Presented by: Angela Benedict SRMT Air Quality Program Manager B REATHING, LIVING AND LEARNING IN THE AKWESASNE COMMUNITY : T OOLS TO IMPROVE INDOOR AIR QUALITY
Presentation Summary ◦ Environmental Justice Grant ◦ Goal ◦ Background ◦ Study Setup Results ◦ Lessons Learned
Environmental Justice Grant EPA-Regional 1 year with extension possible Very small grant ◦ $30K
Our Goal Create a healthy indoor environment for study participants through direct feedback, targeted interventions and education
Background SRMT has known indoor air quality (IAQ) problems due to: ◦ Wet and cold climate ◦ Nearby industry ◦ Traffic
Introduction People spend approximately 90% of time indoors ◦ 65% at home Indoor air pollution concentrations ◦ Strongly correlated with adverse health outcomes How to create a healthy indoor environment? ◦ Reduce indoor air pollution concentrations ◦ Find out the sources of air pollution
Experimental Design Air quality monitoring in 40 homes Pre-Intervention ◦ 12 days of baseline monitoring ◦ Pre-program questionnaire ◦ Diary Intervention ◦ In home intervention by Technician ◦ Mitigation strategies and educational materials Post-Intervention ◦ 12 days of monitoring with implemented mitigation strategies ◦ Exit surveys ◦ Direct feedback through Mango Database
Homeowner Diary
Monitoring AirAdvice Model 7100 Indoor Air Quality Monitor ◦ Data downloaded daily from AirAdvice online server Monitors records IAQ markers: ◦ Temperature ( o F) ◦ Relative Humidity (%) ◦ Carbon monoxide, CO (ppm) ◦ Particulate Matter, PM ( μ g/m 3 ) ◦ Volatile organic compounds, VOCs ( μ g/m 3 ) ◦ Carbon dioxide, CO 2, (ppm)
Monitoring Data Each participant got a report on their home data: ◦ Health PM, Chemicals and CO 2 ◦ Comfort Temperature & Relative Humidity ◦ Safety Carbon Monoxide
Monitoring Data
Direct Feedback
Intervention – Educational Materials and Incentives
Outreach Materials
Data Analysis Quantitatively associate logged activities from diary to concentrations of IAQ markers The following activities were found to cause an increase in the IAQ markers (CO, CO 2, PM, and VOCs) ◦ Cooking ◦ Smoking ◦ Biomass burning ◦ Cleaning (i.e. vacuuming, dusting, use of cleaning products) ◦ Candles, incense, aerosol products ◦ Occupancy (increased CO 2 levels) ◦ Fireworks (increased CO levels) ◦ Unidentifiable sources
Background Peak exposure Data Analysis – Measuring Cooking Exposure Integrated exposure Average exposure
Lessons Learned Completed by the end of Seskehko:wa/September 2014 ◦ Which mitigation techniques are most effective ◦ Exit surveys to improve the program
Acknowledgments Environmental Protection Agency Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe ◦ Julia Jacobs and Angela Benedict Clarkson University ◦ Dr. Andrea Ferro
Questions?