Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Advertisements

SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 1: Introduction to Student Growth Measures and SLOs.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 7: Preparing for My Mid-Year Conversation.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 5: Reflecting and Adjusting.
LDC Lessons Learned The Coaching Perspective. Lessons Learned Teachers need to know what supports are available and R- group space is a great place to.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Module 1: System Overview, Expectations, and Goal Setting.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
The Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Summer Institutes 2013 Change Teacher Practice Change Student Outcomes.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 3: Observation and Feedback January 8 th, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 1: Model Overview 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 5: Engaging Students in Rigorous Learning Winter, 2014.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning March 2009 Assessment Critiquing.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Copyright © 2008 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of.
Curricular Resources Unit Plans. Outcomes Participants will : understand the big picture connection between the SVVSD Teaching and Learning Cycle and.
OTES AND TESTING AND BEARS… OH MY!!! WHAT IS HAPPENI NG?
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Data Teams. Data Teams in Action Medical/Education connections Double Entry Journal MVP – Most Valuable Point Explain one MVP with a partner and then.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. FOUNDATIONS OF STUDENT GROWTH GOAL SETTING: DETERMINING STUDENT NEEDS SETTING A BASELINE What do my students.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 3: Observation and Feedback.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
06.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 6 18 NOVEMBER 2015 PUMP UP THE VOLUME.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
WELCOME! DATA TEAM COACH TRAINING  Review the PLC Process, Roles and Expectations  Provide an opportunity for questions and possible responses.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
GALLATIN COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL ADVANCED ED. REPORT Team Leader: Karen Maxell 3.1 Team Captain: Michelle Cravens 3.2 Team Captain: Brandon Brockman 3.3 Team.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
North Carolina Mentor Training Standards 4 and 5 A Lifeline for North Carolina’s Beginning Teachers.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Bringing the 4 PLC Questions to Life
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013

 Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric  Module 2: Student Learning Objectives  Module 3: Observation and Feedback  Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting The fourth module supports participants in the use of the MSFE TEPG Rubric, evidence, and student data to monitor progress toward professional goals. Participants will revisit their professional goals, check in on student progress, and collaboratively determine appropriate midcourse adjustments to their practice.  Module 5: Engaging Students in Rigorous Learning  Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting 2

 Welcome (5 minutes) Intended Outcomes  Connecting (25 minutes) Gallery Walk  Learning (1 hour, 30 minutes) Teacher Interview Putting the Steps Into Practice  Implementing (30 minutes) Starting With Your Students  Reflecting and Wrap-Up (30 minutes) Planning for the Midcourse Check-In Agenda 3

Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will know and be able to  Use the MSFE TEPG Rubric to self-assess progress thus far and prepare for the midcourse check-in meeting.  Reflect on progress toward achieving goals using a range of evidence.  Develop an appropriate and actionable plan for making midcourse adjustments to practice to stay on track for achieving goals. 4

 Core Proposition 4: Teachers think systematically about their practices and learn from their experience. 4a: Adjustment to Instructional Plans. The teacher continually reflects on his/her instructional decision making and modifies instructional approaches and interactions, making decisions based on student learning needs and best practices. 4b: Continuous Professional Growth. The teacher uses educational research and feedback from others to identify and pursue professional development opportunities that facilitate relevant and appropriate professional growth. (Note: 4b is one of MSD’s focus areas for teacher led evidence collection) Core Propositions and Standard Indicators 5

Connecting 25 minutes 6

The Four-Step Evaluation Cycle in Action 7

 Count off by threes.  Move to the chart paper with your numbered question.  Spend five minutes discussing the questions with your peers and record your responses. Questions: 1.What have you learned about your practice as a result of getting feedback? 2.What evidence have you collected so far on elements of the TEPG Rubric? You may have recorded this evidence on Form 3. 3.How, if at all, have you participated in peer observation so far this year, either as an observer or as the teacher observed? 4.If you have not formally experienced these aspects of the evaluation cycle yet, then what have you noticed informally about your practice and the practice of your peers this year? Connecting Activity: Gallery Walk 8

Learning 1 hour, 30 minutes 9

 Reflecting is an important part of the continuous- improvement process.  The middle of the evaluation cycle is a good time to reflect on progress toward goals.  Reflection can Inform midcourse corrections Help identify necessary professional development Inform goal-setting next year Learning Content 1: Tools and Strategies for Reflecting 10

 Count off by fours.  On the Teacher Interview handout, mark off the interview question with your number.  Take seven minutes and interview at least two other teachers with your question, recording your responses on the handout.  Interview questions 1.How do you reflect on your teaching practice, daily or weekly? 2.How do you reflect on your teaching practice, after each unit or over the summer? 3.How do you build time into your schedule for reflection? 4.How does your team (PLC, grade level, or subject area) reflect on its practice? Learning Activity 1: Teacher Interview 11

 Step 1: Consider the feedback you have received so far during the evaluation cycle on the TEPG Rubric.  Step 2: Consider your progress toward your professional goal and identify the changes in instruction that need to take place to ensure you are on track to meet your goal.  Step 3: Review student learning data.  Step 4: Consider where students are in relation to their SLO growth targets and identify the changes in instruction that need to take place to ensure students are progressing toward their targets.  Step 5: Prepare for your midcourse review (if it occurs in your district). Learning Content 2: Using Data and Feedback to Reflect 12

 Take a look at Teacher Smith’s Midcourse Reflection. Evidence collected related to teacher evaluation so far this year Student progress toward SLO Remembering Teacher Smith 13

 Focus on Steps 1 and 2 of the Midcourse Reflection handout. Consider the feedback you have received so far regarding the Rubric Consider your progress toward meeting your professional practice goal Identify changes in instruction that need to take place to ensure that you meet your goal.  Work with a partner if you would like.  Use the TEPG Rubric and feedback you have received on your evaluation thus far.  Identify action steps for adjusting practice to ensure you are on track to meet your professional practice goal. Learning Activity 2: Putting the Steps Into Practice 14

 Use a sticky note to vote on the following question: How confident are you that you will achieve your professional practice goal?  Respond by putting your sticky note along the 10-point confidence scale. Learning Wrap-Up 2: Taking the Temperature 15

Implementing 30 minutes 16

 Focus on Steps 3 and 4 of the Midcourse Reflection handout. Reviewing student learning data Considering how close students are to meeting their targets on your SLO – Identify changes in instruction that need to take place to ensure students are progressing toward their targets  Work in grade level or subject area teams to identify sources of data on student progress toward meeting SLO targets. Implementing Activity: Starting with Your Students 17

 Identify the changes in instruction that need to take place to ensure students are progressing toward their targets. What instructional strategies have you used? What other strategies could you consider using? Implementing Activity: Starting with Your Students 18 Percentage Range of Students Who Met Their Growth Targets SLO Score 85–100%4 71–84%3 41–70%2 0–40%1

Reflecting and Wrap-Up 30 minutes 19

 To prepare for your midcourse check-in meeting, review the evidence you have summarized in Step 5. You may want to use this time to record evidence on Form 3 that was previously not recorded.  Discuss your responses with a partner at your table. Reflecting Activity: Planning for the Midcourse Check-In 20

In Module 5 we will focus on student engagement: Please come ready with a list or folder of the tools or strategies you use that best engage your students, which you will use in Module 5. Assignment 21