monitoring of Water Parameters.
Expected Long Term Site Evolution of Alameda Creek and former Salt Ponds following Tidal Marsh Restoration Matt Wickland Philip.
TOPSAIL BEACH 30 Yr Beach Management Plan June 8, 2011.
1 Initial Investigation Red River of the North Floods March, April 2009 OHD Mike Smith, Victor Koren, Ziya Zhang, Naoki Mizukami, Brian Cosgrove, Zhengtao.
CE 3372 Water Systems Design
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration-- Challenges to Ecological Restoration.
Napa Plant Site Desalting Modeling Data Comparison November 17, 2010.
Napa Plant Site Desalting Modeling Summary November 10, 2009.
APPLICATION NO LEVEE DISTRICT No. 1 Of SUTTER COUNTY STAR BEND SETBACK LEVEE SUTTER COUNTY April 17, 2009.
Basin-Specific Feasibility Studies, ECP Basins Evaluation of Alternatives Basin-Specific Feasibility Studies, ECP Basins Evaluation of Alternatives August.
OREGON IDAHO WYOMING COLORADO NEVADA NEW MEXICO TEXAS UTAH ARIZONA CALIFORNIA Rene Vermeeren, P.E., D.WRE Chief, Hydrology and Hydraulics Branch Los Angeles.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
HydroEurope Final Presentation Pranav DHAWAN, Wooseok JANG, Kalpesh MALANI, Pablo SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ Clément LUCAS, Anna MSIGWA, Hakim OUERTANI, Malo LAMBERT.
Culler Lake Bathymetry: Potential Changes Following Dredging Spring 2013 Sampling Methods Class: J. Bruland, M. Dybala, N. Gunther, A. Hoffman, J. Jones,
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
STA 2 Expansion Project Conceptual Plan for Cell 4 STA 2 Expansion Project Conceptual Plan for Cell 4 Long-term Plan Communications Meeting November 18,
SCADA Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition Pantech Solutions Here is the key to learn more.
/ Vidy Bay hydrodynamics under different meteorological conditions
Placido Bayou 2 year update followed by 5 year alum budget
OPERATES SCADA OPERATION SYSTEM Explain the operational SCADA
Sinclair Wash Stream Restoration Feasibility Study
Ocean Systems 3.1 The oceans are a connected system. 3.2
Planning & Environmental Compliance HYDRAULIC MODELING UPDATE
Hydrological Information System
Paulding County, Georgia
In-Delta Storage Program
Water & Irrigation Control systems
CTC 261 Hydraulics Culvert Design Form
Culvert Hydraulics using the Culvert Design Form
Mid Atlantic Water Property Measurements W. S
Open water area Franks Tract
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Update to Loxahatchee River Coordinating Council
Ducks Unlimited conserves, manages, and restores wetlands and associated habitats for North America’s waterfowl. These habitats also benefit other wildlife.
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
In-Delta Storage Program
Presentation transcript:

Ponds 6, 7 & 8 Design Update Napa Sonoma Marsh Restoration Group Meeting USGS San Pablo Field Station Office, Building 505, Mare Island April 17, 2008

Presentation Schedule Project Design Overview Mixing Chamber Design Water Quality Sampling

50% Design Submitted April % Design Submitted February 2008 Waiting on USACE Input for Design Permitting Ongoing Schedule

Location Map

Ponds 6/6A Project Objectives Maximize Habitat for Shorebirds and Waterfowl Improve Management Flexibility Improve Levees

6A Donut 6 Donut POND 6A POND 6 CANAL NAPA SLOUGH CHINA SLOUGH DEVIL’S SLOUGH NAPA SLOUGH Abandon Siphon 48”Inlet/Outlet with Gate 2-36” Inlet/Outlet with Gates 4-36” Outfalls with Gates LITTLE ISLAND FARM ” Inlet/Outlet with Gates 48” Siphon ” Culverts with Gates ” Inlet/Outlet with Gates 48” Siphon

Upper Ponds Project Objectives Pond 7 Bittern Reduction in 8 years New Outfall to Napa Slough Demolish Siphon to Ponds 6/6A Improved Pond Management Flexibility

Mixing Chamber - General Setting Design Criteria for the Mixing Chamber are: Mixing chamber inflow of ambient ~ 14,000 afy Initial bittern release = 1% of Mixing chamber inflow = 140 afy Design to provide flexibility for future increase in bittern release Provide complete mixing

General Setting Pond 7A Pond 8 Pond 7 (Bittern) Mixing Chamber

CANAL FROM POND 8 INTERNAL LEVEE POND 7 POND 7A 36” WIDE SLUICE GATE POND 7/7A DONUT (MIXING CHAMBER) NEW CONTROL STRUCTURE INVERT AT 2.5 FT NEW 36” INLET WITH GATE INVERT AT 2.5 FT 2 NEW 36” CULVERTS WITH GATES INVERT AT 2.5 FT 2 NEW 48” OUTFALL WITH GATE INVERT AT 0 FT Design Schematic DREDGE CANAL TO EL. 0 FT 2 NEW 48” OUTFALL WITH GATES INVERT AT 0 FT DREDGE MIXING CHAMBER TO EL. 0 FT

Automated System Automated System was Selected: Highest Flexibility – given design uncertainties, provides flexibility for post-construction calibration and adjustments to meet field conditions Data collection & reporting capabilities Emergency notifications Standard gates available for future habitat pond management Less long-term infrastructure to demo

Level Sensor Flow Sensor Gate Actuator Water Quality DB Cables Control System Concept Mixing Chamber Terminal Building Power Communications Pond 7 Pond 7 Channel Pond 8 Channel Pond 7A

Mixing Power Requirement Elevation, z [m] Density,  [kg/m 3 ] zmzm z0z0 zbzb  ambient 1,010.6  fully-mixed 1,023.6  bittern 1,256.9 Fully-mixed density profile Stratified density profile Mixing chamber bathymetry Thickness of bittern layer The energy required to mix the water column completely depends on: Bittern and ambient water density difference Water depth in the Mixing Chamber

Mixing Power Available Available Power Power Required

Ponds 7, 7A, and 8: Water Quality Sampling  4 Monitoring Locations  Pollutants/Parameters  Pesticides/PCBs, volatile organics, semi-volatile organics, metals, mercury, chromium VI, hardness, turbidity  Field Measurements  Dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity, water temperature, tidal stage, weather  Sampling Schedule  Two sampling events: Spring and Fall 2008

Ponds 7, 7A, and 8: Monitoring Locations

Questions?

Terminal Building System Components in the Terminal Building Controller (PLC) – Gate control Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) – Data collection Batteries/Charger – Provides Power Radio/ Antenna – Offsite Data Communications Gate Control Master Panel – Local manual gate control Intrusion Sensors (Door Switch/Motion Sensors)

The hydraulic problem is… Pond 7 WSEL does not allow for continuous gravity flow into MC Pond 7A, Pond 8, and Mixing Chamber Pond 7 (Bittern)

The solution to the hydraulic issue Issue: Pond 7 WSEL Does Not Allow for Continuous Bittern Gravity Flow into MC Increase WSEL Lower WSEL Maintain Dilution Ratio

Maximum Allowable Water Surface Elevations in Pond 7 Top of Levee (7 – 9 ft NAVD88) Wave runup ( ft) Emergency (0.5 ft) Storage WSEL (4.7 ft NAVD88) LEVEE Freeboard (1 ft) Recommendations Target WSEL in P7 is 4.7 feet Target WSEL in the Mixing Chamber < 4.7 feet Pond Bottom (2-3 ft NAVD88)

Hydraulic simulation results MIKE 11 model run Alt02_Iter09.res11 Pond 7A Pond 7 Pond 8 Mixing Chamber Napa Slough