Background—MOOS-IVP Objective The purpose of the project is to obtain proof of concept of autonomy. Our group has been tasked with developing the logic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Advertisements

Sophomore Design Class Automated Highway Simulation Group 2: Jeremy Sletten Patrick Murphy Michael Olson Randa Ibrahim.
Background—MOOS-IvP Objective The purpose of the project is to obtain proof of concept of autonomy. Our group has been tasked with developing the logic.
Autonomous Mapping Robot Jason Ogasian Jonathan Hayden Hiroshi Mita Worcester Polytechnic Institute Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor:
A UTONOMOUS T RACKING R OBOT Team 7 Victor Abreu Thomas Schreifer Brent Eisenmann Matthew Beutler Peng Xie Hisham Hassan Sponsor: ECE Department Faculty.
MCECS Guide Robot Project Project Update 5/23/2012.
Autonomous Metal Detector Vehicle (AMDV)
A.G.I.L.E Team Members: Brad Ramsey Derek Rodriguez Dane Wielgopolan Project Managers: Dr. Joel Schipper Dr. James Irwin Autonomously Guided Intelligent.
GPSBot 08- “Rikki” An Introduction. Agenda The Team Motivation Objectives Enabling Processes Sub-Systems Time-Line Budget Obstacles Continuation Applications.
Automatic Control & Systems Engineering Autonomous Systems Research Mini-UAV for Urban Environments Autonomous Control of Multi-UAV Platforms Future uninhabited.
FOLLOWER SENSORS AND ACTUATORS EE 552 INTSTRUCTOR :Dr MOHAN KRISNAN BY MOHAMMED KASHIF IQBAL ANESH BODDAPATTI UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY.
Field Navigational GPS Robot Final Presentation & Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Team GPS Rover Critical Design Review Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
Senior Project Design Review Remote Visual Surveillance Vehicle (RVSV) Manoj Bhambwani Tameka Thomas.
Team GPS Rover Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
GPS Robot Navigation Critical Design Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Autonomous Dual Navigation System Vehicle Dmitriy Bekker Sergei Kunsevich Computer Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology December 1, 2005 Advisor:
Patent Liability Analysis Andrew Loveless. Potential Patent Infringement Autonomous obstacle avoidance 7,587,260 – Autonomous navigation system and method.
Deon Blaauw Modular Robot Design University of Stellenbosch Department of Electric and Electronic Engineering.
Introduction to Robotics Electronics and Robotics Club.
1 ECE Department Thermal Mapping Drone Team 17 Jamyang Tenzin Stefan Totino Dylan Fallon Jason Fellow Advisor: Joseph Bardin.
Design and Implementation of Metallic Waste Collection Robot
June 12, 2001 Jeong-Su Han An Autonomous Vehicle for People with Motor Disabilities by G. Bourhis, O.Horn, O.Habert and A. Pruski Paper Review.
Automatic Directional Antenna Azimuth Controller Cezanne Camacho, Andrew Curtis, and Tyler Bowen Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington,
Autonomous Surface Navigation Platform Michael Baxter Angel Berrocal Brandon Groff.
Development of Control for Multiple Autonomous Surface Vehicles (ASV) Co-Leaders: Forrest Walen, Justyn Sterritt Team Members: Andrea Dargie, Paul Willis,
Ruslan Masinjila Aida Militaru.  Nature of the Problem  Our Solution: The Roaming Security Robot  Functionalities  General System View  System Design.
Smart Pathfinding Robot. The Trouble Quad Ozan Mindek Team Leader, Image Processing Tyson Mowery Packaging Specialist Jungwoo Seo Webmaster, Networking.
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS Department of Engineering Design AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER ROBOTIC LABORATORY Researchers : Dr. Asokan Thondiyath, Mr.
Mobile controlling robot. What is a Robot ? “A re-programmable, multifunctional manipulator designed to move material, parts, tools, or specialized devices.
MAE 435 Project Design and Management II 19 October,
Team: Justin Audley, Blake Brown, Christopher Dean, Andrew Russell, Andrew Saunders Advisor: Dr. Richard A. Messner Sponsors: Dr. Richard A. Messner, UNH.
Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI CI Kick-Off Meeting Devils Thumb Ranch, Colorado September 9-11, 2009 Autonomous Marine Sensing and Control Arjuna Balasuriya,
Swarm Robotics Indresh Yadav.
Hardware Sponsors National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
Phong Le (EE) Josh Haley (CPE) Brandon Reeves (EE) Jerard Jose (EE)
Autonomous Metal Detector Vehicle (AMDV) Jared Speer Lamar Williams Jr. Nathan Stephan University of Central Oklahoma Department of Engineering and Physics.
AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE Propulsion Vertical Thrust Controloverview The AUV Team Thrust Experiment Pool Testing The ultimate purpose of the AUV is.
Remote Controlled Submarine Students Osama Naji Abu-Omar Hakam Marwan Risheh Supervisor Dr. Luai Malhis An-Najah National University Computer Engineering.
1 Structure of Aalborg University Welcome to Aalborg University.
PropaGator Oral Report 3 Andrew Wegener IMDL 2012.
Joshua Petrohilos Supervisor: Nasser Asgari.  Bachelor of Engineering (Robotics)/Master of Engineering (Electronics)  My role: Electrical Design.
MSU SeaMATE ROV Explorer Class
Student Name USN NO Guide Name H.O.D Name Name Of The College & Dept.
Final Year Project(EPT4046) Development of an internet controlled Surveillance Mobile Robot By Mimi Madihah Bt Mohd Idris Id: BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING.
Software Narrative Autonomous Targeting Vehicle (ATV) Daniel Barrett Sebastian Hening Sandunmalee Abeyratne Anthony Myers.
Heterogeneous Teams of Modular Robots for Mapping and Exploration by Grabowski et. al.
BLDC Motor Speed Control with RPM Display. Introduction BLDC Motor Speed Control with RPM Display  The main objective of this.
UNH FIREFIGHTING ROBOT Ryan Morin, Craig Shurtleff, Andrew Levenbaum, Stephen Tobin, and Liam O’Connor University of New Hampshire: College of Engineering.
Autonomous Wheelchair Tyler Morton & Ben Hoerst Senior Design Advisor: Dr. Stanislaw Legowski Project Advisor: Dr. Steven Barrett ECE Senior Design.
Wireless Bluetooth Controller For DC Motor. Introduction Wireless becoming more and more available and widely used Bluetooth is one of the major players.
INSTRUMENT CONTROLLED MICROSCOPY Mason Jellings, Justin Gearing, Sarah Reichert, John Byce Client: Dr. Joshua Medow Advisor: Professor Thomas Yen Introduction.
The entire system was tested in a small swimming pool. The fully constructed submarine is shown in Fig. 14. The only hardware that was not on the submarine.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Mechatronics Hydrophobe Josh Pritts – Vice President /EE Team Leader.
E8: Digital Humans Option E AHL: Human Factors Design IB Technology.
Components of Mechatronic Systems AUE 425 Week 2 Kerem ALTUN October 3, 2016.
Metal Detector Robotic Vehicle
Autonomous Surface Vehicle
Data Processing & Controls
‘SONAR’ using Arduino & ultrasonic distance sensor
Balanduino Supervisor: Dr. Raed Al-Qadi Prepared by: Nadeen Kalboneh Nardeen Mabrouk.
Autonomous Targeting Vehicle (ATV)
Rudra Timsina Micah Lucas Marc Salas Advisor: Richard Messner
TMR4225 Marine Operations, ROV systems:
Tablesat iid Kavin Kang, Matthew Coronis,
Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV)
Microcontroller Sensors in Automobile and Aerospace Technologies
Presentation transcript:

Background—MOOS-IVP Objective The purpose of the project is to obtain proof of concept of autonomy. Our group has been tasked with developing the logic necessary that is flexible enough to be installed on a range of surface vehicles. The logic must be implemented such that it is able to perform three main tasks: Obstacle Avoidance Track & Trail Travel from a waypoint to a specified end point The prototype will have the ability to know where it is at all times and arrive at its specified destination while avoiding obstacles. Autonomous surface vehicles (ASV) are extremely useful for both military and civilian purposes. ASVs can be used for a wide variety of tasks in which human operation is either inefficient and/or too dangerous, including: Ocean Mapping Surveillance Search and Rescue Background—ASV Figure 1: Example of an ASV ocean floor mapping. This same method can also be used for search and rescue. Figure 2: Example of an ASV completing track and trail with an underwater ROV (Remotely Operated Vehicle) that is mapping the ocean floor. MOOS-IvP is equipped with tools to aid in development as well as mission deployment. One is the pMarineViewer, which gives a graphical representation of the current state of a particular mission, displays a variety data that is being used within MOOS-IvP, and allows control over the mission through programmable buttons. Figure 3 shows this in motion. Arduino Serial Ultrasonic Sensors Ultrasonic Sensors IMU Figure 3: The built-in MOOS-IvP graphical mission viewer (pMarineViewer) running a simulation of a track and trail mission. MOOS-IVP Communication The payload autonomy interface is a MOOSApp which subscribes to MOOSDB variables that are published by the IvP Helm. It then forwards this data to the Arduino over the USB serial connection, with its schematic shown in Figure 4. At the same time, the interface reads in sensor data sent from the Arduino and forwards this data to the MOOSDB to be read by the IvP Helm. Data that is sent to the Arduino, includes desired heading and speed. Data can then be sent back from the Arduino in the form of position, actual heading and speed, and detected obstacle data. Figure 4: Diagram displaying the map of the communication between the onboard computer and the feedback system of sensors. Autonomous Surface Vehicle Andrew D’Amore, Kristin Therrien, Tom Conway, Billy Lerner—Mechanical Engineering Mike Bogochow, Jeffery Masucci, Cody Noel—Computer Science Graduate Advisors: Damian Manda, Firat Eren Advisor: Professor May-Win Thein Hull Construction The ASV was chosen to be built instead of purchased due to specific size requirements and the need for accessibility. The hull of the ASV has been crafted from fiberglass for durability and strength. This provides a light-weight body to allow easy maneuverability. The dual-motor, dual rudder assembly was chosen to provide sufficient power and precise control for the ASV. A latch was constructed for the top of the hull out of plexiglass and clamps. To prevent the possibility of water leaking into the boat, a foam sealant was used to seal the latch top. This assembly can easily be removed to access and update the interior electronics. Figure 5: (Left) Three-step process of modeling and construction of the hull for the prototype. (Middle) Two DC Brushless motor setup with corresponding Encoder. (Right) Two 120A ESC (Electronic Speed Controller) with their corresponding 22.2V Hyperion Batteries. Feedback System By its nature, autonomy requires a precise feedback system to function efficiently. The feedback system constantly relays environmental and internal information back to the onboard computer (with autonomy installed) such that the autonomy can make accurate decisions. Visual Feedback System—Playstation®Eye Used to detect object of known diameter to determine distance and orientation from said object Essential for Track & Trail capability Sonic Feedback System—Ultrasonic Proximity Sensor 3m range pinging capabilities Used to detect obstacles in 30° field of view Heading Feedback System—9 Degrees of Freedom Razor IMU Triple-axis digital-output gyroscope 13-bit resolution, ±16g, triple-axis accelerometer Triple-axis, digital magnetometer RPM Feedback System—PT series ServoTek Hollow Encoder Used to control the speed of the ASV 30 Pulse, 15V The Prototype Special Thanks The group would like to acknowledge Sheldon Parent, Paul Lavoie, Scott Cambell, Mike Conway, and James Abare for allowing us to use their facilities and helping us with various construction tasks. Additional thanks to the UNH NASA MMS QuadSatC team for developing the visual recognition program. We’d also like to thank Tracey Harvey and Jenn Bedsole for their valuable input on our project.