History and Impact of Standards for Technological Literacy Revising Standards for Technological Literacy – Content for the Study of Technology: Issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consider the past and you shall know the future!
Advertisements

Marylands Technology Education Voluntary State Curriculum 2007 Bob Gray Center for the Teaching of Technology & Science (ITEA-CATTS) and the University.
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
A Report on the National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council Committee Two Year Study Rollie Otto, Panelist February 18 and 19 Sacramento.
The Perspective of Technology Education
THE OVERLOOKED STEM IMPERATIVES: TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING
Standards for Technological Literacy (ITEA) and National Educational Technology Standards (ISTE): Compare and Contrast Standards for Technological Literacy.
Professional Development Standards William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany.
Student Assessment Standards
NAIT 2001: Integrated Manufacturing Systems 1 Ernest B. Ezell,Jr., Associate Professor and John W. Sinn, Professor Bowling Green State University College.
CCTC Background Process coordinated by NASDCTEc 42 states, DC, and one territory involved in development Modeled the process and outcomes of Common Core.
Chronology of the History and Social Science Standards of Learning.
8 1Source: Development of the Next Generation Science Standards Stephen Pruitt, Ph.D., Vice President, Content and Policy Research; Science.
Emeritus Professor, Virginia Tech
The Standards-based Educational System in the United States
1 ITEA Presentation of STANDARDS FOR TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY William E. Dugger Jr., DTE Pam B. Newberry September, 2000.
A 2009 Report on Technology Education in the United States International Conference on Technology Education in the Asia Pacific Region Taipei Taiwan -
VALLEY CITY TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION INNOVATION & ENGINEERING DESIGN UNIT 4 Task #1&2 ENGINEERING DESIGN This material is based upon work supported by the.
At the High School level HS&T Ag T&T IT, T&T T&T The Content areas from STL are already covered by the following ATE areas. –Medical Technologies –Agricultural.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
How Standards Interface with Curriculum and Instruction in Technology Technology Education for the 21st Century: Bridging Theory and Practice Palestine,
Setting Higher Standards for Our Discipline AIAA/ITEA/ITEEA’s 75th Anniversary Columbus, Ohio March 8, 2013 Dr. William E. Dugger.
Barrington 220 Parent University Welcome!. Statistics from National Research Council & the National Academies Rising Above the Gathering Storm In 2009,
1 Oregon Content Standards Evaluation Project, Contract Amendment Phase: Preliminary Findings Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz WestEd November 6, 2007.
EngageNY.org NYSCEA Presentation Friday, March 1, 2013.
Standards for Education and Rehabilitation of Students who are Blind and Visually Impaired A general overview of accepted standards for Teachers of the.
The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics Dr. Robinson, EEX 4251, Spring 2008.
A Framework for K-12 Science Education Changes, Challenges, and Charges Summary created by: Fred Ende Regional Science Coordinator Putnam/Northern Westchester.
Maryland’s Engineering byDesign ™ Advanced Design Applications Supervisor Meeting Baltimore, Maryland January 9, 2007.
THE POWER AND PROMISE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION Kendall N. Starkweather, Ph.D. International Technology & Engineering Educators Association.
Applied Educational Systems ( or ) Explorations and Foundations in Technology tech center 21 Explorations and Foundations in Technology.
Frameworks and Standards and Benchmarks…. Science Education Reform: A Brief History.
Development and Publication Investigating Earth Systems.
HCPSS NEW TEACHER ORIENTATION TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING EDUCATION.
The Federal Government
Building 21 st Century Skills with ICTs What does it mean? GEORGE SCHARFFENBERGER 6 September 2006.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
Program Standards William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany.
William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany The Complete Picture STL and AETL.
Building a Skilled and Competitive Workforce: By Hans Meeder Montana’s Strategic Direction for Career and Technical Education.
Unit 1 The Nature of Technology Chapter 1 Why Study Technology?
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
What is a 21st Century Learner?
SESSION 2.1 PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT TASKS IN GET GRADES R-9.
1 Draft Content Standards for K-12 Science First Reading Helen Maguire, Cheryl Kleckner Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department.
Technological Literacy For All Students. Manual Training: 1870’s Manual Arts: 1890’s Industrial Arts: early 1900’s to 1990’s Technology Education: Mid.
Common Core State Standards A Brief Overview for Staff Members of Public Schools of Petoskey September 2011.
International Technology Education Association Gallup Poll on What Americans Think About Technology March, 2002.
William E. Dugger, Jr. ICITE-SD-2015-November,6-7, 2015
THE OVERLOOKED STEM IMPERATIVES: TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING Presentations given at the United States Department of Education Regional Mathematics and Science.
What is Technology? Broadly speaking, technology is how people modify the natural world to suit their own purposes. From the Greek word techne, meaning.
Technological Literacy For All Students. Technology Shapes Our Lives We are all doing things we never imagined We are absolutely “hooked” on technology.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
Cary Sneider, Portland State University “Engineering Education in 2011 and Beyond”
Evolution of STEM in the U.S. 6 th BIENNIAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION RESEARCH December 8 to 11, 2010 **************** William E.
The case for scientific literacy? so pretty i never knew mars had a sun.
Science Education Collaborative.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
1 Oregon’s Content Standards Revision Process Oregon State Board of Education October 2008.
Better or Not…Here They Come Ohio’s Encounter with the Common Core & Revised Standards.
Internationalizing the Technology Education Curriculum Dr. Edward M. Reeve Professor Utah State University.
A K-12 Engineering Model Based Upon the Standards for Technological Literacy Kendall N. Starkweather, Ph.D. Executive Director/CEO International Technology.
Mapping Dimensions of Technological Literacy to the Content Standards Dr. Larry Hatch Department of Visual Communication and Technology Education Bowling.
Interpretation Workshop Notes
William E. Dugger, Jr. ICITE-SD-2015-November,6-7, 2015
At Keene Middle School Jan. 10, 2013
Technological Literacy For All Students
Creativity and Innovation in STEM Education
Oregon’s Content Standards Revision Process
Technological Literacy For All Students
Presentation transcript:

History and Impact of Standards for Technological Literacy Revising Standards for Technological Literacy – Content for the Study of Technology: Issues and Recommendations NAE, Washington, DC - November 19, 2010

Overview of Presentation  Background to Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (ITEA, 2000, 2002, 2007) (STL)  Overview of STL  Impacts/Results of STL

Background:  Technology for All Americans and ITEA  Funded by NSF and NASA

Background:  Three phases of Project  Rationale and Structure of the Study of Technology (ITEA, 1996 and revised in 2006)  Standards for Technological Literacy, Content for the Study of Technology (STL) (ITEA, 2000, 2002, 2007)  Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy, Student Assessment, Professional Development, and Program Standards (AETL) (ITEA, 2003)

Background (Continued):  Advisory Committee  NAE Provided Substantial Input to STL  NAE Focus Group  Formal Review of STL by NRC  NAE STL Review Committee  NAE Special Review Committee  NRC Technical Review Panel * Approximately 4,000 people reviewed STL * Leaders from 21 International Countries Reviewed STL

Standards for Technological Literacy (STL)(ITEA, 2000,2002/2007) presents the content for what every student should know and be able to do in order to be technologically literate. STL

Standards:  STL Standards are 20 written statements about what is valued that can be used for making a judgment of quality.  Standards represent fundamental concepts.  The goal for students is to meet all of the standards from Grades K-12.  STL Standards were written around five major organizers or categories.

The Five Major Organizers (Categories) in STL  The Nature of Technology (3 Standards)  Technology and Society (4 Standards)  Design (3 Standards)  Abilities for a Technological World (3 Standards)  The Designed World (7 Standards)

Nature of Technology (3 Stds.)  Students will develop an understanding of the:  characteristics and scope of technology.  core concepts of technology.  relationships among technologies and the connection between technology and other fields of study.

Technology and Society: (4 Stds.)  Students will develop an understanding of the:  cultural, social, economic, and political effects of technology.  effects of technology on the environment.  role of society in the development and use of technology.  influence of technology on history.

Design (3 Stds.)  Students will develop an understanding of the:  attributes of design.  engineering design.  role of troubleshooting, research and development, invention and innovation, and experimentation in problem solving.

Abilities for a Technological World: 3 Stds.)  Students will develop the abilities to:  apply the design process.  use and maintain technological products and systems.  assess the impact of products and systems.

The Designed World (7 Stds.)  Students will develop an understanding of and be able to select and use:  medical technologies.  agricultural and related biotechnologies.  energy and power technologies.  information and communication technologies.  transportation technologies.  manufacturing technologies.  construction technologies.

Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development, and Program Standards (AETL)(ITEA,2003)  AETL is based on STL & provides the means for implementing STL in K-12.  AETLcontains three separate but interrelated sets of standards.  Student Assessment  Professional Development  Program

Other accomplishments in Phase 3  Four Addenda developed  (Student Assessment, Programs, Professional Development, & Curriculum Development)  ITEA/Gallup Polls ( ations/TAA_Publications.html)

ITEEA’s Engineering byDesign™?

Impacts/Results of STL  Used in 41 States  Primary document used in NCATE Accreditation Guidelines for teacher education programs in U. S.  Council of Technology Teacher Education (CTTE) 2002 Yearbook based on STL

Impacts/Results of STL (Cont.)  First document in the profession that provided content for what every student in grades K-12 should know and be able to do to be technologically literate.  Used as a significant reference document in the 2014 NAEP Framework for Assessment in Technology and Engineering Literacy. (Section 1 & 2)  Translated into five international languages (Japanese, German, Finnish, Chinese, and Estonian)

Impacts/Results of STL (Cont.)  Misunderstanding about the true meaning of Technology  ITEA/Gallup Polls (2001 & 2004) found that the American public think that science and technology are the same.  Also, two-thirds of the public in the ITEA/Gallup Polls defined technology narrowly as being computers and the internet.  Confusion today about technology as being just information and communication technology (ICT)

Impacts/Results of STL (Cont.)  STL uses the following terms:  Mathematics – over 50 times  Science – over 60 times  Engineering – over 150 times  STL has strong ties philosophically with Benchmarks for Science Literacy (AAAS, 1993) and The National Science Education Standards (NRC,1996)  In the time period when STL was being developed, this was before engineering began formal thinking about what they should be doing in grades K-12

Summary  Background  Overview of STL  Impacts and Resultsof STL

Thank you!