1. The Standards-based Educational System in the United States
International Conference on Technology Education
in the
Pacific Rim Countries, Nagoya, Japan
November 3, 2011
William E. Dugger, Jr.
Emeritus Professor, Virginia Tech
&
Senior Fellow, International Technology and Engineering Educators Association

2. Outline of Presentation
1) Who is responsible for education in the U. S.?
2) Importance of Standards
3) Pros and Cons of Standards
4) History and evolution of standards
5) Standards for technological literacy
6) Some current efforts impacting standards in the U. S.
a) Framework for K-12 Science Standards
b) Common Core State Standards
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
7) Impact of Standards in the U. S.

3. The Constitution of the United States grants the Federal Government no authority over Education, the 10th Amendment applies:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

4. Importance of Standards in U. S.
In a recent survey of policy makers, standards were acknowledged as the central framework guiding state education policy.*
* Massell, D. (2008) The current status and role of standards-based reform in the United States. Washington, DC: A Paper prepared for a National Research Council Workshop on Assessing the Role of K-12 Academic Standards in the States.

5. What is a standard?
A standard is a written statement or statements about what is valued that can be used for making a judgment of quality.
(ITEA/ITEEA, Standards for Technological Literacy, 2000,2002,2007)

6. Why are Standards Important?*
Standards are guideposts for schools. Teachers, parents and students use them as a tool to focus on what students are expected to learn in each grade and each subject.
These standards become the basis for the way teachers are trained, what they teach and what is on state standardized tests that students take.
For example, a first-grade math standard may state that by the end of first grade students are expected to count by 2s, 5s and 10s to 100.
*GreatSchools, Inc. <

7. The Pros of Having Standards*
National standards would raise the level of expectations for all.
National standards would assure that all American students meet international levels of achievement.
National standards would make it easier for students to adjust to a new school when they move from one state to another. *

8. The Cons of Having Standards*
Education has traditionally been a right of the states. The United States has a long history of "local control" of schools that would be hard to change.
National standards would create a one-size-fits-all framework. The needs within each state are different. National standards would not take into account the cultural and geographical diversity of our country.
National standards would discourage innovation and creativity in the classroom. *

9. Types of Standards ➽Content Standards: ➽Performance Standards:
Subject–matter descriptions of what students should know and be able to do.
➽Performance Standards:
Concrete examples and explicit definitions of what students have to know and be able to do to demonstrate proficiency in the skills and knowledge outlined by the content standards (more like passing scores on a test).

10. Three Essential Ingredients in the Educational Process
(Standards)
Content
Assessment
Curriculum

11. Standards-based education reform has more than 20 year history in U. S.
1994 – Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) enacted a standards-based vision into federal law (Clinton administration).
2001 – No Child Left Behind Act (Bush (administration) (Revised in 2007)
2010 – Proposal to modify No Child Left Behind to raise academic standards by linking them to state standards and benchmarks in reading and mathematics (Obama Administration).

12. Evolution of Educational Standards in the U. S.
Standards for Industrial Arts Curriculum Project (Virginia Tech, 1980, funded by U. S. Department of Education).
Discontent with education in early 1980’s
“A Nation at Risk Report” (U. S. Department of Education, 1983).
Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989)(Revised in 2000 as Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.
Benchmarks for Science Literacy (American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993).
National Science Education Standards (National Research Council, 1996)(Currently under revision)
Others (English/Language arts, History, Art, Geography, Music, Etc.)

13. Evolution of Educational Standards in the U. S. (Continued)
Technological Literacy for All Americans: A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology (ITEA/ITEEA, 1996)(Revised in 2006 as Technological Literacy for All: A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology).
Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (ITEA/ITEEA, 2000, 2002, 2007)
Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy (ITEA/ITEEA, 2003)
Addenda to STL and AETL:
Measuring Progress: Assessing Students in Technological Literacy (ITEA/ITEEA, 2004).
Realizing Excellence: Structuring Technology Programs (ITEA/ITEEA, 2005).
Planning Learning: Developing Technology Curricular (ITEA/ITEEA, 2005).
Developing Professionals: Preparing Technology Professionals (ITEA/ITEEA, 2005).

14. Technology for All Americans: A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology (1996)

15. Revised in
2006
Available
on CD
from ITEA

16. STL
Standards for Technological Literacy (STL)(ITEA/ITEEA, 2000,2002/2007) presents the content for what every student should know and be able to do in order to be technologically literate.

17. STL Standards:
STL Standards are 20 written statements about what is valued that can be used for making a judgment of quality.
Standards represent fundamental concepts.
The goal for students is to meet all of the standards from Grades K-12.
STL Standards were written around five major organizers or categories.

18. The Five Major Organizers (Categories) in STL
The Nature of Technology (3 Standards)
Technology and Society (4 Standards)
Design (3 Standards)
Abilities for a Technological World (3 Standards)
The Designed World (7 Standards)

19. AETL is based on STL & provides the means for
Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development, and Program Standards (AETL)(ITEA/ITEEA,2003)*
AETL is based on STL & provides the means for
implementing STL in K-12.
AETLcontains three separate but interrelated sets of standards.
Student Assessment Standards (K-12)
Professional Development Standards
Program Standards (K-12) *

20. Addenda Documents Measuring Progress:Student Assessment
Realizing Excellence:Program Development
Developing Professionals: Preservice&Inservice
ITEA has developed a series of four addenda documents to the standards (STL/AETL). All of the addenda detail the planning process involved in moving towards standards-based programs as well as suggesting specific actions educators can take to achieve technological literacy in the laboratory or classroom. These addenda are meant to compliment the four sets of (STL/AETL) standards and provide suggestions and guidelines for using the standards to develop curricula, develop professional teachers, grow programs, and measure the effectiveness of those programs.
Planning Learning: Curriculum

21. THE BIG PICTURE STL AETL & DevelopingProfessionals
AETL & Measuring Progress
STL
As you have seen, the “target” of all four addenda is student learning. The addenda documents highlight student assessment (Measuring Progress), for program improvement we turn to (Realizing Excellence), for professional development (Developing Professionals) provides guidance, and finally, for curriculum development we turn to (Planning Learning).
While all of the addenda documents are uniquely specific to the aspect of programs being addressed, there are several characteristics that they share. The common functions of the addenda documents are to provide practical suggestions to help educators achieve standards-based programs. The common context of the addenda documents is that educators must look beyond individual classrooms and other program components to arrive at a consensus about the program rather than working in isolation.
Essentially, The four addenda attempt to answer 5 Simple questions:
1. Where are we now?
2. Where do we want to go?
3. How are we going to get there?
4. What knowledge and abilities must educators possess to get there?
5. How will we know when we have arrived?
To learn more about any of these four addenda documents, please…
Thank you so much for your time.
RealizingExcellence
AETL & PlanningLearning

22. Some Current National Efforts Impacting Education in the U. S.
A Framework for K-12 Science Standards
Common Core State Standards
National Assessment of Educational Progress (“The Nation’s Report Card”)

23. www7.nationalacademies.org/bose
A Framework for K-12 Science Standards:
Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas
Board on Science Education,
The National Research Council
July, 2011
www7.nationalacademies.org/bose

24. HOW THE FRAMEWORK WAS DEVELOPED:
NRC convened a 18 person committee in to develop a framework
Draft of framework was released in summer of 2010 for first review
Committee revised draft based on input received
Framework went through NRC review process also with more than 20 experts providing detailed comments
Committee revised framework in 2011
Final framework was released in July 2011

25. Dimension 1: Scientific and Engineering Practices
Dimension 2: Crosscutting Concepts That Have Common Application Across Fields
Dimension 3: Core Ideas in Four Disciplinary Areas:
1. Physical Sciences
2. Life Sciences
3. Earth and Space Sciences
4. Engineering, Technology, and the Applications of Science

26. Framework for Standards
The Framework for K-12 Science Standards: Practices, Crosscutting Ideas, and Core Ideas is now being used to develop the next version of the National Science Standards.
This work is currently being done by Achieve Inc. (

27. Common Core State Standards
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices
and
Council of Chief State School Officers
2010

28. Common Core State Standards (Continued)
Standards for English-language arts and mathematics
Grades K-12
Developed in collaboration with a variety of stakeholders including content experts, states, teachers, school administrators and parents.
The standards establish clear and consistent goals for learning that will prepare America’s children for success in college and work. 
Forty-four states have stated that they will adopt these standards.

29. 2012 NAEP in Technological Literacy
5/13/09
National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP)
(“The Nation’s Report Card”)
2014 Technology and Engineering Literacy Framework

30. NAEP 2014 Technology and Engineering Literacy Framework
What is NAEP?
Evolution and Background
Process of Framework Development
Steering Committee
Planning Committee

31. 2012 NAEP in Technological Literacy
5/13/09
Overall Purposes
Develop the recommended framework and specifications for NAEP Technology and Engineering Literacy Assessment in the U. S.
Recommend grade levels are 4, 8, and 12 for the “probe” assessment The 2014 assessment will be at the 8th grade.
Recommend important background variables associated with student achievement in Technology and Engineering Literacy that should be included in NAEP Assessment.
The assessment will be entirely computer-based.

32. Major Assessment Areas
2012 NAEP in Technological Literacy
5/13/09
Major Assessment Areas
Technology & Society
Design & Systems
Information & Communication Technology (ICT)
Interaction of Technology and Humans
Effects of Technology on the Natural World
Effects of Technology on the World of Information and Knowledge
Ethics, Equity and Responsibility
Nature of Technology
Engineering Design
Systems Thinking
Maintenance and Troubleshooting
Construction and Exchange of Ideas and Solutions
Information Research
Investigation of Problems
Acknowledgement of Ideas and Information
Selection and Use of Digital Tools

33. Teaching to the Test
There is some concern in the U. S. that states and local school districts are using the content in the state and local “high stakes tests” as a basis of curriculum. This is because some states and local school districts want their students to score as high as possible on these tests, so teachers are encouraged to teach their students to learn the content in the test rather than in the standards.

34. Impact of Standards in the U. S.
Developing and using standards to provide the content for what every student should know and be able to do in a subject is a dynamic and changing process.
Standards give us structure.  They give us guidelines and foundations.
Standards provide uniformity across the school curriculum.

35. Impact of Standards in the U. S. (Cont.)
Since its beginning, standards have served as a basis of educational reform across the nation as educators and policy makers respond to the call for a clear definition of desired outcomes of schooling and a way to raise student success in terms of these outcomes.*
*( National Research Council. (2002). Investigating the Influence of Standards: A Framework for Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press)

36. Summary 1) Who is responsible for education in the U. S.?
2) Importance of Standards
3) Pros and Cons of Standards
4) History and evolution of standards
5) Standards for technological literacy
6) Some current efforts impacting standards in the U. S.
a) Framework for K-12 Science Standards
b) Common Core State Standards
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
7) Impact of Standards in the U. S.

37. Thank you! William E. Dugger, Jr. wdugger@iteea.org dugger@vt.edu
Senior Fellow and Former Director
Technology for All Americans Project
International Technology and Engineering Educators Association
and
Emeritus Professor of Technology Education, Virginia Tech

38. This presentation may be viewed or downloaded at:
Resources/PressRoom/
pressroom.htm