Dillon School District Two Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The NEW Bloom’s Taxonomy
Advertisements

Studying at postgraduate level Student Services Get Ahead 2012 Angela Dierks.
H IGHER O RDER T HINKING Q UESTIONS Lesson Plan Review.
Higher Order Skills in Early Years – How Useful is Bloom’s Taxonomy 13 th February 2013 Yvonne McBlain
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy A Tool for Rigor and Alignment
Analysis of Student Work “Embrace the Coyote”. Analysis of Student Work Support ●Joseph Beuys ●Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Verbs and Examples ●How to begin.
Lorin Anderson University of South Carolina
SCIS Oration We are pleased to sponsor Joy McGregor for the SCIS Oration.
Learning Taxonomies Bloom’s Taxonomy
REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY BY FAIZA RANI DA MHS PHASE- IV REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY BY FAIZA RANI DA MHS PHASE- IV.
Review 3 Documents In groups of 2-3, highlight things students must know and be able to do in the 21 st Century Select a speaker to share your items with.
March 21, 2011 Bassett High School Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised and Revisited.
What Do the Data Say? Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Tool for Rigor and Curriculum Alignment.
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
It’s a REVOLUTION… …not just another swing of the pendulum! Tyrrell County Schools Preparing for Changes to Come Thursday, February 24, :30-5:30.
Depth of Knowledge A HEAP of Complexity. BLOOM’S TAXONOMYBLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY KNOWLEDGE “The recall of specifics and universals, involving little.
Advanced Instructor Course. Unit 7 Learning Objective 7.1.
HOW DOES ASKING OUR STUDENTS QUESTIONS ENGAGE THEM IN THEIR LEARNING? Campbell County Schools.
Bloom's Taxonomy: The Sequel (What the Revised Version Means for You!)
 Bloom's Taxonomy is a classification of learning objectives within education.
The Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (RBT): Improving Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in an Accountability-Driven, Standards-Based World Developed and.
Ferris Bueller: Voodoo Economics Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4.
BCCO PCT #4 PowerPoint Texas Commission On Law Enforcement ADVANCED INSTRUCTOR COURSE # 1017 UNIT SEVEN.
2014 Workshop and Plenary Nick Malik CAEAP – Center for the Advancement of the EA Profession.
Using questions to achieve Higher Order Thinking
RBT and the Field Test Year Mary Jo Nason Special Assistant for Curriculum Career and Technical Education Department of Public Instruction.
August 2, 2010 TE 818. Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1943)  Studied exemplary people  Physiological Needs (warmth, shelter, food)  Security.
Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) and Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised (2001) Thomas F. Hawk Management Department Frostburg State University.
Presented by Denise Tarlinton Pupil Free Day Monday 14 July, 2003.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy vs. Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Bloom’s Taxonomy 1956 Benjamin Bloom, pyschologist Classified the functions of thought or coming to know.
NCAEA Division Meetings: 2012
An Introduction to the Revised Taxonomy Mohr & Keim Education Services.
A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge.
The New Bloom Folwell Dunbar, Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation BLOOM 1956.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised Version. Bloom’s Taxonomy of Instructional Activities ( REVISED VERSION – PAGE 52) Create Evaluate Analyze Apply Understand Remember.
What should our graduates know?. We ask this question when designing Our lectures A test A laboratory exercise for students Out of class assignments A.
Understanding the Standards to Support Student Growth Think Tank Facilitators: Cheryl Maney, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
From Here to There “ From Here to There ” Louise Van de Water Kelston Girls College.
© SCHLECHTY CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP IN SCHOOL REFORM All rights reserved. Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy Coaching for Design.
“Although it received little attention when first published, Bloom's Taxonomy has since been translated into 22 languages and is one of the most widely.
Mrs. Kenny Sophomore Seminar February 2011 Name: ____________________________.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Building Knowledge for Success Trey MichaelMary Jo Nason Marketing ConsultantSpecial Assistant for Curriculum
The Instructional Design Process
Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy 1.Remembering “Retrieving, recalling or recognising knowledge from long-term memory”. Technology: Flashcards Eg Microsoft Education.
Original Terms New Terms
Alignment of 21 st Century Skills, the REVISED 2009 Virginia MATH SOL, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Research-based Instructional/Assessment Strategies.
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy Creating Higher Level Discussions.
Planning and Organizing Instruction Effective Strategies for Teaching.
Drafts of the North Carolina Essential Standards STEM Design Team Webinar Middle Grades Summer PD June 15-17, 2010 Asheboro City Schools.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
Bengkel pembinaan item soalan unit biologi 2014
Polling Question... How do you think you did on the test?
Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity
Questions and Questioning Strategies
Chapter 10: Bloom’s Taxonomy
Bloom's Hierarchy “Although it received little attention when first published, Bloom's Taxonomy has since been translated into 22 languages and is one.
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy.
Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان إعداد
Taxonomies Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive Domain (Bloom & Krathwohl, 1956) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision.
H.O.T. Questions High Order Thinking Questions
Lesson Planning (2) (A.E.T. Wk 11).
Assessments for “Remembering” Outcomes
Tiering Learning Experiences with Bloom’s Taxonomy
Presentation transcript:

Dillon School District Two Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

The revised taxonomy is two-dimensional, identifying both the kind of knowledge to be learned (knowledge dimension) and the kind of learning expected from students (cognitive processes) to help teachers and administrators improve alignment and rigor in the classroom. This taxonomy will assist educators to improve instruction, to ensure that their lessons and assessments are aligned with one another and with the state academic standards, that their lessons are cognitively rich, and that instructional opportunities are not missed.

Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge The Original “Bloom’s Taxonomy The Original Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom Revised Bloom Remember Apply Understand Analyze Evaluate Create Evaluation Analysis Synthesis Application Comprehension Knowledge

IN COMBINATION THE SIX REVISED CATEGORIES ARE TERMED “COGNITIVE PROCESS” CATEGORIES AND THEY EXIST ALONG THE COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION.

Q: What happened to knowledge? A: It became a separate dimension – The Knowledge Dimension

THE TAXONOMY TABLE COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION

Remember retrieve relevant knowledge from long term memory – Recognizing – Recalling Can you recall the name of a particular object?

Understand Construct meaning from instructional messages, including oral, written and graphic communication. –Interpreting –Exemplifying –Classifying –Summarizing –Inferring –Comparing –Explaining Can you represent verbal information visually (interpreting)?

Apply Carry out or use a procedure in a given situation. – Executing – Implementing Can you use information in another situation?

Analyze Break material into its constituent parts and determine how the parts relate to one another and to an overall structure or purpose. – Differentiating – Organizing – Attributing Can you break information into parts to explore relationships?

Evaluate make judgments based on criteria and standards –Checking –Critiquing Can you make & justify a decision or course of action?

Create Put elements together to form a coherent or functional whole; reorganize elements into a new pattern or structure –Generating –Planning –Producing Can you generate new products, ideas, or ways of viewing things?

Factual Knowledge Conceptual Knowledge Procedural Knowledge Metacognitive Knowledge

HOT ARTICHOKE DIP (Serves 10 to 14) 2 14-oz cans artichoke hearts 16 oz. mayonnaise 1 c. grated Parmesan cheese Garlic salt (optional) ==================================== 1.Drain artichoke hearts. 2.Mash artichokes with fork. 3.Mix with mayonnaise, cheese, and garlic salt. 4.Bake at 350 degrees for 15 minutes or until cheese is melted. 5.Serve with crackers or party rye.

Factual Knowledge The basic elements students must know to be acquainted with a discipline or solve problems in it. –Knowledge of terminology –Knowledge of specific details and elements

Conceptual Knowledge The interrelationships among the basic elements within a larger structure that enable them to function together. –Knowledge of classifications and categories –Knowledge of principles and generalizations –Knowledge of theories, models and structures

Procedural Knowledge How to do something, methods of inquiry and criteria for using skills, algorithms, techniques and methods. –Knowledge of subject-specific skills and algorithms –Knowledge of subject-specific techniques and methods –Knowledge of criteria for determining when to use appropriate procedures

Metacognitive Knowledge Knowledge of cognition in general as well as awareness and knowledge or one’s own cognition. –Strategic knowledge –Knowledge about cognitive tasks, including appropriate contextual and conditional knowledge –Self-knowledge How did I get that answer?

THE TAXONOMY TABLE COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION 1. REMEMBER Recognizing Recalling 2. UNDERSTAND Interpreting Exemplifying Classifying Summarizing Inferring Comparing Explaining 3. APPLY Executing Implementing 4. ANALYZE Differentiating Organizing Attributing 5. EVALUATE Checking Critiquing 6. CREATE Generating Planning Producing KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION Factual Knowledge Conceptual Knowledge Procedural Knowledge Metacognitive Knowledge