District Training Newport Independent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Next Generation Science Standards Intro to NGSS.
Advertisements

An Introduction to The Next Generation Science Standards
The Adventure Continues: Exploring the Next Generation Science Standards.
A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts and Core Ideas Board on Science Education July, 2012.
Developing Classroom Assessments for the NGSS What evidence of student thinking is needed to determine if a student has met a PE (performance expectation)?
Development of New Science Standards:
Oregon State Board of Education October 2012
1 Welcome back!. Vision for Science Teaching and Learning 2 View free PDF from The National Academies Press at *Will also be posted.
Seeing the Destination So We Can Direct Others to It
Crosscutting Concepts and Disciplinary Core Ideas February24, 2012 Heidi Schweingruber Deputy Director, Board on Science Education, NRC/NAS.
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
Who Am I? Hallie Booth – Special Education (K-12) – Science 6-8 (Gifted and Talented 6 th ) – Science Coach 6-12 – CTE LDC Coach 9-12 – Middle School LDC.
Supporting the CCSS in the Science Classroom through the Science and Engineering Practices of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) John Spiegel.
A Framework for K-12 Science Education Changes, Challenges, and Charges Summary created by: Fred Ende Regional Science Coordinator Putnam/Northern Westchester.
Literacy and the Next Generation Science Standards Kentucky Department of Education.
Common Core Mathematics, Common Core English/Language Arts, and Next Generation Science Standards. What’s the common thread?
KSTA Fall Conference November 2, 2013 Translating Current Lessons to Meet the Vision of the NGSS.
INTRODUCTION TO NGSS. Rate Your Familiarity with NGSS Choose one of the following that best describes your familiarity with the NGSS and explain your.
The Four Strands of Scientific Proficiency Students who understand science:  Know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world  Generate.
Engaging in Next Generation Science Standards. Amber Farthing Professional Learning and Program Assistance Coordinator, LASER Ellen Ebert Science Director,
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM NGSS Resources by CREATE for STEM Institute MSU licensed.
What is STEM? What is STEM?
Overview and Updates. Outcomes  Discuss the development process of the NGSS  Provide information regarding the NGSS and relationship to CCSS.
Next Generation Science Standards Paula Messina San Jose State University Science Education Program & Geology Department Achieve, Inc; Washington D.C.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP 1 Start recording—title slide—1 of 3 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards Originally presented by:
Science and Social Studies Teacher Leaders October 22, 2014 Twitter #grrecisln.
Chris DeWald Science Instructional Coordinator Montana Office of Public Instruction.
Next Generation Science Standards Quick Overview Analysis: Performance Expectations related to Climate Change Modified from a presentation by Paula Messina.
Developing the Next Generation Science Standards.
Update for TN State Board of Education July 24, 2013 Next Generation Science Standards for Today’s Students and Tomorrow’s Workforce.
Welcome to NGSS Base Camp. Learning Targets 2 1.Understand the NGSS development process & timeline 2.Describe the 3 dimensional nature of a performance.
Sustainability Education and the Next Generation Science Standards.
NGSS 103 Deepening Understanding of the Next Generation Science Standards K-12 Alliance We are all in the same room, but not in the same place 1.
NGSS and the Classroom What to Expect!. Instructional Shifts in the NGSS 1.Performance Expectations 2.Evidence of learning 3.Learning Progressions 4.Science.
Planning for Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) 1.
NGSS-Health Science August Connection to the Common Core.
NGSS Information and Updates ______________________________ Beechwood Independent PD
National Research Council Of the National Academies
Next Generation Science Standards –
The NRC Framework for K-12 Science Education and the Next Generation Science Standards Tom Keller, Senior Program Officer Board on Science Education National.
NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS (NGSS) Millard E. Lightburn (Ph.D.) Science Supervisor Ms. Mary Tweedy and Ms. Keisha Kidd Curriculum Support Specialists.
Click to edit Master title style Overview of the NGSS Framework.
The Basics About NGSS
STEM is gathering Steam!!!
1 Cathy Ezrailson, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Science Education, University of South Dakota.
Planning for Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) 1 Lesley Merritt, Science Specialist STEM Center for Math & Science Education-University of Arkansas.
Integration of practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. NGSS Architecture.
The case for scientific literacy? so pretty i never knew mars had a sun.
NGSS and Harding Township School Presented to the BOE on February 8, 2016 Dr. Michael Gervis Middle School Science Supervisor.
Science Education Collaborative.
A Vision for K-12 Science Education as Described in the Framework for K-12 Science Education and Next Generation Science Standards How is NGSS different.
Good Morning and Welcome NGSS KCAS for Science Overview Kevin Crump Science Instructional Specialist KDE
Nevada State Science Standards Revision: Why NGSS?
District and school leaders January 22 or March 4, 2016.
Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and Draft of New York State P-12 Science Learning Standards with a Focus on English Learners ELL Think Tank.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Welcome to the STEM Task Force Funding provided by:
Shifts in Science Education Testing, Standards, Curriculum, and Instruction Virginia Rhame, Science Specialist, NWAESC Lesley Merritt, Science Specialist,
 Continue to develop a common understanding of what STEM education is/could/should be here at Killip.
Carolyn A Hayes, Ed.D. NSTA President ( ) 1 Next Generation Science Standards.
Elementary Science Learning Academy CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH.
Module 1: Overview of the Framework for K–12 Science Education
Board on Science Education Draft released 15 July 2011
NGSS 101 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards for
Summer GeoSTEM Academy for Teachers
Key to Decoding NGSS NGSS = Next Generation Science Standards
NGSS Overview Bassett USD
Next Generation Science Standards March 14, 2013
Next Generation Science Standards
Maia Binding, SEPUP, Lawrence Hall of Science
NextGen STEM Teacher Preparation in WA State
Presentation transcript:

District Training Newport Independent

Rate Your Familiarity with NGSS Choose one of the following that best describes your familiarity with the NGSS and explain your choice: I know there are new science standards Know a little about them/I know they have different colored sections on the paper Read some of the framework/standards I have a real deep understanding of standards their meaning and the content taught I could lead a PD or group planning on the standards. Read the choices and decide which one best describes your knowledge level. Close your eyes and on the count of three, raise your hand and hold up the number of fingers that best represents your familiarity with the NGSS. P-12 MSOU of PIMSER

Facts and Myths About the NGSS Scientific and Engineering Practices Place an X next to the descriptions you think are correct. Which of your answers are you least sure about? Explain your thinking. Discuss with a partner. What other questions do you have? Remind to keep handy. Participants will be revisiting several times throughout the day. P-12 MSOU of PIMSER

A New Vision of Science Learning that Leads to a New Vision of Teaching The framework is designed to help realize a vision for education in the sciences and engineering in which students, over multiple years of school, actively engage in science and engineering practices and apply crosscutting concepts to deepen their understanding of the core ideas in these fields. A Framework for K-12 Science Education p. 1-2 P-12 MSOU of PIMSER

What’s Different about the Next Generation Science Standards?

Three Dimensions Intertwined The NGSS are written as Performance Expectations NGSS will require contextual application of the three dimensions by students. Focus is on how and why as well as what

Instructional Shifts in the NGSS Performance Expectations Evidence of learning Learning Progressions Science and Engineering Coherence of Science Instruction Connections within Science and between Common Core State Standards

“…students cannot fully understand scientific and engineering ideas without engaging in the practices of inquiry and the discourses by which such ideas are developed and refined. At the same time, they cannot learn or show competence in practices except in the context of specific content.” A Framework for K-12 Science Education, pg. 218 P-12 MSOU of PIMSER

Standards: Nexus of 3 Dimensions Not separate treatment of “content” and “inquiry” (No “Chapter 1”) Curriculum and instruction needs to do more than present and assess scientific ideas – they need to involve learners in using scientific practices to develop and apply the scientific ideas. Crosscutting Concepts Core Ideas Practices P-12 MSOU of PIMSER

Science and Engineering Practices Guiding Principles Students in K-12 should engage in all of the eight practices over each grade band. Practices grow in complexity and sophistication across the grades. Each practice may reflect science or engineering. Practices represent what students are expected to do, and are not teaching methods or curriculum. The eight practices are not separate; they intentionally overlap and interconnect. Performance expectations focus on some but not all capabilities associated with a practice. P-12 MSOU of PIMSER

Science and Engineering Practices 1. Asking questions (science) and defining problems (engineering) 2. Developing and using models Planning and carrying out investigations Analyzing and interpreting data 5. Using mathematics and computational thinking 6. Constructing explanations (science) and designing solutions (engineering) 7. Engaging in argument from evidence 8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information P-12 MSOU of PIMSER

Crosscutting Concepts Patterns Cause and effect Scale, proportion, and quantity Systems and system models Energy and matter Structure and function Stability and change Framework 4-1

Physical Sciences PS 1: Matter and Its Interactions PS 2: Motion and Stability PS 3: Energy PS 4: Waves and Their Applications An overarching goal for learning in the physical sciences, therefore, is to help students see that there are mechanisms of cause and effect in all systems and processes that can be understood through a common set of physical and chemical principles. The first three physical science core ideas answer two fundamental questions—“What is everything made of?” and “Why do things happen?”—that are not unlike questions that students themselves might ask. These core ideas can be applied to explain and predict a wide variety of phenomena that occur in people’s everyday lives, such as the evaporation of a puddle of water, the transmission of sound, the digital storage and transmission of information, the tarnishing of metals, and photosynthesis. We also introduce a fourth core idea: PS4: Waves and Their Applications in Technologies for Information Transfer—which introduces students to the ways in which advances in the physical sciences during the 20th century underlie all sophisticated technologies available today. The committee included this fourth idea to stress the interplay of physical science and technology, as well as to expand student’s understanding of light and sound as mechanisms of both energy transfer (see LS3) and transfer of information between objects that are not in contact. (Framework, p. 5-1)

Life Sciences LS 1: From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes LS 2: Ecosystems: Interactions, Energy, and Dynamics LS 3: Heredity: Inheritance and Variation of Traits LS 4: Biological Evolution: Unity and Diversity The life sciences focus on patterns, processes, and relationships of living organisms. Life is self-contained, self-sustaining, self replicating, and evolving, operating according to laws of the physical world, as well as genetic programming. Life scientists use observations, experiments, hypotheses, tests, models, theory and technology to explore how life works. The study of life ranges over scales from single molecules, through organisms and ecosystems, to the entire biosphere, that is all life on Earth. It examines processes that occur on time scales from the blink of an eye, to those that happen over billions of years. Living systems are interconnected and interacting. A core principle of the life sciences is that all organisms are related by evolution and that evolutionary processes have led to the tremendous diversity of the biosphere. There is diversity within species as well as between species. Yet what is learned about the function of a gene or a cell or process in one organism is relevant to other organisms because of their ecological interactions and evolutionary relatedness. Evolution and its underlying genetic mechanisms of inheritance and variability are key to understanding both the unity and the diversity of life on Earth. The first core idea, LS1: From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes, addresses how individual organisms are configured and how these structures function to support life, growth, behavior, and reproduction. The first core idea hinges on the unifying principle that cells are the basic unit of life. (Framework, p. 6-1) The second core idea, LS2: Ecosystems: Interactions, Energy, and Dynamics, explores organisms’ interactions with each other and their physical environment. This include show organisms obtain resources, how they change their environment, how changing environmental factors affect organisms and ecosystems, how social interactions and group behavior play out within and between species, and how these factors all combine to determine ecosystem functioning. The third core idea, LS3: Heredity: Inheritance and Variation of Traits across generations, focuses on the flow of genetic information between generations. This idea explains the mechanisms of genetic inheritance and describes the environmental and genetic causes of gene mutation and the alteration of gene expression. The fourth core idea, LS4: Biological Evolution: Unity and Diversity, explores “changes in the traits of populations of organisms over time” [1] and the factors that account for species’ unity and diversity alike. It examines how variation of genetically-determined traits in a population may give some members a reproductive advantage in a given environment. This natural selection can lead to adaptation, that is, to a distribution of traits in the population that is matched to and can change with environmental conditions. Such adaptations can eventually lead to the development of separate species in separated populations. (Framework, p. 6-2)

Earth and Space Sciences ESS 1: Earth’s Place in the Universe ESS 2: Earth Systems ESS 3: Earth and Human Activity Earth and space sciences (ESS) investigate processes that operate on Earth and also address its place in the solar system and the galaxy. Thus earth and space sciences involve phenomena that range in scale from the unimaginably large to the invisibly small. Earth consists of a set of systems—atmosphere, hydrosphere, geosphere, and biosphere—that are intricately interconnected. These systems have differing sources of energy, and matter cycles within and among them in multiple ways and on various time scales. In addition, Earth is part of a broader system—the solar system—which is itself a small part of one of the many galaxies in the universe. Earth’s Place in the Universe describes the universe as a whole and addresses its grand scale in both space and time. This idea includes the overall structure, composition, and history of the universe, the forces and processes by which the solar system operates, and Earth’s planetary history. Earth’s Systems encompasses the processes that drive Earth’s conditions and its continual evolution (i.e., change over time). It addresses the planet’s large-scale structure and composition, describes its individual systems, and explains how they are interrelated. It also focuses on the mechanisms driving Earth’s internal motions and on the vital role that water plays in all of the planet’s systems and surface processes. (Framework, p. 7-1) Earth and Human Activity, addresses society’s interactions with the planet. Connecting the earth and space sciences to the intimate scale of human life, this idea explains how Earth’s processes affect people through natural resources and natural hazards, and it describes as well some of the ways in which humanity in turn affects Earth’s processes (Framework, p. 7-1 & 2).

Engineering, Technology and Applications of Sciences ETS 1: Engineering Design ETS 2: Links Among Engineering, Technology, Science and Society Engineering Design: Although there is not yet broad agreement on the full set of core ideas in engineering [1], an emerging consensus is that design is a central practice of engineering; indeed, design is the focus of the vast majority of K-12 engineering curricula currently in use. The components of this core idea include understanding how engineering problems are defined and delimited, how models can be used to develop and refine possible solutions to a design problem, and what methods can be employed to optimize a design. Links Among Engineering, Technology, Science, and Society (ETS2): The applications of science knowledge and practices to engineering, as well as to such areas as medicine and agriculture, have contributed to the technologies and the systems that support them that serve people today. Insights gained from scientific discovery have altered the ways in which buildings, bridges, and cities are constructed; changed the operations of factories; led to new methods of generating and distributing energy; and created new modes of travel and communication. Scientific insights have informed methods of food production, waste disposal, and the diagnosis and treatment of disease. In other words, science-based, or science-improved, designs of technologies and systems affect the ways in which people interact with each other and with the environment, and thus these designs deeply influence society. In turn, society influences science and engineering. Societal decisions, which may shaped by a variety of economic, political, and cultural factors, establish goals and priorities for technologies’ improvement or replacement. (Framework, p. 8-1)

Coherent Science Instruction The framework is designed to help realize a vision for education in the sciences and engineering in which students, over multiple years of school, actively engage in scientific and engineering practices and apply crosscutting concepts to deepen their understanding of the core ideas in these fields. Framework pg. 8-9 Stress role of practices in deepening understanding. Practices must be taught throughout the year in context of the content. P-12 MSOU of PIMSER

Instruction Builds Toward PEs Performance Expectations

Implications NGSS Curriculum Instruction Assessment P-12 MSOU of PIMSER

How do I read this document?

Inside the NGSS Box Title and Code The titles of standard pages are not necessarily unique and may be reused at several different grade levels . The code, however, is a unique identifier for each set based on the grade level, content area, and topic it addresses. Performance Expectations A statement that combines practices, core ideas, and crosscutting concepts together to describe how students can show what they have learned. Clarification Statement A statement that supplies examples or additional clarification to the performance expectation. What is Assessed A collection of several performance expectations describing what students should be able to do to master this standard Assessment Boundary A statement that provides guidance about the scope of the performance expectation at a particular grade level. Engineering Connection (*) An asterisk indicates an engineering connection in the practice, core idea or crosscutting concept that supports the performance expectation. Scientific & Engineering Practices Activities that scientists and engineers engage in to either understand the world or solve a problem Foundation Box The practices, core disciplinary ideas, and crosscutting concepts from the Framework for K-12 Science Education that were used to form the performance expectations Disciplinary Core Ideas Concepts in science and engineering that have broad importance within and across disciplines as well as relevance in people’s lives. Crosscutting Concepts Ideas, such as Patterns and Cause and Effect, which are not specific to any one discipline but cut across them all. Connections to Engineering, Technology and Applications of Science These connections are drawn from the disciplinary core ideas for engineering, technology, and applications of science in the Framework. Connection Box Other standards in the Next Generation Science Standards or in the Common Core State Standards that are related to this standard Connections to Nature of Science Connections are listed in either the practices or the crosscutting connections section of the foundation box. Codes for Performance Expectations Codes designate the relevant performance expectation for an item in the foundation box and connection box. In the connections to common core, italics indicate a potential connection rather than a required prerequisite connection. Based on the January 2013 Draft of NGSS

Exploring a Performance Expectation Choose a PE for a concept you are least familiar with, but one that connects to a big idea in your current curriculum. Find the Disciplinary Core Idea (DCI) for that PE, and work your way through the NGSS to find the other connections in the TOP of the chart. If you finish one PE, try repeating the process for another PE. This is the AM activity.

Putting the PE into the classroom ____________________________ From the PE that you chose continue with the planning of instructional process by thinking of Clear Learning Targets

Clear Learning Target If the learning is unclear to you then You will not be able to make it clear to students. It will be unclear what to teach and how to assess. It could be interpreted different ways that could lead to significantly different learning experiences. Create learning targets that are inherent to the intent of the standard. Sometimes the benchmark or standard is stated in a manner that is clear and may only need to be categorized to determine which method should be used to assess the intended learning.

Cognitive Scaffolding and Targets Knowledge Reasoning Performance Skills Products

Types of Learning Targets Knowledge Reasoning Performance Skills Product What knowledge or understanding is required to become competent on this standard? What reasoning (if any) is required to be competent on this standard? What performance skills (if any) are required to demonstrate competence on this standard? What product competencies (if any) are required by this standard? Remember, not all standards have all of these as underpinnings and some standards may only need to be ‘classified’ to assist with assessing students’ learning. Explain, Know, Describe could be Knowledge or Reasoning – need to be crystal clear when using these verbs. “Understand” needs more clarity and should not stand alone.

Intent of Performance Expectation Knowledge Reasoning Intent of Performance Expectation Performance Skills Product Targets that collectively work together to develop the intent of the standard -

Initial Thoughts… Overall Goal: Knowledge Reasoning Performance/Skills Products Things I’m not clear on… Progression, Practices, Core Ideas, and Crosscutting Concepts CASL Chapter 3, page 64 and content resources Interdisciplinary Connections and other resources Performance Expectation: Final Thoughts… Knowledge Targets: Reasoning Targets: Performance/Skill Targets: Product Targets: I am clear about … References

Assessment Formative and Summative Instruction and assessment should be seamless and flowing. A teacher should know where the students stand prior to the summative assessment on a specific PE or Unit Topic before they summative is given….how….thru formative assessments.

Assessments should include all of the following: Science and Engineering Practices Disciplinary Core Ideas Crosscutting Concepts “The three dimensions of the Framework, which constitute the major conclusions of this report, are presented in separate chapters. However, in order to facilitate students’ learning, the dimensions must be woven together in standards, curricula, instruction, and assessments.” NRC Framework Pages 29 - 30 Using this section of the PPT we will introduce the three dimensions. 1- Now think about these dimensions, are they new? Do they look familiar? The science practices are similar but not exactly habits of mind from Science for all Americans and inquiry from NSES. It is import ant to note that is not just skills or not just knowledge but both and taken together. The book Taking Science to School provided a clear picture of Science Practices. 2. The Core Ideas are similar in many regards to the Benchmarks statements that are found in the AAAS documents. They are reduced and clarified, but still support the science concepts that are important. These include life, physical, earth and engineering concepts. 3. Crosscutting Concepts are not new they come from the NSES, Benchmarks and NAEP framework. The crosscutting concepts have application across all domains of science. As such, they provide one way of linking across the domains in Dimension 3. These crosscutting concepts are not unique to this report. They echo many of the unifying concepts and processes in the National Science Education Standards, the common themes in the Benchmarks for Science Literacy, and the unifying concepts in the Science College Board Standards for College Success. The framework’s structure also reflects discussions related to the NSTA Science Anchors project, which emphasized the need to consider not only disciplinary content but also the ideas and practices that cut across the science disciplines.

State Assessment So how will the state assess the KCAS Next Generation Standards?????? How can I be a part of the creation process????

How to create a Learning Experience/Assessment Reshaping the classroom and learning experience

3-D Model = Science Performance at the Intersection 3D Student Performances 1. Instruction 2. Assessment 3. Instructional Materials 4. Professional Development Science and Engineering Practices Crosscutting Concepts Disciplinary Core Ideas Professional development must model the instruction of the classroom. The 3-D expectation holds for the PD as well as classroom instruction.

Standards Based Education System Instruction Standards Assessments Classroom Assessments Curriculum Standards Teacher Observation of Students Assessments Accompanying Instructional Materials Skills The relationship of Standards to Assessment. The “Big Red Arrow” is the instruction that goes on in the classroom. SEC provides insight into this instruction. Math Language Arts Science State Level NRT and ELD Assessment

Gathering Reasoning Communicating (Moulding, 2012) Professional development must provide teachers with a way to engage student is all aspects of science. (Moulding, 2012)

Where do they go? Assign the eight Science and Engineering Practices to the appropriate category (categories?) independently. Discuss your placement decisions with a shoulder partner. Take note of any AH-HA moments, and questions you may have.

Gathering Reasoning Obtain Information Ask Questions/Define Problems Communicating Obtain Information Ask Questions/Define Problems Plan & Carry Out Investigations Use Models to Gather Data Use Mathematics & Computational Thinking Evaluate Information Analyze Data Use Mathematics and Computational Thinking Construct Explanations/Solve Problems Developing Arguments from Evidence Use Models to Predict & Develop Evidence Professional development must provide teachers with a way to engage student is all aspects of science. Communicate Information Using Argue from Evidence (written/oral) Use Models to Communicate (Moulding, 2012)

Crosscutting Concepts The Framework has identified seven key Crosscutting Concepts that serve a variety of purposes in science. This is one way to organize them for instruction. Cause and Effect Patterns Systems Scale Change and Stability Structure and Function Matter and Energy

Systems Causality Cause and Effect Patterns Scale and Proportion Stability and Change Matter and Energy Causality Cause and Effect Structure and Function Patterns

Science Performances Engaging Students in Science and Engineering Practices Using Core Ideas as evidence in Science Performances Clearly Defined and Meaningful Use of Crosscutting Concepts

Phenomena Defining Systems to Investigate Finding and Using Patterns as Evidence Determining Cause and Effect Relationships

A 3D instructional experience what does it look like and how do I develop one????

Performance Expectation Example 3-PS2-2. Make observations and/or measurements of an object’s motion to provide evidence that a pattern can be used to predict future motion. [Clarification Statement: Examples of motion with a predictable pattern could include a child swinging in a swing, a ball rolling back and forth in a bowl, and two children on a see-saw.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment does not include technical terms such as period and frequency.]

Deconstruct of Example Knowledge Explain that “patterns” describe a repeating characteristic, and give examples of patterns in the manmade or natural world. (Connection to Nature of Science: science findings are based on recognizing patterns.) Identify an observed and/or measured pattern, and explain the pattern. Recognize that “observations” and/or “measurements” are data that can support a claim. Reasoning or Skill Gather and analyze data to provide evidence for patterns of motion. Use mathematical reasoning to compare the motion of objects in order to identify a pattern. Explain how a pattern of motion can be used to predict other motion of an object under similar constraints.

What does this look like Look at the learning experience given.. What do you see that is different than a regular lesson plan? What perspective is the learning experience written from? How would learning targets link to the learning experience? How may PE’s does this cover? – and why?

Create your own Using the PE chosen before, the deconstruction statements you have created earlier…create your own learning experience Use the protocols to help guide you in evaluating if your learning experience is following the guidelines.

Developing your Learning Experience In grade/subject level groups of 2 or 3 Think of the PE you have chosen. On a separate sheet of paper note your favorite experience you would use to teach it. In your group come to an agreement on the topic you would all like to work on Use your deconstruction and PE to create a learning experience based on your favorite experience

Developing your Learning Experience Work in your groups and using the idea template (Gathering, Reasoning Communicating), create an experience for your students. All groups will share out to the other groups for feedback. There will be time for all to revise based on the group discussion.

Learning Experience Expectation Ideally…..Teachers/Instructional Leads will implement lesson idea before next meeting and bring back reflections.

Next Steps What is the next steps for the District and how will you “implement” a learning experience????