Setting Standards for Post-Disciplinary Oversight James R. Anliot Director of Healthcare Compliance Services Affiliated Monitors, Inc. ™ © All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Organizational Governance
Quality Management Branch Cady Clark, MSN, RN Branch Manager Claudia Himes-Crayton, BSN, RN Patricia Palm, MS, RNC Nurse Consultants.
Policies and Processes for Limiting Conflict of Interest Patrick N. Breysse, PhD, CIH Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Vice-Chair,
PRESENTATION ON MONDAY 7 TH AUGUST, 2006 BY SUDHIR VARMA FCA; CIA(USA) FOR THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS – INDIA, DELHI CHAPTER.
W. Richard Frederick Governance Consultant. 1. Is the board effective, passive, or dysfunctional? 2. Is the board composition good?  Skills, experience,
Corporate Governance Chapter 2.
Department of Computer Science Faculty of Science Research Methods Supervision.
Environmental Management System (EMS)
Core principles in the ASX CGC document. Which one do you think is the most important and least important? Presented by Casey Chan Ethics Governance &
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Role of and Duties of Plan Commission Members Ralph E. Booker.
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Lect. Victor-Octavian Müller, Ph.D.
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
Purpose of the Standards
Workers Compensation Commission Sian Leathem Registrar 29 September 2008.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
1 Committees of a Board. 2 Why Committees? To get impartial and professional input To get impartial and professional input Reduce work load for directors.
Module 4: Association Personnel – The Executive Director Presented by the Southern Early Childhood Association.
The Board’s Fiduciary Role Presenter Insert Name Insert Organization.
District 6200 Rotary Foundation Grant Management Seminar.
CORPORATE COMPLIANCE Tim Timmons Vice President Compliance and Regulatory Services Health Future, LLC.
Ethical And Legal Considerations Ethical Issues  Ethical codes are not set in stone. They serve as principles upon which to guide practice.  There are.
1 Copyright © 2011 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 8 Ethical Issues in Patient Care.
The Board of Directors Corporate Governance Chapter 4.
ISO 14001:2004, Environmental Management System
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. 1 Part Four: Implementing Business Ethics in a Global Economy Chapter 9: Managing and Controlling Ethics.
Implementing and Auditing Ethics Programs
Foundations of Effective Board Operation Nicole L. Mace Vermont School Boards Association.
Board of Directors and Governance
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
The Research Subject Advocate (RSA). Pictured, left to right: Andrea Saltzman, RN; Enrico Cagliero, MD; Debi Dunkless.
Care Management 101 Governor's Office of Health Care Reform October 28, 2010 Cathy Gorski, RN, BS, CCM.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz.
UMBC POLICY ON ESH MANAGEMENT & ENFORCEMENT UMBC Policy #VI
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
A.S. FlemingFall 2009 Acct 431 – Cost Management "Ethics in its broader sense, deals with human conduct in relation to what is morally good and bad, right.
Hospital Board of Directors “Best Practices” 2010 Joshua Liswood, Partner Miller Thomson, LLP January 12, 2010.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
1 Performance Management and Appraisal Chapter 9.
Guidance Training (F520) §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance.
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Company: Cincinnati Insurance Company Position: IT Governance Risk & Compliance Service Manager Location: Fairfield, OH About the Company : The Cincinnati.
MGT 461 Lecture #27 Project Execution and Control Ghazala Amin.
© 2011 Leaffer Law Donor-Advised Scholarship Funds: The Rhythm and Harmony of Donor Participation Karen Leaffer Becky Farr Seidel National Scholarship.
Theodore G. Lucas, JD, CPPO Director, Procurement & Contracts Division Sound Transit, Seattle, Washington Avoiding Even the Appearance of a Conflict of.
AFSA Chapter Officer Training Module 1 Officer Roles and Responsibilities.
0 Due Diligence Monitoring and Auditing of Third Party Vendors October 28, 2008 Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Compliance Congress and Best Practices Forum.
Selecting, Reviewing, and Supporting the Administrator Governing Board Online Training Module.
Governance, Risk and Ethics. 2 Section A: Governance and responsibility Section B: Internal control and review Section C: Identifying and assessing risk.
Protect Association Meeting FCA s166 Skilled Person Reviews 4 March 2016 Mark Davies Associate Director Financial Services Group T: E:
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
January 2009: PRS Template Presentation PRS for Music Code of Conduct.
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
Presenters: Promoting Regulatory Excellence Bruce G. Matthews Deputy Registrar Real Estate Council of Ontario Jim Anliot Director of Healthcare Compliance.
Nominations and Elections Process SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES.
1 Changes to Regulations Governing Personal Conflicts of Interest and Organizational Conflicts of Interest Breakout Session # C08 Name: Barbara S. Kinosky,
Chapter 5 ASX Guidelines for Listed Companies
Roles & Responsibilities of an Impressive Program Governance Plan
Well Trained International
The Role of Education/Special Education Decision Makers
Standards and Certification Training
Be Part of Governing your Community Hospital
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
Be Part of Governing your Community Hospital
Making Local Government a Participatory Sport
Nominations and Elections Process
Presentation transcript:

Setting Standards for Post-Disciplinary Oversight James R. Anliot Director of Healthcare Compliance Services Affiliated Monitors, Inc. ™ © All rights reserved. No copies or reproductions may be made without the express written consent of Affiliated Monitors, Inc. 1

The Challenges We Face Professional discipline is a balancing act What course best serves public interest ? Rising use of negotiated remedial outcomes Problems with current oversight models  Questions about impartiality, conflicts of interest  Board staff – do they have needed expertise?  Board members – recusal issues?  Licensee chooses monitor - quality of oversight?  Board review and approval – criteria for decision? 2

US Dept. of Justice Memorandum - Origins Increased use of settlements – DPAs & NPAs  Similar in many ways to Board consent orders  Both require ongoing oversight Increased concerns re: monitor neutrality Nine principles announced “Internal DOJ guidance only”, but ….. 3

US Dept of Justice Memorandum Principles 1 & 2 – Monitor Selection Criteria Monitor must be properly qualified  Parties should discuss needed skills beforehand  Necessary skills/expertise may vary with case Monitor must be impartial  No relationship with respondent if reasonable person would question impartiality  No relationship with respondent for one year after monitoring ends 4

US Dept of Justice Memorandum Principle 2 – Monitor Selection Process No one selection process preferred No unilateral choice by prosecutor Nominate three candidates for each case Use review committee to make selections 5

US Dept of Justice Memorandum Principles 3 and 4 – The Role of the Monitor Should be clearly defined Evaluate efforts to prevent recurrence of misconduct –Compliance with corrective action requirements? –Internal controls to prevent future problems? Does not “further punitive goals” Should be “no broader than is necessary to prevent recurrence of misconduct” 6

US Dept of Justice Memorandum Principles 5–9 - Reporting & Duration Need open communication with both parties Monitor provides periodic progress reports  Even-handed – reports positives and negatives  Identifies problems, makes recommendations Identify what monitor must report Allow “reasonable time “ to make changes Duration of monitoring  Factors to consider  Allow both extension and early termination 7

One Board’s Experience Massachusetts Criteria for selection – follows DOJ except  Bars relationships between monitor and respondent’s family  Board may allow respondent to employ monitor after monitoring ends Committed to use of external monitors Different selection process  Created roster of “pre-approved” monitors  Licensee submits 3 names from list – Board picks 8

Establishing Monitor Selection Criteria Define case objectives clearly Ensuring monitor is qualified  What skills are needed for this case?  Is specialized expertise needed? Ensuring impartiality and objectivity  What kinds of relationships with either party might reasonably impair neutrality?  Are potential future relationships between monitor and licensee okay? 9

Defining the Monitor Selection Process How is selection made?  Role of the parties (need agreement?)  Does licensee submit multiple candidates?  Role of the Board Should we create a “pre-approved” roster?  Is the roster open to companies/organizations?  May be helpful in avoiding negotiating problems 10

Define the Monitor’s Role and Responsibilities Be specific about what is to be evaluated Think carefully about scope and frequency  Sample size on record reviews  Frequency of visits? Frequency of reports? What must the monitor report? Effect of monitor’s recommendations  The value of mentoring  Timetable for implementation?  Effect of failure to implement? 11

Other Issues to Address Duration – consider both extension and early termination options Conflicts between monitor and respondent  Can respondent challenge the monitor’s findings?  What is Board’s role in resolving conflicts? Costs of monitoring – who pays? Protection of monitor and reports 12

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!! Affiliated Monitors, Inc.™ 111 Devonshire Street, Fourth Floor Post Office Box Boston, MA (866) All rights reserved. No copies or reproductions may be made without the express written consent of Affiliated Monitors, Inc. 13